Total World War: December 1941 3.0.0.6
-
and that's exactly why in that battle-log the sub rolls are separated from the other British rolls. Subs can never hit air.
-
@Gully Yeah. I guess in theory if there are no available targets then the engine shouldn't even bother rolling for them.
-
ok I wasn't sure i thought that was the case on other maps but when i was playing it looked like they were still getting first strike attacks versus the naval fighters.
-
@ubernaut It is weird looking at the log... because I have never been prompted to try and select a casualty from my air units from subs.
-
@Hepps def an edge case scenario i still have trouble seeing scrambles when plotting my attacks i will try to pay a little more attention if i get into that kind of thing again.
-
@redrum I would like to do the final boss thing we discussed earlier in the coming weeks.
-
@Gully Sure. Just let me know when you'd like to start it up. I'm fine with either side and open to whatever settings.
-
Submarine change looks quite nifty and good.
But I feel while the change itself is positive, the adjustments on the map for Turn1 outcome for what concerns submarines are not sufficient - the Allies have many more surviving naval units, which speed up sensibly their invasion force.
Then I've a concern that I've read in the notes - but not experienced yet: if Vichy turns German due to Allies taking North Afrika, what happens to the remainder of the Vichy possessions (such as Madagascar / etc) assuming they're still Vichy France? Their PU go into a waste-bin, or they convert too into German regions?
-
@Shonn Yes the turn one implications of the subs changes have not gone unnoticed... but I think more testing is required before any decisions are made. I am, as I have always been, open to suggestions to balance... provided they are with overall balance in mind.
Yes notes are slim right now... since I am using what available free time I have to push a new venture forward as quickly as possible since it is also a testing platform for more ambitious plans and goals for game design. I promise I will formalize the TWW note better as I have time.
In the interum I will clarify that when one of the protectorate territories in North Africa is liberated... Germany only gains the North African territories... the remaining Vichy Territories remain under Vichy control. It just means Vichy has much fewer resources at their disposal. -
@Shonn Actually, if anything, I think Axis are a bit stronger at this point after all the changes in v3.0. We made a few adjustments in v3.0.0.4 to give some small boosts to the Allies so its pretty close now.
When Vichy loses N.Africa, they still keep their non-N.Africa possessions so will usually have a small income.
-
@redrum On point 2 I went to read again the changes, and I've misread the 'Vichy turns into a ... gives income to Germany' into 'Vichy turns German' (Hence thought Vichy was to lose their capital).
On the submarine business we'll see how it pans out - atm the few games I've watched saw the Allies quite well positioned - and I did twice the first turns in new games to be continued.
-
some kind of problem with notifications in PBF/EM games just shows a blank dialog.
-
@ubernaut Not sure what you mean? Can you provide a bit more detail.
-
whenever you should get a notification it just shows this:
once you set a PEBM game you can actually see the rror on regular local games too:
-
-
@redrum yeah it is doing it with new local games as well and i am using those versions. i guess this was the first time i tried 3.0.0.4
-
@ubernaut Hmm. It appears you are on a Mac which might have something to do with it. I recently updated and fixed notifications to reference the images packaged in the map rather than a URL on SourceForge. Do you happen to have a windows machine that you can test on?
If anyone else has a Mac and can test if they see notifications that would be helpful.
-
@redrum i dont sorry i can say that my installation is recent and clean fwiw 10.14.4
"You should never have told me horses sleep standing up, it gave me a mental block." - Mister Ed
-
I was feeling already the Allies too strong before the changes of 3.0 frankly. Now I played a few games and German T1 is quite awful - but in general Allies are winning in -every- game I get to watch in the lobby (unless a player is quite bad compared to the other, only cases where I saw Axis in winning positions).
What I think about 3.0 changes that need fine tuning (and that in my opinion leaves the game still widely in favor of the Allies):
-
SUBs should stay 4-1-2 OR Germany also gets Improved Submarines as starting Tech (It's the only really impactful one, all other nations have few subs for the difference to be felt).
-
Keep Improved Submarines to 5-1-2 tech.
UK naval plane from Central Britain to London (It cannot scramble from there) -
Improved Destroyers also add 1 to Destroyed defence (making them 3-4-2). The defines more the role of Sub as offensive unit and DD to defensive one.
-
US naval plane in E.Coast to inland, Eastern Central US.
-
Undo the last UK changes (Put back naval plane in SZ148, remove the 2 extra AA)
German transport from SZ69 to SZ64 (Gives the option to ferry that resource to Morocco if they want when it's still possible) -
Italian starting technology is Special Warfare instead of Improved Hulls (They had alpini and san marco and decima mas) - a tech that at least a nation like Italy can use, more than one that works pratically for 3 of their units (and probably fated to remain 3 for quite a while). Also gives them to operate in the Mediterranean better making the theater more interesting, and threatening Malta of invasion on T1. (Operation Hercules)
UK gets already 30 free BPs in turn 1-5 in the form of the Dakar Vichy Fleet - unless miracles happen Axis cannot impede that, it's like having frozen assets there for a short while in a game that technically should span well over 10-15 turns but ends usually well before. Vichy mainland fleet is there but will disappear once Morocco falls (and the Allies can arrange that by turn 3 or 4 usually. It's a good shielding force but that's pretty much it. Germany may have a minor gain averagely by lucking out 1 or 2 of these ships, averagely. Not something one can rely on though since it's random, and even the less plan around).
