TripleA Logo TripleA Forum
    • TripleA Website
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Tags
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • S

      G40 Captain Expansion StevenJ vs Johnny

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Play By Forum
      253
      1 Votes
      253 Posts
      10k Views
      S
      @JohnnyCat 354345234988-G40 EXP StevenJ vs JohnnyCat G56c End.tsvg RIP Japan
    • ubernautU

      TWW 3.0.9? NTSH (ax) v (al) ubernaut Game 4

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Play By Forum
      973
      1
      1 Votes
      973 Posts
      517k Views
      N
      @ubernaut Got around to Turkey
    • B

      Multi Game 2 barnee Trout vs Alex Panzer

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Play By Forum
      243
      1
      0 Votes
      243 Posts
      14k Views
      Panzerstahl-Helm 0P
      @Trout @Trout said: @alexander @panzerstahl-helm-0 @beelee By the way, you may see me posting some questions on the A&A forum for our Danish leader. That's because when summer started, my son who goes by Mussolini Pizza Emperor on TripleA, decided to want to play his Dad in HRE again. So we have a board game going now which has an interesting twist. Tokyo fell to Allies and next turn Moscow falling to the Nazis. So I need some clarification from him on a few things that are new in this situation Howdy, I indeed saw these post and was searching for that game here to have a look at t he map and front lines. That game sounds a hell of a ride! At which round are you? BR
    • Panzerstahl-Helm 0P

      exp-game -10 - beelee (Axis) vs. panzer (Allies) - Operation "Straweberry Fields Forever"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Play By Forum
      145
      0 Votes
      145 Posts
      5k Views
      B
      @Panzerstahl-Helm-0 Hallo Game History Round: 14 Purchase Units - Japanese Japanese buy 1 Japan_destroyer, 6 TotalWar_Tanks, 1 carrier, 1 demo_harbour, 1 elite, 3 infantry and 1 mech_infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens; Combat Move - Japanese Trigger Kamikaze: Japanese has 1 Kamikaze placed in Japan Trigger Banzai: Japanese has 1 Banzai placed in Japan Trigger RailMovementAutoPlaceJapanese: Japanese has 2 J_Rails placed in Kiangsu Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode 1 Japan_destroyer moved from 19 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 3 fighters moved from Philippines to 36 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kwangsi to Yunnan 4 armour moved from Kweichow to Yunnan 1 JPNbomber and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kweichow to Kansu 1 armour moved from Shensi to Kansu 1 mech_infantry moved from Suiyuyan to Kansu 1 armour moved from Sikang to Kansu 1 armour moved from Yakut S.S.R. to Amur 1 armour and 6 mech_infantrys moved from Korea to Amur 2 mech_infantrys moved from Jehol to Amur 6 armour moved from Jehol to Amur 2 infantry moved from Korea to Amur EDIT: 1 Japanese_LCV, 1 elite and 1 infantry moved from Japan to Amur Combat - Japanese Battle in 36 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 1 Japan_destroyer and 3 fighters Americans defend with 1 submarine Japanese roll dice for 1 Japan_destroyer and 3 fighters in 36 Sea Zone, round 2 : 2/4 hits, 1.83 expected hits Americans roll dice for 1 submarine in 36 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.17 expected hits 1 Japan_destroyer owned by the Japanese lost in 36 Sea Zone 1 submarine owned by the Americans lost in 36 Sea Zone Japanese win with 3 fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is -1 Casualties for Japanese: 1 Japan_destroyer Casualties for Americans: 1 submarine Battle in Yunnan Japanese attack with 4 armour, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber British defend with 3 infantry Japanese roll dice for 4 armour, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber in Yunnan, round 2 : 4/6 hits, 3.17 expected hits Chinese roll dice for 3 infantry in Yunnan, round 2 : 1/3 hits, 1.00 expected hits 1 armour owned by the Japanese lost in Yunnan 3 infantry owned by the British lost in Yunnan Japanese win, taking Yunnan from Chinese with 3 armour, 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 4 Casualties for Japanese: 1 armour Casualties for British: 3 infantry Battle in Amur Japanese attack with 1 Japanese_LCV, 8 armour, 1 elite, 3 infantry and 8 mech_infantrys Americans defend with 3 infantry Japanese roll dice for 1 Japanese_LCV, 8 armour, 1 elite, 3 infantry and 8 mech_infantrys in Amur, round 2 : 7/21 hits, 6.17 expected hits Russians roll dice for 3 infantry in Amur, round 2 : 1/3 hits, 1.00 expected hits 1 Japanese_LCV owned by the Japanese lost in Amur 3 infantry owned by the Americans lost in Amur Japanese win, taking Amur from Russians with 8 armour, 1 elite, 3 infantry and 8 mech_infantrys remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6 Casualties for Japanese: 1 Japanese_LCV Casualties for Americans: 3 infantry Battle in Kansu Japanese attack with 1 JPNbomber, 2 armour, 1 mech_infantry and 1 tactical_bomber Chinese defend with 2 infantry Japanese roll dice for 1 JPNbomber, 2 armour, 1 mech_infantry and 1 tactical_bomber in Kansu, round 2 : 2/5 hits, 2.50 expected hits Chinese roll dice for 2 infantry in Kansu, round 2 : 0/2 hits, 0.67 expected hits 2 infantry owned by the Chinese lost in Kansu Japanese win, taking Kansu from Chinese with 1 JPNbomber, 2 armour, 1 mech_infantry and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 6 Casualties for Chinese: 2 infantry Non Combat Move - Japanese Trigger RemoveKamikaze: has removed 1 Kamikaze owned by Japanese in Japan Trigger RemoveBanzai: has removed 1 Banzai owned by Japanese in Japan Trigger RailMovementAutoPlaceRemoveJapanese: has removed 1 J_Rail owned by Japanese in Sikang Trigger RailMovementAutoPlaceRemoveJapanese: has removed 1 J_Rail owned by Japanese in Kwangsi 1 Escort moved from 6 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 3 fighters moved from 36 Sea Zone to Philippines 2 infantry moved from Japan to 6 Sea Zone 2 infantry and 1 transport moved from 6 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone 2 infantry moved from 35 Sea Zone to Philippines 1 pacific_transport and 1 transport moved from 35 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Yunnan to Kweichow 1 J_Rail moved from Kiangsu to Korea 1 J_Rail and 1 infantry moved from Korea to Kwangsi 1 JPNbomber and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Kansu to Kweichow 2 fighters moved from Japan to Kweichow 1 armour moved from Shensi to Kweichow 1 J_Rail moved from Kiangsu to Korea 1 J_Rail and 1 infantry moved from Korea to Sikang 1 aaGun moved from Buryatia to Amur Place Units - Japanese Units in Kwangsi being upgraded or consumed: 1 harbour 1 demo_harbour placed in Kwangsi 1 Japan_destroyer and 1 carrier placed in 6 Sea Zone 1 elite placed in Japan 6 TotalWar_Tanks, 3 infantry and 1 mech_infantry placed in Korea Trigger JapaneseTotalWarTankPlace6Korea: has removed 6 TotalWar_Tanks owned by Japanese in Korea Trigger JapaneseTotalWarTankPlace6Korea: Japanese has 6 armour placed in Korea Turn Complete - Japanese Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 4 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 43 Sea Zone. Rolls: 4,5,6,3,4,4,3,1,5,2,4,2,5,1,2,2,6,4,3,2 Japanese collect 47 PUs (4 lost to blockades); end with 47 PUs Trigger Japan Loses CarolineIslands: Japanese met a national objective for an additional -3 Optional[PUs]; end with 44 Optional[PUs] Trigger Japanese Controls Philippines Pacific Expanded: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 3 Optional[PUs]; end with 47 Optional[PUs] Trigger Japanese Controls Guam Pacific Expanded: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 1 Optional[PUs]; end with 48 Optional[PUs] Trigger Japanese AdvancedProduction: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 8 Optional[PUs]; end with 56 Optional[PUs] Trigger Japanese Controls WakeIsland Pacific Expanded: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 2 Optional[PUs]; end with 58 Optional[PUs] Objective Japanese 5 Control China: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 63 PUs Combat Hit Differential Summary : Chinese regular : -0.67 Americans regular : 0.83 Japanese regular : 1.33 Russians regular : 0.00 EXP Game 10 Straw J 14.tsvg
    • PantherP

