• Big World v3 issues with balancing - unbalanced

    Moved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    Not sure why this was moved in tournaments, but moving it to Maps & Mods, if that's fine.
  • The Rising Sun

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    Z
    zod's explanations don't account for it at all though. his stuff applies to ALL sieg maps, by his own statement. While the situation we have here is TRS receives very little play, while NWO and WAW receive a good amount. In order to be an explanation it needs to account for that discrepancy. which means it needs to point to something that differentiates TRS from the other Sieg maps.
  • WWII Revised - Facelift

    55
    0 Votes
    55 Posts
    26k Views
    General_ZodG
    @hepps Yeah, I saw a nice bf109 model with that paint scheme. I'm glad someone noticed it. As the infantry goes, he is glistening in the sun and sleeves rolled up ready to fight. The tiger is much nicer than original too, added the german cross and high lighted some areas so the tank pops a little. These were little experiments to see what it takes to improve units. It's quite difficult to work on tiny scales where a few pixels is all I have to work with. But I learned a lot. Too bad we don't have a vectored graphics for TripleA, then can do all kinds of stuff on any scale.
  • Domination 1914 - Meat Grinder

    40
    1 Votes
    40 Posts
    14k Views
    SchulzS
    Hello scallen1 I am huge fan of this game and I had several attemps to improve the current dom 1914 for years but I did generally failed. Then I really realize what dom players (or TripleA players) want to see and what they don't want to see in the game. You can improve any game greatly but in term of the taste of people that's another story. These are general opinions of most dom 1914 players (or big map players) (including me) Historical accuracy: It is not as important as you think coz nobody really care. Also making these map historical would make the game significantly more unbaşanced. Declaration of war: Another bad idea. Every nations definitely should always start in the first round. These triggers slow downs speed of game. Increasing the importance of techs: Not good idea because some players can prefer playing it without techs and the current tech rolling system is already very dicey. Boosting these techs makes the game more aleatory. Different units/costs for different nations: People usually don't like it. They like great variations of units but generally better to give every nations to the same units. Too many country: Again, it just slow down games, they don't provide more strategic options. I would liek to see to share more my opinions if you are interested in. Thanks.
  • Map question like global with more territories

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @redrum The most areas on a world map is the World at War Map. However it does not use the AAG40 rules.There is no map that uses the AAG40 rules with more map areas. However, it would not be hard to change an existing large map such as World At War,or Ultimate World/Global War to AAG40, by cutting & pasting the xml file. Note that v3/AA50 rules differ only in small ways from AAG40 rules. You could probably play Ultimate World or Global War without making changes.
  • Misspelling in World War II Global maps.

    Moved
    22
    0 Votes
    22 Posts
    10k Views
    C
    @scousemart You can download mapskins like maps. This mapskin is available in the repository, under skins. Map skins are a view option, of course.
  • The Rising Sun Variant vXXX - Official Thread

    4
    1
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    vicvictoryV
    @hepps That's the way it goes. I'll add this information piece to our thread.
  • World at War Variants - Official Thread

    2
    1
    3 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    vicvictoryV
    Axis vs Allies. Who will be victorious? Good to know: TURN ORDER in World at War - Variants Addendum: Axis nations go first, Allies go second. [image: 0_1535308261116_Turn order WAW.jpg] AXIS TURN ORDER Germans - Italians - Finns - Romanians - Japanese - Thai ALLIES TURN ORDER Chinese - Russians - British - French - Americans - Anzac - Dutch
  • WAW variant vXXX version 1.7.8

    Moved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    @mario-rafael-herrera-vaca received it.... when are we playing...pbem
  • World at War variant vXXX

    Moved
    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    4k Views
    vicvictoryV
    @general_zod You're right. Recruits are used as a mechanism to build other units only. @Mario-Rafael-Herrera-Vaca Recruits have to be regarded as a resource item only like iron or fuel. Recruits units are produced by Factories, depending on the maximum production unit value of a specific territory at the end of the round. They will be consumed by producing specific units. When @sneakingcoward first implemented the resource item "recruits" into World at War variant vXXX map and second in The Rising Sun variant vXXX map, gameplay became once more realistic. Both maps belong to TripleA maps that are state of the art. [image: 0_1534581074462_wawtrs_postcard.jpg]
  • World at War variant vXXX version 1.7.8

