AI Development Discussion and Feedback

[Cernel]

@Alexei-Svitkine said in AI Development Discussion and Feedback:

Glad to see my improvements helping so much!

There is at least one more coming which should help a lot too. I just sent a PR for it this morning.

@Cernel said in AI Development Discussion and Feedback:

TripleA 18843:
Time to end the first turn (Carthage): 0' and 29"
Time to end the first 5 rounds: 13' and 21"
RAM level at the end of the first turn (Carthage): 1.94 GB
RAM level at the end of the first 5 rounds: 2.29 GB

Still tested with:
-Xmx4096M
-Xms4096M
All to Fast AI and with the "barbarians" player disabled.
AI Pause Duration=250

TripleA 18871:
Time to end the first turn (Carthage): 0' and 32"
Time to end the first 5 rounds: 13' and 48"
RAM level at the end of the first turn (Carthage): 1.94 GB
RAM level at the end of the first 5 rounds: 2.03 GB

So, this time it took slightly more time, actually (but maybe just a coincidence, as virtually no games go the same way), but it seems there is an 11% reduction in the RAM allocated, after finishing 5 rounds.

[Alexei Svitkine]

Not sure if helpful, but I have another example of some bad AI strategy.

This time on Domination 1914. This from a 2.0 prerelease, unfortunately before the recent Unit + TripleAUnit merge, so to load the save, you need a slightly older version (e.g. prerelease/checkout at 2.0.18893 for example).

In this game, I was playing as Communists and all other players were Hard AI. The central powers did really well, in particular because USA wasn't able to ever get in the game (it just amassed planes in USA that never made it to somewhere relevant - despite it being possible to island-hop them to Europe/Africa). For example 71 planes in Charleston (there's another 50 in Aleutian Islands):

As Communists, I conquered all of Russia, creating a border of my territories against the central powers. So they just kept amassing land units there, not sure why - since they can't enter my territory so they were kind of stuck there. They didn't try to build transports to get those units somewhere useful.

On the other hand, when Europe was fully captured, Germany did a hard turn in its production, going from building mostly ground units to building something like 15 planes a turn. But then it ended up in some awkward situations where Britain kept taking some territories with land units and transport and Germany having no neighbouring land units but like 40 planes, to recapture. Germany could have defended things much better.

Arabia was particularly interesting - due to Turkey not playing very well, Arabia kept managing to stay alive and harass them. However, its capital could only produce 4 units, which it was doing to produce 4 Beaudoin units each turn. But it had more money than that - so it was just building up a war chest for no reason (as opposed to using it - e.g. building a factory somewhere or just dumping intro trenches that could be built without a factory).

One turn UK loaded up some units on a transport and just left it in open waters sinkable by my plane. Even though those units could have landed in an undefended territory instead (e.g. Latvia)!

Another thing, at some point different countries like UK, Austria, Germany, USA built navies. But ship choices were rather poor - mostly building Cruisers - but ideally for large fleets, you want to have battleships to take hit points without dying - the computer was not doing that.

I'm sure there's lots of other questionable stuff there, but the above are some of the most glaring.

dom_AI.tsvg.zip

[redrum]

@Alexei-Svitkine Some good examples here. Quick thoughts:

• The AI struggles with 3 move planes and maps without carriers and need ssome additional checks around those.
• The AI doesn't quite understand the neutral relationships between the Central Powers and Communists.
• The AI only has limited support for 0 move units (trenches).
• Guessing the unloaded units was some sort of movement bug

[Alexei Svitkine]

I noticed some very buggy AI behavior. On WAW, Hard AI playing the Japanese factions was sending a bomber to attack a well defended ANZAC territory. The bomber just died as expected. And WAW uses low luck, so it was a guaranteed suicide. This happened twice with a bomber over different turns another time with 2 fighters.

(Getting a forum error adding a screenshot. Can try later.)

This is with latest prerelease. Save:
waw_buggy.tsvg.zip

[Frostion]

I also get error when trying to add screenshot. Tried to do it like 15 hours ago. What's up with that?

[bluelionman]

Big World 1942 v3

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but wanted to offer some feedback. I play the AI a lot and find I beat it even on Hard but when I play a human I usually lose (with the exception of my sibling whom I usually beat).

I played a really long game against the AI where I was only 1 country - all the rest on Hard AI and I tried really crazy things at the start as I was testing the theory you can do anything and win against the AI. Well there is no way I should of won - I was losing big time the Axis (AI) had taken Russia and the whole continent was there's between Germany, Italy and Japan... also Italy had all of Africa. I had loads of powers for UK and just kept buying infantry and bombers stopping the Axis having a navy to get to UK or USA and having enough defend against parachute drops of dudes.

This stale mate went on for ages then in round 40 something I noticed Germany had moved everything out of its capital I'd no idea why but I pounced had 6 bombers drop 6 British infantry. His AA shot 2 down but 4 landed and I took his money over 100 PU's.

Now any human would not make that mistake again - he had 55+ units off all types 1 territory away but every German go he only put half a dozen units in to take it back and moved no more in on non combat to re-in-force. This meant I kept retaking Germany every round for the next 4+ rounds and its money so it never got to build and Britain got to spend near on 140 PUS every round - so of course I came back and won.

So somehow the AI does not realise the significance of its capitals and how losing them means it loses its PU's. Can anything be done to address that?

Also I found the USA as an AI is dead useless it just seemed to buy transports and infantry and sail up to Alaska and pretty much drop them off and go back and that's all it really did most game and drop some off up and down that coast when no chance of holding off Japanese units and leaving its navy to get sunk by planes over and over again. The US could of helped so much more having the most PU's income of the allies early on but seemed to do nothing much - no plan whatsoever.

