💥 1941 Global Command Decision - Official Thread

[ezgaming]

@thedog thanks for the manual link !!!

[ezgaming]

By now you guys know that I ABSOLUTELY LOVE this game you created.

But you also know that I keep putting it down because of the many issues that I have had with it.

Having said that, however, I have noticed great improvements in both the game as well as the TripleA Mothership code - and it's very nice to see your game now in the DOWNLOAD MAPs option of the standard triplea engine.

Today I want to present to you more consternation over these damn Nukes. For a couple of B29s these guy behave as if they have super powers and are a Battlestar/Imperial I-class Star Destroyer.

Just today we had a scenario where the Allied Nuke Bmr got caught in India and was about to be annihilated, only to see it kill everything that attacked it.

Surely this is a bug.

Here is the game-generated report of the opening of that battle.

[JohnnyCat]

@ezgaming Just to be clear about the defense:

UK 1 Inf, 1 Med Industry, and 1 USA Nuke Bomber apparently piloted by Jesus and Santa Claus together with Spiderman and Dr. Strange riding in back.

Is there some sort of code where the nuke can only be killed by "dog fights"???

I read that somewhere, perhaps in the tool tip over the icon in game since we did not have the manual at the time. But I recall there being something in the game that stated that the --> Only thing that could kill it was during a dog fight. Though I forget the source now.

Anyway I hope that helps.

Johnny C

[TheDog]

@ezgaming
No bug, it is working as intended, attack or defend with fighters.

As JohnnyCat says the nuke can only be killed by "dog fights" (and SBR AA)

.
So the new tool tip text says
Can only be targeted by air units in a Dog-Fight & AA from a Strategic Bombing Run on Industry/Base-Camp

So all ground units cannot hit the high altitude bomber, just like in history.

[ezgaming]

@thedog that makes perfect sense given the context. Thanks again for clarifying.

[JohnnyCat]

Here are three battles whose outcome make no sense to me.

What do you guys think?

[TheDog]

@johnnycat
Please be more specific, which bits make no sense.

Generalising against bunkers you need at least 2x artillery.
Check the Terrain stat changes on the status bar, Kandahar has no terrain stat modifiers, the other two do.

[wc_sumpton]

@johnnycat

In the first attack in W.Algerian-Sahara, Germany attacks with 1 Armor-Lgt at 2, 6 Inf-Elites, 1 Inf-Motorized, and 3 Inf-Trained all attacking at 1. This may sound good with 11 hit points, but the Neutrals have 2 Bunkers at 2 hit points that defend at 2, and 3 Inf-Trained that defend at 3 because W.Algerian-Sahara is a desert territory. Thats 7 hit points with better dice. Germany is going to have to get through those bunkers while Neutrals Inf-Trained chew them up. Advantage Neutrals.

Again, with the battle in Kandahar, which is also a desert territory, Germany attacks with 4 Anti-Tanks and 1 Inf-Elite all attacking at 1 with 5 hit points. The Neutrals defend with 2 Bunkers at 2 with 4 hit points. Sure, the Anti-Tanks are first strike, but as the dice show, one's are not happening. Advantage Neutrals.

The battle in Stockholm is just bad. Stockholm is mountain territory and Germany's Armor-Med and 2 Artillery get -1 to attack while Neutrals 9 Inf-Trained will receive a +1 with 5 defending at 4 when adding in the Artillery bonus. Big Advantage Neutrals.

@johnnycat said in 1941 Global Command Decision - Official Thread:

Here are three battles whose outcome make no sense to me.

So, to answer your question, Yes, these 3 battles should be won by the Neutrals. Campaigns against Neutral held territories are going to be very costly, as explained in a post above, and there is little to no reward in do so. Germany's units could have been put to better use else where.

Cheers...

[JohnnyCat]

@thedog once again I appreciate your response. I’m stating to get accustomed to how things should go. I’m just not picking up terrain mods and such things quickly: I guess I’m still sort of thinking in basic TripleA terms which clearly do not apply !