    Moved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    @mario-rafael-herrera-vaca Moved to maps and mods, assuming it doesn't necessarily entails modifications to the TripleA program itself. I would update the title to be more specific, also on the account that there are several topics about this game. The referring mapmaker is @sneakingcoward.
  • European War

    86
    1 Votes
    86 Posts
    53k Views
    B
    @schulz no I got it to work. Just took a long time for my computer to have the map blends show up. Just waiting on the PR to get merged
  • Crazy Europe: House of Habsburg

    453
    2
    7 Votes
    453 Posts
    743k Views
    CrazyGC
    Little one is a galley, big one is a man of war. Both can fight, I really dislike the instantly killed dedicated transports of some games.
  • Random number of units placed randomly at random turns?

    38
    0 Votes
    38 Posts
    16k Views
    CrazyGC
    Random though about this. Currently you can make a trigger fire another trigger. <option name="activateTrigger" value="triggerAttachmentRussians5_FarEastReserves:1:false:false:false:false"/> (Format: "triggerName:numberOfTimes:useUses:testUses:testConditions:testChance") How doable would the following be? <option name="activateRandomTrigger" value="triggerAttachment1:triggerAttachment2:triggerAttachment3" count="2"/> The above would fire exactly 2 of those 3 triggers at random. IDK how important the additional options are for activateTrigger (I don't understand what the test things do, and if I wanted to fire the trigger more than once I would just put more lines) Also I investigated and I do not have the global conquest map on this computer. Sorry
  • AI never buys resources?

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    3k Views
    redrumR
    @comr Best thing is to play some of the new/complex maps and read the POS2 XML to understand what is available today: https://github.com/triplea-maps/the_pact_of_steel/blob/master/map/games/pact_of_steel_2.xml The AI overview and backlog of improvements are here: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/105/ai-development-discussion-and-feedback. I wrote all of the Fast/Hard AI so know all of the algorithms/code for it. It was primarily written to play the standard A&A maps (classic, revised, v3, global, etc) so it performs reasonably well on maps that primarily use similar rules. But if you try to have the AI play Total World War or Civil War, it plays very poorly and doesn't understand many of the features used in those games. Suggestions and contributions are always welcome and you can find the AI code here: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/tree/master/game-core/src/main/java/games/strategy/triplea/ai
  • This topic is deleted!

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    11 Views
  • Can Russia upgrade minor IC's to major?

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    HeppsH
    @willk_1230 So if by eligible Minor Factories... you mean the one in Novgorod and the one in Volgograd... then it is because neither is eligible to be up-graded. "Major industrial complexes can be built only in originally controlled (not captured) territories with an IPC value of 3 or higher." Page 23 Restictions on Placement Pragraph 4. Here is a link to the manual for your reference.... https://www.axisandallies.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Axis-Allies-Europe-1940-Second-Edition.pdf
  • Civil War | Ships placement

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    I know the owner of the map is not around, so what I'm asking here is what most players understand or anyway play with.
  • Civil War | Assign and hide utilitarian players

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    redrumR
    @cernel Ah, well yaml file updates just determine whether users that have the map downloaded get prompted to update it. Probably don't need to update it for a minor change like this. But not a big deal either way.
  • Japan limited on Minor IC's in Global 40?

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @willk_1230 unless you already have one there you should be able to. Post a save and we'll try and see what's up

Recent Posts

  • I tested this to the game ends. No one builds anything,

    read more

  • Step 5 Assign alliances

    There will to be two alliances "Aggressor" and "Status Quo" The Aggressor alliance is attempting to reorder the world through military force, while the Status Quo is trying to resist that.

    As I am not trying to track the ideologies you can assume that unlikely alliances are probably the result of ideological conflicts and similarities.

