Navigation

    TripleA Logo

    TripleA Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • TripleA Website
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Tags

    Fighters landing on carriers being built

    Player Help
    6
    14
    850
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • James McMullan
      James McMullan last edited by

      Hello.

      I am playing G40 Balanced - Balance Mod 3.3 with Combat Move first. Currently, the United States has some naval units blockading Japan.

      As Japan, is it legal to move fighters to the sea zone in Japan for combat if they need all 4 movement points to get there as long as the Japan player is purchasing carriers at the end of the turn? The game prevents the Japanese player from making this move, but I can't find clarification in the rules as to whether this should be disallowed or not.

      Here is a visual of the situation.

      Thank you for your time.

      ubernaut Panther T 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ubernaut
        ubernaut Moderators @James McMullan last edited by ubernaut

        @James-McMullan yes i believe so even though the engine is not allowing it, but perhaps someone else has a more informed opinion. 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ubernaut
          ubernaut Moderators last edited by

          @redrum @Panther thought i would ping the two of you since this seems to be a pretty major undiscovered oversight if im not mistaken.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • B
            beelee last edited by

            Yea I just noticed that on 20234. It seems as if i only use 1 ftr it lets me move correctly but if I use 2 it doesn't. I'm gonna do a little more testing then make a git issue

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Panther
              Panther Admin Moderators @James McMullan last edited by Panther

              @James-McMullan This is a known problem of the "Combat Move first" - game.
              At the time of moving, the engine does not "know" that you will purchase a fighter later (after moving).

              In regular games (purchase before moving) this issue does not occur and the situation is resolved correctly.

              It has been discussed in a Github-issue, that I will search when I find some time for it.

              James McMullan 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • James McMullan
                James McMullan @Panther last edited by

                @Panther Thank you so much--I figured Combat Move first was causing the issue; but I wasn't actually sure you were allowed to fight with planes that have to land on a newly built character. So in the meantime, it would be legal for my player to "Edit mode" the fighters into the battle (although it turns out you need to edit mode some carriers in, then the fighters, then delete the carriers, but it can be done) as long as he committed to purchasing the required number of carriers as if every plane survived, right?

                Panther 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • T
                  tinfoil666 @James McMullan last edited by

                  @James-McMullan

                  Are you sure that this is not correct behavior?

                  Depending on the map,

                  If placements are done before movement, then, during the movement phase (before or after combat), there can be platforms there to hold the fighters.

                  If placements are done AFTER combat / after-combat movement, then there are no such carriers there by the end of those movement phases. How can a fighter land on a carrier that is not there yet? Aircraft losses due to no landing point would be resolved BEFORE any placements take place.

                  Placements are distinct phases from movement. One has to be done before the other can begin.

                  Panther C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Panther
                    Panther Admin Moderators @James McMullan last edited by

                    @James-McMullan Correct, you need to enforce the result by using Edit Mode.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Panther
                      Panther Admin Moderators @tinfoil666 last edited by

                      @tinfoil666 BM is following the core G40 2nd ed. rules. Combat Move First here is not intended to change core rules, but implemented for "convenience reasons" only. Some players simply prefer moving before purchasing (for whatever reasons).

                      ubernaut 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ubernaut
                        ubernaut Moderators @Panther last edited by

                        @Panther battle outcomes could affect purchasing decisions.

                        Panther 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Panther
                          Panther Admin Moderators @ubernaut last edited by Panther

                          @ubernaut said in Fighters landing on carriers being built:

                          @Panther battle outcomes could affect purchasing decisions.

                          Here it is:
                          Combat Move
                          Purchase Units
                          Conduct Combat

                          instead of:
                          Purchase Units
                          Combat Move
                          Conduct Combat

                          I am not familiar with other maps with CM first, though, so only arguing for this specific map.

                          ubernaut 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ubernaut
                            ubernaut Moderators @Panther last edited by

                            @Panther yeah buying before combat definitely requires a more conservative approach. 🙂

                            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              Cernel Moderators @ubernaut last edited by

                              @ubernaut said in Fighters landing on carriers being built:

                              @Panther yeah buying before combat definitely requires a more conservative approach. 🙂

                              If by "combat" you mean "Conduct Combat", what I believe @Panther is telling you is that both phases orders are having you "buying before combat" (not sure what you mean, instead, if by "combat" you mean "Combat Move").

                              Really, everyone putting a "Combat Move" phase before the "Purchase Units" phase for merely convenience reasons should take care fully to document the matter in notes, like I did in my v3 modifications. 😔

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                Cernel Moderators @tinfoil666 last edited by

                                @tinfoil666 said in Fighters landing on carriers being built:

                                @James-McMullan

                                Are you sure that this is not correct behavior?

                                Depending on the map,

                                If placements are done before movement, then, during the movement phase (before or after combat), there can be platforms there to hold the fighters.

                                If you mean the actions you do during the "Mobilize Units" phase, "placements" are done after both "movement" phases in both cases, here. So, in both cases, there is no "platform" to hold any fighter, yet.

                                If placements are done AFTER combat / after-combat movement, then there are no such carriers there by the end of those movement phases. How can a fighter land on a carrier that is not there yet? Aircraft losses due to no landing point would be resolved BEFORE any placements take place.

                                They can because the rules says so since v2 LHTR. First of all, the fighters don't necessarily end their movement during the "Combat Move" phase, and, in fact, they often do so during the "Non Combat Move" phase. Secondarily, the "Non Combat Move" phase is still before the "Mobilize Units" phase, but this is irrelevant, as the fighters land only at the end of the "Mobilize Units" phase, so they are still hovering the zone, waiting for the needed carrier to be placed under them. Ending movement and landing are two different actions: You don't land when you end your movement (unless the rules say so, which they don't, since v2 LHTR).

                                Placements are distinct phases from movement. One has to be done before the other can begin.

                                Correct, but here "movement" doesn't matter. What matters is "landing", that is not part of any "Move" phase and it is, in fact, part of the "Mobilize Units" phase, instead, happending at the end of it.

                                @Panther Please correct me if I got anything wrong.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • 1 / 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright © 2016-2018 TripleA-Devs | Powered by NodeBB Forums