• WW2 Oil and Snow (1st ed.) NEW MAP RELEASE

    205
    1
    6 Votes
    205 Posts
    153k Views
    ebbeE
    @g40newb Hej there, nice that you are playing Oil and Snow... first of al: it is the game mechanics: I decided that it would be not realistic for a foreign power to produce new units in the enemies conquered factories... so they remain disabled by this... the conquere receives the terr's extra PU's and more emphasize is put on transporting units newly constructed units to the frontline... creating logistical challenges once reaching far in conquest as is reality. Keep sending all feedback and issues... as I am halfway and good update of this project, ( as it was years ago made and my first one ) and I can adapt all issues coming out of your player experience, greetings
  • Total World War: December 1941 3.0.0.6

    661
    2
    6 Votes
    661 Posts
    1m Views
    M
    @victoryfirst said in Total World War: December 1941 3.0.0.6: Hi, I have a bunch of random questions. Is this game perfectly balanced, or is a bid required? Why has it been chosen to let Germany go before Russia and add the Russian winter, instead of making Russia go before Germany? Can I as a beginner have a competitive game against the AI? Should the AI be the Axis or the Allies? Are you trying to learn 2.8 or 3.0 version ?
  • 🏯 Sengoku - Nippon Warring States -Official Thread

    maps thedog
    21
    2
    4 Votes
    21 Posts
    8k Views
    TheDogT
    @rogercooper It was a good mod in its own right. Well please upload it to GitHub, but I will not support/maintain it.
  • 270BC Wars - Official Thread

    16
    2
    2 Votes
    16 Posts
    4k Views
    TheDogT
    Deleted post.
  • August came early !!

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    834 Views
    TheDogT
    @johnnycat Oops missed that off. Axis Players & USSR can attack neutrals with Aircraft AI Axis & USSR 1:3 chance to Attack neutrals with Aircraft or 2:3 chance not to attack neutrals with aircraft. I will add it to the post.
  • Hard AI vs Fast AI

    17
    0 Votes
    17 Posts
    6k Views
    RogerCooperR
    Scenario World War II V3 - 1942 Version 2.6.14770 Results Fast AI won in 9 turns as the Axis, the Hard AI won in 8 turns The Fast AI successfully pulled off some risky attacks as the Axis, but still took longer to win the American even taking Italy for one turn. With 4 victories in a row, using different scenarios, I can conclude the Hard AI is better.
  • In a Land Far Far Away: Medieval Crossover Game in America Thread

    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    5k Views
    board 3659B
    @cernel ISOT is an acronym that means Island in the Sea of Time. It's a book about the Island of Nantucket bring brought back to the Bronze Age. Think of it like a Western Isekai but focused on time travel instead of going to another world. Anyway, people use this acronym in Alternatehistory.com to describe stories with the same sort of premise
  • 🏯 The Shogun - Official Thread

    maps thedog
    30
    3
    4 Votes
    30 Posts
    18k Views
    TheDogT
    Latest version 1.5 ready for download In TripleA 2.6 (currently there is no UPDATE map tab/version control, so ...) Click Download Maps Button Click Installed tab Find & Click The Shogun Click Remove Button Click Yes button to remove Click Ok button (Successfully removed) Click Close (To force the map list to refresh) Click Download Maps Button Find & Click The Shogun Click Install button (be patient dont double click it) Enjoy! . MAJOR CHANGES Added Ebbe's most excellent Shogun Advanced Samurai/Japanese sounds.
  • Battle for Craglorn - Alpha/Early Testing Thread

    33
    2 Votes
    33 Posts
    8k Views
    TheDogT
    In case you have not seen this, you can have both 2.5 & 2.6 installed at the same time. https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/3724/how-to-have-triplea-2-5-2-6-installed-at-the-same-time
  • Azimuth's Trilogy - Official Teaser Trailer

    22
    3
    5 Votes
    22 Posts
    6k Views
    A
    @rogercooper done. It's now possible to play Nazi Germany and pretend it's not Nazi Germany
  • Transport Restricted Unload

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    806 Views
    cameronC
    bah. it does only apply to noncombat unloading. well that sucks. oh well. thanks for the reply.
  • 💀 Settlers: Age of Tribes - Official Thread

    maps thedog
    14
    2
    1 Votes
    14 Posts
    5k Views
    TheDogT
    Fixed missing Flag none.png image found here; https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/12584 . Link to 1st post that has the Google Drive download link https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/2399/settlers-age-of-tribes-official-thread
  • Does anyone still play Classic?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    671 Views
    PantherP
    @moomanmaster Look at https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/ Some people play Classic over there.
  • UHD Domination NML Upscaled Baseline

