Maps & Mods

• 

  World at war : variant v3 (Victory Conditions)
  • forthebirds  

  1
  0
  Votes
  1
  Posts
  154
  Views

  No one has replied

• 

  Feudal Lords
  • alkexr  

  6
  5
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  609
  Views

  C

  @redrum Wow that is seriously Ethnic oriented. There is that single "Slavs" players that groups together Pomerania, Bohemia, Polonia, almost all Russia, Serbia and Bulgaria. Tho, in this case, they got the name "Britons" wrong, as those are, rather, the "Anglo-Saxons" migrants, since also "Brittany" ("Little Britain") I see it is not part of the "Britons"...
• O

  No retreat LL games? Especially NML/NWO
  • Ondis  

  22
  2
  Votes
  22
  Posts
  1193
  Views

  O

  Have you ever beaten the Union militarily? So who made the map? Also wondering if there is any negative consequence for having negative manpower?
• 

  Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5
  • Hepps  

  472
  2
  Votes
  472
  Posts
  62776
  Views

  

  @LovePlayingAAA Good catch, it appears we missed a few updates on some of the HeavyDestroyers and will fix that in the next minor version. ImprovedDestroyers and AdvancedDestroyer techs still exist and have been updated to make different improvements for destroyers now. This post outlines the sub/destroyer changes: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/493/total-world-war-december-1941-beta-2-8-0-5/392 (there were a few adjustments to that original vision). The notes haven't been updated yet for 3.0 but are in-progress and hopefully be added shortly. Please use the new TWW 3.0 for discussing the new version: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1181/total-world-war-december-1941-3-0-0-0-now-available
• 

  Unit Browser Instructions
  • Mahks  

  17
  2
  Votes
  17
  Posts
  2158
  Views

  

  UBr Update: WARNING using this update will require scenarios to be reloaded. Added sorting options. Added a list of game properties used in the scenario. Better handling of complex support attachments. Fixed off-line issues. Production frontiers are now dealt with as groups in the unit list, rather than having them as separate items in the empire list. This allows one to view and filter the frontiers so one can compare. Initial placement units are placed in a group as well as sometimes they are not in a production frontier. Newest version : UBr Link 1.002.003
• S

  Iron Blitz (with Classic Map)
  • slimschadey  

  7
  1
  Votes
  7
  Posts
  565
  Views

  L

  not sure if i should start a new thread but ever since i update to 1.10.13285 the game cannot parse: age of tribes classical civil war eastern campaign 1914 blood and steel thegreatwar-ultimate
• 

  Star Trek Dilithium War - Official Thread
  • Frostion  

  17
  5
  Votes
  17
  Posts
  1975
  Views

  

  @Frostion Just the new pizza delivery feature!
• 

  Update for Domination 1914 No Man's Land
  • Schulz  

  31
  0
  Votes
  31
  Posts
  2834
  Views

  

  Did you guys get permission from sieg for adding additional sea zone into Pacific during WaW update process? If not then wouldn't be possible to divide Belarus and Arabia in the update like you had done similar thing in WaW?
• B

  Upgraded V3 41-42 Version
  • beelee  

  3
  1
  Votes
  3
  Posts
  422
  Views

  B

  @Panther Thanks : )
• A

  Big World v3 issues with balancing - unbalanced
  • Andre Segui  

  5
  0
  Votes
  5
  Posts
  1763
  Views

  C

  Not sure why this was moved in tournaments, but moving it to Maps & Mods, if that's fine.
• 

  Total World War (TWW) 2.7.7.2
  • Hepps  

  80
  0
  Votes
  80
  Posts
  14952
  Views

  

  @blackfox Yes you need "Improved Destroyers" Tech in order for the Destroyers to enable fighter aircraft to target Subs. All air to air combat is limited to Bombing-intercepting- and escorting.
• Z

  The Rising Sun
  • zlefin  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  722
  Views

