Subcategories

  • China Rules for Other Countries

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    824 Views
    RogerCooperR
    @beelee I didn't need a capital at all.
  • Move Game notes to its own file?

    Moved
    12
    5 Votes
    12 Posts
    6k Views
    LaFayetteL
    One challenge is having a mechanism to associate a game notes file with the game file. Having the two files with matching names and the notes file being suffixed with '-notes.html' might be easy enough. For example: world_at_war.xml world_at_war-notes.html
  • xml editing (POS2) documentation

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    LaFayetteL
    @Panther the two HTML files are now updated to be MD, they'll render now.
  • User action bug? or is this working as intended?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    635 Views
    F
    @wc_sumpton I don't think that is the problem. I am basing this off of other maps that have fully functional user actions, and they don't have conditions in the activated triggers. This text change is also the only thing that isn't working correctly in those triggers. It seems like it is firing the trigger and making the change, and then calling the text to display, after it has changed it. As i read what I am typing, it doesn't seem like it is as clear as it could be, so please ask questions if it isn't clear.
  • Non AA target groups names

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    463 Views
    No one has replied
  • User actions question

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    481 Views
    No one has replied
  • Allow Blockades in All Sea Zones?

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    LaFayetteL
    Ah, just saw the responses : ) The variable route would work, you are still duplicating the territory names, but at least it's more concise.
  • place units anywhere, also no max production in factories

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    F
    Now for the last thing for these units. How can i place them in allied territories (assuming i have a rookie there)?
  • Infantry-Only Factories

    production
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    632 Views
    N
    Hi Roger, check https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/2066/new-production-unit-barracks for this - I had the same topic before.
  • Proposal: Automatic <property> type discovery based on value

    Moved done
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    403 Views
    LaFayetteL
    PR: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/pull/7651
  • Proposal: Simpler '<canal>' node

    Moved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    827 Views
    LaFayetteL
    Thanks for pointing me to the property @Cernel ; I'd like to keep updates limited to the game data assembly layer. That means for now I'll leave the "Control All Canals Between Territories To Pass" property unaltered.
  • Proposal: Combine tags into `<territory>`

    Moved
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    594 Views
    LaFayetteL
    We could even remove the <territoryAttachment> node altogether, eg: <territory name="Quebec"> <owner value="Canadians"/> <unitProduction value="3" /> <kamikazeZone value="true" /> <placements> : : Thoughts? For canals, they attach to multiple territories, nesting underneath one territory would potentially not be as helpful as it could be. Here is an example of what we have today: <attachment name="canalAttachmentCentral America - Colombia" attachTo="25 Sea Zone" javaClass="games.s trategy.triplea.attachments.CanalAttachment" type="territory"> <option name="canalName" value="the Central America - Colombia channel"/> <option name="landTerritories" value="Central America:Colombia"/> </attachment> <attachment name="canalAttachmentCentral America - Colombia" attachTo="100 Sea Zone" javaClass="games.strategy.triplea.attachments.CanalAttachment" type="territory"> <option name="canalName" value="the Central America - Colombia channel"/> <option name="landTerritories" value="Central America:Colombia"/> </attachment> I think that might be better as one 'canal' tag. It's a really good call-out - though if it's going to be a different tag then perhaps topic for another thread (thread created: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/2269/proposal-simpler-canal-node)
  • Adding a default for map.properties 'color.Impassable'

    Moved done
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    317 Views
    No one has replied
  • 1 Votes
    1 Posts
    398 Views
    No one has replied
  • Second combat movement phase

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    962 Views
    A
    Well I have played with it a little more. If the area one attacks during the first combat phase is still enemy-controlled at the end of the first combat phase (either because you just attack with air units or because there is a ground unit but it does not survive the attack), then during the second combat movement phase you can move a friendly ground unit into the area and then directly into another enemy-controlled area. Otherwise, you can move into the attacked, now-friendly-controlled area, but not then move from there into an enemy-controlled area. Then I tried putting the second combat movement and combat at the very end of the turn, after the EndTurn phase and now it works, I can move into the previously attacked area (whether it is friendly-controlled or enemy-controlled) and from there directly into an enemy-controlled area. You cannot use air units to support any attack you make in the second combat phase (because they had to land during noncombat movement). But this does not bother me. If anyone has a better way to do this please let me know.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    313 Views
    No one has replied
  • Help: National Objectives are removed when editing name of map file

    51
    0 Votes
    51 Posts
    17k Views
    Jason Green-LoweJ
    Wonderful! It works now on my end -- thank you so much for fixing the problem.
  • carrier rules for WWII V3_41

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @Numetalfan The saved game carries a copy of the xml used to create the game. Any changes made to the xml will not show in a saved game. To test changes you have to always start a new game. Cheers...
  • 0 Votes
    20 Posts
    3k Views
    B
    @Jason-Green-Lowe heh heh friendly advice was just saying you could have it included in the original map for a one click activation instead of an entirely separate map
  • Can you have mutually exclusive units?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    280 Views
    No one has replied

Recent Posts

  • @black_elk

    you are the only one. Help us BlackElk

    😁

    read more

  • @Ramon No problem! I ran into the same problem when making changes to my North Africa map. Black_Elk made very cool reliefTiles for our map, but I didn't know how he made them. So when changing some territory borders, the reliefTiles didn't update along with them. I tried several things and what I described above ended up working the best. You can still see that the map is slightly darker at the places where the change happened, but I still tried my best to conceal it.

    image.jpeg

    The best thing actually to do is trying to contact the map maker! However, the map maker for NML is Black_Elk, and when I contacted him for North Africa, he didn't reply. But maybe you have more success!

    read more

  • @VictoryFirst

    Hi Victory thank you for your reply!

    Its very unfortunate that i dont have the original overlay that the map used.
    I will see what i can do!

    Cheers!

    read more

  • @ramon Changing the reliefTiles is difficult when you do not have the overlay that the game used. You can actually modify individual tiles, but it is not recommended if the change is across multiple tiles. Assuming that this is the case, you'd need to use the baseline image, change the borders there, and then break it using the tile image breaker. Then, you'd need to open the reliefmap by combining it using the tile image reconstructor. Also open the modified baseline map so that you can see what borders you removed and where the new borders are. To remove borders from the reliefmap, you can do the following. In the images you sent, you can see that the color of the territories isn't empty, it has a black-ish (or white/gray-ish in the other) color with a very low opacity. Try selecting this as color and remove the borders using this color. If you use GIMP, you can select the color using CTRL+click when having the pencil tool selected. Do not make it transparent as you did, that will make the territory shade go away completely. You should not be using the eraser at all, only the pencil tool. To draw new borders, you can select the white border color and use it to draw the new borders. If you lower the opacity of the baseline map and put it above the reliefmap, you can see the new borders and you can trace them. Then you can use the heal tool to make the borders and territory colors look more like the rest of the reliefmap, with different shades of colors. This doesn't necessarily make it look nice though. Even if you do your best, you will still probably have spots with a different shade than the rest of the map, but it's better than nothing.

    One small tip is to past the reliefmap not once several times in GIMP, so that you have like 10 identical layers. This will increase the opacity of the reliefmap. If you then combine all these layers, you essentially have increased the opacity. This allows you to actually see everything properly. You'd still need the heal tool to make the colors blend into each other better. Then you can lower the opacity of the layer so that it is around the same as the original reliefmap.

    Last option is to create your own relief tiles using your own overlay. This might be a lot of work but it would ensure that the map looks nice.

    read more