• Axis & Allies: Stalingrad

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    829 Views
    No one has replied
  • Cold War 1965 version 2.0 - Official Thread

    50
    1 Votes
    50 Posts
    15k Views
    TheDogT
    Capture Units on Entering Territory Is usually not set as True, so is usually false. I have not played the map, but I think it should be false.
  • Technology Step being Skipped

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    StohrmS
    @wc_sumpton I found the problem. My OCD wants things in alphabetic order and in doing that I accidentally moved the ending </technology> caveat after the French player's code. Thus only the Americans, ANZAC, British, Chinese and French were actually recognized. The British get theirs from the UK_Pacific's choice and the Chinese don't have any (at this time). So, the rest all got skipped. I appreciate the help. I also put the code back in player turn order, but added "Player 01 - ", 02 etc. before the Faction heading comments. My OCD is thereby satisfied.
  • Cold War 1965 - Official Thread

    76
    1
    1 Votes
    76 Posts
    39k Views
    D
    @redrum Thread for Cold War 1965 version 2: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/4201/cold-war-1965-version-2-0-official-thread
  • Connection Error in wwII_revised

    13
    2 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    PantherP
    @rogercooper Thanks.
  • UHD World War II Global

    53
    2
    3 Votes
    53 Posts
    17k Views
    B
    @wc_sumpton Sweet ! [image: 1754959368806-rightarm.png]
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    38 Views
    No one has replied
  • 1 Votes
    5 Posts
    968 Views
    L
    @rogercooper Thanks for the encouragement! I was able to mod it this AM. Appreciate it
  • Over the Top- new WWI mod

    54
    5 Votes
    54 Posts
    28k Views
    TheDogT
    @djabwana You can restrict the movement of units by step and switch them on & off, between steps, not just by turn as in 1888A Steam & Steel eg (I have not played your game, so this will probably be wrong) turn off all movement for none Battleships/Cruisers, Heavy Artillery, and Railguns step Move Battleships/Cruisers, Heavy Artillery, and Railguns turn on all movement for none Battleships/Cruisers, Heavy Artillery, and Railguns Search go winter in the xml and apply the principles to different step phases of a turn https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/4056/1888a-steam-steel-official-thread Here is an overview, there are a lot of components, you will not them all Winter Search go winter in the xml to see the components that make up how to use terrain effects and a dummy player needs an allied dummy player, eg. winterp define TT & SZ to be affected define a new allied relationship eg winterr allows combat takes over in TT/SZ (oops has no go winter) needs a WinterLand & WinterSea to be shown in the TT & SZ define territoryEffect eg. Winter Triggers to make it happen when you want it. Note -reset- has to redefine the TT/SZ when a TT/SZ changes effect Hope this helps
  • ⭕ Lord of the Rings: War of the Ring - Official Thread

    maps thedog
    54
    2
    2 Votes
    54 Posts
    21k Views
    L
    @thedog any reason it's not finding the map when I try to select the map in game? i downloaded the zip, copied it to the downloaded maps folder, and have tried keeping in both a zip format and unzipping it but when I go to select the map in TripleA it gives me this.![alt text]([image: 1750940620758-d5c48cbf-0f77-4af3-a59b-2bc1459b962f-8bc5ee52-fb8d-4b6b-9a27-74c420fdf07f.png] image url)
  • AA G1940 with 1942 setting map?

    5
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    877 Views
    Tom SamO'T
    I'll take a look. Cheers!
  • Larry Harris Gencon 3.0

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    PantherP
    @rogercooper Yes, why not. The alternative setup has never changed from the initial posting that LH once issued. So it is safe to simply rename it.
  • Mega New Elk WIP

    409
    1
    2 Votes
    409 Posts
    321k Views
    Black_ElkB
    @rogercooper Those are cool! Yeah that cartoon! total Inception lol Oh it's this dude's work... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Edes_Harrison The challenge he faced was that most Americans, like many people at the time I guess and still today, they were so familiar and ingrained with the Mercator from schooldays and the era of the sail/naval navigation going back several centuries, that they really struggled to understand how the advent of aviation had changed the game. Or like why these faraway points were so key to the war effort. So they basically hired on a technical artist (rather than a cartagropher) to reimagine how these distances and war situations could be depicted in popular media. The maps were in mags and periodicals, so I think they're sorta Duckburg style, like fighting the war of ideas, with that sort of jingoism baked in, but it definitely anticipates stuff like GPS Satellite maps or the UI's from video games. Like I can just see it morph from that into Hearts of Iron after a couple more decades floating around. I just think it's cool, since it sorta takes root during that period and comes to define the new look, along with commercial advertisements and pulp illustration (pin ups and such) the fonts and whatever, which is why I think it looks cool for window dressing type thing, but I'm not sure it works so well as a main map campaign view. It would work maybe for a mini map though, or an endgame stats view thing, or just alternative style view from a hotkey. But then I have no idea how something like that could be translated into tripleA without like a total UI overhaul that can somehow use two baselines at once hehe. Hence the pipe dream. It's to me interesting cause for Classic, the world projection there was clearly Mercator style, but then every A&A board since Revised and then later War Room, they riff more like some of those Harrison maps from the 1940s to me. Like the way some of the continents are compressed and such, or the crops that were chosen. Almost like it was a crop and swap, where the maps were tilted up from there to hammer home the idea. But then the north pole view sorta doesn't really do the telescoping on Europe and the Pacific the way the dual Theater Atlases usual show the war in the books, like with a double inset with room for many sculpts. To me the G40 is more like those, but then when I think back to Iron Blitz, it totally reminds me of those Harrison map vibes. Almost as if the one is a call back of the other. Even down to the names there, it's like a whole harris thing haha
  • A New Year and a New Mod

