-
2 Votes6 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes36 Posts9k Views
-
1 Votes6 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes95 Posts66k Views
-
0 Votes147 Posts82k Views
-
0 Votes62 Posts30k Views
-
1 Votes10 Posts2k Views
-
0 Votes23 Posts7k Views
-
0 Votes2 Posts981 Views
-
0 Votes23 Posts8k Views
-
0 Votes2 Posts898 Views
-
1 Votes1 Posts866 Views
-
0 Votes2 Posts780 Views
-
1 Votes3 Posts911 Views
-
0 Votes6 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes3 Posts915 Views
-
3 Votes34 Posts12k Views
-
3 Votes8 Posts2k Views
-
1 Votes4 Posts1k Views
-
1 Votes3 Posts762 Views
Recent Posts
-
@Schulz
No, is the simple answer.But Atk+Def+Mov (-1 for A&A style) then +1 or +2 for any Targeted or Support Atk/Def or +1 other added bonuses like isDestroyer
Then playtest to see if the AI buys them.You can have the above then a multiplier and the AI still works out relative values.
-
Update to Version 2.64

lol hope you can read it. The font gets smaller all the time.
And so does the download Maps window wtf ? Maximize and the maps window stays same size. Can't even read what the fckn map is. Just the first three words.
Fckn Stupid !
-
Is there any reliable way to figure it out?
Like, how would you readjust the cost of all your units if every unit had anti-air ability? Or how about giving +1 attack or defense to any unit? I know it's pretty map-specific, but just wondering if there's a way to determine cost differences between units as correctly as possible.
I like unit costs being as close to each other as possible. Like decreasing air units' cost as much as possible while not making them overpowered. Or something.
-
@KurtGodel7 Nice! Were you using Claude for the unit images too?
Autocannoni is the plutral form, a singular unit is an Autocannnone.
In that case, I should probably say that I have given the Autocannone an improvement to its stats. It now defends on a 2 instead of on a 1.
In answer to your question, some of my unit art came from existing maps, and some was created by Claude.