      Urgent communication needed - 2026-06 Launch & MARTI Dice Server

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
      41
      2 Votes
      41 Posts
      1k Views
      PantherP
      @Nothingtoseehere You will need to use workarounds here or play at https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/ PBF works fine there, as the forum-software is on a lower (but compatible) version than here.
    • T

      EXP G40 Game 4 Trout (Axis) vs Panzer (Allies)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Play By Forum
      69
      0 Votes
      69 Posts
      2k Views
      B
      @Trout Hi Trout Your old saves won't work with a new email address. Triplea or the Dice Server, will look for the emails the game originally started with. If it can't find it, then the above error that Panzer gets is the result. You can either register your old email, if you still have it, or play out the game in local mode
    • LaFayetteL

      Lobby Upgrades, June-25-2026

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      30
      1 Votes
      30 Posts
      599 Views
      LaFayetteL
      @beelee unfortunately you cannot, bot comment is set at bot start once. Need a reboot of the bot to change it abd server access to do that
    • B

      MARTI dice service website issues?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Player Help
      28
      2 Votes
      28 Posts
      879 Views
      PantherP
      @LaFayette Success! I can confirm that registering, confirming and testmail work with 2026-06.16.15640! Thank you, that will certainly help!
    • TheDogT

      TripleA 2026 with Java 25 & TripleA.vmoptions settings

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Map Making
      27
      3 Votes
      27 Posts
      795 Views
      ubernautU
      @drumstick919 @lafayette i’m wondering if this might have something to do with the new skin engine?
    • wc_sumptonW

