Is there any way to implement it in the current engine or wouldn't it be nice feature if Triplea allowed modders to use these numbers. There would be a lot of benefits.

1. Would there be way easier and effective way to implement upkeeps.

2. Pus distirbution would be more variable.

3. If there are units cheaper than 3 Pus, these low income territories might still play crucial roles.

How is Great War broken?

While I was playing online 270BC_wars after certain rounds I became unable to purchase skirmisher/sperman and later Egypt's archer. The game also prevented me placing these units via edit.

Thanks for the answers. Is it possible to set up suicide or submarine units preventing enemies to pick their casualties?

Can anyone give me examples of this kind of units;

1. A land unit that perform pre-emptive strike like sub and roll 3 dice (ex: with 4 attack they instantly take on 2 enemy units in ll)

2. Sucide planes (Like gas but they attack enemy fighters only)

3. Ships that perfor shore bombard per combat round instead performing once per battle.

4. Functional sea mine codes if exist

5. Unit that can gain additional +1 or +2 defense power when used with another units (similar to supporting ability but defensive version)

Why? Why it is so hard to see the urgency of taking Morocco-Madeira as fast as possible with USA and rapidly reinforcing N.Italy from newly builded Morocco-Madeira factories? There is a really good reason why isn't Morocco showed as part of France though t was in WW1. It is almost game over for Entente if they lost both Piedmont-Marseille and it is one of the most vulverable Entente spot whereas there is absoltely no urgency taking Mexico city. USA should avoid heavy investments against both Mexico city and Commies. Anything that cause delaying USA participating into war in Europe is plain bad.

I am pretty sure the current properties about air warfare are complicated and insufficient. After rethinking some ideas finally came up:

1. Need more type of air units and their roles shold be definitely separated like as I said

-Fighter: Dogfighting and protecting air units only
-CAS: Supporting ground units and sinking enemy ships
-NAV: Sinking enemy ships only but performing better than CAS
-Bomber: Strategic bomber only
-TAC: Do whatever CAS,NAV,Bomber but its jack of all trades master of none.

Not separating their roles would make even one single air unit too good and also too boring. For more variety of strategies it is really must I can't see any other way.

2. Dependence of performance on range

Another really a must thing without it small/medium maps would be really unplayable.

How possible to add these kind of new properties on the next version?

The problem might be specific to me only since in my native language there are two separate letters as "ı" and "i". The similar problem had occured when I downloaded v3,v4,v5 and revised. They are all downloaded like wwıı not wwii then I had edited them manuelly.

There were two properties belong unts which are;

<option name="isAirTransportable" value="false"/>
<option name="IsAirTransportable" value="true"/>

And I deleted all IsAirTransportables and it works right now. Originally were they air transportable or not?

Why do they start with so many units?