  Z

  zod's explanations don't account for it at all though. his stuff applies to ALL sieg maps, by his own statement. While the situation we have here is TRS receives very little play, while NWO and WAW receive a good amount. In order to be an explanation it needs to account for that discrepancy. which means it needs to point to something that differentiates TRS from the other Sieg maps.
• 

  WWII Revised - Facelift
  • General_Zod  

  55
  0
  Votes
  55
  Posts
  5779
  Views

  

  @hepps Yeah, I saw a nice bf109 model with that paint scheme. I'm glad someone noticed it. As the infantry goes, he is glistening in the sun and sleeves rolled up ready to fight. The tiger is much nicer than original too, added the german cross and high lighted some areas so the tank pops a little. These were little experiments to see what it takes to improve units. It's quite difficult to work on tiny scales where a few pixels is all I have to work with. But I learned a lot. Too bad we don't have a vectored graphics for TripleA, then can do all kinds of stuff on any scale.
• S

  Domination 1914 - Meat Grinder
  • scallen1  

  40
  1
  Votes
  40
  Posts
  3111
  Views

  

  Hello scallen1 I am huge fan of this game and I had several attemps to improve the current dom 1914 for years but I did generally failed. Then I really realize what dom players (or TripleA players) want to see and what they don't want to see in the game. You can improve any game greatly but in term of the taste of people that's another story. These are general opinions of most dom 1914 players (or big map players) (including me) Historical accuracy: It is not as important as you think coz nobody really care. Also making these map historical would make the game significantly more unbaşanced. Declaration of war: Another bad idea. Every nations definitely should always start in the first round. These triggers slow downs speed of game. Increasing the importance of techs: Not good idea because some players can prefer playing it without techs and the current tech rolling system is already very dicey. Boosting these techs makes the game more aleatory. Different units/costs for different nations: People usually don't like it. They like great variations of units but generally better to give every nations to the same units. Too many country: Again, it just slow down games, they don't provide more strategic options. I would liek to see to share more my opinions if you are interested in. Thanks.
• J

  Map question like global with more territories
  • jonpfl  

  4
  0
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  477
  Views

  R

  @redrum The most areas on a world map is the World at War Map. However it does not use the AAG40 rules.There is no map that uses the AAG40 rules with more map areas. However, it would not be hard to change an existing large map such as World At War,or Ultimate World/Global War to AAG40, by cutting & pasting the xml file. Note that v3/AA50 rules differ only in small ways from AAG40 rules. You could probably play Ultimate World or Global War without making changes.
• 

  Misspelling in World War II Global maps.
  • scousemart  

  22
  0
  Votes
  22
  Posts
  3048
  Views

  C

  @scousemart You can download mapskins like maps. This mapskin is available in the repository, under skins. Map skins are a view option, of course.
• 

  The Rising Sun Variant vXXX - Official Thread
  • vicvictory  

  4
  1
  Votes
  4
  Posts
  926
  Views

  

  @hepps That's the way it goes. I'll add this information piece to our thread.
• 

  World at War Variants - Official Thread
  • vicvictory  

  2
  3
  Votes
  2
  Posts
  1701
  Views

  

  Axis vs Allies. Who will be victorious? Good to know: TURN ORDER in World at War - Variants Addendum: Axis nations go first, Allies go second. AXIS TURN ORDER Germans - Italians - Finns - Romanians - Japanese - Thai ALLIES TURN ORDER Chinese - Russians - British - French - Americans - Anzac - Dutch
• 

  World War II v5 1942 Second Edition
  • Schulz  

  42
  0
  Votes
  42
  Posts
  5730
  Views

  R

  @rlphelps You could easily mod the scenario to do so.
• M

  WAW variant vXXX version 1.7.8
  • Mario Rafael Herrera Vaca  

  6
  0
  Votes
  6
  Posts
  810
  Views

  S

  @mario-rafael-herrera-vaca received it.... when are we playing...pbem