• This topic is deleted!

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    19 Views
  • Alagaësia

    49
    2
    4 Votes
    49 Posts
    35k Views
    alkexrA
    Version 1.0 released, uploaded to map repository. Updated the first post in this thread to reflect this.
  • Axis and Allies 1914 Map

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    mezzaM
    @panther Thanks! Hopefully someone will be able to make a workable version.
  • Conversions to Version 1.9

    100
    2 Votes
    100 Posts
    76k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @rogercooper Everything I have has been converted. I will leave it to others to put these in the repository.
  • question about TWW

    Moved
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    P
    @hepps gigglez
  • i need someone who can help me develop a new game

    Moved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @seancb Can you post your rules & setup?
  • Unit Browser

    22
    0 Votes
    22 Posts
    9k Views
    MahksM
    @general_zod Got the support bonuses working: UBr Update Filters may be configured under "Settings" (Not 100% happy with those yet) The techAttachments do not look like they will be useful. Since they are dependant on whether the player has the tech or not, it would be hard to display, unless there is a popup with all techs switched on, but ... messy...
  • Global 1940 2nd Ed. Revised_Combat Move First

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @drbrunch Hi dr It's mostly a personal preference thing. NWO uses it. Their reasoning was for when you have AAguns shooting at air units during flyovers in CM, you would know before purchase if you lost any air. As far as the mod goes, if it's RD 4, Russia can attack regardless of the phase order. Suppose the Game Notes could be updated to reflect that.
  • WWII v3 1942

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    SchulzS
    @deltium I would like prefer to play the it via the lobby if possible. I don't know how to PBEM, I used to try it but I was unsuccesfull during the v341 tournament.
  • Non Combat Move - Disable issue

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    MahksM
    @general_zod resetUnitStateAtEnd fixed it thanks!
  • Terra Firma 1939

    40
    4 Votes
    40 Posts
    17k Views
    redrumR
    @oda Overall, definitely a step in the right direction. I think you have at least a good core unit set now and the infrastructure portion is pretty interesting. I think just layering on a few more of the features you have planned then starting to get some games going to test balance is a good approach. If you have any questions on the XML or would like feedback on any particular areas just let me know.
  • neuschwabenland flags mystery

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    General_ZodG
    @mahks To expand on above explanations. If the game located in C:\username/triplea/downloadedMaps/*gamename*/map is lacking an image or sound file. It will look in the following location. Which is the TripleA engine's installed location. The typical install location for the triplea engine and the "assets" folders are below. C:\Program Files/TripleA v.1.9.x.x.xxx/assets flags misc resources sounds units territoryEffects (this one is missing now?)
  • WWII v3 1941 Mod

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    General_ZodG
    @schulz Well if your interested in testing out the balance with my suggestions let me know. It will surely require more tweaks. As current balance goes it is terrible imo, thus why allies need 13 to 15 bid. And even with bid strategies are limited due to NO's.
  • World War I 1914

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    SchulzS
    Yes. I have recerched them. I was looking for widely accepted house rules. Also honestly I'd prefer to chance IPC powers for to achieve balance instead of house rules.
  • Has Anyone Tried To Make World War I Larry Harris Game?

    Moved
    41
    0 Votes
    41 Posts
    21k Views
    SchulzS
    It works right now. Thanks.
  • World War I 1914 Map By Zim Zero and Colonel Carter Question

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    I tried it two times and got rid of it after failing.
  • Defiance In The Desert Game

    Moved
    13
    1 Votes
    13 Posts
    4k Views
    HeppsH
    @captain-crunch @beelee Not sure but I remember watching Baa Baa Black sheep as well.
  • UNDER SIEGE: America

    22
    1 Votes
    22 Posts
    11k Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @general_zod said in UNDER SIEGE: America: @wc_sumpton The American AI struggles a lot, with 3 human invaders as well. However we didn't use any of the game options that may help AI America, since there were no notes on it. Plus I wanted to see how it plays without those first. I made a couple other observations on the max 5 unit. It causes movement validation issues during NCM. Even with air units flying over an already maxed out territory, can't. This really sucks if they are returning from combat. It forces edits and redoing moves. It is completely ignored during CM. So a territory can end with way more than 5 units after combat. I like the 5 unit limit, but the above bother me a bit. Not sure if they can be worked out. As a whole, nice job. Thank you for your feed back. Try using the Fast AI as the Americans. It still does some 'stupid' moves, but it feels more aggressive and seems to play a better game. There are really only two options that change gameplay when using the Americans as the AI 1)'No Reinforcement' and no one gets reinforcements, 2)'Add 1 Extra American Reinforcement/TechRoll' which gives 3 Tech Rolls at the end of every turn instead of 2. When the game detects an AI it sets up the rules for that player. American AI gets 1) 'Add American Reinforcements to Purchase' - All reinforcements are add to the Americans so no purchasing is required. (AI has problems purchasing when 'maxBuiltPerPlayer' is set.) 2) The Americans can place the 'Strike Tokens' anywhere. Pre-placing them like they are done with a human player cause the AI not to touch them. For the Invader AI, they use a random schedule reinforcement pool to bring in their reinforcements (Because of the purchasing problem). 2 first) During CM any unit that can enter a contested area may do so. So yes 'stacking limits' are ignored. Since units that moved during CM can not move during NCM there will be more the 5 units there. When moving out of the territory, the stacking limits will apply. (Makes for a tough counter attack by the other team. lol) 1 second) Moving of air during NCM. Air unit don't really 'fly over' a territory in tripleA, they enter every territory they move into, also since the Battle has already happened, air units can not fly over/enter into a controlled territory that already has 5 friendly units, the movement stacking rules apply in this case, and by the rules would need to move around those territories. (A trigger to remove stacking limits for air units during NCM would allow air units to stack more the 5 units in a territory. Since stacking is check only during placement, movement, and attacking (which is not use here), there is no way to inforce stacking 'after movement' into a territory except during movement.) -- hope this helps I think I talk about both points in the 'Notes' 2 under 'Combat Movement' and 1 in the etc... section at the bottom. About the 'AI rules' maybe a pop-up to other player explaining what happens? I open for suggestions... Again thanks for taking the time to play, and you comments are most welcome!! Cheers...
  • Amazing what you can find when you can't find something

