Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5

Hepps

Furthermore... I want to underscore just what a tremendous resource @redrum has been, both with making new features available and providing technical assistance to laymen such as myself in getting this product out to you all.

Be sure to give him a hardy slap on the back if you see him in the Lobby to show him how appreciative you are of all his ongoing efforts. Slap hard and often to show you care!

Hepps

@hepps ~~BTW everyone... please hold for the time being. I found some issues with the release and I need to find an engine version that is compatible.~~

Hepps

Ok problems solved.

The new usable Pre-release engine is ...https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/releases/tag/1.9.0.0.11131 the link is also available on the first post in the thread.

If you had already downloaded 2.8.0.5 please delete and re download. There were a few minor errors that have since been corrected.

As near as I can tell the game is backwards compatible with 2.8.0.4 saves. So you can update your game version and reap the benefits of the new icons.

If you come across any issues please post here so I know what else needs to be examined and fixed.

Hepps

To give you a glimpse of the near future, the next release is currently under development.

TWW 3.0.0.0 will definitely feature...

New Sub vs. Destroyer mechanics.
New Occupation Territories for French North Africa (including some PU valuation changes for FNA as well as French West Africa). French North Africa will be German occupation zones (Similar to The British Occupation areas) and Vichy will not earn PU from them. However, French West Africa will increase slightly in value to compensate the vichy for the PU losses in FNA.

I am also toying with the following...

Adding a single new Command unit for every nation.
Adding Mongolia as a new Neutral Nation. This is meant to ensure there are fewer opportunities to exploit the region if you are playing without Diplomacy, while also adding some more zesty goodness if you are.
Adding Saudi Arabia as a Neutral Nation. This is meant to ensure there are fewer opportunities to exploit the region if you are playing without Diplomacy, while also adding some more zesty goodness if you are.
Adding Mexico as a Neutral Nation. This is meant to ensure there are fewer opportunities to exploit the region if you are playing without Diplomacy, while also adding some more zesty goodness if you are.

All of these proposed changes are designed to test just some of the new idea's that are being worked on in a Hepp's Secret Government subterranean bunker for Global Dominance.

What I will do is formally retire 2.7.7.2. It has had a good run... but alas progress is an insensitive bitch.

2.8.0.5 will become the Gold Standard for TWW. While 3.0 will be the playground for my evil maniacal tendencies. I do so adore human testing. :smiling_face_with_horns:

prastle

@hepps "subterranean bunker" ? This I need to see

Hepps

@prastle Sorry. Access is reserved to Ultra level clearance.

prastle

@hepps Hehe

wirkey

0_1533725352540_f43110e5-f7dc-4585-a7c1-1cd535d51e8e-image.png
Why does Germany get those green marking above the infantry, even without special warfare and UK with adv sw doesn't get them? Same for the fighters

wirkey

@hepps said in Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5:

To give you a glimpse of the near future, the next release is currently under development.

TWW 3.0.0.0 will definitely feature...

New Sub vs. Destroyer mechanics.

New Occupation Territories for French North Africa (including some PU valuation changes for FNA as well as French West Africa). French North Africa will be German occupation zones (Similar to The British Occupation areas) and Vichy will not earn PU from them. However, French West Africa will increase slightly in value to compensate the vichy for the PU losses in FNA.

I am also toying with the following...

Adding a single new Command unit for every nation.

Adding Mongolia as a new Neutral Nation. This is meant to ensure there are fewer opportunities to exploit the region if you are playing without Diplomacy, while also adding some more zesty goodness if you are.

Adding Saudi Arabia as a Neutral Nation. This is meant to ensure there are fewer opportunities to exploit the region if you are playing without Diplomacy, while also adding some more zesty goodness if you are.

Adding Mexico as a Neutral Nation. This is meant to ensure there are fewer opportunities to exploit the region if you are playing without Diplomacy, while also adding some more zesty goodness if you are.

All of these proposed changes are designed to test just some of the new idea's that are being worked on in a Hepp's Secret Government subterranean bunker for Global Dominance.

What I will do is formally retire 2.7.7.2. It has had a good run... but alas progress is an insensitive bitch.