    21
    5 Votes
    21 Posts
    13k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @beelee said in A New Year and a New Mod: @rogercooper said in A New Year and a New Mod: East & West has a rule that allows tanks to move out of a territory in non-combat movement. You mean after already having been in combat ? If so, you could suggest players use edit or make a map option they can turn on at game start boosting the Tank if they don't want to. I like the idea of making it a map option. I will default the defense to 3, which most mods use.
  • New Steampunk Advance Thread

    93
    2 Votes
    93 Posts
    46k Views
    board 3659B
    I'll probably begin to play both Steampunk Advance and Camerons version to sort of plan out more ideas
  • UHD Revised templet

    5
    2
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    Black_ElkB
    Hmmm I definitely found a few lines that jumped lol For the geometry of the sea zone tiles, the goal would be to find something analogous (where the connections are the same.) Also on a physical table maybe like an extra wide king banquet 36x72 that sorta deal hehe. I think v3 probably makes the more sense to key it that way than revised though, since that one is so small, but I also wanted to get the white border thing working which is always sorta tricky, mainly on account of wanting something that can be blended as well. If I pass it through a gray instead of white gives different effects, so like to make it more muted, or the sea zone color doing different blues for player preference. Mainly because for revised it's cool to have the dark ocean light sea zone, but other boards like Classic or v3 might look better with the black line, so just trying to get a way to do both from the same sort of templet. [image: 1742873870316-uhd_v2_example_baseline_paintover-resized.png]
  • Limit total number of Chinese fighters?

    4
    1
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @jason-green-lowe said in Limit total number of Chinese fighters?: I swear I tried hard to think of this on my own and couldn't, but it seems so obvious once you point it out. I have said the same thing! @beelee, @TheDog and many others have pointed stuff out to me, and I'll just go "WOW! I could have had a V8!" (Head-slap emoji) Cheers...
  • Initial Duplication

    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    977 Views
    M
    @panther said in Initial Duplication: ww2global40_2ndEd_move1st.xml Found it, thanks! This makes the other posts make sense, talking about the particulars after getting to that starting point.
  • The First Battle of the Next War

    5
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @thedog said in The First Battle of the Next War: This might be of interest? https://www.reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/comments/108fwga/report_launchthe_first_battle_of_the_next_war/ That thread discusses the same report. There are some interesting comments. I have played this out in some commercial wargames with same result, any surface ships in war zone are dead within days. Which is a problem for an amphibious invasion. A&A/TripleA make amphibious invasions much easier than they are in real life.
  • World War II v3 1941 Balanced Mod Tech Issue

    5
    1
    2 Votes
    5 Posts
    989 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @beelee Problem is not with the mod, as it works as it should in 2.5+, as all tech show up in the "Unit Help" window, and the unit "Tool Tip". But in 2.6+/2.7+ the tech info does not show in the display/tip. So, this is a problem with the new release that would need to be reported. Cheers...

Recent Posts

  • Name The Grand War
    Description World wide war in alternate history setting
    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/The_Grand_War
    11eeec50-2d56-40a3-9415-efe1d1adfbb7-image.jpeg

    Good Points

    An original alternate history setting with background information provided Each nation has special units and abilities Reasonably sized map

    Bad Points

    No victory conditions
    read more

  • @ebbe I am going to try this with everyone starting at peace (except Gaia and Nature). In general, I don't like FFA games as you can't make plan when everyone is at war and players on the edge of the board are favored.

    read more

  • @RogerCooper Thanks for the feedback and good to hear there is a lot you like about this game. About the initial settings: yes that was a deliberate choice, as it is FFA we like to have instant action. and a "what if"- feeling The game is very historical concerning the map, mountain ranges/passes, spreading resources, Pu value of various provinces,units, events and so... but indeed not historical in the alliances setting at game start .... that was a sacrifice we made to have a better ballance between the Clans.... but you can tackle this by changing the Diplomatic settings at game start with the editor. greetings ebbe

    read more

  • Name Age of Tribes: Primeval
    Description Civ-like tech tree on a map of Europe
    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Age_of_Tribes:_Primeval
    9c6498ad-ec74-413d-b88d-119f033301cb-image.jpeg

    Good Points

    The tech rules interesting

    Bad Points

    A simplistic East vs West alliance structure

    Note: This game would benefit from a random start.

    read more