TripleA Logo TripleA Forum
    • TripleA Website
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Register
    • Login

    Download Maps has map Tags

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Player Help
    65 Posts 7 Posters 115 Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Cernel Moderators Lobby Moderators @Cernel
      last edited by

      Alternatively, it could be:
      99-
      100s
      200s
      300s
      400s
      500s
      600s
      700s
      800s
      900s
      1000s

      (This is simpler and clearer, but the first grop would have only 99 items - not being possible having a map with 0 spaces - and every other one before 1000 would have 100, which is a little bit inconsistent but not a big deal.)

      TheDogT 1 Reply Last reply
      Reply Quote 0
      • TheDogT
        TheDog @Cernel
        last edited by

        Added various FFA to the FFA, PVP, Solo tab/column.

        @Cernel
        Spaces: Done Rogers list. Im only part way through all the maps, it will take some time, I have to download a lot.

        Currently there are only x8 800+ sized maps so not currently worth expanding beyond 800+, yet.

        https://forums.triplea-game.org/tags/thedog
        https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/3741/curated-best-top-maps-triplea-guides

        C 2 Replies Last reply
        Reply Quote 0
        • C
          Cernel Moderators Lobby Moderators @TheDog
          last edited by

          @TheDog said:

          Currently there are only x8 800+ sized maps so not currently worth expanding beyond 800+, yet.

          OK. I still believe that a map having over 1500 spaces would be better classified as 1000s than as 800+.

          How about changing -99 to 99-?

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply Quote 0
          • RogerCooperR
            RogerCooper @Cernel
            last edited by

            @Cernel I actually would prefer the terms "areas" as "spaces" is ambiguous. The rules for Axis & Allies used the terms "territories".

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            Reply Quote 0
            • C
              Cernel Moderators Lobby Moderators @TheDog
              last edited by Cernel

              @TheDog said:

              Added various FFA to the FFA, PVP, Solo tab/column.

              Interesting addition about FFA, but it has several issues.

              1. FFA is not alternative to PvP: it is rather a subset of PvP but really also of PvAI.
              2. FFA may be understood as 3+ players and no teams: meaning a game in which every player (meaning power/polity/country/faction...) is on its own (and typically always at war with everyone else), so a map with 3 or more alliances (of which at least one has more than one player) could be seen as not being a FFA. According to Google, the prevailing meaning of FFA is indeed a no-teams game.
              3. Anything like being or not being a FFA is a very much a game-related thing (not a map thing). For example, in the Napoleonic Empires map, you have 3 games, of which one is a 2 sided team game and the other two are FFA.

              Instead of having FFA as part of that column, I rather suggest having an other column with the number of sides (For example, if the only sides are Axis and Allies, the number would be 2: passive neutrals like those of World At War or of 270BC Wars are of course not counted: these games are also 2 sided ones.). In its narrowest (and prevailing) interpretation, a FFA would be any game with 3+ sides inasmuch as the number of sides is equal to the number of players (which could be an other column).

              Still, you would have to decide what to do for maps having multiple games with different sides. (For example, for Napoleonic Empires, the number of sides would be "2" (if you only look at the main game) or "2/5/8" if you look at each of its games.)

              RogerCooperR 1 Reply Last reply
              Reply Quote 0
              • RogerCooperR
                RogerCooper @Cernel
                last edited by

                @Cernel To me FFA (free-for-all), means everyone permanently at war with everyone. Some mods have relationships that can change in the course of the game, and can't be easily summarized as alliances.

                To me FFA mods are uninteresting. If you are in the middle you can't accomplish anything, while if you are at the edge, you can often pull off an easy victory.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Cernel Moderators Lobby Moderators @RogerCooper
                  last edited by

                  @RogerCooper said:

                  @Cernel I actually would prefer the terms "areas" as "spaces" is ambiguous. The rules for Axis & Allies used the terms "territories".

                  I think that per se the best term is "Zones". The "Sea Zones" are always called as such and TripleA does not have stuff like the "Mobilisation Zone", so it should be quite obvious that "Zones" means territories plus sea zones. However, I've checked the rule-books from Classic to Global, and the official term is "Spaces" or "Game Spaces".

                  Areas does not sound quite clear to me. An area could be a group of zones or a cosmetic area with no zones at all (like the one that World At War has between 118 and 124 Sea Zone or the many cosmetic islands of New World Order, having not only no ownership but neither existing at all beside visually). Moreover, I would argue that those pacific islands with multiple islands (or Turkey when the European and Asian parts are the same territory) are each a territory/zone/space with multiple areas, meaning multiple areas part of the same territory/zone/space (and I think it would be hard to argue against this).

                  (Obviously "territories" is a terrible term if non-convoy sea zones are comprised, and just one of the several cases in which TripleA technical terms are just bad. Let's keep them under the hood as much as possible.)

