@RogerCooper said in How to diversify USA strategies in WWII maps?:
It may be obviously the Atlantic, but try the Pacific sometimes. If no one fights the Japanese, they can get a tremendous income and then overrun Russia from the east.
The Global 1940 game has the possibility of the Axis winning on either side of the map, to the Americans can't ignore either front.
A less subtle solution is to have separate American incomes for each front like UK-Pacific in the Global game.
The most realistic solution would be to constrain the growth in the US ability to transport forces across oceans and give the US naval parity in the Pacific. Then the Americans would fight the Japanese at sea in the Pacific while building up for a European campaign.
I mean the US player should be free whatever he/she want, they would be able to full force go to Atlantic or Pacific BUT these should not be optimum strategies. USA should be forced to split its resources between Atlantic and Pacific if they want to win games.
Separating American incomes for each front like UK-Pacific is great idea but it still wouldn't totally prevent the US conducting only one front unless we remove connections between east and west US.