New Steampunk Advance Thread

board 3659

@rogercooper I didn't realize that, thanks for the suggestion but I basically tried estimating the best cost for the new units based on the abilities and how much value they have and the stats (some of the ones from Tokens are good but they need to be rolled for)

board 3659

This isn't that related to Steampunk advance but I wish there were a few maps that had Antarctica. I think the steampunk feel here could make it work though I think that might be something in the future and not my priority

luhhlz

@board-3659

Agree antartica only makes sense for steampunk. Machines stop working at Russian winter temperatures IRL, at antartica temperatures, forget it.

RogerCooper

@luhhlz said in New Steampunk Advance Thread:

@board-3659

Agree antartica only makes sense for steampunk. Machines stop working at Russian winter temperatures IRL, at antartica temperatures, forget it.

Check out this boardgame Antarctica.

Also check this sort of Antarctic map https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Small_Balanced_4_Player_Teams

board 3659

@luhhlz Makes it better than the comic "League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" (an inspiration for this TL) has Captain Nemo going to Antarctica. His daughter also went to Antarctica and I think there were was stuff there

board 3659

@rogercooper Thanks

board 3659

Part III

Martians:

Give them Technology (IDK why they don't, ig they had to be since Serbia in Domination 1914 had no tech but then why couldn't the OG modder or Swampy change? It's also very inaccurate with the book they are based on since they are shown to be able to adapt technologically)
- Victory bonds: No change (there will be but for all powers)
- Industry: No change
- Science: No change
- Working women (Probably will be changed to Human tolerance for the Martians): Infantry and trenches can be bought plus Aviatrix (I think this is possible since the manual says they are friendly with the communist and they don't attack them)
- Propaganda: Probably allow them to place a Maginot anywhere instead of 3 infantry in capital
- Late fighter: Make the fighter a 4/4 9 pu air unit or 2/4 6 pu air unit.
- Bunkers: This will give Majinots a bombard shot of 2 or maybe make them 3 hit
- Armor: No change but make Tank be replaced with Elite Tripod, 6/6 2 hit unit with 4 mov and can support 2 units in Atk and Def. Cost 20
- Mobile Warfare: Martians can target select @ 2 or less
- Mustard Gas: Gas is more potent and can stay there for 2 more turns (basically if you don't conquer a territory, that territory next turn will have to roll x amount of gas to see if they hit)
- Creeping Barrage: Martians have artillery
- Railway guns: No change
- Submarine Warfare: Tripods can go to sea zones connected to the land and are 3 mov, 3/4 bomb. 3 with sub-rules.
- Convoy and Defense: Pontoon and Bridges are small naval units (+2 def), Tripods are large naval units (+1)
- Fleet Action: No change
- Merchant Marine: Smaller naval units get +2 mov. and no restriction
- Dockyards: Unlocks Advance bridges, Raft, Red Kelp, and Submerged weed.
  - Adv. Briges: 2/3, pu 8, mov 2, transport cost 8, bomb 2 (smaller)
  - Raft: 1/1, pu 2, move 1, transport 3 (coast only). Anti sub (smaller)
  - Red Kelp: 2/3, move null, pu 11, Anti-sub. At the end of the round, make 1 Red kelp in adjacent territory, (large)
  - Submerged weed: 2/5, move 2, pu, 13, anti sub, sub-rules. (large)
- Carriers: No change
Give Handling Mach. and Flying Mach. (former 2/4, move 2, pu 32, at the end of the turn, make one Tripod; later 3/5, move 6, transport 8, bombard 2, can raid 2d 1-12. pu 17) [wanted to be faithful to the source material and wanted to give maintains an air unit]
*Make Pontoons block production or have +1 atk (This is because when someone produces a unit on the same sea zone, on the martian turn, the pontoon will be "attacking" but it has no attack so it dies which is unrealistic}
Maybe add Damascus as another VC for them but add maybe 2 more tripods (This is because all VC of the Martians are in the Americas so they can neglet the Middle-east)

Part IV tomorow

board 3659

Who is interested in playtesting Steampunk Advance in the Lobby. Bot 703 if anyone is interested

board 3659

Imo the Tech system Domination 1914 has and this game essentially isn't my cup of tea. Domination does it better for a few reasons but I first need to mention why.

