I only play my own global map 1941GCD, as Britain/USA I line my Transport route with Destroyers, meaning they dont have to move . This tactic should work for most global maps? Maybe this is a valid option for HuskyAI ?

@Vendetta Hmm ... very interesting. What say you @victoryfirst

Update: loading fills own transports first, allied ones only take the rest stats tab shows a total row per alliance with more than one nation battle calculator resets the chosen attacker when another nation's turn starts Thank you

@black_elk you are the only one. Help us BlackElk

Presently, the behaviour of the game when both sides lose all Soldiers is that the defender wins, and all attacking lords and relics are captured. I tend to think that that is a wrong behaviour, so I've opened an issue about it: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/15090

@RogerCooper said: more sense to have the executive module set a broad plan and then the other modules figure how to execute the plan. I was thinking that the plan would be more emergent rather than preset if it was set by local processes, but maybe you're right. I will try both ways. The issue with global plannig i think will be getting the nescessary information to the executive and have it analyze that info appropriately without just simulating all possibilities (which isn't possible.) My account is drained of tokens now, so progress is on temporary hiatus.

@ubernaut cloudflare is comprehensive, IIRC you can toggle it so any new IP needs to do a captcha style challenge first. If we get attacked for real, then setting up cloudflare would likely be the only thing to restore the forum. OTOH, our data is what most people really want, I doubt very many really want to simply DDOS TripleA

@Vendetta That might be hard to implement in the engine.

@panther said The fact that the installation now went flawlessly shows, that the MS service behind is 'learning'. I agree. I am inclined to think that it is based on the number of downloads Microsoft has in its SAC database, too few and it is a risk, enough and it passes. So from our point of view, we will need to keep a SAC viable downloads list @cowey To confirm, please find out your friends TripleA version, I will guess it is 2026-10.16.15815 ? Just need the last 5 digits, so its probably 15815

@GREGOREK Yah, scrolling both edges sure is cool. I wish this could be possible in an actual (spherical) world (like ours) with some sort of projection, but unfortunately it is not (as far as I know).

@beelee I would suggest erasing the flags which is easy to do in Paint. There is no reason to have flags in unit images, as you can turn flags on with View/Flag Display/Small.

@VictoryFirst I replaced all references to "placeNoAir" to "place" and added <attachment foreach="$All-Players$" name="rulesAttachment" attachTo="@All-Players@" javaClass="RulesAttachment" type="player"> <option name="placementAnyTerritory" value="true"/> </attachment>

@ubernaut said: @malmessi no reason to be playing 2.8 imo I am playing 3.0 But still checking old 2.8 pdf manual and I was looking for a place to find all the changes joined together, the online game help is perfect

@alkexr hi gent, I’d like to report 2 issues 1: Saruman’s mountain troops are unable to pass through friendly mountainous territory to launch an attack. Is this intended behavior? same thing happens in mordor's turn when a non-mountainer tried to move and attack gondor. 2: i think the acient tower and acient walls and fortress are goood in old versions, why are u removing them? btw, i'd like to join the map test if u agree. thanks

@beelee said: right after I post this it starts working normally classic 🫡

@Rrrrricky said: Hey everyone, im new here. Trying to modify NO's on World War ii v3 1942 map. Github looks locked apparently? I couldn't create an account there for some reason. Any ideas? TY! Why did you want to change the NO's? If you want different NO's, you need to create a new mod.