Yes, the same way.

I was trying it considering wwii global xml, I've done it exactly the same things (for only Canberra as testing) but it didn't work.

		<!-- British Game Sequence -->
  
  <step name="britishPurchase" delegate="purchase" player="British"/>
  <step name="anzacPurchase" delegate="purchase" player="Anzac"/>
  <step name="britishCombatMove" player="British" delegate="move">
    <stepProperty name="combinedTurns" value="British:Anzac"/>
  </step>
  
  <step name="britishBattle" delegate="battle" player="British"/>
  <step name="britishNonCombatMove" delegate="move" player="British" display="Non Combat Move">
    <stepProperty name="combinedTurns" value="British:Anzac"/>
  </step>
  <step name="britishEndTurn" delegate="endTurn" player="British">
    <stepProperty name="skipPosting" value="true"/>
  </step>
  <step name="anzacPlace" delegate="place" player="Anzac"/>
  <step name="anzacEndTurn" delegate="endTurn" player="Anzac">
    <stepProperty name="turnSummaryPlayers" value="British:Anzac"/>
  </step>

<attachment name="unitAttachment" attachTo="Infantry" javaClass="games.strategy.triplea.attachments.UnitAttachment" type="unitType">
<option name="movement" value="1"/>
<option name="attack" value="1"/>
<option name="defense" value="2"/>
<option name="transportCost" value="2"/>
<option name="artillerySupportable" value="true"/>
<option name="canBeGivenByTerritoryTo" value="British"/>
</attachment>

<attachment name="territoryAttachment" attachTo="Canberra" javaClass="games.strategy.triplea.attachments.TerritoryAttachment" type="territory">
<option name="production" value="6"/>
<option name="capital" value="Anzac"/>
<option name="changeUnitOwners" value="British"/>
<option name="whenCapturedByGoesTo" value="British:Anzac"/>
<!--<option name="victoryCity" value="1"/>-->
</attachment>

Any plan about adding aerial warfare at least optional?

Also I don't think capital cities would represent realism. Soviets wouldn't have collapsed without Moscow.

Making Rome as captal of Italy does not make sense. Northern Italy or Sicily would be better. But I would still prefer removing capitals in a realistic scenario.

@Hepps said in How would you rate countries and territories considering realism in big WWII maps.:

@Schulz It is an over simplification to say that some measure of a countries wealth (eg. PU) gained by support from an Ally is inherently contained within the production of a territory without factoring that into the production value of the "parent" state(s). More over this idea assumes a constant, consistant and stable supply of resources or manpower every turn. Finally, what happens when the territory is lost? Does the enemy gain the bonus PU each turn? Is this to say the Germans would continue to send men and equipment to Southern Italy and simply hand it over to the Allies? Because if you add PU to Italian territories with this in mind... then theoretically that is what you are saying is happening.

If German helps should not be considered as Italian then this rule should be applied to Commonwealth nations too. Canadian and British troops should not be able to attack Germany together for example.

I think the best solution is calculating the exact German helps to the Italians then adding this extra Pus value to Northern Italy. (Or spreading all Italian territories) But if people want to make North African campaign more important then this extra values can be added to Tunisia. It would be also historical too.

Because not counting German assets, supplies, helps etc... as Italian would make impossible to take Egypy for Axis since the Germans and Italians would be unable to attack together the British units. That does not really make sense.

I don't know did the Germans supply Italians in terms of resources? Sure they should all take into account as Italian domestic productions.

Also US lend lease should be represented as British-Soviet domestic productions.

We have to count foreign aids as domestis production (power) regardless of country and for example there is really nothing wrong in depicting Italy stronger than she was because Germany had deployed 15 divisons and hundred of planes, armours, trucks etc in North Africa.

Ottoman Sinai makes sense for me Cernel since in the war the Ottomans had took Sinai and kept for a long time when they joined the war.

Also when balance and playability is priority there is nothing wrong in starting round of Italy. If did you notice, Greece joins the war before Romania. Italy have Albania.

I really liked new improvements such as railways, russian national objective new units though lack of Balkan countries and convoy zones has gived me a bit sadness.

Great job. Thank you for sharing.

I've downloaded it works perfectly. You need blue train image right?