consumesUnit

[Numetalfan]

Hello,
<attachment name='unitAttachment' attachTo='gun_bunker' javaClass='UnitAttachment' type='unitType'>
...
<option name='consumesUnits' value='1:bunker'/>
<option name='consumesUnits' value='1:artillery'/>
...
</attachment>

I understand this example as an AND-operator
this means BOTH the bunker and the artillery are consumed by the new unit, here the gun-bunker

--

But this is not what I am looking for, I look for a code line that is an OR-operator

which means: EITHER a bunker or an artillery can be consumed
if this is possible of course

Do I have to make two commands out of one, like:

<attachment name='unitAttachment' attachTo='gun_bunker' javaClass='UnitAttachment' type='unitType'>
<option name='consumesUnits' value='1:bunker'/>
</attachment>

<attachment name='unitAttachment' attachTo='gun_bunker' javaClass='UnitAttachment' type='unitType'>
<option name='consumesUnits' value='1:artillery'/>
</attachment>

[Numetalfan]

Hmmm,

I thought only about situations where there is only unit X or unit Y. But what if both of them are in the same territory....

This seems to be the problem.

So this would require a user action and things become more complicated.

Damn. I did want to have two updates, but I see nothing better

So
Unit a. Update for a. Consumes a
Unit b. Update for b. Consumes b

Anyone a better idea?

[Hepps]

@Numetalfan Seems strange to have (what I would presume to be) 2 very different units being used to create the same defensive unit upon merging.