Global Dominance

[Hepps]

@redrum Here you go...

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE game SYSTEM "game.dtd">
<game>
<info name="Global Dominance: A world in Conflict" version="1.0.0.0"/>
<loader javaClass="games.strategy.triplea.TripleA"/>
<triplea minimumVersion="1.8"/>
<diceSides value="12"/>
<map>

[redrum]

@hepps Oh looks like a good start. Though should probably capitalize the "w" in world and make minimum version 1.9

[Shonn]

Given the large map and the span of turns it should take for a meaningful representation of the war I throw here a bundle of suggestions.

More unit tiers of some type. Like 3 fighters plus jet fighters. TWW in comparison has the base, the improved tech and then the advanced unit. I'd simply make the 'improved' a new type of unit instead of boosting all the existing fighters. I see it as like (hurrican > spitfire > typhoon, or Bf109 > FW190 > TA152 type of thing). That can be done for planes, tanks, and in general costy units.

Garrison troops. 0 moving infantry that can be moved only like the AAs, by trucks and trains. Helps a lot to balance quiet sectors and not have the Allies have an early landing start in the first turns - that in TWW is completely ahistorical - or the overly active Chinese army.

Not having Finland 'winterized' on turn1. Most of Axis troops there if not all of them (Germans included) had winter warfare equipment or were trained for - especially Finns. They should be able to move and the like OR if frozen the Soviets should not be able to make progress in the Finnish sector.

Japan Surprise Bonus - add some 'Kamikaze' units that can boost Japanese attack / soak losses in turn1, with some rule (via document) that can only be used vs UK and USA. That should help to mirror the fact the W.Allies suffered the brunt of the sudden attack.

Coastal defence boats. I am not sure how you plan to handle them - but they could have like 0 movement by default and gain a +2 from ports or so? Or remain at 0 movement to defend the coasts where they're placed in (Think of torpedo boats, coastal gunships, monitors, and the like). It would also be nice to evaluate some 'airfield' alike movement bonus for ships in general.

Doctrines technologies. Some troops can start with determined stats and simply being boosted up via techs to mirror warfare preparations. Ideally as manpower is added, in the grand scope there can also be the significant difference of quantity vs quality. Like - basic infantry can be 1-1-1 (attack - defence - movement) and through various techs (Infantry Tech I, Infantry Tech II, etc - be it a mix of improved equipment, training, doctrine) they ramp up to 1 - 2 - 1, then 2 - 2 - 1, then 2 - 3 - 1 and so forth.

[Hepps]

@shonn said in Global Dominance:

Given the large map and the span of turns it should take for a meaningful representation of the war I throw here a bundle of suggestions.

More unit tiers of some type. Like 3 fighters plus jet fighters. TWW in comparison has the base, the improved tech and then the advanced unit. I'd simply make the 'improved' a new type of unit instead of boosting all the existing fighters. I see it as like (hurrican > spitfire > typhoon, or Bf109 > FW190 > TA152 type of thing). That can be done for planes, tanks, and in general costy units.

I am not planning on adding any new tiers nor new intermediate (improved) unit types. While I would love a system where there were a cost to up-grade each existing unit that becomes "improved" when it ends its turn at an Aircraft Facility (for aircraft) or a Factory (for mechanical units)... there is not really a clean way to do that currently. Simply adding that to the purchase window would make for an even more daunting end of turn process.

Garrison troops. 0 moving infantry that can be moved only like the AAs, by trucks and trains. Helps a lot to balance quiet sectors and not have the Allies have an early landing start in the first turns - that in TWW is completely ahistorical - or the overly active Chinese army.

I toyed with this idea, but abandoned it. Does not mean it may not be resurrected... but at this point I did not see the value in the design.

Not having Finland 'winterized' on turn1. Most of Axis troops there if not all of them (Germans included) had winter warfare equipment or were trained for - especially Finns. They should be able to move and the like OR if frozen the Soviets should not be able to make progress in the Finnish sector.

Lots of things are different in GD. Though I really don't know in how many games the Russians are "active" on turn 1 in Finland.

