Roger's Scenario Thread
-
@rogercooper I mean I am fine with the idea like Smart zombies can exist and imo are a cool concept. I mean is the turn base way Axis and Allies games play unrealistic already?
-
@board-3659 said in Roger's Scenario Thread:
@rogercooper I mean I am fine with the idea like Smart zombies can exist and imo are a cool concept. I mean is the turn base way Axis and Allies games play unrealistic already?
Being turn-based does not make games unrealistic. Any type of simulation will need a certain level of abstraction. A&A is not a very accurate simulation, but it does simulate WW2 to a certain extent.
I am fine with introducing fantastical elements like zombies. But if you do so, they should be done in a consistent way. If zombies are the living dead (or infested/crazed humans) the game should explore what that means. The typical, contemporary view of zombies is that they are mindlessly aggressive. In A&A&Z, they are an older concept, the Draugr of Scandinavian folklore, where they are corpses animated by evil spirits (including the souls of the body's former inhabitant). That justifies their ability to coordinate tactically to some extent.
-
Name 1914-COW-Empires
Description World War on the Napoleonic Empires map
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/1914-COW-Empires
Good Points
- Accurate economic values
Bad Points
- Most production concentrated in capitals
- No feel for German tactical superiority and Russia's problems
-
@rogercooper said in Roger's Scenario Thread:
No feel for German tactical superiority and Russia's problems
I wonder is there any way to represent German tactical superiority other than simply increasing German income?
I think there is actually a very easy way to represent Russian politic, logistic and military problems. Making Communist militias popping up randomly in Russian territories in each round would be a good solution IMHO.
-
@schulz said in Roger's Scenario Thread:
I wonder is there any way to represent German tactical superiority other than simply increasing German income?
You could make unique German Units with better combat and movement abilities. Depends on how much you wanna change the game
-
Name Genuine 39
Description World War 2 in Europe starting in 1939 with the Russian-German alliance holding
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Genuine39
Good Points
- A different take on WW2 in Europe
Bad Points
- Becomes an East vs West slugfest
-
Name Charles de Gaulle 1939
Description 1939 scenario for global game
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Charles_de_Gaulle_1939
Good Points
- Successful implementation of a 1939 scenario
Bad Points
- The usual problems with the global game, poor AI handling of Japan and political actions
- Small technical glitches (but nothing that interferes with play
-
Name MEWWW-Alliances
Description Conflict in the Middle East and Europe
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Mewww-Alliances
Good Points
- Straightforward rules set
- Not another WW2 game
Bad Points
- Ugly map
- No backstory
-
Name NWO Andrew's
Description World War II in Europe starting in 1939 on the New World Order Map
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/NWO_Andrew's
Good Points
- Straightfoward rules set
Bad Points
- Uphill struggle for Axis
-
Name Hearts of Iron: Awakening the Giant
Description World War 2 on large map starting in 1941
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Hearts_of_Iron:_Awakening_the_giant
**Good Points
- More historically accurate than most games
- US has lots of income but it takes a while to build up forces
- Many interesting unit types
**Bad Points
- The many unit types can confuse the AI
- Some of the units are not well-balanced.
-
Name WWIIv3 1941 Move-Buy-Move
Description WWIIv3 1941 with reordered phases
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/WWIIv3_1941_Move-Buy-MoveGood Points
- Combat movement before purchases speeds up play for both humans and the AI
Bad Points
- The second combat movement phase seems pointless
-
@rogercooper said in Roger's Scenario Thread:
Bad Points
- The second combat movement phase seems pointless
It's not pointless! It is explained in the notes!!!
This game is not about changing the rules, just about making the game easier to play while remaining at least as much rules-compliant as the original one.
Under the current state of the program (or at least the state of the program when the game was made), if you would have combat movement only before purchasement, you would be unable to make air movements which require the possible placement of a new carrier to be validated. Moreover, there is the issue that capturing empty capitals would allow you to use the captured income on the same turn it has been captured, but this is actually a wrong behaviour.
-
For the record, there is an other game-modification, called "WWIIv3 1941 Move-Then-Buy", which has combat movement only before purchasement, and I suppose it addressed the problem I mentioned by having "Kamikaze Airplanes" enabled. However, this obliges the players to be much more careful not to make illegal movements (and to pay attention your adversary does not), to which you should add the problem about what to do if a "kamikaze" movement is detected after combat has been started. Moreover, if my understanding is correct, the game-maker arguably failed to add an explanation in the notes about that unless he or she actually wanted to have "Kamikaze Airplanes" as a "house rule" (in which case I would say he or she failed to clarify that the game-modification is also about this quite major change).
I think "WWIIv3 1941 Move-Buy-Move" is the best compromise you can possibly have for playing the original "WWIIv3" game via the current program.
-
@rogercooper How are you playing this map? It's crashing before it opens for me, and the error reporter says the problem was already logged, so it's no unique to me.
-
@mattbarnes referring to the Hearts of Iron / Awakening map that you recently reviewed.
-
@cernel i actually love move-buy-attack, sometimes, especially when im drinking, i buy the wrong units either by mistake or during movement phase my movements make my purchases-before movement phase stupid. but it never caught on and i hardly even ask to play that version anymore.
-
@mattbarnes said in Roger's Scenario Thread:
@mattbarnes referring to the Hearts of Iron / Awakening map that you recently reviewed.
What version are you running in? I am using the 2.6 prerelease. I have it running on two different computers.
-
@rogercooper 2.5.22294
-
@mattbarnes said in Roger's Scenario Thread:
@rogercooper 2.5.22294
Upgrade to the prerelease version. It is currently working better than 2.5.
-
Name New World Order 1939 Lebowski
Description World War 2 in Europe starting in 1939 on the New World Order Map
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/New_World_Order_1939_Lebowski
Good Points
- Axis is strong enough to fight a two front war
- Reasonably balanced
Bad Points
- 2 PU infantry dominate the game and result in high unit density, many moves each turn and a slow game
- Spain & Turkey are full members of the Axis
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login