-
0 Votes9 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes7 Posts1k Views
-
1 Votes1 Posts543 Views
-
2 Votes17 Posts2k Views
-
1 Votes15 Posts3k Views
-
4 Votes10 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes3 Posts867 Views
-
2 Votes25 Posts4k Views
-
0 Votes8 Posts2k Views
-
1 Votes2 Posts902 Views
-
1 Votes1 Posts752 Views
-
0 Votes8 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes10 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes5 Posts884 Views
-
2 Votes6 Posts2k Views
-
1 Votes32 Posts10k Views
-
1 Votes14 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes27 Posts7k Views
-
0 Votes7 Posts1k Views
-
1 Votes7 Posts1k Views
Recent Posts
-
@beelee Dracula makes everything slightly more spaced apart compared to Dark. I prefer it over Dark because there everything is smaller and more cramped together

I don't like the colors from the politics panel either. They are too bright. Also, the text inside is also barely readable because it is gray. It's probably better if the text is black or white with a black outline or something.
-
In some of the themes, when you click on one of the tabs on the first row on the right side when having a game loaded, they suddenly move down to the 2nd row, and the tabs on the second row move to the 1st row. This doesn't happen in "Metal", but it does happen in "Nimbus" and "FlatLaf Dark" (I didn't test all the themes). This is confusing me and I'd prefer if the tabs stay where they are like in "Metal" (and also how it was originally).
It would also be nice if there were more dark themes. Right now, there are only two and I don't really like either of them. There are much more light themes but those are a no go for me because they are too bright.
-
Is there a way to manually adjust the colors for the Politics Panel ? I assume this is from the new LookandFeel. I tried switching to Dracula and restarting everything but didn't notice any difference.
Kinda bright for my old eyes
In the Global game it pops up for every Players turn, so quite frequently.
Edit
Otherwise it seems fine.
-
I suppose it is worth pointing out that a 'revert' in git is just an undo update. The code history in Git is write-once. Git never deletes anything. So, in a revert update, based on the reverted change: any lines that were added are removed, and any removed lines are re-added. So, a revert is a new update, it just an inverted update to cancel out a previous one.
Revert PRs are not at all special to Git, it's just another update. Once a revert is merged, a person can revert the revert update, add more changes to it, and then merge all of that as one bundle.
So, a flow might be like this (the letters on the left hand side represent the commit ID, AKA the commit SHA):
a43ae Some update that introduced a bug 3ads2 Revert: Some update that introduced a bug fae54 Revert: Revert: Some update that introduced a bug + Bug FixChanges to the code base are "squashed" together. When a person clicks the revert for the revert, that creates a new proposed change. Bug fixes can be added to that proposed change, then it'll all be squashed together as a single commit that is then released.
For example, when reverting the revert, this change would be proposed:
abc12 Revert: Revert: Some update that introduced a bugIn that proposed change, we can add the bug fix, eg:
abc12 Revert: Revert: Some update that introduced a bug fea23 Bug fixThen, when merged, that would land on the main branch and in the history as one commit, eg:
fae54 Revert: Revert: Some update that introduced a bug + Bug Fix