Roger's Scenario Thread

[RogerCooper]

Name 1939A Historical-Revised
Description World War 2 starting 1939 on the Revised map
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/1939A_Historical-Revised

Good Points

• Fast-playing

Bad Points

• An uphill fight for the Axis

[RogerCooper]

Name Britannia: Roman Invasion v2
Description The Roman invasion of Britain
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Britannia:_Roman_Invasion_v2

Good Points

• Interesting strategic situation
• Historically-themed units

Bad Points

• The British income advantage overwhelms the powerful Roman start
• There is no sense of the logistical limitations of the British tribes which allowed the Romans to defeat them in detail

[RogerCooper]

Name Age of Tribes: Primeval
Description A 4X game of conquering Europe
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Age_of_Tribes:_Primeval

Good Points

• Period-specific units
• Interesting tech rules

Bad Points

• The East vs West alliance structure makes for dull head-butting battles

[RogerCooper]

Name Second World War
Description The Second World War on a large world map starting in late 1941
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Second_World_War

Good Points

• Straightfoward rules set
• Low unit density

Bad Points

• Russia is too weak, falling too quickly before the Western Allies can pressure the Axis.

[Cernel]

@rogercooper Naples is the capital of Italy?

(And I think that it should be forbidden to have map names which are just the generic names of any wars, be it "Second World War" or "Great War".)

[RogerCooper]

@cernel Lots of maps put the capital of Italy effectively in Naples, because Rome is too close to the boundary between Northern Italy and Southern Italy.

This is the only mod that starts "Second World War". That is less confusing than all the mods starting with "World War II".

This could have been a really a good mod with better balancing.

[RogerCooper]

Name NWO Vichy 1941
Description World War 2 in Europe with Vichy France treated as full Axis member and Canada is separate.
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/NWO_Vichy

Good Points

• Reasonably balanced
• Straightfoward unit set
• Reasonable unit density

Bad Points

• It can be a long game

[board 3659]

@RogerCooper Is there any maps that you have changed your mind on in terms of enjoyment?
(I also wouldn't mind a sort of quick list of your favorite to least favorite maps)

[RogerCooper]

@board-3659 I can't really say I changed my mind dramatically on a map. As the AI has gotten better and my computer has gotten faster, I respond more favorably to large maps.

I don't like the idea of ranking and rating maps. All maps have good and bad features.

I will highlight a few maps which try to do things a little differently with success. The Grand War is relatively small scale map with completely divergent alternate history. WW2 Path to Victory improves on the WW2 Global Game. The Shogun Advanced tries to make the Sengoku period as it really was, a war of mountain passes and fortresses.

[RogerCooper]

Name World at War
Description World War II starting in 1939 on a large world map
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/World_At_War

Good Points

• Conflict all over the map
• Reasonably balanced
• Unit density is reasonable
• Losing a capital does not knock a nation out of the war
• AI plays fairly well, transports have a defense factor

Bad Points

• Large map makes for a long game
• It can be hard to really defeat a major power
• A lot of ahistorical map anomalies

[board 3659]

@rogercooper Have you reviewed any maps that are 1600s era? I know Caribbean Trade War but I really think a Thiry Years War Map would be cool

[RogerCooper]

@board-3659 The only TripleA scenarios set in the 17th century involve Sengoku-period Japan. The Thirty Years War might make for a good scenario. I always like something other than another WW2 scenario.

[RogerCooper]

Name 41 Oztea Island
Description Global game starting in 1941 with better balance and objectives for Pacific islands.
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/41_Oztea_Island

Good Points

• Reasonably balanced
• Action starts right away for everyone

Bad Points

• No major problems

[board 3659]

I am curious if you have reviewed Civil War: A House Divided. I say I like it even if it has a pretty steep learning curve even for a veteran of Axis and Allies-styled games. Idk how balanced it is but I won with US and CSA once each on fast ai

[RogerCooper]

@board-3659 I don't think it is playable by the AI with all the complex unit types.

[board 3659]

@rogercooper it is. I did "lose" once but that was due to having no idea on the rule set. However, once you get a basic idea of it, yeah the AI just isn't really the best at it. It can halt your progress but I never felt too overwealmed

[RogerCooper]

Name Aggression 1939
Description World War 2 starting in 1939 on a world map, with upkeep costs and other rules changes.
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Aggression_1939

Good Points

• Upkeep costs are realistic and keep unit density reasonable
• Nations enter the war in a historical fashion
• Cheap aircraft with limited effect, alter combat dynamics in an interesting way
• You can only build in your home factories, making logistics more significant

Bad Points

• It is hard for the Axis to build up any momentum
• The inability to build new factories restricts strategic choices

[RogerCooper]

Name Six Army 2 Alliance
Description An abstract struggle between 2 alliances on the Revised map
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Six_Army_2_Alliance

Good Points

• Not just another WW2 game
• Straightforward rules set

Bad Points

• Everyone starts with a big opening bid, which throws off the AI

Note: If playing against the AI, don't build anything in the bid phase, holding onto the PU's.

[RogerCooper]

Name Middle Earth-Battle for Arda
*Description * The War of the Ring, on large map
https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Middle_Earth_-_Battle_for_Arda

Good Points

• Beautiful map
• Interesting unit interactions and terrain rules
• Reasonably balanced

Bad Points

• AI has some trouble with this (turning off the mountain restriction helps)
• Feels too much like WW2 in Middle Earth

[board 3659]

@rogercooper I think Battle of Adra and other Middle Earth maps tend to be hit with the WW2 game style the most. I think that they really should feel more like Medival/Renaissance-style warfare with unique units tbh.

I think part of it is the lack of a late-entry dynamic. I think one of the official board games does this and it's a really interesting mechanic for the Good/Valor side.

Anyway, I seen people also complain that Angmar is too weak and gets easily crushed

{Note this is likley an older version I am referring to since it seems like Angmar and Isengard got buffed)