Subcategories

  • Unable to Load Polygons.txt Error

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    @wc_sumpton, @beelee My apologies, I mistook "info name" for "mapName". Changing to lower case seems to have solved it. So I believe I just need to update this in the version on GitHub. Thanks for your help.
  • Open a Dialog Box when event triggers?

    20
    2 Votes
    20 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Jason-Green-Lowe You can use a "changeOwnership" trigger with suitable conditions to change territories as you see fit.
  • One Time PU Capture For Certain Events

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    HeppsH
    @Contango You can tailor that to ensure both your goals are achievable.
  • Should we support YAML for Maps?

    Moved not adopted
    26
    2 Votes
    26 Posts
    6k Views
    djabwanaD
    I love building UIs and I love data interchange and would love to help with such a UI once I get some free time which might not be for awhile...
  • Command-line tools for map making

    1
    4 Votes
    1 Posts
    679 Views
    No one has replied
  • Runtime error on unit placement

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    A
    Thanks for the responses. I'm glad it's working for somebody. My xml is just screwed up. I'll have to get it straightened out.
  • Minor question about the order of actions in the User Action window

    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    340 Views
    No one has replied
  • Negating the loss of capital

    capital
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    860 Views
    P
    @alkexr said in Negating the loss of capital: Try playerAttachment instead of rulesAttachment in both name and javaClass.mcdvoice Thank you for the explanation. It is clear for me.
  • Bombers – Single Round Attack

    40
    0 Votes
    40 Posts
    9k Views
    F
    @Contango that is unfortunate. My map was going to have most of the income be objective based for one side.
  • How can I with just the Triplea tiles, produce a complete map?

    5
    1
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    660 Views
    TheDogT
    @alkexr @Hepps Thanks both!
  • Big World 3

    19
    1 Votes
    19 Posts
    2k Views
    SchulzS
    @ff03k64 Everything was different. This map is not needed in anywhere when Aggression 1941 already fulfills all of its functions with better graphics.
  • RFC - In-Game Map Uploads

    Moved
    33
    2 Votes
    33 Posts
    7k Views
    LaFayetteL
    First, thank you all for the engagement on this topic! To summarize where we are so far in this discussion: github repositories is a beneficial storage solution that provides a lot of features that we would be unwise to rebuild in its entirety automating the management of 'triplea_maps.yaml' is welcome documentation effort is needed to make the upload process clear. We should create at least a thread, if not a category to provide help for uploading Follow-Up Topics to Discuss in other Threads A number of other topics were raised that could use discussion. I'm thinking to create a thread titled something like: "How should we improve the maps ecosystem" where we could discuss the many other aspects of maps and what could use improvement. Still under consideration: zip uploads that are automatically stored as repositories First, if we automate the generation of 'triplea_maps.yaml' by finding data that is stored in the repositories, we'll have taken care of a portion of the download side. Specifically the idea here is that 'triplea_maps.yaml' has a section for each map, essentially we move each section of that file to the respective map repository where the backend would be configured to find it. In this way the backend could effectively generate the 'triplea_maps.yaml' file. A really nice thing about the above is the backend wouldn't care how the map data gets into repository. After we get to that point, it could make sense to build an in-game uploader that takes a zip file and uploads it into a repository. There is enough complexity in doing that where I don't know if it would be worth it, so we'll need to play it by ear when and if we get there.
  • Victory Cities ICon

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Hepps Thanks! Clear Now. Regards.
  • Changing Colours of Map

    15
    1
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    3k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Frostion Thanks!
  • Mixed Questions

    Moved
    130
    0 Votes
    130 Posts
    70k Views
    SchulzS
    Is it possible to end games in a certain round with triggers? Is it possible having auto-intercept?
  • Auto-Intercept

    Moved
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    275 Views
    No one has replied
  • How to Balance Map?

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @Mas-N so if the map is playable and you just want feedback on balance, you should upload it to triplea under experimental. You can then make adjustments for future versions as needed. Here's Frostion's guide. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FfF7N0srp9QG0_if5D-c1d1Aa1QTttdhxgm1GBh3pI4/edit If you're not familiar with git, it might take a bit to figure out. Ask if you have any trouble.
  • Different upkeep method

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    401 Views
    No one has replied
  • Retreating and Strategic Bombing Issues

    28
    1 Votes
    28 Posts
    5k Views
    F
    @Mas-N 8500 lines of triggers!! :astonished_face: The map I am working on doesn't even have 8500 lines of code in total!
  • A new unit set up

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    800 Views
    SchulzS
    https://www.sendspace.com/file/oihq93 You can check it everything from there. I just can't update somethings via github due to wrong file structure. The land AA's are no different than classic anti air units. 1/6 chance for every air units. More ground AA stacks have no impact.