                  Definitions from Cambridge (first definition given):

                  Space: an empty area that is available to be used

                  Zone: an area, especially one that is different from the areas around it because it has different characteristics or is used for different purposes

                  Area: a particular part of a place, piece of land, or country

                  Territory: an area of land or sea that is controlled by a particular country


                  At the end, I think the easiest pick is just the official one: space (or game space).

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    Cernel Moderators Lobby Moderators @RogerCooper
                    last edited by Cernel

                    @RogerCooper said:

                    @Cernel To me FFA (free-for-all), means everyone permanently at war with everyone. Some mods have relationships that can change in the course of the game, and can't be easily summarized as alliances.

                    Yah, what I was saying is that FFA is very ambiguous a term. Practically, it can mean one of 3 things, from the wider to the narrower interpretation.

                    1. A FFA is any game with 3 or more sides (either 3 or more players with only one player per side (so no actual sides) or 1 or more players per side).
                    2. A FFA is any game with 3 or more sides where every side is composed of only 1 player (so no actual sides).
                    3. A FFA is any game with 3 or more sides where every side is composed of only 1 player (so no actual sides) and every player is always at war with every other player.

                    Personally, I tend to understand it as definition 2, but I can totally see @rogercooper and other people understanding it as definition 3, as well as some other as definition 1.


                    A FFA can be an amazing game, but it is very hard to make a very good FFA (especially with ever-growing TUV dynamics like basic TripleA).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply Quote 1
                    • X
                      xxXEddieXxx
                      last edited by

                      @thedog
                      How is the sorting for Spaces supposed to work?
                      Currently it seems a little off to me. One Sort option shows 100 first and the other shows -99 ? Shouldn't the big maps come first in the second?

                      Screenshot 2026-11-05 123328.png Screenshot 2026-11-05 123322.png

                      TheDogT C 2 Replies Last reply
                      Reply Quote 0
                      • TheDogT
                        TheDog @xxXEddieXxx
                        last edited by

                        @xxXEddieXxx
                        Try again the -99 are now 0-99 and this should be a logicial sort order.

                        https://forums.triplea-game.org/tags/thedog
                        https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/3741/curated-best-top-maps-triplea-guides

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply Quote 1
                        • C
                          Cernel Moderators Lobby Moderators @xxXEddieXxx
                          last edited by

                          @xxXEddieXxx Noticed too but did not bother. Yah, the -99 goes after the 800+. Makes no sense

                          This can be easily solved by changing the "-99" to "099-".

                          However, then what to do when having 1000s? Would that go before 100s?

                          To reiterate, my suggestions then would be

                          099-
                          100s
                          200s
                          300s
                          400s
                          500s
                          600s
                          700s
                          800s
                          900s
                          1000s

                          or

                          001-100
                          101-200
                          201-300
                          301-400
                          401-500
                          501-600
                          601-700
                          701-800
                          801-900
                          901-1000
                          1001-2000

                          However, I now see the additional problem that 1000s would not go after 900s and 1001-2000 would not go after 901-1000.

                          Is there no way to define the up-down order? Is it forcibly dependent on alphabeta-numerical order left to right?

                          If there is not, then I guess something like this:

                          01 (99-)
                          02 (100s)
                          03 (200s)
                          04 (300s)
                          05 (400s)
                          06 (500s)
                          07 (600s)
                          08 (700s)
                          09 (800s)
                          10 (900s)
                          11 (1000s)

                          (Also, really no idea why wanting to have 800+ instead of going up to 1000s or having 1000+. I don't think there being few (8?) maps at 800+ is enough of a reason for not completing it up to the thousand but leaving it hanging unfinished at the 800 mark.)

                          TheDogT 1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply Quote 0
                          • TheDogT
                            TheDog @Cernel
                            last edited by

                            @ All
                            So I have settled on the current Spaces column values and its heading.

                            Using as few characters as possible to convey the intent of the numbers.

                            0-99, yes you will never have 0 spaces, but used for sorting the values
                            100s, 100-199 spaces, players can pick their favoured sized maps
                            etc
                            :
                            800+, there has to be an upper limit and this is a reasonable limit, there are under 10 of these maps, also it avoids 1000s sorting problem.


                            What do people think of the current FFAs, PVP, Solo column?
                            We could

                            • remove the column ?
                            • add to the values, like having maximum number of players listed ?
                            • remove it and add another column, if so what ?

                            A map like Another World, has 18 players, Shogun Advanced has 16 players as examples, some players want, some avoid these large player maps.

                            This could be folded into this hybrid/multi use column.
                            Most fields will be blank, as they will have say 10 or less players and is considered normal and so not worth recording.

                            Thoughts?

                            https://forums.triplea-game.org/tags/thedog
                            https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/3741/curated-best-top-maps-triplea-guides

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Reply Quote 0

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                            Register Login
                            • 1
                            • 2
                            • 3
                            • 4
                            • 4 / 4
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Powered by NodeBB Forums