@husky81 So now you have your initial baseline results, Im hoping for now, that you stop using your Tokens verses Hard-AI, Easy-AI and Does Nothing, and just concentrate on using them, against Fast-AI ? What are your plans for testing for improvements to Claude-AI ?

@VictoryFirst I replaced all references to "placeNoAir" to "place" and added <attachment foreach="$All-Players$" name="rulesAttachment" attachTo="@All-Players@" javaClass="RulesAttachment" type="player"> <option name="placementAnyTerritory" value="true"/> </attachment>

Special Units Special units cannot be purchased with PUs. Each Advanced Production Center (APC) you own produces one special unit a turn. You must research tech to be able to build APCs in the first place. Also, you must research the tech for the units you would like to build. In the above lists, heavy tanks, Panthers, King Tigers, early jets, jets, Superfortresses, and flying wings are all special units. Superfortresses and flying wings take 2 turns to build. Whose tank tech tree is the best? That all depends on what you want. If your focus is on building tanks with PUs, Britain's tank tech is probably the best. Its Comet tank tech adds +1 to the attack and defense of British tanks. (A Comet was rather similar to a Firefly.) If your focus is on special unit tanks, Germany's King Tiger tech allows you to build the best special unit tank in the game. With the right tech, each German APC can produce a free Panther each turn in addition to its normal production. Expect late game German armies to have their share of Panthers, and the occasional King Tiger. The Soviet player has access to good tank tech. He or she can research the ability to buy tanks at reduced cost. The IS-2 tech gives an upgrade to Soviet heavy tanks. Japan is the odd man out. At the start of the game it can build light tanks only (no medium tanks). It can research tank tech to let it buy normal tanks. But no heavy tanks for Japan. As if to make up for this, Japan's Yamato battleships are the most expensive and the most powerful in the game. A Yamato battleship gives you more bang for the buck than a normal battleship would.

Just posted a suggested fix for an inconsistency between the rule-book and the game's behaviour about newly recruited lords moving into or ideally out of a fort controlled by the enemy if anyone wants to weight in: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/15013

@RogerCooper said: more sense to have the executive module set a broad plan and then the other modules figure how to execute the plan. I was thinking that the plan would be more emergent rather than preset if it was set by local processes, but maybe you're right. I will try both ways. The issue with global plannig i think will be getting the nescessary information to the executive and have it analyze that info appropriately without just simulating all possibilities (which isn't possible.) My account is drained of tokens now, so progress is on temporary hiatus.

Version History Version 3.0 (2026-10-11) Initial beta release

@Vendetta Currently using the XML, you can configure this to work exactly in the way you described, except for "Allies retreating to different territories". Currently all units go to one territory. The Pull Request is almost merge-ready, it just needs a bit of improvements outlined at the GitHub page. @iratoric How are things looking right now? Are you planning to work on the last bits of the PR?

Hello, I'm back. So uh idk if I'll do much but probably will do something like maybe get a game set up (idk if like via forum or online depending on time constrants).

@GREGOREK Yah, scrolling both edges sure is cool. I wish this could be possible in an actual (spherical) world (like ours) with some sort of projection, but unfortunately it is not (as far as I know).