      Rules interpretation for placement Human vs AI

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Map Making
      26
      2
      2 Votes
      26 Posts
      840 Views
      wc_sumptonW
      @RogerCooper said: I am not sure that this is true. I recently played the mod https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/WWIIv3_1941_UK_Factory in which the British starts with an unplaced factory. The AI places it in Persia. This is done through the bid process. Zero out the British bid and the factory will never be placed by the British AI player. The engine does violate the rules for placing factories. Cheers...
    • I

      Poll on how Defender Retreat should work

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
      21
      2 Votes
      21 Posts
      472 Views
      LaFayetteL
      @iratoric which North Africa game? AFAIK some of the variations are mutually exclusive. I think the first task it is to identify which variations should be plausibly supported. Once done, I would like a full spec identified. Following, we can then look at the plan for how that would be encoded into XML. Doing so iteratively and not all-at-once is perfectly fine. Though, I think we should know beforehand which retreat variations we are likely to want (and also in which maps).
    • LaFayetteL

      Doc: Map Population on website and download list

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved How To & Docs
      21
      2 Votes
      21 Posts
      668 Views
      B
      @RogerCooper Yea I haven't looked at the new map process closely yet. I have updated a preexisting map twice and both times it has updated to the latest in the lobby fwtiw
    • B

      EXP Game 12 barnee vs Trout

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Play By Forum
      96
      1
      0 Votes
      96 Posts
      3k Views
      B
      @trout Yep I just tried us. You are back in action. You did it all yourself too on a massive update day for the site lol
    • ubernautU

      why did we remove the undo all button for movement phases?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
      20
      0 Votes
      20 Posts
      579 Views
      ubernautU
      @Cernel wasn’t even aware of all of these existing commands i do use the control click for getting an entire unit type. didnt realize at all that right clicking current deselects units selectively. i dont think it’s a great idea to flip the click tho not sure the current thing is broken just a bit convoluted and not well understood probably
    • H

      Compatibility with MacOS Silicon

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
      19
      4 Votes
      19 Posts
      578 Views
      ubernautU
      @LaFayette ok so maybe all that wud be needed at this point then since the menu is icons i’d reverse the up arrow that wud make it more obvious that thats where you go to download
    • PantherP

      world_war_ii_v5_1942 is incorrectly linked and installed

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Maps & Mods
      15
      1 Votes
      15 Posts
      372 Views
      PantherP
      I can confirm that it downloads fine now. That already was a good example for the workflow. Thank you
    • LaFayetteL

      Release Strategy & Versioning Proposed Changes - CalVer and Quarterly Recommended Releases

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
      26
      4 Votes
      26 Posts
      991 Views
      LaFayetteL
      I suppose it is worth pointing out that a 'revert' in git is just an undo update. The code history in Git is write-once. Git never deletes anything. So, in a revert update, based on the reverted change: any lines that were added are removed, and any removed lines are re-added. So, a revert is a new update, it just an inverted update to cancel out a previous one. Revert PRs are not at all special to Git, it's just another update. Once a revert is merged, a person can revert the revert update, add more changes to it, and then merge all of that as one bundle. So, a flow might be like this (the letters on the left hand side represent the commit ID, AKA the commit SHA): a43ae Some update that introduced a bug 3ads2 Revert: Some update that introduced a bug fae54 Revert: Revert: Some update that introduced a bug + Bug Fix Changes to the code base are "squashed" together. When a person clicks the revert for the revert, that creates a new proposed change. Bug fixes can be added to that proposed change, then it'll all be squashed together as a single commit that is then released. For example, when reverting the revert, this change would be proposed: abc12 Revert: Revert: Some update that introduced a bug In that proposed change, we can add the bug fix, eg: abc12 Revert: Revert: Some update that introduced a bug fea23 Bug fix Then, when merged, that would land on the main branch and in the history as one commit, eg: fae54 Revert: Revert: Some update that introduced a bug + Bug Fix
    • B

      Creating new game with multiple friends

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Play By Email
      10
      2 Votes
      10 Posts
      403 Views
      B
      @beelee Oh, let me clarify. I noticed the "Automatically Send Emails" section is disabled. That is what I was referring to.
    • RogerCooperR

      Roger's Scenario Thread

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Maps & Mods
      971
      9 Votes
      971 Posts
      2m Views
      SchulzS
      @RogerCooper Aren't v3 41 and 42 unbalanced in favor of the Allies without national objectives?
    • H

      PlayByForum First - Utrecht

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Play By Forum
      8
      2 Votes
      8 Posts
      166 Views
      H
      Thanks all for the quick and helpful replies. Unfortunately the PBEM using a generic SMTP (Fastmail) does not seems to work with my macOS client. I want to set it up for Async possibilties. See Screenshot [image: 1782827481197-triplea-gen-smtp-resized.png] The Play button is greyed out, as well as the Send Test Email. The To and Email Username is red indicating a missing or wrong value, even though the information is correct I think. Is this know, if not I can create a GitHub issue. Good to know, that the A&A forums are a possibility as well.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 1 / 4