@frostion I did update it not too long ago, apart from images the text is mostly up to date. The need for description.html and preview.png are not yet mentioned but those are 2.6 features (not yet released).

It's probably prudent we convert this to be in the official documentation so that anyone can suggest an edit without needing to go through you first.

@torpedoa Now the one thing I have never tested is making the same vessel both a transport and a carrier together... so theoretically a ship might be able to be both at the same time.

The only things (if it works) is that you would likely need to make the Marine and Archers purely consume Carrier capacity. Thus meaning that your galley would likely be able to carry one of those 2 units AND however many of the normal units as cargo (depending what the transport capacity is)

You could test to see whether a unit with both transport cost and carrier cost will consume both spaces and still participate in the naval battle... but I have never tried it and I'm not sure what effects it might have.

@hepps hej maestro , thnxs for the suggestion: as stated in my chat I think it is still to close too mountains: I am trying to base it more on this example hills, irregular spread, and more open.... but then a shady version I think,

title.png

@wc_sumpton Thank you. Worked perfectly.

@thedog Interesting. Removing it I think is a reasonable option. I have not noticed that it is gone from the game-select UI.

@thedog Thank you.

I definitely have too much time. You can notice that by the variety on some unit images with no purpose.

WARRIORTEMP - Kopie (2) - Kopie - Kopie - Kopie.png WARRIORTEMP - Kopie (2) - Kopie - Kopie - Kopie - Kopie.png Unbenannt.png Thor - Kopie.png templatese - Kopie (3).png templatese - Kopie (2).png templatese - Kopie - Kopie.png templatese - Kopie - Kopie (2).png Principes_O.png Elephantes.png

@rogercooper
Nice idea. That would be the only solution i guess. And i like it, but the AI cannot handle it i am quite certain.

I have instead a much more AI-friendly, but primitive simple idea how to prolonge and kind of restrict easy fast, reckless repairing/healing of HPs.

I only got to the point of thinking about this because my mod is like 30-40% 2HP units.
And repairing a big stack of "wounded" ancient warriors by 1 healer unit the normal way is quite magic.

So i have now this idea, not sure how it will work out:

Just give the healer unit a marginal/massive negative support attachment to all allied units, so one is compelled to always keep in mind that it is not wise to be attacked or go for a attack if the units are in treatment, which means being in the same territory or combat move with the army stack.

Does that make sense?

@TheDog I am glad you enjoy my postings. Note that I avoid numerical ratings, as my tastes may differ from others.

I suspect that most users download the boardgame conversions and I think that they should have their own category.

I don't think there is any place for broken maps in the repository. If a developer is having a problem with a map, they can zip it up and post it to Google drive where the community can download and help. Even if the map is basically meant as a resource, such as 100 x 100 hex grid, it takes little effort to create a simple scenario to use the resource.

@TorpedoA Oh yes! it was very fun. But now I don't have time to play it, because it was happening 24/7 and so you had to plan raids at specific times regardless of your personal schedule 😉 Now that I have a job and kids I can't do it any more.

Since TripleA supports different resource types, I really like this idea of a building-heavy game where the buildings themselves produce different resource types (wood, wheat, iron, etc.) which can be used to build the units (and then the fancier buildings can produce fancier upgraded units), more like Tribal Wars, Age of Empires, etc. instead of the typical- territories = money, money buys units. Very clever!

@RogerCooper - No, ordering does not matter