    4
    1
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    General_ZodG
    @hepps While looking around for something else, I stumbled into this. I love this look for the revised map upgrade. It's not too busy and pops nicely. @hepps said in Amazing what you can find when you can't find something: Forgot about most of this from some time ago... was looking for something I misplaced for 270 BC and came across an old package of stuff for a Domination MOD. [image: 0_1500871147235_AOE example.png] LMAO... forgot about that MOD entirely. I may be bugging you soon on tips to recreate the look.

Recent Posts

  • I tested this to the game ends. No one builds anything,

    read more

  • Step 5 Assign alliances

    There will to be two alliances "Aggressor" and "Status Quo" The Aggressor alliance is attempting to reorder the world through military force, while the Status Quo is trying to resist that.

    As I am not trying to track the ideologies you can assume that unlikely alliances are probably the result of ideological conflicts and similarities.

    The first step is to determine the lead aggressor. The lead aggressor is randomly chosen from the major countries. The lead aggressor goes first and will receive more units.

    Next the lead status quo power is chosen from the remaining major countries. The lead status quo power receives extra resources.

    The remaing major and medium powers are randomly assigned as follows

    50% Status Quo 30% Aggressor 10% Victim 10% Impassable

    The "Victim" nation is a passive member of the Status Quo alliance. It is neutral with regards to the rest of the Status Quo alliance and at war with the Aggessor alliance. The Status Quo alliance can't assist the "Victim" but if the liberate a territory they don't need to return it. Each turn the lead Status Quo power receives a bonus of 1 PU for every Victim-held territory. Note that is major or medium power has been reassigned to the victim nation, that means it is in civil war or some other internal disorder.

    The "Impassable" nation is neutral to everyone and out of play.

    There is a 50% change of delayed entry of each Status Quo nation and a 25% change of delayed entry for each Aggessor nation (other than the lead aggressor). The delayed entry nation comes in a randomly chosen turn between 2 and 5 at the start of the lead aggressor turn. It is possible that every Status Quo nation is delayed entry, allowing the lead aggessor to focus on victims.

    Historically, there was one territorial dispute directly involving major & medium countries, Alsace-Lorraine. Ethnically German but historically French it would be difficult (but not impossible) to resolve the dispute and conflict is likely. There will be a 30% chance that Germany is lead aggressor, while France is a status quo power that is active immediately. This will probably not work out well for France.

    read more

  • Step 4 Align minor countries with larger countries

    As minor countries don't have their unit images or turns they will be aligned with medium and major countries. Medium countries will also sometimes be aligned with major countries.

    When countries are aligned, their territories and units become part of the larger country, like Canada with Britain in the original game.

    Each minor and medium country will be entered into a table giving their chances of being aligned. In addition, countries may be aligned into the dummy countries of "Victim" and "Impassable".

    Note that this may in effect undo step 3. For example India may gain independence in step 3 and become a close ally of Britain in step 4. The effect will be the same, but the notes will be different.

    This is also when protectorates are handled. Egypt will be probably be aligned with Britain, but it may escape British control and be aligned with some other country.

    If China has become aligned with another country, then the special Chinese rules don't apply.

    read more

  • Step 3 Resolve Interwar Period

    There were a number of conflicts in the interwar period which could change what country controls a specific territory. Most only involved a single territory such as the Rif War or the Indian Independence movement. Territories controlled by the "Split" country must be assigned to a specific country.

    There are three conflicts that deserve special consideration, Russian Civil War, Russo-Polish War and the Reunification of China.

    Russian Civil War In the context of this scenario generator, it does not matter which side wins as somebody will end up controlling the core Russian areas of Russia, Archangel and Karelia. However there was a possibility of creating a stable country in Siberia controlling multiple areas. Peripheral areas of Russia may gain independence.

    Russo-Polish War as closely related to the Russian Civil War. Plausible outcomes range from Russian reconquering Poland to a powerful Polish state controlling Poland, East Poland, Baltic States, Ukraine, East Ukraine and Belorussia. However the outcomes must all involve a contiguous Polish state. Note that even a maximum Polish state remains a minor country.

    The order of resolution needs to be

    Siberian independence Peripheral territories status Russo-Polish War

    War of Chinese Reunification By the end of WW1, warlords have already taken control of China. In effect each territory was an independent state. If the Northern Expedition had failed, China would have remained divided.

    An additional complication was the Japanese invasion. The Japanese may decide not to invade, to only take Manchuria or to take Kiangsu as well. Note that if the Japan and China end up on the same side, Kiangsu will be returned to China.

    Even if China is reunified, there still be independent states formed, representing undefeated warlords or Communist territory. There is also a chance that Kwangtung ends up under effective Chinese control.

    In any case the usual China build rules and territory restrictions apply, as the KMT would not even under the best of circumstances had enough time to build a modern industrial economy. If China is allied with Japan, than the movement restrictions are China are lifted.

    read more