It gives the more economically strong countries. Usually, the bigger ones have more power

5 Pu's for a token is not cheap. Sure you can use it again each turn until it hits but larger powers (Germany, and Britain) can spend a lot more on them unlike weaker powers (Nemo pirates, Martians, Austria) who already have significantly less so 5 pu's is a lot for them. Even if they can afford them, the larger powers can just spend more to get a significantly higher chance of getting it. This ties into my second problem

Strategies start to revolve mainly on Tech or it's becoming required

This might be controversial but I am not saying tech can't be used when making a strategy. However, strategies shouldn't have to rely on them in order to work but often it's necessary. What I see is Germany or Turkey in Domination trying to get turn 1 Late fighter. If they fail in the first few rounds (1-4) then it's likely that they won't be able to control the British Navy. Another this time for Steampunk advance would be getting Armour due to the great number of units there. Now, this on its own isn't bad I mean there is a gain-and-lose factor though I wish it wasn't a necessary thing to do with some objectives as that kind of negates the gain-and-lose thing. The issue is when combine with point 3 it's terrible. speaking of point 3

It's too luck based
The worst aspect is how luck-based it is. It's possible to use 6 tokens and miss on that turn (seen it happen before) not to mention the smaller countries who would realistically only buy 1-2 each turn if they can. You also only select from categories, You have no choice on which of those technologies from those categories you can get. This issue isn't that bad in Domination because there are 18 techs spread across 6 categories evenly. However Steampunk Advance has the same amount but with the old rules where it was 3, not 6 categories. This makes it more luck based as you can't even decide what you want (this makes #2 a lot worse as sometimes you are unable to do your strategy if you don't get the correct tech or get no rolls).

So this is why I dislike the system. Now I should mention that I don't play Low luck because I dislike it so maybe it works better with that.

Imo I would change the tech system to be more like Global War 1936/1914 in which you get tech rolls each turn based on the number of heavy factories (in this instance ig it would be based on Factories in territories of 3 Pu's). Next, you assign 1 dice on each tech you are rolling to get. You roll and are trying to get a value or greater (in GW it's 7, 8, or 9 but it can be different here). You need to do this 4 times for the tech so you can get it. Now I wouldn't remove the previous system since that works with Low Luck so I wonder if it's possible to have that as a map option but yeah these are thoughts I am writing out

board 3659

Who is interested in helping me playtest this game (basically check for what need to be fixed more). If so then comment below

board 3659

Part IV

Turkey

Pretty much the most balanced country in the game. IDK if I should add more units in the south or not since it will mess with Martian's expansion there. Adding more unites or trenches in the Sinai would be the only real change I would make

Britain

Decrease the Australian navy a bit or spread it out because it's often mandatory for the Nemo Pirates to attack it in Turn 1 because if not then it unites with the Singapore force. You can get diced early which just kills the Nemo Pirates so I want to decrease the chance of that. I can give France a bit more as compensation for allied power in the pacific.
Tanks in Belgium make no sense tbh since if Britain is making them wouldn't they be in Britain at the start of the war? (also too hard for Germany to try to go around Alsace as a result)
fewer units in the Suez or near it at the start since Turkey and the Martians really can't threaten it unlike Domination 1914 where it's a major chokepoint.

Russia

Due to turns 2-3 German capture of St.Petersberg was too strong. I will make it have more defense (mainly trenches and a bit more infantry). Still will make that strategy viable but it will take longer and require the capture of Finland or a huge airborne stack in Lithuania to be able to have a shot.

Communist

Fix the weird political situation of being technically allied with the Nemo pirates and Martians but just assisting the Central Powers (Either make it its own faction or make it just not be able to be in Central power territory)

US

Not enough testing but seems mostly balanced though again Artillery should be more balanced since Snipers are especially more useful for the US which has a Mid income level.
Guerillas should be able to be placed in every city in the US not just in Charlestown (too restrictive and usually you use it for Naval stuff early on or if you get pushed back a lot, either Infantry, Hero, or Airplanes)
Zepplin for the US should be cheaper like Germany due to more advance airship technology present for their country (The Edison class aircraft outclasses it hard)

This is my current list of fixes so if anyone has suggestions or anything else than tell me below

RogerCooper

@board-3659 If you are finding tech too random, use events to grant tech instead of tech rolls. You can have the likelihood of a event increase each turn, so tech becomes a matter of when rather than if.

You can also use events in other useful ways. For example, the AI will not build the economic infrastructure of the Nemo Pirates because it sees no military benefit. You can use events to give them the units automatically.

board 3659

@rogercooper Interesting. I might implement some of it for a few of the tech but not all. I prefer the Global War 1936 tech system because it's less rng (lowest is 33% for a stage of tech) and you needing more than 1 roll is a good thing because it's more likley they will even out in luck (you need 4 rolls). How you get a die roll of tech in that game was through heavy factories which would just be factories on territories with 3 Pu's.

