Maps & Mods

• R

  Roger's Scenario Thread
  • RogerCooper  

  95
  4
  Votes
  95
  Posts
  9111
  Views

  R

  Scenario Rome Total War Download Repository/Experimental/Rome Total War Description The Mediterranean in 270BC Good Points Good unit art Some interesting unit types Bad Points Anti-Roman alliance has a significant advantage No victory conditions This would probably be better with the Romans receiving a bonus and a time-limit on conquest
• 

  Triplea Maps
  • prastle  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  2809
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  The Triplea Game Engine
  • prastle  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  1534
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Power of Politics 1914 : A WWI scenario
  • Hepps  

  152
  4
  Votes
  152
  Posts
  8111
  Views

  

  Just a little update... with all the basic stuff done this map is now moving into the final phases of development... Get ready to get your Diplomacy on... it's gett'n hot in here!
• R

  did anybody fix that bug on the game of thrones map?
  • runman  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  26
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Iron War - Official Thread
  • Frostion  

  523
  0
  Votes
  523
  Posts
  127110
  Views

  J

  @Frostion Also, I think that it would be a cool idea if you could unlock increasingly better technology with multiple tiers (e.g. better aircraft, ships, nukes etc) so that having a technological advantage would have more effect on the gameplay. It could also be interesting if you added more esoteric special units for different countries, e.g. occult weapons, UFOs for Germany, sea monsters for Japan. It would also be neat if there were some units that you could unlock after a certain point in the game, e.g. intercontinental bombers, more powerful, tanks and artillery, and nuclear missiles.
• 

  Global Dominance
  • Hepps  

  495
  2
  Votes
  495
  Posts
  106951
  Views

  J

  Is this project still in development? Could you please provide some screenshots or show us how much progress you've made?
• B

  Global 40 House Rules
  • beelee  

  13
  4
  Votes
  13
  Posts
  851
  Views

  B

  @beelee Ran into a couple things that needed fixing during test game. While at it I redid the math on "Planes Can Target Naval" and decided I had over compensated for the fact that Tac Bmbrs can't stack against Subs, so changed that up. Here's what we have now: When "Planes Can Target Naval" is activated Tacs and Ftrs will now hit ships at 1 in 8. Ftrs attack has been separated from Tacs so they can do joint attacks against Ships without Subs adversely affecting the battle. Before if you attacked with say, 3 Ftrs 3 Tacs against a CA BB CV and 2 SS, the 5 Ships would undergo 5 shots and if you had 2 hits, the Sub could take both hits. Now Ftrs attack, if they get any hits the Sub can't take them. Tacs then attack and their hits can be taken by the Sub or the Capital ships. Also, Ftrs Target ships at 1 in 12 on defense and Tacs 1 in 8. This is so the Tac can still shoot at Subs on defense when "SubsCanEvadeDestroyers_ChangerMustActivate" is activated. Because of that, when "BBandCA_AA" is activated, Cruiser's and BB's AA will work when attacking. They hit at 1 in 12. This can make the Battle Window a little busy, but I think one can get used to it fairly easy. Well see. Here are the odds of AA and Planes Targeting hits: AA _ Planes Shots _ % of Hit _ % of Hit 1 _ 10 _ 12.5 2 _ 19 _ 23.4 3 _ 27.1 _ 33 4 _ 34.4 _ 41.4 5 _ 40.5 _ 48.7 6 _ 46.9 _ 55.1 7 _ 52.2 _ 60.7 8 _ 57 _ 65.6 Guess i should figure out how to make a table some day heh heh Basically Planes Targeting has a slight advantage over the Ships AA which was what was wanted, as I feel Defensive Fleets tend to have the advantage and Historically Planes were more effective against Ships. It varies depending on the makeup of the forces though and Idk how 2 hit units and Subs will affect things, so we'll see how it shakes out.
• 

  Total World War: December 1941 3.0.0.4
  • Hepps  

  290
  4
  Votes
  290
  Posts
  9124
  Views

  

  @Gully Sure. Just let me know when you'd like to start it up. I'm fine with either side and open to whatever settings.
• 

  Age of Tribes - Official Thread
  • Frostion  

  31
  0
  Votes
  31
  Posts
  3644
  Views

  J

  Would it be possible to have a worldwide version of Age of Tribes, like your 'Iron War' scenario, and rename this map to 'Age of Tribes: Europe'?
• 

  World of War Heroes – Official Thread
  • Frostion  

  47
  10
  Votes
  47
  Posts
  2440
  Views

  

  @Hepps Well given that the ordering is better defined now after I made some changes a while back, you should be able to ensure the locations of at least certain types of units like infrastructure. Reference: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/681/group-and-sort-units-onto-placements-logically
• R