    5
    5
    3 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    Black_ElkB
    @bret-hawkeye How's it going! No worries dude, we're all still sorta noobin' it here honestly, or at least I am hehe. Currently it's just a baseline. To make it into a functional tripleA map that we could actually edit in the game-engine we're still at the point where it needs the centers.txt and the map.properties etc. It's a bit of challenge since basically what we're trying to do is upscale an existing map/scenario that already has an XML rather than creating an entirely new one. So taking the same Territories and Sea Zone tiles (same labels, nations etc) but where those polygons have new coordinates for a larger board. Everything else remaining the same. This is similar to the method used to make the UHD Global, where we take an existing game (the Standard Global by Bung & Veq) but using a new map for it. Here's an example of something similar, using another larger scale map, but where the process is a bit further along. Just so you can see how it might potentially come together... https://github.com/beelee1/mega_new_elk That's a port of 1941 GCD gamemap, but using the UHD Global unit files/game XML etc. It's is just a skeleton of a game, there are no starting units yet, not actual scenario per se. Bill helped me throw it together, where we just grafted the latter onto the former to get a ball rolling. That one uses the 2.6 pre-release, so you'd just drop it into downloaded maps and should fire up as normal. Here is the same, but with a quickie xml draft created using edit mode. So basically all territories with a production a floor at 1 PU, convoys blanked out, a couple capitals assigned and whatnot, just so it will launch within tripleA and look like something vaguely familiar for a G40 vibe. Again just as a jumping off point. From there you'd go in and adjust the production values of the territories or add starting units for a set up, come up with a turn order sequence or tech and stuff like that. 2024-5-7-Mega-New-Elk.tsvg In that scenario, you can imagine maybe that the start date is right after the Fall of France (instead of before like regular G40). Maybe aircraft are evacuated from the Paris tile to England tile, on the first turn of the game to represent DeGaulle? Perhaps most of Vichy goes Pro Axis neutral, while Free France has their locus of power in Central Africa or a Government in Exile in London. Whatever, just a riff for a starting point and spitball idea. Might look something like this for a 1940 date, very rough draft... [image: 1715543184291-screenshot-2024-05-12-123749.png] In order to do something similar for the older WW1 map, it's a similar process a little bit simpler, since presumably players of that scenario would want to keep the game they play more or less unchanged, just with a beefier map. So starting with an existing game xml, same tech advances or whatever, but warping it to fit into a new larger map. In the case of 1914 NML, like using all those production values or units etc. Or one could use one of the larger maps and create a variant from there, but then that's like making a whole new game right lol. Little more involved hehe. Anyhow not sure if that helps to clarify. It was pretty bare bones for the Domination stuff, last person to tool around there was Redrum I think? I wanted to make a WW2 customizers map that had sorta all the stuff in there, perhaps also with a playable scenario for a jumping off point, so I guess the idea would be roughly like that, just more WW1 themed? Again not sure what all is grabbin' peeps these days or how much interest there'd be for it.
  • Arheic Wars / Pangea Proxima A&A

    53
    1 Votes
    53 Posts
    17k Views
    jkprinceJ
    @jkprince havent been doing much lately, here is some pixelart that might find its way in as unit sprites [image: 1713750744471-5c0667b2-1d88-44d1-b29f-b43624525602-image.png] [image: 1713750768427-1849d59b-1729-42a5-935a-9107e955011e-image.png] [image: 1713750783507-21379730-daa3-44e6-a998-f623e5f04342-image.png] [image: 1713750801028-2953405c-1eeb-4d0f-8d01-b8411db2c899-image.png] [image: 1713750894473-49c9d10f-9b2a-4a70-a8b5-d95236223dd6-image.png] [image: 1713750977202-cbc292e8-9bc7-4bdb-9eab-4fb6d92bf457-image.png] [image: 1713751001237-579b14e5-d9f4-4e1d-83e6-085aa142e746-image.png]
  • Experimenting with Realistic Distances

    9
    1
    1 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    SchulzS
    Any another suggestion about the territories? What about the sea zones?
  • Domination 1914 NML relief (black lines update?)

    2
    1
    3 Votes
    2 Posts
    837 Views
    ubernautU
    @black_elk love it!
  • CrazyG's Big World War One

    164
    1
    3 Votes
    164 Posts
    126k Views
    C
    @tinmanta Moved to this topic.
  • The Grand War