The events is an interesting way to fix the nemo pirates. I didn't thought of that so thanks

board 3659

Ok so I am in the process of making a 2nd edition so is there any suggestions?

board 3659

I really can't make progress without some actual playtest so is anyone interested

board 3659

also, does anyone know how to contact Swampy (I know they are not part of this community anymore but more info on what they did on this map game can be nice)

board 3659

I'm going to just continue to mod and then give a list of what I changed.

board 3659

I am going back and giving my thoughts on what I said before and seeing if they made sense:

If I or someone to make a mod of this here are some things:
Germany

Give them Dreadnoughts, probably 3 as well as at least 6 airplanes (IDK who thought giving Britain this much of a naval advantage was balanced; Dreadnoughts allow planes to be viable for Germany)

Give more ships to Germany so its navy is able to defend against the British (previous point)

Add 2-4 Deutschland Subs around the world. (This is because Germany's naval production is limited to only 2-3 areas that are constantly under threat so you never build them.)

Make the normal zeppelin cheaper (IDK why it would be more expensive than the graf zeppelin class ones which heavily outclass it, ig 10 is probably fine)

I still largely agree with this tbh with maybe Normal Zepplins being 11 but that is more of a nickpick than anything tbh. I think this holds up well.

I would add a complaint that in Graf-Zepplins should not have to return back to their original starting point and be able to stay with the trade-off of no retreating and -3 atk next turn (b/c they do need to go back to reload bombs) b/c Zepplins require little infrastructure to land so they should easily land in the captured territory. It also will make a more realistic approach to how the conflict would play out, though I don't know if I will be able to do this on Triple-A.

I would add however that Snipers should be 4 ... they are so versatile and imo should be costing more for that versatility

France

France can't make Maginot unit (Was too overpowered for a country with an above-average economy, made France basically not be under any major pressure until late in the game, meaning they are likely the ones who will be making the offensive push first, plus the 7 Maginots in Alsace-Loraine made Germany not be able to effectively threaten the French unless they go around, limit that stack to 3-4.)

Maybe make France's conscripts units not need a factory but cost 3, make them not be able to cross France or limit where they can be placed (France's production allows them to be able to abuse conscripts unlike Russia and buy them with no real consequences since they can, later on, buy heavy artillery or Roburs).

Okay so I think I kind of overreacted on making the Maginot banned for France. It really shouldn't be changed with maybe Alasace-Loraine having fewer Maginots (4-5 is fine).

I do think conscripts are too good for a high-middle-income nation that has high production b/c you then just spend money on conscripts + any strong-hitting units. I think making them be limited to only Frances starting Factories does make it less of an issue while not making conscripts insignificant

Italy

Make the Hitman unit a 4/0 and limit production to North Italy (Were too spamable and due to Austrias low unit amount made it nearly impossible to defend against this)

Make Militia be limited to only the Balkans (Same issue as conscripts but worse since they were a 2 cost infantry but with 1 less defense, The main issue is that you can build them in Rome so you can make stacks of them which saves money allowing you to buy more expensive units as compensation for the lower defense)

Make pontoons bridges cost 9 and be a 0/3 (They can be used to protect sea zones very cheaply at 7 pu compared with 12 pu's for a battle cruiser and 14 pu's 2 transports making 28 in total, sure it's stationary but the lack of production cancels that out and even if it didn't it would still be the sea version of the Maginot for all intents and purposes. It makes it very hard to push back the Alliance once they gain momentum in the Pacific since they can place these to defend their island's sea zones, which essentially prevents the Nemo Pirates from being able to take them back without huge cost either in the battle or in the counter-attack).

I still stand by my statements regarding Hitman's

I still agree with Militias and I think making them just no factory 2 PU units in the Balkans makes more sense thematically. I would however remove their 1 transport cost since that just makes them the perfect unit for naval transports which just makes no sense.

I need to playtest more to see if Pontoons are really that problematic.

Austria-Hungary

Give them more units (Seriously this is sad, why do they start out with so little)

Start them out with a leviathan and let them be able to make Stormtruppen (Austria has the least diverse amount of unique units)

Let them have the dreadnought and start with 1 maybe 2 plus increase the Austrian navy (Why is it so small? it was stronger or comparable to the Italian one so this makes no sense)

Yeah more units ... like just doubling the amount on the continent is a good start

I do think Austria should build Stormtruppen and have 1 Leviathan but I think even then ... just give them more unique stuff ... like give them a rail gun inspired by "From the Earth to the Moon", The Austrias are able to steal US tech that was originally meant to launch people to the Moon, likely trying to find a similar method of space travel to how the Martians did and repurpose it as a very long range gun. Another idea is then get a Drachenflieger (technically it will function more like a gyrocopter but name-wise) inspired from "The War in the Air". The last idea is a drill partially inspired by "The Journey to the Center of the Earth" where the Austrians repurposed drills used for civil and defense purposes into an offensive role to attack static defenses.

RogerCooper

@board-3659 You might think of capping the number of all non-historical units so they can't be spammed (and even some historical ones). That way they will get used without dominating the game.

board 3659

@rogercooper I was thinking of that for some of the special units like Lethiathans or Tetrapods

I don't think capping is the best idea on all units. Consripts are meant to be spammed to a certain extent, it's just how much is too much.