-
0 Votes14 Posts4k Views
-
0 Votes26 Posts11k Views
-
0 Votes14 Posts5k Views
-
0 Votes22 Posts9k Views
-
0 Votes5 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes3 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes4 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes8 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes4 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes2 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes3 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes2 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes6 Posts3k Views
-
0 Votes1 Posts1k Views
Recent Posts
-
I may have already found part of the answer to my own question in the following code:
<attachment name="playerAttachment" attachTo="British" javaClass="games.strategy.triplea.attachments.PlayerAttachment" type="player"> <option name="shareTechnology" value="UK_Pacific"/> <option name="helpPayTechCost" value="UK_Pacific"/> <option name="retainCapitalNumber" value="2"/> <option name="destroysPUs" value="false"/> </attachment>Except that I'm not sure it actually works; as it currently only accepts payment from the UK_Pacific and not the British.
-
I would like to fully separate the British and the UK_Pacific units and turns with the exception of their Tech Development. What is the simplest way to achieve that?
Perhaps what we really need is more than one type of tech development phases: Allied or Axis tech development where the research is pooled and shared by all members of an alliance; National tech development where only but all players of that nation pool and share their advances; and Player tech development that remains specific to that player.
Either that or a tech brokering phase where one can give or sell their tech advances to other players.
-
I think the XOB file format is escaped. We may need to take another stab at exporting the data.
-
huh. so what's adding the weird prefix?
maybe try commenting out line 9 & 10?