[JohnnyCat]

Started another game - nothing unusual that I can tell. But upon completion of the German Turn 1, the program just hangs with 1200 % CPU usage.

We've been playing this game for a year and these problems of the game crashing happen virtually every game. Usually the thing craps out when the game is mostly finished but now it's not letting us even start a normal game.

I hope that posting the game save here is useful. Please let me know if you have time to check into this and if you get same issue.

JohnnyG1.tsvg

[TheDog]

@johnnycat
I can reproduce your error if I select Yes to Attack Submarines in 091 A Sea Zone.
Before playing your G1 saved game, if I change Britain to FAST-AI it appears NOT to crash at the same point.

Perhaps the HARD-AI does not like something, but we need to try and find what for the Devs.

.
Do you have a Mac?
Do you game with ezgaming, as he says the same, it crashes late game?
You appear to have edited the map, as Corsica & Sardinia have had their defences removed, yes?
Do you have your version of the start of the game? What Im after is your changes to the downloaded version.

[wc_sumpton]

@thedog said in 1941 Global Command Decision - Official Thread:

Perhaps the HARD-AI does not like something, but we need to try and find what for the Devs.

Sea Zone 109. If Russia is changed to Fast AI, then the player "scrambles" to help in its defense. By removing that battle, combat happens normally. So, the Hard AI is getting stuck on it scramble code.

Cheers...

[JohnnyCat]

YOU QUESTIONS

Do you have a Mac?
Do you game with ezgaming, as he says the same, it crashes late game?
You appear to have edited the map, as Corsica & Sardinia have had their defences removed, yes?
Do you have your version of the start of the game? What Im after is your changes to the downloaded version

MY ANSWERS

Yes I use a Mac. I’m wanting to get a new VERY GOOD PC system for gaming on steam but have yet to research that. If you have any suggestions for a new 2024 Best Class of PC gaming systems I’d love to know.

Yes Eric (EZ GAMING) and I play together often

Hmm as for mods I did this game from scratch and did not mod Corsica or anything. The ONLY thing I changed was giving the axis 200% resources since it’s too boring to play with realistic axis resources lol

But seriously I did not mod the map pieces at all and am confused by this. Could it be that you are referring to that last thing Eric and I posted ? We posted three little battles against neutrals that we just wanted to know why our intuition was off but you explained those well and now we know to take terrain and such into account

YOU ASKED
D o you have your version of the start of the game? What Im after is your changes to the downloaded version

And all I have is the G1 save that o posted here

[TheDog]

@johnnycat
Thanks for the info, I need it for posting on GitHub for the Devs.

Also, what version of 1941 GCD are you using?
You can find it by Select Game (button)> and highlighting 1941 GCD

[JohnnyCat]

Ah I don't get that at all mate. I get this :

While I have your attention I just noticed the manual here as well and wanted to ask you to decode the mountains stats for me. And is the word "are" meant to be an "or"?

THANKS

Johnny C

[TheDog]

@johnnycat
You are on v165 or earlier, I have tested it with 170 & (175 unreleased) it still crashes, so thanks!

Mountains
Any ground unit with Atk: 2+ are -1 Atk when Attacking, eg Tank 3-1=2 Atk
Def: Any Infantry ( but not Inf-Motorised) & AntiTank +1 in Defence

[beelee]

@thedog

since there game just started and froze, they might want to go ahead and update to latest before trying another one

[JohnnyCat]

@beelee ok well ensure we have the newest version. Thx

[JohnnyCat]

I downloaded a new version of TripleA 2.614787

And I see a new 1941 Global Command Decision game!

This is version 1.170

The saved game I sent you still hangs sadly...

Where would I get version 1.175?

[TheDog]

@johnnycat
175 is under test, should be out early August.

The current 175 still crashes, I have raised it on GitHub for the Devs.