    The first step is to determine the lead aggressor. The lead aggressor is randomly chosen from the major countries. The lead aggressor goes first and will receive more units.

    Next the lead status quo power is chosen from the remaining major countries. The lead status quo power receives extra resources.

    The remaing major and medium powers are randomly assigned as follows

    50% Status Quo 30% Aggressor 10% Victim 10% Impassable

    The "Victim" nation is a passive member of the Status Quo alliance. It is neutral with regards to the rest of the Status Quo alliance and at war with the Aggessor alliance. The Status Quo alliance can't assist the "Victim" but if the liberate a territory they don't need to return it. Each turn the lead Status Quo power receives a bonus of 1 PU for every Victim-held territory. Note that is major or medium power has been reassigned to the victim nation, that means it is in civil war or some other internal disorder.

    The "Impassable" nation is neutral to everyone and out of play.

    There is a 50% change of delayed entry of each Status Quo nation and a 25% change of delayed entry for each Aggessor nation (other than the lead aggressor). The delayed entry nation comes in a randomly chosen turn between 2 and 5 at the start of the lead aggressor turn. It is possible that every Status Quo nation is delayed entry, allowing the lead aggessor to focus on victims.

    Historically, there was one territorial dispute directly involving major & medium countries, Alsace-Lorraine. Ethnically German but historically French it would be difficult (but not impossible) to resolve the dispute and conflict is likely. There will be a 30% chance that Germany is lead aggressor, while France is a status quo power that is active immediately. This will probably not work out well for France.

    read more

  • Step 4 Align minor countries with larger countries

    As minor countries don't have their unit images or turns they will be aligned with medium and major countries. Medium countries will also sometimes be aligned with major countries.

    When countries are aligned, their territories and units become part of the larger country, like Canada with Britain in the original game.

    Each minor and medium country will be entered into a table giving their chances of being aligned. In addition, countries may be aligned into the dummy countries of "Victim" and "Impassable".

    Note that this may in effect undo step 3. For example India may gain independence in step 3 and become a close ally of Britain in step 4. The effect will be the same, but the notes will be different.

    This is also when protectorates are handled. Egypt will be probably be aligned with Britain, but it may escape British control and be aligned with some other country.

    If China has become aligned with another country, then the special Chinese rules don't apply.

    read more

  • Step 3 Resolve Interwar Period

    There were a number of conflicts in the interwar period which could change what country controls a specific territory. Most only involved a single territory such as the Rif War or the Indian Independence movement. Territories controlled by the "Split" country must be assigned to a specific country.

    There are three conflicts that deserve special consideration, Russian Civil War, Russo-Polish War and the Reunification of China.

    Russian Civil War In the context of this scenario generator, it does not matter which side wins as somebody will end up controlling the core Russian areas of Russia, Archangel and Karelia. However there was a possibility of creating a stable country in Siberia controlling multiple areas. Peripheral areas of Russia may gain independence.

    Russo-Polish War as closely related to the Russian Civil War. Plausible outcomes range from Russian reconquering Poland to a powerful Polish state controlling Poland, East Poland, Baltic States, Ukraine, East Ukraine and Belorussia. However the outcomes must all involve a contiguous Polish state. Note that even a maximum Polish state remains a minor country.

    The order of resolution needs to be

    Siberian independence Peripheral territories status Russo-Polish War

    War of Chinese Reunification By the end of WW1, warlords have already taken control of China. In effect each territory was an independent state. If the Northern Expedition had failed, China would have remained divided.

    An additional complication was the Japanese invasion. The Japanese may decide not to invade, to only take Manchuria or to take Kiangsu as well. Note that if the Japan and China end up on the same side, Kiangsu will be returned to China.

    Even if China is reunified, there still be independent states formed, representing undefeated warlords or Communist territory. There is also a chance that Kwangtung ends up under effective Chinese control.

    In any case the usual China build rules and territory restrictions apply, as the KMT would not even under the best of circumstances had enough time to build a modern industrial economy. If China is allied with Japan, than the movement restrictions are China are lifted.

    read more