Recent Posts

  • @TheDog

    Hi Dog

    Long time since I played Anniversarry. I think China can only have 3 dudes in a TTy max. Not sure but I think the Fctry gets destroyed the way it would in G 40 as china can't use it.

    Screenshot from 2026-06-11 02-28-55.png

    read more

  • @wc_sumpton
    Your post above lists 3 functions that the AI cannot do that a Player can, I would like to add a 4th.

    Give the AI a Factory it will not Place it (it will place units). It will only Place a Factory that it has decided it needs, even though it might have a lot them to place.

    Give a Human the Factory, they would place it if they thought it safe to do so.

    The AI does not appear to check how many Factories it has already and still buys what it thinks it needs and in turn Places it and no others.

    @wc_sumpton
    Summarising the Chinese rules, they do appear to work for a human, I have tried them once for human play, but your saying for the AI they dont?

    Is one of the problems placementAnyTerritory only applies to land TTs?

    @panther
    In World War II v3 1941 A&A game PvP, Lets look at an unlikely scenario.
    Japan build a Factory in Manchuria, 3PU
    Next Turn, China captures Manchuria
    ..In that same turn, how many units can China, place in Manchuria?
    ..Is it 2 or 3 ?
    ..Also, in 62 Sea Zone can China Place any ships in this same captured turn?

    Note: The above is for the boardgame.

    @Anyone what does the TripleA game do?

    read more

  • @thedog

    I am very sorry for my above post. I do think that you have a legitimate bug/issue. I have found the cause to your problem (review issues #14447 and #14457). While investigating this issue I uncovered other problems with how the AI handles the placement of units. To me these fixes seemed simple, so I submit a PR to make those changes. A test was created to check the output of the file I wanted to change.
    The file passed all the tests. I took issue with the test file because it failed to test the broken functionality of file. Some changes were made to the test but none of the testing covered any of the issues which I raised. So again, I took issue with the test.
    Now I'm being told to find the rules.
    When a Human places an isConstruction unit, either given or purchased, there are certain rules the player follows. These are the same rules the AI player follows when placing a purchased isConstruction unit. But the rules change for the AI player when placing a given isConstruction unit. Why? So now I have to find a rule that governs the placement of a given unit because it's not the same as placing a purchased one.
    A human player as to follow certain guidelines with respect to the use of "placementAnyTerritory", "placementAnySeaZone" or "placementCapturedTerritory" but the AI does not have to follow the same guidelines unless there is a rule?

    Why are there different sets of rules for placement given that a player is Human vs AI?

    Again, sorry for the rant. The fixes are easy. But without a rule they will not be made.

    Cheers...

    read more

  • @TheDog

    Let me see if I can explain things better. For reference I'll be looking at the "Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition" rule book. Page 10

    *The U.S. player places the new Chinese units at the same time that the new U.S. units are placed. They may be placed on
    any Chinese-controlled territories, however those units cannot be placed on any territory that already contains three or
    more units. *

    To be rule complaint "World War II v3 1941" has:

    <attachment name="rulesAttachment" attachTo="Chinese" javaClass="games.strategy.triplea.attachments.RulesAttachment" type="player"> <option name="movementRestrictionTerritories" value="Chinghai:Ningxia:Sikang:Yunnan:Hupeh:Fukien:Suiyuan:Manchuria:Kiangsu:Kwangtung"/> <option name="movementRestrictionType" value="allowed"/> <option name="productionPerXTerritories" value="2"/> <option name="placementAnyTerritory" value="true"/> <option name="placementCapturedTerritory" value="true"/> <option name="placementPerTerritory" value="3"/> </attachment>

    "placementAnyTerritory" allows a player to place any non-isSea unit into any land territory that was owned at the start of the players turn (Human player only not AI players). can you place in any LAND territory you owned at the beginning of the turn? (Does not include newly captured territories for Human players only.)
    "placementCapturedTerritory" allows a Human player only, not used by the AI player to place these units because "placementAnyTerritory" assumes placement into newly captured territories as a default, to place units into newly captured territories, but still follows production rules. can you place in territory you captured this turn?
    Even though these are handled/enforced differently they are both considered rule complaint and so it will not be changed.
    And don't get started on "placementAnySeaZone" (For Human player only) can you place in any SEA territory beside a LAND territory you owned at the beginning of the turn? But because there is no rule for placement of sea units without production, the AI will not be changed this.
    One would think that the same rules would apply to the placement of a purchased factory would apply to the placement of a given factory. They do not. And because there are no rules that govern the placement of a given factory do not expect this to change ant time soon.

    Cheers...

    read more