-
2 Votes6 Posts4k Views
-
4 Votes24 Posts86 Views
-
7 Votes35 Posts320 Views
-
0 Votes4 Posts22 Views
-
3 Votes10 Posts48 Views
-
2 Votes8 Posts50 Views
-
2 Votes40 Posts9k Views
-
5 Votes42 Posts9k Views
-
0 Votes5 Posts208 Views
-
4 Votes2 Posts1k Views
-
0 Votes20 Posts7k Views
-
1 Votes3 Posts1k Views
-
1 Votes15 Posts5k Views
-
4 Votes26 Posts8k Views
-
2 Votes41 Posts8k Views
-
1 Votes4 Posts2k Views
-
4 Votes19 Posts6k Views
-
2 Votes8 Posts3k Views
-
2 Votes7 Posts3k Views
-
2 Votes22 Posts9k Views
Recent Posts
-
-
@Cernel i think you could make the argument either wae all im saying here is if there room for all of those primary options why bury any of them? they are distinct modes of play
-
@Cernel i believe if we wer to bury the various network game options under a group button the correct terminology would be network or online game vs local game, not multiplayer vs local
his current layout would seem to have room for those additional buttons so i would argue no reason to bury them in the first place
I assume under the understanding that Play-by-Email and Play-by-Forum are local game (not network / online game)?
Anyway, my suggestion remains having the trichotomy Play Online, Play by Message and Play Offline.
-
@Cernel i believe if we wer to bury the various network game options under a group button the correct terminology would be network or online game vs local game, not multiplayer vs local
his current layout would seem to have room for those additional buttons so i would argue no reason to bury them in the first place