2.8.0.5 will become the Gold Standard for TWW. While 3.0 will be the playground for my evil maniacal tendencies. I do so adore human testing. :smiling_face_with_horns:

TWW 3.0 = GD? I remember a time you said you wouldn't contribute anymore to TWW.
About Mexiko, Mongolia, Saudi Arabia: I wouldn't make them neutral nations. I would just make them join another nation if attacked.
Mongolia goes to Russia/Japan if attacked by Axis/Allies
Saudi-Arabia to UK/Italy
Mexiko to US/Germany
Is it possible to change turn order? In that case you could even make them minors of the nations they join.

Hepps

@wirkey You are a keen one Mr. Wirkey.

Yes for the new neutrals I am adding them because I will have to create them for GD. So I figure instead of creating everything from from scratch I can build further on the existing XML of TWW.

Yes in GD all Neutral Nations will become Minor nations for a Major Belligerent. That is the long term goal for neutrals.

And yes while I had initially intended to abandon TWW in favour of developing GD, I have found TWW has been a great platform to introduce and test some of the new concepts.

Hepps

@wirkey Can you post a save game? The icons have been working flawlessly for me so I would need to see what is going on.

Hepps

@wirkey said in Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5:

Why does Germany get those green marking above the infantry, even without special warfare and UK with adv sw doesn't get them? Same for the fighters

I think I kind of covered it with you personally. What can happen is if you close a game then open another saved game.... (without closing Triple A) it seems the engine somehow keeps ghosts of the existing icons from the previous game. I have found the same issue if try to launch a saved game from a BOT that had a TWW game on it when you entered it. Wasn't sure if it was happening to everybody... but I guess it is.

currently the only solution I have found is to close Triple A completely then reopen it and load the saved game.

wirkey

@hepps since when does the overfly of a paratrooper over a SZ enables a cruiser to bombard from that SZ into the territory attacked by the paratrooper?
0_1533844700982_tww spartan bombard.tsvg

Hepps

@wirkey Well nothing in the XML has changed. So the either that behavior has always been the or something in the new engine has changed. I will examine your save.

zlefin

Why retire 2.7.7.2? is something in it buggy?

Hepps

@zlefin Yes it is bugging me that no one should need to play such a antiquated version of the game.

Hepps

So the design for 3.0.0.0. has begun in earnest.

Here is a glimpse of the initial changes to the Vichy situation.

0_1533994767983_TWW Africa.png

So the changes will be a dramatic departure from the current game.

While North and Western Africa are more valuable overall... it represents challenges for both sides.
If North Africa is liberated but cannot be held. Germany will begin to earn even more PU.
For the Axis the material gained every turn will enable Germany to strengthen Western Europe each turn that North Africa remains as protectorates.
The loss of 1 PU (overall) for Vichy means that Western Africa is increasingly important to keeping them in the game as a valuable member of the Axis.
The increased value of Western Africa makes it more significant to both sides.
The significance of North and West Africa will force the Allies to have to commit more resources to liberating Africa if a European campaign is to be successful.
The changing priorities for both sides should have a significant impact on how much can committed to the Egyptian front.
The changes will mean that the Americans will likely have to play a more balanced game.
The increase in the value of Nigeria will mean the British can develop production in Africa.

There is one other significant change that I will detail in a subsequent post once I have finalized the details.

Gully

I like that. West-Africa always felt kinda boring so far. England collects it and that's it, only choice is how early can you afford to collect it without losing Egypt.

But that's a big buff to the Europe-Axis. An extra material for Germany for a long time (need to take Morocca AND Algeria to prevent it), and extra PU for Vichy to spend on subs or aircraft. Extra Material to maybe build a Barracks. Allies need something to balance, maybe 1-2inf when liberating West-Africa and/or Morocco?

Hepps

@gully The Vichy actually earn 1 less PU per turn. Neither them nor Germany collect PU from the protectorates while they remain as such.

And yes I was intending on adding EA unit placements to several of the African territories if they are liberated.

And yes the idea is to make some difficult decisions for both sides to make the war in Egypt more of a balancing act.

Gully

Ah right. I forgot that intact protectorates don't deliver their PU value. So that's some longer-living protectorates than the Dutch East Indies. I like it.