I think the 30 BPs (BB + DD) that are getting given to UK in 'frozen terms' need to find a tradeoff on Axis end. 1 resource does not cut it (and that transport ferrying it in 99% is just fated to sink without chance of other support in Allied dominated seas.)
Not saying to remove the Dakar fleet (it's a good idea imo and fits historically!) - but Axis needs gains elsewhere to make up for that!General Pre 3.0 feelings:
As of now it seems far too easy and cheap to overwhelm Italy prematurely, and stall Japan naval expansion in the Pacific that hardly reaches the expansion historically had. From Australia fantasy fleet to an undewhelming Japanese starting fleet (they are awfully short of small vessels as DDs), Japan only faces a fierce resistance in islands that are all manned (I'd empty of INFs an amount of the Dutch Indies as they were litterally scarcely garrisoned and should just be a takeover as most of the holdings of Commonwealth there) ontop of the fact that Japan life also can change a lot if they nail Special Warfare on Turn1 or not.
I think Japan needs 1-2 more DDs -and- to have all the infantry in the islands (except Formosa and Hainan) converted to marines. While that gives actually them more marines they lack shipping for most of them assuming USA plays a split between Europe and Pacific (and thus it's only a +1 in defence). BUT if Japan has a major problem (which can happen) to not gain Special Warfare in T1, and eventually in T2 too...How things pan out in Europe is more like Germany gets hammered by Soviets in T1. In T2 both sides reorganize. In T3 Germany can try some shy offensive but in the while the Allies packed up their shit and are ready to hammer the Germany down somewhere.
Allies are far too quick to do their things as it is now - and Axis just implode in the long run. And Axis needs time too to pack their shit for Russia or wherever they want to hit. Russia can hit way too hard in Turn1 (I think Germany needs 1 more INF in each of: Pskov, Orel, Kharkov, E. Ukraine).But math is not an opinion - Allies have higher starting TUV by a far shot, and they've a full nation (Russia like) of additional production. So it is usually just a matter of time til Axis is toppled (That assuming even skills of players).
Viable options are to:
Weaken Dutch Indies and / or (I'd do both) convert Japan INF into MARs.
Japan needs some more naval assets / Australia needs less.
Add German starting units, in Russia, and some trenches in the West / Norway (Copenhagen especially)
Tweak production some - Axis needs a bit more production over time to remain competitive. Germany in particular. Some provinces may require extra PUs per turn.
Italy seems very passive and often impotent - and if the UK and USA wants to go for the Med they can, by itself is not wrong, but it's the speed at which they can concentrate to achieve that.In general I try to play but end up pretty much frustrated as Allies can be in parity or gain upper hand on Axis anywhere. And by turn 3 or 4 it's more a matter of gathering together your assets and producing things with the PUs you got. There is no massive swing from starting position (save as mentioned already, poor players that sleep on their feet and get some mighty army swept clean because they moved inaccurately).
Given Turn1 can be quite a variable only for Germany - not much that can be done.
Japan can roughly calculate their attacks. Soviets can calculate them with even more precision. And so is for everyone around except Germany - because Germany besides Tobruk plays lottery. Your sub sent against a transport can fail, and then gets hit with 1. That repeats all over - and thus there is a major luck / unluck swing on Germany turn1.
All other nations can pratically predict the outcome of their battles (assuming one plays with LL - I personally prefer dice but... no one or almost like dice. Then one can go play chess in general if they prefer no luck!). That can give quite a swing to Allies, doing already big invasions on Turn3, or Turn5 instead if the submarines were effective. Because if German submarines kill things AND survive they remain a threat, so Allies need to escort their stuff adequately. If in German T1 the Allies are lucky, kill submarines and their things even live in large amount ... Allies dance.
That has a -major- impact on how the game pans out in the subsequent turn (exactly as much as UK nailing Special Warfare turn1 or not, for who does not tech Logistics on T1.)Adding: Allies also have starting superb technologies for their relative needs. Italy has a shoddy one. Germany's quite relative and in many cases only works on T1 Soviet assaults and with AT that survives that, since Germany must try to grab grounds and won't produce defensive units early on. Soviets have the amazing logistics, USA has production which is ever handy and UK has the better AA which always help! (I know National Tech Advantage is an optional - but gives an amount of chrome. I'd alter that to mirror better Axis earlier 'tech / training' advantage in various fields, giving more than 1 tech to who may deserve it - and / or adding further starting tech if Shared Tech is enabled to some nations)
-
-
@ubernaut just noticed another odd thing
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login