Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5

[Hepps]

The gracious and glorious @redrum has offered to help with the changes so they should be up-loaded to GIT Hub today.

ALL HAIL RED!

I will be changing the name of the thread to 2.8.0.4 as soon as all the changes are done. Once you see the thread name change you know you can re-download the game.

[Hepps]

Here is the Appendix with the revisions. It shall be added to the new download.

[prastle]

@hepps Woot! Starts a cheering section for redrum

[Hepps]

Just want to say thank you for all the help and input from everybody on the last couple rounds of more ambitious changes.

I realize that many of the changes take the game further away from generally "accepted" rule structures. But I think with continued examination and refinement we shall end up with a game that has a truly superior and dynamic play style.

[redrum]

2.8.0.4 is live. Here is the PR with the changes: https://github.com/triplea-maps/total_world_war/pull/8.

Summary

• Fix L&L trains in Eastern Szechwan
• Change subs AA back to just 1 round
• Change BB bombard to 2x5 and BB-damaged bombard to 1x5
• Set BB-damaged TUV to 17
• Set ACC-damaged TUV to 16
• Set H.Tank-damaged TUV to 7
• Update notes appendix images

** There is an engine bug that needs to be addressed so that non-purchaseable units properly read the manual TUV XML option

[prastle]

@redrum on it boss
like Hepp's @ the massage parlor

[Hepps]

@prastle Every rub deserves a little tug.

[prastle]

@hepps All bots updated

[oigroig78]

Nice to hear, and wishing to test...
After the desert troops suggestion, I would like to suggest a new adding for future releases: Commercial raider/auxiliary cruiser, they played a role in the first stage of WW2...

Thanks for this beautiful game

[wirkey]

@oigroig78 I don't think we need another unit. But in the upcoming GLobal Dominance with its shipping lanes this might be a nice idea, if those units have some special abilities.

[Hepps]

@oigroig78 Thanks for the suggestions.

TWW is for the most part a complete work. Many of the most recent additions to the game have been done simply to include some of features made available through the hard work of @redrum . These were added to TWW as a method to both; test and showcase them to the community. At this point I consider TWW a finished peice of work other than to continue testing for balance and tweaking for functionality.

Your suggestions however are not falling on deaf ears. Work on Global Dominance (the expansion to TWW) is moving forward with vigor.

GD will represent a more comprehensive envisioning of WWII.

1. 'Merchant Raider' is definitely on the table already as potential idea. The key to its design and implementation really hinges on the further development of a feature request.

2. 'Desert terrain' has already been defined conceptually. Whether that leads to having a specific category of Infantry units or not remains to be seen.

I am glad you are enjoying TWW and I hope that you will dip your toe in the dark waters of GD once it is ready.

[Hepps]

Realized that I never went back to examine the Capital Liberation issues. Will re-examine over the next little while. This portion of XML manipulation is not within my comfort zone so I might be a while examining it.

On top of that I have also decided to make one last addition to the TWW 2.8 franchise due to other changes already made...

Since the changes to Strat. Bombing have reduced the effectiveness of bombing campaigns.... I will be making some changes to the Hvy. Strat. Bomber unit to increase its appeal as a potential long-term strategy and Tech pursuit.

The Hvy. Strat. Bomber will now become a 2 hit unit. It will suffer from the same reductions in performance as the other 2 hit units and will require repairs to be made to it when damaged.

I shall be examining the stats for both types of Strat. Bombers and making some decisions about their capabilities.

[zlefin]

how would repairs for it work? 2 hit air can end up bein crazy powerful if you're not careful.
and if the changes to strat bombing have made it too weak, why not simply undo some of those and up the bombing damage rates a bit?

[Hepps]

@zlefin I Suppose I will have to be careful then.

Remember I am all about testing new idea's... not so much about regurgitating watered down versions of existing one's.

[zlefin]

and aren't there some other tech paths/trees which are underutilized?
any other balance issues to be addressed?

[redrum]

@Hepps For reference, we need to eventually look into the Capital Liberation fix here: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/493/total-world-war-december-1941-beta-2-8-0-4/140

Regarding 2 hit air units, they tend to be very strong because generally its easy to repair them every round so they become like a free HP each turn.

@zlefin I do think some of the tech paths and a few units probably need buffed a bit to make them more viable from a balance perspective. But we haven't had that many games of 2.8.0.3 and 2.8.0.4 played yet to base things on. It would be interesting to have some sort of discussion/ranking of existing techs in 2.8.0.4 and say identify the weakest/least used 5-10 techs.

[zlefin]

the sample space is indeed a bit small; i've only got one game. which leaves extrapolation based on trends in the game established by prior versions, or waiting for more data.
It's also tricky as metagame shifts or changes in one area propagate through and can make other combos much better/worse.
I'd be up for a discussion; or we can just wait awhile and see how things shake out.

on another note: I've realized that fighters sent to escort bombers on a bombing run don't get shot at by AA guns in the target territory. that seems odd, why does the fighter get to not get hit by AA, despite being over the target province?
also, what modifiers affect the air defense value?

[Hepps]

@zlefin & @redrum The priorities for techs tends to be fairly consistent. That is not to say certain techs aren't valuable... yet under utilized because players continue to follow the same patterns regardless of what is available.

While some of the techs are consistently a lower priority.... it makes sense. As an example you can look at something like "Improved Gunlaying" which is sorely under utilized.... however, with the double Bombard of the BB this tech can be extremely valuable. +2 for each BB and +1 for each CC during an Amphibious assault. No small bonus for a nation like Japan at the start of the game. Does the fact that most players ignore it make it underpowered? No just under utilized because players choose other priorities.

I am open to discussion... but I feel like for the most part the Tech Chart is fairly well balanced. Low priority Techs aren't necessarily under powered.... they are simply deemed not as important due to the pressures exerted by your opponent and the immediate needs of your nation.

To be honest the only three techs that I see consistantly over looked are...

1. Gunlaying - which makes sense. It can be valuable but is often overlooked until later in a game.
2. Improved Submarines - which is hit and miss as far as usage depending on the player.
3. Improved Strat Bombers - which has always been the case since few players have ever really tried a bombing strategy. (Which is weird since the few games I have seen where a player has actively pursued a Bombing strat. have fared very well.)

---

EDIT (redrum): I'd probably add 2 more techs from tier 1 to the list of overlooked:
4) Improved Hulls - Similar situation as Gunlaying.
5) Rockets - Similar situation as Improved Strat Bombers.

Generally, naval and strat bombing techs are probably the least used. Strat bombing is tough to say on balance given the changes were pretty significant in 2.8. Naval techs will always be a bit more niche since they only apply to really UK, USA, and Japan. But overall, naval techs feel kind of weak even with BB having 2 rolls buffing Gunlaying and Improved Hulls. It would probably be better if those 3 nations were at least considering more of the naval techs in the early/mid game.

[Hepps]

@zlefin Yes due to the way the game defines the escort role... the fighters are never actually engaged in the bombing run itself.

Really you can look at this in a specific way... that the fighters are there while enemy interceptors are in the air... then they peel away and head for home before the bombers head into the targets. Thus the AA are only firing once their own fighters either return to base or have been shot down.

I would be curious if the behavior could even be changed... since the bombing run is actually its own battle.

[Hepps]

@zlefin said in Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.4:

also, what modifiers affect the air defense value?

I don't believe air attack and defense values are affected by anything during an air battle.