TripleA Logo TripleA Forum
    • TripleA Website
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Tags
    • Register
    • Login

    Casualty Auto Selection - Engine Preference To Disable

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Feature Requests & Ideas
    40 Posts 6 Posters 12.8k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • prastleP Offline
      prastle Moderators Admin @prastle
      last edited by

      @prastle as long as hitting space while chatting doesn't confirm the casualty

      If we open a quarrel between past and present, we shall find that we have lost the future! Sir Winston Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Offline
        Cernel Moderators @redrum
        last edited by

        @redrum When I proposed it years ago I had mostly in mind maps like Feudal Japan Warlords, in which it is extremely annoying having to undo the autoselect each time, before selecting.
        The concept of rather improving the autoselect to cover all is a good point, theorically, but, as you see, at the distance of many years AA are still not covered (not saying they should have had, since there are many more important things to do); so, I think, especially in a volunteer based project, an opt out option, to fall back, has a good value.
        Anyways, I'm not playing much of those games lately, so I'm not strong, and I agree that for most people this opt-out would have no value.
        But, again, it may have a value because of that problem of spacebar selecting casualties while you are using it for chatting, but, again, that would be better if solved specifically.
        But, yeah, if everything would be fully covered and nothing would have any problems (like the spacebar chatting / confirming mash up), then you would not want to have this option. Question is, will it always (or should I say ever) be?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • C Offline
          Cernel Moderators @redrum
          last edited by

          @redrum It works for me too, but I think it would be better if generally chatting would not confirm generally, since there are other things that spacebar still confirms, like politic and action proposals, but this is off topic. Mostly, I don't think that is really a solution, because it is kind of easy not spotting it, so you will still have people misclicking at random.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • General_ZodG Offline
            General_Zod Moderators
            last edited by

            @redrum @prastle Problem is if you have it set to use spacebar. While chatting and not looking at game events. The cursor automatically tabs to somewhere on the game interface. This happens on nations turn start for sure, on game start and various notifications that need clicks, and there's a few other times that I don't recall atm. Anyways so while typing for chat, your actually accidently somewhere else on the game interface, clicking away. This includes on the menu as well as what ever various user actions are currently popping up.

            There should be an additional mechanism to keep the cursor in the chat box during the various cases. So then it can truly be avoided.

            prastleP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • prastleP Offline
              prastle Moderators Admin @General_Zod
              last edited by

              @general_zod good point but i am literally reffering to while typing as now my spacebar confirms something... even when on a different webpage

              If we open a quarrel between past and present, we shall find that we have lost the future! Sir Winston Churchill

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • C Offline
                Cernel Moderators @redrum
                last edited by

                @redrum Yah, regarding the negative support, the autoselection is very bad for games like Blue vs. Gray, where it autoselects the inf. crack before the veterans. I would definitely opt it out if playing that game, but obviously if the selection would see that the crack are worth more than the vets, then I would not.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • prastleP Offline
                  prastle Moderators Admin @redrum
                  last edited by

                  @redrum to reiterate something Cernel and I were ignored on years ago but is kinda semi fixed would be to explain in this fashion. DEFAULT settings should be typing cant cause a click!

                  If we open a quarrel between past and present, we shall find that we have lost the future! Sir Winston Churchill

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • redrumR Offline
                    redrum Admin
                    last edited by

                    Uh. There are several different conversation going on here now. Anything that isn't directly related to either disabling default casualty selection or configuration of default casualty selection should probably have a separate thread.

                    TripleA Developer with a Passion for AI: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/105/ai-development-discussion-and-feedback

                    General_ZodG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • General_ZodG Offline
                      General_Zod Moderators @redrum
                      last edited by

                      @redrum Due to some overlapping behaviors and then linking to others. But yes the spacebar chat issue needs its own feature request or bug report.

                      prastleP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • prastleP Offline
                        prastle Moderators Admin @General_Zod
                        last edited by

                        @general_zod naw I'm done with it now ignored then ignored now moving on

                        If we open a quarrel between past and present, we shall find that we have lost the future! Sir Winston Churchill

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C Offline
                          Cernel Moderators @redrum
                          last edited by

                          @redrum Would that optional "slower / perfect" casualty selection you removed have handled the HoH case with negative support attachments @CrazyG is pointing out? Just mostly curious, as I never got to know what that option had to offer.

                          redrumR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • redrumR Offline
                            redrum Admin @Cernel
                            last edited by

                            @cernel Yes, I believe so. It handled enemy support attachments. It still never handled AA though.

                            TripleA Developer with a Passion for AI: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/105/ai-development-discussion-and-feedback

                            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C Offline
                              Cernel Moderators @redrum
                              last edited by

                              @redrum Well, if I knew that handled negative supports, I would have suggested keeping it, but it would have needed a tooltip or something to tell it (and whatever else it offered in exchange for being terribly slow), otherwise very unlikely to figure it out. Still, not much value added, as those thing might get used only by very few power users. Anyways, now that HoH is in the repository, you might consider adding it back, so that @CrazyG might be able to use the BC. 😉

                              redrumR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • General_ZodG Offline
                                General_Zod Moderators
                                last edited by

                                I made a topic for the chat spacebar issue.

                                https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/644/chat-dialouge-lock-mechanism

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • redrumR Offline
                                  redrum Admin @Cernel
                                  last edited by

                                  @cernel It was too slow to really be usable. It was more of an experiment to see how much I could get the calc to cover. I would need a more optimized approach to cover some of the remaining items that it doesn't today in a fashion that finishes in a reasonable amount of time.

                                  TripleA Developer with a Passion for AI: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/105/ai-development-discussion-and-feedback

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C Offline
                                    Cernel Moderators @redrum
                                    last edited by

                                    @redrum I actually used it a bit, even to not managing to understand what it was doing different from the default one, and, while it was like 10 times slower, I would say it was fairly playable, as long as you were not playing a game with massive stacks, and depending on the calculating power of your terminal.
                                    In a case like I mentioned, I think it would definitely be nice to have (sounds like, I've not met the case myself), but up to you; there are very few maps like HoH, for which it would matter.

                                    prastleP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • CrazyGC Offline
                                      CrazyG Moderators
                                      last edited by

                                      The Battlecalc has a very good option to manually set order of losses. What if we got an option to make a default order for a specific map?

                                      This gives some options to fix enemy support issues (it works for HoH at least).

                                      Also its just appearances but I would love it infrastructure units no longer displayed 1 HP in the battle calc.

                                      redrumR prastleP 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • prastleP Offline
                                        prastle Moderators Admin @Cernel
                                        last edited by prastle

                                        @cernel tww broken as you said
                                        stacks NWO not much better

                                        If we open a quarrel between past and present, we shall find that we have lost the future! Sir Winston Churchill

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • redrumR Offline
                                          redrum Admin @CrazyG
                                          last edited by redrum

                                          @crazyg Yeah, the HP battle calc issue is really more of a bug as very few maps use infrastructure that can participate in battles during attacks. Probably better to submit a github issue for it. Most of the time manual OOL will be worse as often unit sets to need weave units to consider support attachments plus things like technology and territoryEffects.

                                          TripleA Developer with a Passion for AI: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/105/ai-development-discussion-and-feedback

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • prastleP Offline
                                            prastle Moderators Admin @CrazyG
                                            last edited by

                                            @crazyg yup it would require each map maker to set the default but a great idea!

                                            If we open a quarrel between past and present, we shall find that we have lost the future! Sir Winston Churchill

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright © 2016-2018 TripleA-Devs | Powered by NodeBB Forums