Subcategories
-
5 Topics70 Posts
-
0 Votes7 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes3 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes1 Posts1k Views
-
2 Votes3 Posts1k Views
-
1 Votes31 Posts11k Views
-
0 Votes9 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes17 Posts5k Views
-
0 Votes6 Posts2k Views
-
3 Votes10 Posts2k Views
-
2 Votes7 Posts2k Views
-
1 Votes15 Posts4k Views
-
0 Votes5 Posts2k Views
-
1 Votes6 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes0 Posts20 Views
-
1 Votes10 Posts3k Views
-
0 Votes11 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes2 Posts760 Views
-
2 Votes14 Posts2k Views
-
1 Votes7 Posts3k Views
-
2 Votes1 Posts625 Views
Recent Posts
-
@ All
So I have settled on the current Spaces column values and its heading.Using as few characters as possible to convey the intent of the numbers.
0-99, yes you will never have 0 spaces, but used for sorting the values
100s, 100-199 spaces, players can pick their favoured sized maps
etc
:
800+, there has to be an upper limit and this is a reasonable limit, there are under 10 of these maps, also it avoids 1000s sorting problem.What do people think of the current FFAs, PVP, Solo column?
remove the column ? add to the values, like having maximum number of players listed ? remove it and add another column, if so what ?
We couldA map like Another World, has 18 players, Shogun Advanced has 16 players as examples, some players want, some avoid these large player maps.
This could be folded into this hybrid/multi use column.
Most fields will be blank, as they will have say 10 or less players and is considered normal and so not worth recording.Thoughts?
-
@xxXEddieXxx Noticed too but did not bother. Yah, the -99 goes after the 800+. Makes no sense
This can be easily solved by changing the "-99" to "099-".
However, then what to do when having 1000s? Would that go before 100s?
To reiterate, my suggestions then would be
099-
100s
200s
300s
400s
500s
600s
700s
800s
900s
1000sor
001-100
101-200
201-300
301-400
401-500
501-600
601-700
701-800
801-900
901-1000
1001-2000However, I now see the additional problem that 1000s would not go after 900s and 1001-2000 would not go after 901-1000.
Is there no way to define the up-down order? Is it forcibly dependent on alphabeta-numerical order left to right?
If there is not, then I guess something like this:
01 (99-)
02 (100s)
03 (200s)
04 (300s)
05 (400s)
06 (500s)
07 (600s)
08 (700s)
09 (800s)
10 (900s)
11 (1000s)(Also, really no idea why wanting to have 800+ instead of going up to 1000s or having 1000+. I don't think there being few (8?) maps at 800+ is enough of a reason for not completing it up to the thousand but leaving it hanging unfinished at the 800 mark.)
-
@xxXEddieXxx
Try again the -99 are now 0-99 and this should be a logicial sort order.
-
Hey check this out and tell maintainers, that you want this if you prefer other colors.