@Gully Scramble?

TripleA Move Summary: Italy round 2

TripleA Move Summary for game: Total World War: December 1941 3.0, version: 3.0.0.6

Game History

Round: 2

    Research Technology - Italy
        Italy spend 0 on tech rolls
        Italy removing all Technology Tokens after successful research.
        Italy discover SpecialWarfare

    Combat Move - Italy
        Trigger italianTank1: Setting isLandTransportable to false for unitAttachment attached to italianTank
        Trigger italianHvyTank1: Setting isLandTransportable to false for unitAttachment attached to italianHeavyTank
        Trigger italianAirtraninfra1: Setting isInfrastructure to false for unitAttachment attached to italianAirTransport
        Trigger italianAirtraninfra1: Setting attack to 1 for unitAttachment attached to italianAirTransport
        Trigger italianAirtraninfra1: Setting destroyedWhenCapturedBy cleared  for unitAttachment attached to italianAirTransport
        Trigger italianMecht3: Setting isLandTransportable to false for unitAttachment attached to italianMech.Infantry
        1 italianInfantry and 1 italianMech.Infantry moved from Orel Kursk to Smolensk
        1 italianInfantry moved from Kharkov to Eastern Ukraine
        1 italianMech.Infantry moved from Western Ukraine to Eastern Ukraine
        1 italianTank moved from Tobruk to Al Kufrah
              Italy take Al Kufrah from Egypt
        1 italianTank moved from Al Kufrah to Tobruk
        1 italianAirTransport and 1 italianParatrooper moved from Crete to Trans Jordan
        1 italianStrategicBomber moved from Crete to Iraq

Savegame

@Denisco-Dion So here is a summary of what you have in that XML so far:

Here are the relationship types you have defined:

<relationshipTypes>
<relationshipType name="Allied"/>
<relationshipType name="War"/>
<relationshipType name="Ceasefire"/>
<relationshipType name="Open_Borders"/>
</relationshipTypes>

You don't have a relationshipInitialize section though so aren't initializing any relationships. You need to add something like this after the resourceInitialize section:

    <relationshipInitialize>
      <relationship type="War" player1="France" player2="UnitedKingdom" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="France" player2="Spain" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="France" player2="KingdomOfPrussia" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="France" player2="Sweden" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="France" player2="AustrianEmpire" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="France" player2="OttomanEmpire" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="France" player2="Russia" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="UnitedKingdom" player2="Spain" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="UnitedKingdom" player2="KingdomOfPrussia" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="UnitedKingdom" player2="Sweden" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="UnitedKingdom" player2="AustrianEmpire" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="UnitedKingdom" player2="OttomanEmpire" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="UnitedKingdom" player2="Russia" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="Spain" player2="KingdomOfPrussia" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="Spain" player2="Sweden" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="Spain" player2="AustrianEmpire" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="Spain" player2="OttomanEmpire" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="Spain" player2="Russia" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="KingdomOfPrussia" player2="Sweden" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="KingdomOfPrussia" player2="AustrianEmpire" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="KingdomOfPrussia" player2="OttomanEmpire" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="KingdomOfPrussia" player2="Russia" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="Sweden" player2="AustrianEmpire" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="Sweden" player2="OttomanEmpire" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="Sweden" player2="Russia" roundValue="-2"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="AustrianEmpire" player2="OttomanEmpire" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="Ceasefire" player1="AustrianEmpire" player2="Russia" roundValue="-1"/>
      <relationship type="War" player1="OttomanEmpire" player2="Russia" roundValue="-2"/>
    </relationshipInitialize>

But replace the Napoleonic Empires player names with your player names:

<player name="Miana" optional="false"/>
<player name="Pirata" optional="false"/>
<player name="Condottieri" optional="false"/>
<player name="Tarona" optional="false"/>
<player name="MonteLaguna" optional="false"/>
<player name="Wasteland" optional="false"/>
<player name="Venucci" optional="false"/>
<player name="Feligno" optional="false"/>

@Denisco-Dion The easiest thing would probably be to upload your XML here and describe what you are trying to do so we can take a look at what you have so far.

There are 3 main parts to how politics/relationships work in the XML:

1. Defining the possible relationships nations can have (relationshipType and relationshipTypeAttachment):
   https://github.com/triplea-maps/the_pact_of_steel/blob/master/map/games/pact_of_steel_2.xml#L678
   https://github.com/triplea-maps/the_pact_of_steel/blob/master/map/games/pact_of_steel_2.xml#L1612
2. Defining political actions that can change a nation's relationships (politicalActionAttachment):
   https://github.com/triplea-maps/the_pact_of_steel/blob/master/map/games/pact_of_steel_2.xml#L4064
3. Initializing starting relationships for all nations (relationship):
   https://github.com/triplea-maps/the_pact_of_steel/blob/master/map/games/pact_of_steel_2.xml#L4523

@wc_sumpton Yeah, I think you could do it with variable list + a trigger using it to essentially generate triggers to add to the unit attachment givesMovement list. But that is kind of messy for defining the unit attachment that isn't changing so decided it was worth updating the property to allow a list of unit types

@wc_sumpton That's correct. It should be first the folders in the map zip (nation, then shared) then the folders in TripleA engine assets (nation, then shared). If you share the map zip then I can take a look.

@wc_sumpton I don't believe so. The foreach would be creating multiple separate unit attachments not multiple options in the same attachment.

@Gully No scramble and standard OOL.

@Cernel I believe you can just do it all in the same trigger and that the trigger should always execute the lines as they are listed so something like this (I haven't tested this):

    <attachment name="triggerAttachmentExample" attachTo="Germany" javaClass="TriggerAttachment" type="player">
      <option name="conditions" value="someCondition"/>
      <option name="unitType" value="germanAirfield"/>
      <option name="unitProperty" value="givesMovement" count="-reset-:4:germanFighter:germanNavalFighter"/>
      <option name="unitProperty" value="givesMovement" count="8:germanAdvancedFighter"/>
    </attachment>

@Cernel Either way. It would depend on how many maps need updated but would probably deprecate it and just make it set the new properties to be safe.