I don't know how AI is coded and it must be real hard but is there anything being worked on to help it do better?

I don't wish to moan I love the game just wanted to feed back my experiences in the hope it may help those behind this great game online. Thanks all.

[pithief]

Of note, I believe the new 2.1.20365 engine does not build new factories anymore, at least under certain maps. Previously played through a couple games under the scenarios The Rising Sun (Map v. 1.9.3) and 270BC (map v. 1.7.0) using the 1.9 engine and the AI would build plenty of factories or cities. We all updated and now they don't.

Hope this is the right place to put this. Also, ya'll have done great things with and for this game!

[TorpedoA]

Hi there
I have a unit called TrenchInf.
Supposed to be like a Infantry which is entrenched and in a extreme defensive position so they cannot attack immediately so to speak, so i want them to be a noncombatmovement infantry.
At first it looked like this:

<attachment name="unitAttachment" attachTo="TrenchInf" javaClass="games.strategy.triplea.attachments.UnitAttachment" type="unitType">
<option name="movement" value="1"/>
<option name="attack" value="0"/>
<option name="defense" value="3"/>
<option name="isLandTransportable" value="true"/>
<option name="transportCost" value="4"/>
<option name="canNotMoveDuringCombatMove" value="true"/>
<option name="isConstruction" value="true"/>
<option name="constructionType" value="FieldFort"/>
<option name="maxConstructionsPerTypePerTerr" value="20"/>
<option name="constructionsPerTerrPerTypePerTurn" value="2"/>
</attachment>

Then i noticed that the AI seems to never non-combat-move it by sea transport.
Then i thought that it could be something about infrastructure, so i now changed it to something like a normal infantry unit:

<attachment name="unitAttachment" attachTo="TrenchInf" javaClass="games.strategy.triplea.attachments.UnitAttachment" type="unitType">
<option name="attack" value="0"/>
<option name="defense" value="3"/>
<option name="movement" value="1"/>
<option name="transportCost" value="4"/>
<option name="isLandTransportable" value="true"/>
<option name="canNotMoveDuringCombatMove" value="true"/>
</attachment>

Unfortunately the AI still doesnt move this unit by sea transport in noncombatmovement round.

This is all Fast AI.

Any ideas?

[ff03k64]

I am wondering if it is possible to have the AI from previous version. I.E. If i design a single player map balanced for the current AI, I probably want a way for it to still be relevant in the future.

[TorpedoA]

About "Show Hard AI Logs"

Where do those Efficiency numbers come from?
For example Infantry
Movement=1
Attack=1
Defense=1
PU-cost=4
HP-Efficiency=0.4
Att-Efficiency=1.5
Def-Effiecieny=1.75

How?

[Mora]

@pithief said in AI Development Discussion and Feedback:

Of note, I believe the new 2.1.20365 engine does not build new factories anymore, at least under certain maps. Previously played through a couple games under the scenarios The Rising Sun (Map v. 1.9.3) and 270BC (map v. 1.7.0) using the 1.9 engine and the AI would build plenty of factories or cities. We all updated and now they don't.

Hope this is the right place to put this. Also, ya'll have done great things with and for this game!

I second that. Unfortunately, AI doesn't build factories any more like it did. I am a WAW player. It's no fun anymore...

[Frostion]

@Mora said in AI Development Discussion and Feedback:

@pithief said in AI Development Discussion and Feedback:

Of note, I believe the new 2.1.20365 engine does not build new factories anymore, at least under certain maps. Previously played through a couple games under the scenarios The Rising Sun (Map v. 1.9.3) and 270BC (map v. 1.7.0) using the 1.9 engine and the AI would build plenty of factories or cities. We all updated and now they don't.

Hope this is the right place to put this. Also, ya'll have done great things with and for this game!

I second that. Unfortunately, AI doesn't build factories any more like it did. I am a WAW player. It's no fun anymore...

Is there any dev willing to look into this issue? Or at least just identify the issue?

I have no idea if this issue is posted at Github.

By the way, a bug like this really hinders map development, besides messing with the single player experience, especially for maps that utilize the AI in some way.

[Mora]

https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/7353

[ff03k64]

I am wondering what the priority is for getting the AI to handle resources besides PUs very well. Thanks!

[LaFayette]

AFAIK the biggest priority is for factory purchases to be brought back.
@redrum , do you remember the background on why AI stopped purchasing factories?

[ff03k64]

@LaFayette I was more wondering like short term, mid term, long term.

Because I know a lot of maps don't use them, some like Warcraft the AI can handle them ok based on how they are implemented. Others like fuel on iron war they just smash their heads into the wall.

[LaFayette]

@ff03k64 I don't want to discourage discussion here, however TBH our labor capacity is critically overstretched these days. Therefore certainly not short-term, probably not even medium term

[ff03k64]

@LaFayette That's fine. I am just trying to decide how to design my map, and if this is a ways off, i will probably use triggers to get desired performance out of the AI.

I don't want to duplicate requests, do we know if it is on the feature request page? I am terrible at search, and don't want to go through the hundred posts that i get to see if they are remotely what this is.

[LaFayette]

I think AI handling alternative resource types exists as a feature request, but TBH I'm not completely sure it is.

[beelee]

@LaFayette said in AI Development Discussion and Feedback:

I think AI handling alternative resource types exists as a feature request, but TBH I'm not completely sure it is.

I don't see it listed. @ff03k64 you can make a request one thread above this one.

Ahh I see you already made one. Please disregard