Feature Requests & Ideas

• 

  AI Development Discussion and Feedback
  • redrum

  96
  1
  Votes
  96
  Posts
  7214
  Views

  

  For beating the Ai, oh I wanted to mention that using Low Luck dice is a massive help and if I didn't use Low Luck dice I bet I would have played way more games trying to beat the Ai so basically Low Luck dice is a bigger help against a machine opponent than a real person I am positive eh?
• 

  Guidelines and Feature Request List
  • redrum

  3
  3
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  678
  Views

  

  ill start a few at a time zoom in yes idle timer yes fix the lag caused by new joiners yes three is enough for now
• 

  Expand UserActionAttachment & PoliticalActionAttachment To All Resources
  • General_Zod

  46
  1
  Votes
  46
  Posts
  1008
  Views

  C

  I see you have already updated "Pact of Steel 2" yourself. So that could have gone out of my list. However, I looked at your changes and saw that now Americans would be able to give British 6 PUs at no cost to themselves, while it used to cost 10 PUs. This pull request should restore the functionality of having the aforementioned action costing 10 PUs for Americans: https://github.com/triplea-maps/the_pact_of_steel/pull/17 In doing it, I went ahead adding the cost info in the button description. I've also put back three commented out not default functionalities (doesn't matter, but I prefer to keep the intended code). @redrum to merge Theorically, people that downloaded this map meanwhile should be told to redownload it, but I'll leave it up to the admins to decide if to update the download number (I made no pull for the yaml).
• B

  Thank You Developers
  • beelee

  1
  4
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  111
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Mini (Me) Map options
  • Hepps

  19
  0
  Votes
  19
  Posts
  296
  Views

  

  Just awesome!!! I just reworked the TWW minimap.... thing is way better than it ever was.
• 

  Unit Icons Added By Conditions
  • redrum

  27
  3
  Votes
  27
  Posts
  507
  Views

  

  PR merged. This can now be tested in the latest pre-release: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/releases/tag/1.9.0.0.10351
• L

  Blitz more like amphibious attacks?
  • liberty_lion

  43
  3
  Votes
  43
  Posts
  1454
  Views

  

  @schulz I feel like the first sentence of this comment means it should end with something like... "This message has been brought to you by the party against single blocker units".
• 

  Unit Option Can Submerge/Hide for Land Units (Partisan/Guerrilla/Spy/Diplomat/Munition)
  • Hepps

  18
  0
  Votes
  18
  Posts
  763
  Views

  

  @hepps More like a capitalistic way for him to appropriately prioritize which gardens to tend...
• S

  Blitz in non-combat
  • Schulz

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  157
  Views

  C

  @schulz This is partially a duplicate of (or at least much overlapping) this other topic: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/657/blitz-more-like-amphibious-attacks
• C

  Increasing regular dice default run count
  • Cernel

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  141
  Views

  No one has replied

• C

  Hide Unused Options From Default Tooltips
  • Cernel

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  183
  Views

  C

  @general_zod Yeah. I considered this too. There are a bunch of other reasons, as well; for example, customized tooltips don't work with technology (if you have a map where a unit may get better for a tech, you can't really customize its tooltip).
• 

  More design info
  • Mahks

  2
  0
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  120
  Views

  

  After sleeping on it, I think the credits should be left to the HTML notes. So the proposed info tag could just be : <info name="Age of Tribes: Primeval" version="1.0.7" created='2016.03.06' updated='2018.01.02'/>
• D

  This topic is deleted!
  • Dedbit2445

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  4
  Views

  No one has replied

• R

  Victory Points
  • RogerCooper

  8
  2
  Votes
  8
  Posts
  264
  Views

  

  @hepps then once a map had a system the results could be standardized.
• 

  Resource System Assessment and Improvements
  • redrum

  38
  2
  Votes
  38
  Posts
  3361
  Views

  

  @cernel Yeah I do something similar in my "Bad-Ass 4-Nation FFA" tech tokens are purchased during the purchase phase. One could add resources there in addition to PUs cost. But the level of luck hat a typical technology model uses, ruins the game imo. There should be very little luck, if any at all, when the often typical game changing, overpowered and unbalanced technologies are involved. Tackling all resource related improvement in one shot, sounds like a big job. I would be very happy with the simple fixes which I proposed above as first intermediate steps. @general_zod said in Resource System Assessment and Improvements: This method is not only ideal for userAction and politcalAction, but would definitely reduce the amount of code needed as compared to checking conditions and making triggers to replicate what is already elegantly achieved. (currently with "costPU" method). This being said, I am still, all for a separate option, with the ability to check resources in separate conditions which can be used anywhere (non userAction/politcalAction areas ideally). And if this method turns out to update resources instantly, I guess doing things the long way will be better than not doing them at all.
• 

  AI - Improve Neutral Categorization
  • redrum

  16
  0
  Votes
  16
  Posts
  471
  Views

  C

  Ooooooooooooh it because they fear to lose the capital! Well, actually, in Feudal Japan you cannot directly go from war to allied, and practically I've never seen players coordinate for canopeners, nor I think it is really something you worry about. @redrum I agree that Feudal Japan has several issues and it is kind of silly, also tendentially very hard to balance, due to the linear island shape, but, compared with what we have, it is surely one of the best FFA of TripleA. Of course, it is playable only if the humans are in the minority, if only for balancing reasons. I think this problem would be fixed by adding 2 castles in each capital (for a total of 3), which I actually believe would be good anyways, giving some anti-stomping margin. If I would do this change (only), would you merge it? This is a 20 rounds savegame with the 3 castles setup; it looks fine enough: 0_1524681495796_20180425_Feudal Japan_AI(Fast)_02.tsvg
• L

  AA revised - possible upgrades
  • LouisXIVXIV

  20
  0
  Votes
  20
  Posts
  698
  Views

  

  @cernel they never supported that because it would affect all maps for only one maps ruling would be my guess.
• W

  Income and Bonus Income copied with Alliance button
  • wc_sumpton

  2
  1
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  128
  Views

  C

  Yah. Having to write it down for each player I believe is the main drawback of the new bonus system, as I pointed out. Tho probably a way to assign it to all players sharing the same type would cover better, like in case you solo a FFA with many players. Following your proposal, rather better the button just sharing all possible settings for the player amongst the alliance; also easier to document in the tooltip.
• 

  Zero Cost Production
  • theredbaron

  17
  0
  Votes
  17
  Posts
  391
  Views

  

  @redrum Thanks for doing this, it works quite well. I will put it to good use. @Cernel That sounds like a good solution, to remove (or limit) the max button for zero cost purchases. We shall see if abuse of this feature becomes a problem once a map-maker implements it and we can see how players use it.
• 

  Filter unread alert
  • Mahks

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  195
  Views

  

  That ignore option with the category does the trick, Thanks!