Global Dominance
-
@redrum Yeah the Mig 9 was the other option... it just looked kinda boring from a visual standpoint. But really it is neither here nor there.
-
-
@hepps Given the warm reception all the jet fighters have received, perhaps the time is right to reveal the new rockets.
-
All the unit pictures are astonishing quality What is the difference between the two rockets?
-
@frostion Yeah, the Rocket images were long over-due for a revamp. Thanks.
First generation... and Second Generation (Advanced). The second gen. rockets have a bigger payload (more damage) and better accuracy.
-
-
@hepps The big cylinder thing though I don't think I even have a guess to what it is.
-
@redrum You guessed it first try. A big cylinder thing.
-
-
If one wants to be really very (overly?) detailed, it can be said that the jets with a single engine in the tail and with two engines in the wings should be two different units (like bf109 vs bf110) (but then several units would need to be totally invented).
Never read of those towers before. -
BTW all... just to be clear...the Flak Towers were just for shits and giggles.
-
@hepps is that Canuck language?
-
@prastle Might just be Captain Canuck language.
-
@hepps I think you just like big obstructionist objects that might impede things
-
@prastle I guess its because I have one with me everywhere I go. It also fires in an upward direction when a suitable slender target gets within range.
-
-
@hepps explain the requires port part of commerce raider please.
-
@prastle As a special unit the Commerce Raider is still capable of acting as a transport. However it is not equipped to launch Amphibious landings. It would require the nation to already own (or one of her Allies) a territory and have a Port facility present in order to off-load its cargo.
-
@hepps kk I get ya. I was wondering if a port was required for its attack movement. Good stuff!
-
@prastle No those "Port" references are only related to debarcation capabilities.