1. Home
  2. AI
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • redrumR

    AI Development Discussion and Feedback

    Pinned Moved
    316
    3 Votes
    316 Posts
    487k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @bluelionman said in AI Development Discussion and Feedback: I have been having an epic battle with the AI on Fast in BW1942v3 and have encountered an issue. The AI should of beat me and has 100's of units but keeps leaving East Germany - it's capital empty. 3 times now I have taken 100 PU's off it with Britain using a paratrooper as when empty the AA gun does not fire. For me the AI does not seem to understand the importance of a capital and it's loss resulting in losing all it's PU's (money). [image: a7334637-4ae4-4c3c-ac80-8726d425d2c6-image.png] The AI does not understand paratroopers, so it does not defend against them. Human players should not use them against the an AI. Why do you, as a human have more than 100 british ships? You should be landing every turn in Europe, while the Americans push west form the Pacific. Another way of winning would be to land in Scandinavia reinforcing by sea to the front of your line each turn.
  • H

    Creating a (hopefully) competitive bot using Claude Code.

    36
    3 Votes
    36 Posts
    184 Views
    TheDogT
    @husky81 So now you have your initial baseline results, Im hoping for now, that you stop using your Tokens verses Hard-AI, Easy-AI and Does Nothing, and just concentrate on using them, against Fast-AI ? What are your plans for testing for improvements to Claude-AI ?
  • dsIofD

    neural network development-suggestions welcome

    Moved
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @dsiof You may want to checkout the Minimap mod, the simplest non-trivial mod on the site.
  • S

    AI Not Adding AA to Vulnerable Factory 2.7

    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    4k Views
    S
    @panther Oops, I apologize! It was WWII Classic 3rd Edition.
  • I

    ww2v5 AI Stacking, No Good Reason to Fix It

    12
    1 Votes
    12 Posts
    7k Views
    I
    @rogercooper said... @igbi Be careful with making every VC a capital. The AI can overdo it, focusing too much on it. But Roger, unlike your mods, there's no nuance or sophistication to my mods. They're a brutal reduction. Ha, ha. You tell me one thing. TheDog tells me another. A rock. A hard place. I'm between them? No, no, I'm over to the side, just a blip on the screen. Only the storage scope will show that I've been here. It would be good if the AI had direct support for victory cities, at a level intermediate between capitals and normal territories. Don't know the details in any way, manner, or fashion. But the best of AIs would require no tweaking by us, except to weaken it, which would be in the options. There are things of number value all over the map. Those numbers, along with the tagging of what has to be captured should be enough information for a super-strong AI to calculate a plan. A strategy, with battle tactics to carry it out, adapting as needed to what the opponent does. But maybe you're talking about something else. --IGBI
  • I

    Command line AI vs AI play feature

    14
    2 Votes
    14 Posts
    9k Views
    I
    @cernel said in Command line AI vs AI play feature: @igbi said in Command line AI vs AI play feature: The ww2v0 is my naming to make it line up with ww2v2 to ww2v6. When 1, 2 and 3 actually mean first, second and third, there is no zero (traditionally). What comes immediately before 1 is -1. Anyway, Classic Second Edition is V1. Mind you, "V1" stands for "Classic", not for the edition here: the Classic Third Editions, basic or Iron Blitz, are also V1. No need to reply here. But when writing a response to the last post, I thought there was a going to be context in another post to engage in long-windedness, but actually there's not. And then I thought, I'll go ahead and summarize some thoughts anyway about "Some Hypothetical Great A&A Analysis Tool vs What is an AI", but in the light of that every good thing comes to an end, every marginally good thing needs to be brought to an end. As to confusion amongst naming, there's the manufacturer, a large corporation, and then there's the user. The user is looking for free software written by benevolent developers, and confusion on the user's part results in the wasted effort of answering the same questions over and over. As to the large corporations, confusion many times makes them money. Bought that $100 version instead of the $45 version, because you were confused? The Original Topic Title I put out a request. Maybe in a year or two the developers decide it's something they want. I only created an account to make the request. The software is good as it is. --IGBI
  • T

    Setting DO NOTHING the AI still does something

    5
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    T
    @thedog fantastic! Thanks!
  • KindwindK

    Python Database

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    5k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @kindwind You will need to parse the data yourself, by using functions like instr() in Excel or find/replace in Notepad. I have used Microsoft Access to import everything, but even then the results were not easy to use.
  • jkprinceJ

    Make AI able to understand "bombardment" units

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • RogerCooperR

    Is the Hard AI Broken?