  Historical Statistics
  • RogerCooper  

  25
  2
  Votes
  25
  Posts
  1637
  Views

  R

  I have added total mobilized: Country Manpower on Entry into War End of War Peak Number Total Mobilized Albania 13,000 13,000 13,000 Australia 91,700 575,100 575,100 993,000 Belgium 600,000 650,000 650,000 900,000 Bulgaria 160,000 450,000 450,000 1,011,000 Canada 63,100 759,800 759,800 1,100,000 China 2,500,000 5,000,000 5,700,000 14,000,000 Denmark 6,600 6,600 6,600 Finland 127,800 270,000 270,000 270,000 France 900,000 437,000 2,680,000 2,680,000 Germany 3,180,000 7,800,000 9,500,000 17,900,000 Greece 430,000 540,000 540,000 Hungary 80,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 India 197,000 2,159,700 2,159,700 2,581,800 Italy 1,899,600 259,100 2,563,000 2,563,000 Japan 1,700,000 7,200,000 7,200,000 9,100,000 Netherlands 270,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 New Zealand 13,800 192,800 192,800 192,800 Norway 25,000 25,000 90,000 Poland 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 2,400,000 Rumania 686,000 370,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 South Africa 19,000 198,000 250,000 UK 681,000 4,683,000 4,683,000 5,896,000 USA 5,413,000 11,877,000 11,877,000 16,354,000 USSR 9,000,000 12,400,000 13,200,000 13,200,000 Yugoslavia 150,000 800,000 800,000 1,500,000
• 

  World At War - Official Thread
  • redrum  

  41
  0
  Votes
  41
  Posts
  7198
  Views

  L

  I've been a fan of NWO and TRS for a while, and just found this map, and I love it. Kudos to sieg and all that worked on it!! Also totally disagree with undying, and agree with the guy that responded to him: in the best maps, luck plays the crucial role of making the game proceed differently each time you play it. I never play low luck. Choosing when to gamble, and adapting to lucky/unlucky battle is what makes AAA fun. I love how many theatres the UK/US can choose from. I also love the huge starting disparity between axis/allies income/total army size. I don't know whether it's balanced yet.
• F

  World at war : variant v3 (Victory Conditions)
  • forthebirds  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  101
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Dragon War - Official Thread
  • Frostion  

  52
  0
  Votes
  52
  Posts
  5732
  Views

  

  @mattbarnes I guess you mean that Crowton is at a disadvantage as it is a sea / island based nation. I don't know if I agree. I think that there are pluses and minuses, defensive and attack options. Yes, Crowton needs to build ships (besides the free ships and marines they get), but that also gives them a lot of options, especially vs. the elves. Crowton with fleet can pick and chose where to focus and battle, while the elves have a certain way to go, a long coast to protect and elves cannot evade the AIs harassing races. Maybe AI is at a disadvantage when playing Crowton, but I think that human players can use this island nation a bit wiser.
• 

  Middle Earth: Battle For Arda - Official Thread
  • alkexr  

  416
  3
  Votes
  416
  Posts
  35540
  Views

  

  @mattbarnes And it will have legs as support attachments.
• 

  Feudal Lords
  • alkexr  

  6
  5
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  511
  Views

  C

  @redrum Wow that is seriously Ethnic oriented. There is that single "Slavs" players that groups together Pomerania, Bohemia, Polonia, almost all Russia, Serbia and Bulgaria. Tho, in this case, they got the name "Britons" wrong, as those are, rather, the "Anglo-Saxons" migrants, since also "Brittany" ("Little Britain") I see it is not part of the "Britons"...
• O

  No retreat LL games? Especially NML/NWO
  • Ondis  

  22
  2
  Votes
  22
  Posts
  1049
  Views

  O

  Have you ever beaten the Union militarily? So who made the map? Also wondering if there is any negative consequence for having negative manpower?
• 

  Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5
  • Hepps  

  472
  2
  Votes
  472
  Posts
  60874
  Views

  

  @LovePlayingAAA Good catch, it appears we missed a few updates on some of the HeavyDestroyers and will fix that in the next minor version. ImprovedDestroyers and AdvancedDestroyer techs still exist and have been updated to make different improvements for destroyers now. This post outlines the sub/destroyer changes: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/493/total-world-war-december-1941-beta-2-8-0-5/392 (there were a few adjustments to that original vision). The notes haven't been updated yet for 3.0 but are in-progress and hopefully be added shortly. Please use the new TWW 3.0 for discussing the new version: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1181/total-world-war-december-1941-3-0-0-0-now-available
• 

  CrazyG's Big World War One
  • CrazyG  

  149
  3
  Votes
  149
  Posts
  7738
  Views

  

  @CrazyG said in CrazyG's Big World War One: I agree with the slightly smaller version for the PU markers Ask an yeh shall receive... PUs.zip