Japan Surprise Bonus - add some 'Kamikaze' units that can boost Japanese attack / soak losses in turn1, with some rule (via document) that can only be used vs UK and USA. That should help to mirror the fact the W.Allies suffered the brunt of the sudden attack.

There will be no Kamikaze type units. There are some interesting new features for the J1 turn. Guess you will just have to wait and see.

Coastal defence boats. I am not sure how you plan to handle them - but they could have like 0 movement by default and gain a +2 from ports or so? Or remain at 0 movement to defend the coasts where they're placed in (Think of torpedo boats, coastal gunships, monitors, and the like). It would also be nice to evaluate some 'airfield' alike movement bonus for ships in general.

Lots of things going on in the naval warfare aspect. But there will not be any representation for small coastal vessels. In all games I have tried where they have added tiny combat vessels, they just become cheap fodder stacks. They just ruin naval combat in the same way that attacking with 2 aircraft carriers, 4 planes and 16 Sea Transports ruins a game.

However, what I will say is naval movement is FAR more dynamic and that there are many new features that will make the experience very different.

Doctrines technologies. Some troops can start with determined stats and simply being boosted up via techs to mirror warfare preparations. Ideally as manpower is added, in the grand scope there can also be the significant difference of quantity vs quality. Like - basic infantry can be 1-1-1 (attack - defence - movement) and through various techs (Infantry Tech I, Infantry Tech II, etc - be it a mix of improved equipment, training, doctrine) they ramp up to 1 - 2 - 1, then 2 - 2 - 1, then 2 - 3 - 1 and so forth.

There are considerable changes to how the different Infantry groups operate and improve. All will be revealed in time.

Thanks for the suggestions.

[Hepps]

Here is the disposition of American troops defending the Philippines as of December.

[scallen1]

@hepps When are you gonna want some people to test play this?

[Hepps]

@scallen1 Who can say. When its ready I suppose.

[scallen1]

@hepps well I volunteer as tribute - I tend to spends saturdays in the fall watching football all day with my laptop up. If its ready by November I can probably give it a solid saturday of play testing at least.

[ghostronin]

Hola Master Hepps! How goes it?

[Hepps]

@ghostronin I seriously nearly poohed myself.

Yes there has been a bit of a slow down on much of the TA development for me as I am extremely busy ATM. Not to worry. The project is still very much alive and kicking.

[LovePlayingAAA]

Nice to hear, that the project is still alive. So I would like to ask: Maybe next week you publish a version of Global Dominance? Or the week after?:smiling_face_with_open_mouth_smiling_eyes:

[LovePlayingAAA]

<Sonar active> BEEP BEEP BEEP any activity here? Looking for global domination. BEEP BEEP BEEP <Sonar inactive>

[prastle]

@loveplayingaaa Hehe

[ghostronin]

UPDATE - Unsure how to post in-line GIF's rather than images, link here for GIF: https://giphy.com/gifs/1XeGcaJO7q3KwYbnAG

@Hepps @redrum I'm rewatching Game of Thrones right now and couldn't resist the comparison...two amazing universe creators and their audience eager with anticipation /patiently waiting to experience their next creation, e.g. Book 6 - Winds of Winter, Global Domination, etc.

[Hepps]

@ghostronin LMFAO!!! Am I John Snow in this scenario?

[LovePlayingAAA]

Hi,

any news here? When can we expect global dominance for download?

Best
LPAAA

[LovePlayingAAA]

Hi,

this project is still alive or not?

Best
LPAAA

[Hepps]

@LovePlayingAAA Still in development. Bear in mind this represents the most ambitious project in TripleA... not just in scope and scale... but also in the sheer number of elements included.

I don't really do this as a career... so you will simply have to be patient with me on its development. Some nights I feel like working another 4 hours on it... some nights I just want a beer... a Leaf game... and some attention from my wife.

[ubernaut]

@Hepps this looks awesome!

[John Cena]

Is this project still in development? Could you please provide some screenshots or show us how much progress you've made?