    5
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @beelee What is interesting is that this not a problem using the Fast AI. A few months back, there was an issue with big transport fleets not landing that affected both AI's. The non-landing issue seems resolved.
  • jkprinceJ

    What changes would it take to make TWW playable by Hard AI

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    5k Views
    ubernautU
    @thedog TWW is unlike any other map u should def check it out
  • Hayden WhitleyH

    "Game Database"

    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    Hayden WhitleyH
    @beelee said in "Game Database": https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/30807/league-general-discussion-thread/1816 Thanks! I will check those out.
  • RogerCooperR

    AI Refuses to Land

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @beelee Turning off Low Luck does not help. Changing to Fast AI does not help. The US fleet ignores an undefended Tokyo and lands in Palawan.
  • S

    Are dice loaded?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    B
    On a personal note, the only time I've seen "Loaded Dice" was when they were next to an ashtray with a marijuana cigarette
  • J

    Smarter defending of "strategic important points"

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    There are two different issues here, the ability to define territories as important and the vulnerability of the AI to can-opener attacks. As of now, the AI only pays special attention to capitals. In fact, the AI will play listlessly on a map without capitals. It would be desirable for the AI to pay extra attention to victory cities. The second issue, is the AI's vulnerability to can opener attacks. It understands how to make such attacks, but it doesn't understand how to defend against them. Both these problems are fixable in the scope of the current AI. If nothing else, coastal capitals should be garrisoned if there is any potential vulnerability to can opener attacks.
  • SchulzS

    AI Compatibility in Unit Spawning Scenarious

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    TheDogT
    Yes, there is something in 2.6 that errors on G1 turn and does not give any detail to fix it, which is a shame because 2.6 is better and faster than 2.5 So I would install 2.5.22294 I have 4 version of TripleA install, just put the version behind the TripleA-2.5.22294
  • joewichowskiJ

    Leadership Optimism / Regime Change

    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    TheDogT
    I dont know, but @redrum does, as its his bag.
  • I

    AI won't use trains/railroads

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    I
    @rogercooper I will try increasing the move value of all the units. The base problem I am trying to solve is that I have a large map and I don't want it to take forever to move units across it.
  • T

    AI Territory valuation visibility?

    19
    1 Votes
    19 Posts
    11k Views
    M
    @lafayette Ah, I see it. I guess I was expecting to be available for the Hard AI, since the Flow AI doesn't do anything on some maps.
  • TheDogT

    AI and over stacking of defensive units on Capitals

    13
    1 Votes
    13 Posts
    8k Views
    TheDogT
    @beelee If you want to, open a new post in player help and I will try to guide you

Recent Posts

  • TheDogT
    TheDog

    @husky81
    So now you have your initial baseline results, Im hoping for now, that you stop using your Tokens verses Hard-AI, Easy-AI and Does Nothing, and just concentrate on using them, against Fast-AI ?

    What are your plans for testing for improvements to Claude-AI ?

    read more
  • H
    husky81

    @TheDog said:

    the start they should form part of th

    For me, most of my games when playing humans end with economic victories, where one side has enough excess material and income that the other side resigns. There are exceptions, but generally economy ends up being more important than VC's. Of course many territories are important for multiple reasons, like Karelia, which blocks the western allies and the russians from linking up.

    I think they are important of course, but for now it's a later thing once the basics are covered.

    read more
  • TheDogT
    TheDog

    @husky81 said
    will not plan around VC Play.

    I think this should be a major part of your Executive planning that you are talking about in the other thread, owning the 13 VCs should be a major part of the "eyes on the prize" .

    A human player always has the VCs as part of their planning, so should Claude-AI.

    they aren't worth anything until a VC snipe is on the cards

    Totally disagree, from the start they should form part of the Claude-AI opening play, otherwise how will the Claude-AI ever win?

    read more
  • H
    husky81

    @TheDog said:

    Claude-AI/NavalAgent needs guidances (helping hand) as to what is important to players. Then o

    It knows the value of capitals, and of production points per territory (it uses 1 inf per pu). it doesn't really concider vc's yet. those are tricky, because they aren't worth anything until a VC snipe is on the cards. for example, if I'm Germany and besieging moscow, on pace to take in say 2 turns turns. I don't care if USA can trade Italy, France and Karelia, unless they also have a bunch of VC's on the other side of the map.

    The bot does check the win condition ahead of its turn so it will try to retake a VC if it is about to lose, but will not plan around VC Play.

    read more