@husky81 So now you have your initial baseline results, Im hoping for now, that you stop using your Tokens verses Hard-AI, Easy-AI and Does Nothing, and just concentrate on using them, against Fast-AI ? What are your plans for testing for improvements to Claude-AI ?

@Ramon I believe by default tech dice use the dice sides specified on the top of the XML (by default 6). So if you want to give tech a dice of 4, you'd be changing the dice sides that regular combat units use as well. If you want tech to be rolled with 4 dice sides and the other rolls with 6 dice sides, I think theoretically it would possible, but would it would be insanely complicated and require the use of a user action phase with a lot of nested triggers/conditions. Also, some of the stuff you want to implement that is currently not possible can be made possible by making changes to the engine. So if you'd like to see this happen, feel free to post a feature request here: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues (click on "New Issue" and select the top option "Feature Request")

Cernel said: Cernel said: I'm keeping finding issues. I'm again (...) confident it will be a matter of very few days. Some information here: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/15013 Ok. I'm not going to give ETA any longer, but I'm working on the map as I find more things to address. When I played with @wirkey, I attacked and captured a lord with the Sword. To my dismay, the lord got automatically freed. I thought that was something intended because I assumed I need a lord to keep captives, but now I think it's actually a bug, and I should have been able to execute the lord I captured with the Sword. More information here: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/15013 Since the rule-book is far from clear here, I'm actually just going to leave the behaviour as it is and document it in Game Notes (that, if you win an offensive battle with only relics or with only relics remaining, every captive lord in there gets freed). (That was quite a bummer when it happened to me.)

@RogerCooper said: more sense to have the executive module set a broad plan and then the other modules figure how to execute the plan. I was thinking that the plan would be more emergent rather than preset if it was set by local processes, but maybe you're right. I will try both ways. The issue with global plannig i think will be getting the nescessary information to the executive and have it analyze that info appropriately without just simulating all possibilities (which isn't possible.) My account is drained of tokens now, so progress is on temporary hiatus.

@ubernaut cloudflare is comprehensive, IIRC you can toggle it so any new IP needs to do a captcha style challenge first. If we get attacked for real, then setting up cloudflare would likely be the only thing to restore the forum. OTOH, our data is what most people really want, I doubt very many really want to simply DDOS TripleA

Update: i worked on some more of @Karl Roderick(Discord) suggestions and extended the Game Info Tab. You now have a diplomatic info screen and you get a diplomatic matrix shown instead of a big wall of Text You now have a info screen for aviable Units You now have a info tab for all aviable tech Diplomatic actions and tech rolls got improved selection screens. the ingame menu got sorted (i moved bug report and how to play out of the menu) Game Notes got renamed Game Info and now includes the mentioned changes. transporters now use the least amount of ships possible to transport a given amount of troops -> Example if the player has 2 transports in a zone and has 2 inf and 1 tank. The move of 2 Inf no longer fills 2 Transports on default. improved yes/no Dialogs (strategic bombing, shore shelling, etc.) All of this is part of the new release. Thank you guys [image: grafik.jpeg] [image: grafik.jpeg] [image: grafik.jpeg] [image: grafik.jpeg]

@craigviau Nice you got it working xml work can be frustrating, unless you were born with a large amount of patience I try to look at it as a puzzle anymore, as opposed to wanting to throw my computer down the driveway lol PactofSteel2 xml is still the best information source, next to wc

@GREGOREK Yah, scrolling both edges sure is cool. I wish this could be possible in an actual (spherical) world (like ours) with some sort of projection, but unfortunately it is not (as far as I know).

Updated to 2.63 [image: Screenshot from 2026-09-25 20-20-09.png]

@beelee I would suggest erasing the flags which is easy to do in Paint. There is no reason to have flags in unit images, as you can turn flags on with View/Flag Display/Small.

@TheDog thanks

It seems very interesting. A lot of posts yesterday but you must be working on it since you were born !

@VictoryFirst I replaced all references to "placeNoAir" to "place" and added <attachment foreach="$All-Players$" name="rulesAttachment" attachTo="@All-Players@" javaClass="RulesAttachment" type="player"> <option name="placementAnyTerritory" value="true"/> </attachment>

@VictoryFirst You need to keep in mind that A&A combat consists of a number of interlocking pieces and that changing one can throw the balance off. It is unrealistic that a small force of infantry can stop a tank blitz but is even more unrealistic that battles run an unlimited number of rounds, that there is no retreat and the lack of supply rules. Making blitzing easier makes things hard for the Russians on the Eastern Front.

@Rrrrricky said: Hey everyone, im new here. Trying to modify NO's on World War ii v3 1942 map. Github looks locked apparently? I couldn't create an account there for some reason. Any ideas? TY! Why did you want to change the NO's? If you want different NO's, you need to create a new mod.