    44
    2
    6 Votes
    44 Posts
    27k Views
    jkprinceJ
    6 years later, this mod is still great and I believe deserves to be moved up at least to the "good quality" section from where it sits in experimental. I might make a house rules mod for this as practice- One thing I notice is that Mazdak is almost always the first nation to drop in each game, at least when it is played by AI. IMO, its cultist underpinnings should be represented ingame thru a system that's in mechanically between the Chinese Underground and Grand Armee ones. Rn, the possibility of Mazdak taking Arcadia is a pipe dream if you're not playing as them. If I make an upgrade mod for this, I will add a "Global Mazdakism" territory, impassable like Grands. Unlike Grands, it is not their capital, and does not have any IPC value, so they can still be eliminated. However, also unlike Grands, it has a factory in it. As Mazdak takes more territories, they gain additional locations to which they can deploy units out of their Global Mazdakism pool. Mazdak only: Can deploy to Mazdak and Aksum Control =>3/5 of (Aksum, Sudan, Arcadian Congo, Zimbabwe, Korean Congo): Add deploy to Hedjaz and Sudan, free units in Hedjaz and Mazdak Control =>3/5 of (Khemet, Palestine, Hedjaz, Agrot Republic, Madagascar): Add deploy to Makan and Sumatra and adds some free units in both Control capital Arcadia: Adds free armies and PUs and declares war against everyone (existing rule). Adds deploy to Bengal and Burma. Adds a Motor Pool building into the Global Mazdakism pool, to speed up infantry exit. Control =>3/5 of (Bengal, Burma, Sumatra, Dravidia S.R, Arcadia): Adds a free nuke into the pool territory, for use anywhere, no tech required. Adds a few more free units. First time you capture any nation's capital other than Arcadia's: Also adds a free nuke into the pool territory. Gives a bonus free tech token. ... Apart from Mazdak, some other nation ideas (possibly only for when controlled by AI): India / SUFFER gets a single free volunteer added to "Volunteers 5" at their turn end for as long as they don't control all of their original territories. GRANDS gets a single Infantry added per turn to their Grand Armee pool as long as they are on Total War (i.e losing) China gets an extra Refinery in Yunnan, to help their Fuel budget. It's removed if the territory is lost, and not returned when regained
  • Total World War Diplomacy -- country specific bonuses?

    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    ubernautU
    @jim-parker glad i could help

Recent Posts

  • @alkexr I primarily play evil on the map. Currently, it seems to have too much of an advantage because of the multi-hit units and more units than in prior version. I suppose some balance changes are coming?

    Also, do ranged units still do a hit on flying units like they used to? If so, I think keeping flank is a must because that is pretty much one of the main strategies for evil to counter massed archers responding to flying nazgul/dragons. Also, having cheap goblin archers in a stack is probably one of evil's best ways to deal with eagle spam.

    read more

  • Hi @alkexr, thanks for the update!

    Hope things are going well for you and you can spend a bit of time on the map 🙂

    One question on the removal of mechanical variety. You are planning to remove flanking vs ranged but you want to introduce/keep/adapt charge vs. spearwall. This seems a little weird to me. I think I understand where you are coming from but charge is very similar to flanking in that it's mechanically different but not strategically (in your sense of the word).

    "Ambush" seems like an interesting idea to add a strategic option. It seems to be delivering what you want to achieve. "Scouting" on the other hand has the problem that there is no upside to it. It is purely a reaction while ambush has no downside. (And please don't buff the elven rangers even more by giving them another ability, they are already arguably the best unit in your map.)

    Retreating heroes might work well. I don't think it will make bringing a mage or a balrog the right move but it can make it less of a bad investement (in particular if the balrog can finally affect the foes it will actually be fighting). If dragons can retreat like submarines, though, they will be way too strong/unkillable imho.

    The changes to charge seem a mixed bag. I might be thin ice to comment without having seen/tested the prototyp but ithe new charge seems overly complicated for a mechanic that was very weak and easy to counter in the past (the targeted attack against them meant "charge" was a liability and it was better not to build chargers at all in many circumstances). The new charge is a lot stronger just by not making formation/spearwall a targeted attack (excellent change) but the rest seems very hard to keep in mind/consider when doing some rough calculations. It just does not seem to add much in terms of depth to balance it out.

    Siege was/is an excellent ability from a mechanical point of view imho. I would not make it weaker in caves and so on. It just adds complexity without much benefit. It seems this is targeting very niche scenarios or no scenarios at all.

    I hope you had a chance to look at my explanation on how to simplify the user interface/nomenclature for terrain effect and "tactic" modifiers without loosing any functionality. Some house keeping would really help on that front.

    read more

  • @djggml
    Do have a map.yml in the the_pact_of_steel folder, if not it sholuld look like this

    map_name: the_pact_of_steel games: - {game_name: Pact of Steel, file_name: pact_of_steel.xml} - {game_name: Pact of Steel 2, file_name: pact_of_steel_2.xml}
    read more

  • Hi everyone! I forgot to post it here, but there is a new video where I talk about upcoming changes, mostly to unit abilities. Some abilities were removed, some are now affected by territory effects, and there are also some entirely new abilities, too.

    read more