Middle Earth: Battle For Arda - Official Thread
-
@zlefin Nice catch! They are coded to have wilderness preference.
-
@redrum said in Middle Earth: Battle For Arda - Official Thread:
I think the only major thing that you still might want to consider addressing further are 4 move land units
I've been thinking about this. A major issue is that we didn't actually see most of those units in play.
But we can nerf them, it will likely be a move towards balance, not away from it.- Dúnadan lancers: movement 4 -> 3
- Variag raider: cost 7 -> 8
- Scout: cost 5 -> 6
- Éorling rider: movement 4 -> 3
- Éothéod cavalry: movement 4 -> 3
- Rohirric scout: cost 7 -> 8
- Elven cavalry: cost 7 -> 8, defense 2 -> 3
- Warg rider: stays as is (I didn't want to buff them yet, but they didn't feel very strong. Their wilderness preference is inconvenient for Angmar. Orcs were busy building warg scouts.)
Note that for now I don't plan to buff units. Also the immediate goal is not fine-tuning units; the dynamics of the game is still going to change a lot in this version, maybe even the next.
"For the world is changing: I feel it in the water, I feel it in the earth, and I smell it in the air."
-
@alkexr Cool. I think those changes look like a step in the right direction and yeah until things settle a bit more, we can't really fine tune.
-
@alkexr
Im really liking the idea on the Neutrals.
Good change for the Flyers as this keeps most of them out of my lists below.Consider the following;
Warships like the Dromund moving 3 as it is rower and sail powered.
Cavalry transport cost 1 -> 2
Creature transport cost 1 -> 3+, some like the Oliphant could be 99, so it cannot be transported by sea.
This requires that transport carrying capacity increases.For what it is worth as we calculate PUs differently, I have the following PU suggestions;
(These do take into consideration your proposed changes.)
However with the proposed changes in the size of starting armies, Leadership has lost some of its value.Top 3 differences are;
winged_nazgul 30 -> 47, difference of 17
nazgul 18 -> 27, difference of 9
wizard 20 -> 29, difference of 9Increase PU of;
olog_hai 20 ->24
swan_knight 12 ->19
wainrider_chieftain 14 ->18
kings_company 11 ->18Decrease PU of;
fire_of_orthanc 14 ->12
This is hard to value as it is a suicide unit, but I think it is currently overvalued. I think it closer to 8 PU, but that is too much of a change for now.The PU suggestions are just that, suggestions.
Once again, thanks to all involved, for all the hard work!
-
@alkexr said in Middle Earth: Battle For Arda - Official Thread:
Visual
- Remove PUs from the reliefs and add PU placements ( @Hepps I will add the placements if you give me the relief without PUs and the PU images.)
Yes, be sure to do that. While I understand putting the territory effect display in relief, as that is the only way to have them fancy, having the PUs is relief is potentially an even bigger issue, both for developing and modding the map. If you want to save time, just make a decoration covering the whole map, having the PUs images, that is much easier to manage (very minor basic graphic skills required and no surging needed) and will display also with map details off (as PUs info should).
- Tweak Dol Guldur and Gondor colors
I don't see any need to change Gondor. Dol Guldur, just have it exactly in the middle of the colours of Mordor and Saruman (currently, it seems a bit too closer to Mordor). I have to say that, for a map featuring 16 different players and neutrals, and also colour based units, colours have been close to excellently selected. It is a huge challenge to be distinctive with 17 different players plus the sea, and there are maps around that have distinctiveness issues with half or less that number (pretty much, if you go to 20+ players, then you cannot anymore distinguish with colours, as there is no way you can have all distinctive with each other, thus you would need to have flags everywhere and units with flags or anyways not colour based, talking also to those suggesting to add more players to the map).
- Ask @Cernel about this thing with map blends
I see that you are already using blends to overlay, meaning mostly mixing the base with the relief (albeit that applies more to the normal setting, as overlay has also other effects, that make the relief somewhat more defined or grittier looking and sharpen the transparency differences) that, as the base behind the territories being white, it basically manily means you are whitening the map a bit.
You prefer having that?
Anyways, if you are fine with losing that available effect, in favour of a darkening one, you can substitute the relevant lines with this:
map.mapBlends=false
map.mapBlendMode=LINEAR_LIGHT
map.mapBlendAlpha=0.2This will allow mostly to darken the board a bit, by ticking "View/Show Map Blends", for people that prefer so, and also being able to keep switching during the course of the game, while keeping the default at its own bright colourful glory.
