Just a note - ships are not able to battle - they are all transports and can share a sea zone. I might like them to be able to transport AND fight, or maybe this is better, I'm not sure. Naval combat definitely not a focus though.

@thedog I made a new map, thanks for the encouragement. It's called Alexander350 (world conquest set in 350BC). .zip in Maps & Mods, tell me what you think.

It does use modern region names (Oil Wars map), and units from Middle Earth with only minor tweaks.

@thedog, @Black_Elk

Some basic information:

O/V P H/M/L/B Germany 91/4 211 11/7/3 USSR 88/5 318 7/1/3/1 Pacific-Allies 46/3 135 0/1/2 Italy 27/3 136 6/2/2 Britain 134/4 343 5/3/5 Japan 40/4 211 6/2/4/4 USA 61/5 300 9/0/2 China 19/1 63 0/1/1/4 Allies 348/18 1159 21/6/13/5 Axis 158/11 721 23/11/9/4 Neutrals 100/0 146

Japan cannot produce the Inf-Motorized. Germany and Italy cannot produce Carriers. Germany may produce Armor-Hvy, but that's only after research, British and USSR start with it and USA can do the research.

The Inf-Motorized is 2/2/2, 6PUs, can carry, and may blitz when stacked with armor. This is a very powerful unit, and not letting all players produce it sets them at a disadvantage. The inability for Germany and Italy to produce Carriers in the Atlantic Gives the Allies the advantage in the west. Also allowing Allies Armor-Hvy IMO is another imbalance.

Just some thoughts.

Cheers...

@rufy-0 I use Print screen and then paste in photoshop into the total file... then save it... you might even try the Tile Image Constructer under : map image tools: other: optional things ..to reconstruct the Base map or relief tiles map from their responding tile maps?

@falkon-powers waw is revised based so V2, v2 doesnt have scramble.

if you played with scramble that means you played the v3 variant.

for the record i have never seen a decent bomber strategy on a serious waw game. and everyone has 0 income that means you have to bomb 70-100 income from allot of nations. sounds a bit silly to me

ice

World At War 3.0 or 2.1.1 ? - 2.5.2294 Java 11.0.6. Download Maps shows Version World At War 3.0 but once installed says Version 2.1.1 ?!?

Played many rounds and Fighters do not defend against Bomber raids?!? This is a massive problem, game unplayable as a result and results in nothing but a Bomber mass build by all countries and ZERO income by any faction by round 3-4.

Also - Subs being able to be hit by planes without a destroyer ruined the game with the latest changes made to it. Please tell me this is a bug and not intended?!?!WAW Fighters dont defend Boming Raid 2.JPG WAW Fighters dont defend Boming Raid.JPG  World At War Sub Issue.JPG

The PoliticalStateOverview.java file has the color coding for the three relationship archeTypes, meaning this functionality could be added but of course its not accessible from the mapmaking point of view.

As there is no Devs working on TripleA at the moment this will not change any time soon. 😞

@thedog tooltips.properties is what I was missing.

I'll have to review that map further. Looking right off, arena has a very accessible xml file.

Thanks for the welcome and help!

@beornthebold-0 This is the whole logic of being unable to move to someone's territories. It means that you can't move to someone's territories. You are not going to be able to get TripleA to move in some directions and not others.

You could use triggered events to simulate the evacuation of a specific base, but it would be difficult to do this on a large scale.

Updated for corrections to Pacific SZ connections on the map.

Should be up in the Experimental section of the downloads for the X files. Looks like this now for the sz split...

d1faa3c7-8eee-42d5-bd3c-3d4edb5b21c4-image.png

Thanks to VictoryFirst for catching that one with the eagle eye!

Hopefully should be good to go. Let me know if there's anything else I goofed for the G40 revamp haha

99421ae9-84af-4506-83a2-6fab6f61da36-image.png

8fff205a-eb40-4382-90a1-c989e45d5ee3-image.png

31eacc34-0c45-4367-9c43-1fe965b210d4-image.png

https://github.com/triplea-maps/uhd_world_war_ii_global

@wc_sumpton

I've had a trouble to find the correct cost for submarines.

I'm considering giving Japan a harbour in Indochina, Malaya or Truk. Japan can be further buffed too if Axis looks like disadvantageous.

@mattbarnes Alagesia works well as PvAI.

@zlefin

It would just be like a trigger that you drag into a box like with everything else that then spawns them all around the map. I dont know how to mod this game but it wouldnt be too hard, just a pain in the ass to do.

I rarely play the map anyway so if its just me then ignore this.
Is there a github or something with older versions of the map to download perhaps? Or if you could be bothered just to upload the newest version without railways then id be really grateful, cheers.

Maybe Im overthinking this anyway ,I observed a game recently and they barely had any trains. Maybe its not really worth building them anyway so that balances it out a bit?

You need to set the information in the game options, it does not automatically determine AI status.

@cernel Was there ever a way? Anyway then I guess a second version of at least the two most common maps would be hugely appreciated for us who like tech 😛 (2nd Version and 3rd Balanced)

Thanks. I'll give that a shot!