- Remove placement hack and add dont_show_units
Low priority, now that the stable is out, but a nice clean up to be made, since I feel responsible for being always the one suggesting the dirty hacks.:winking_face:
- Flip Eorling riders (to make them easier to tell from King's Company)
Nah, let them cavalry all face the same direction. Add a pennant to the lance of the King's Company, if that makes sense. Also, should the King's Company have the biggest horses? Also I believe everything being different should have a different image, the colours just telling a different ownership story; meaning I suggest making some changes to either "raider" or "variag_raider" (also, if feasible, changing "raider" to a name not being a subset of "variag_raider", so that you can talk about those without the risk of confusion).
Bug fixes
- Carn Dum, Mount Gundabad and Wellinghall don't have settlement territory effect
Now here I could use that feature request by @zlefin.
Also add that Ethir Anduin doesn't have the marsh graphic in relief.
It's important you get everything right here, since the territory effects are on the relief; so basically you can only change them by remaking the relief. Hopefully the players of this map will report anything the like they might spot.- (EDIT) The names of "Rhudaur", "West Rhudaur", "Helm's Deep", "Treebeard's Hill" are misspelled ("Rhunaur", "West Rhundaur", "Helms Deep", "Treebeards Hill"), the former two only on the relief ( @Hepps yet again - only if that's not too much trouble)
Oh no! The names are on the relief too. I understand that doing it the proper way is a lot of work on top of already a lot of work, but, in this case, I suggest making a decoration image covering the whole board, where to have the names (much better and practical, at no additional workload). If going this way, I suggest such decoration having whatever the like (PUs etc.), meaning not using this method more than once, as having multiple decorations covering the whole board would slow down loading times.
-
@cernel Also, I recall that veqryn told me (not in forum tho) to avoid having apostrophes in the names, or anything referenced to the user really, as, in his opinion, it might have given problems to some. He didn't explain better, so just saying in case this is of any relevance, and I'm curious to know more on the matter, in case anybody knows. Feel free to ignore, as veqryn didn't explain me specifically what might have been these problems, and I definitely would go with "Helm's Deep" as well, if no major problems in most cases.
-
Experimenting with the color of Dol Guldur...
How quickly can you notice the stray Mordor army?
-
@alkexr Definitely better.
-
@alkexr All of the territory spelling mistakes are fixed and the missing swamp images have been added to the reliefs.
I am working on removing all the PU from the map now.
-
Okay so I finished the planned changes. I also made some other changes, most importantly snaga skirmishers got nerfed (cost 4 -> 5, attack 2 -> 3).
https://github.com/triplea-maps/battle_for_arda/archive/development.zip
@redrum you may want to have a quick look at the balance before the next round of game(s).
-
Version 2.0.7 is online, next round of games can commence any time now. I think I can try up to two games at once this time. @epinikion you are the next in line if you want a game, since you've already asked for it quite some time ago.
-
not that it means much as a baseline, but on hard ai only games, the good side consistently wins in this newer version.
-
hey alkexr, yeah that would be fun. can you make it to the lobby? Or should we start pbem? my email is epinikionrevised@gmail.com.
best, epi
-
hey, i updated the map
now i get an error loading a file with the previous version. Any help?thx, epi
-
this is the file i cant open any more since i updated to new version. Wassmuss and me are very thankful for any help!
thank you in advance,
epi
-
@alkexr Looks like some territories are missing centers:
No data of type centers for territory: Helms Deep No data of type centers for territory: Lands of the Balcoth No data of type centers for territory: Treebeards HillWere these renamed or are they actually missing?
-
@epinikion It is almost certainly because some territory names were changed between versions, so you (both) need to get back the old map, if you want to keep playing it.
It would be good if there is a way to warn users when a version they download is breaking backward compatibility with the one they have installed (and might have savegames of).
In general, better never updating maps when you have any savegames to finish.
The way to change names while granting backward compatibility is to keep all the old entries in the folders, but this is kind of a dirty solution, as it keeps around a lot of useless entries (maybe for the years to come), and, anyways, it is up to the mapmakers to do it, and it is sometimes just impossible (like in the case you are using for some territory a name previously assigned to another one).
-
thank you cernel
-
@epinikion I have played neither in the lobby nor PBEM yet, so I'll need help setting the game up. We can start it now, but I'm having busy days, so I won't be able to make my move until around Thursday.
I prefer default rules, except Low Luck and Low Luck for AA on. Choose your side.
-
hey alkexr, i have send you an email. so you have my mailadress. for pbem is an easy manuel at this website. short description: 1. register your emailadree at marti-dicserver. its free 2. start the trpleasoftware. 3. choose play by mail 4. enter your and mine emailadress 5. start playing. 6. Saver after your move and 7. send me the file (this could be also automatic). then i load the file, move my turn save , send file to you and so on. all dice rolls will be send by marti to both players. We also can play by forum but for this i need some help for the setup, bc i never did before
your settings are fine for me, i will choose evil, looking forward
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login