Perhaps this is simple as making the dice roller fields optional. (though, if you set one, then you need to set all of them as required, or leave them all blank to not use a dice roller). To make the UX better for this we could default a checkbox "Use MARTI dice roller" to checked, and if you uncheck it then it hides the MARTI dice roller fields. A Help button would be pretty key here to explain that MARTI would do external dice-rolls and internal would simply just not use that.

I think there are probably some implications for the game engine itself as the way PBF is done is kinda hacky, the flag indicating PBF is not direct and probably would trigger a request to Marti. We'd need to make the 'using-marti' be an (internal) game option and to check only that for whether to use marti or not.

@bluelionman said in Single Play Timer request:

I find the biggest issue with me is I over think things and I am hugely indecisive - a bad personality trait.

My buddy has that issue. I find it extremely disturbing when he's passing someone on a two lane highway. lol
...

This leads to when I play human players they get very frustrated with my slow play. I would love to be quicker but like a smoker without intervention I just can't seem to improve.
...>

Hey nobody likes a quitter 🙂 In all seriousness though, this has been discussed before and I think it'd be a good feature. You'd probably have to search for it, as it's been a while since I've seen it discussed.

@madvitale
I'm not sure how the AI would react. When changing cost you need a new unit. A new unit needs to have everything the old unit does, so quite a bit of work.

Transport capacity should be able to be done with conditions/triggers only. I think 🙂 So not too bad.

You have to alter the xml. Explained here:

pact_of_steel_2.xml

It takes a while to get the hang of, unless you happen to be a triplea savant : ) If you wanna pursue it, people will help.

@Panther Created an issue if you would like to add anything. https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/7187

@wirkey That it can't, apparently.

@Panther Actually, I would say this is a duplicate of:
https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1727/have-a-button-that-shows-all-your-units

@redrum Shuould duplicated feature requests be locked?

@wc_sumpton ill dig into it

Indeed, having the 13066 behavior for the active player was the important part.

@Michael-Hoover Currently TripleA asks if you are sure inconsistently. For example, you are not asked if you are sure when you decide to end the Research Technology phase buying nothing, while, instead, you are asked if you are sure when you decide to end the Purchase Units phase buying nothing.

A good example file is the pact of steel repo. Download that map and unzip it, then just open up the xml its full of comments about every option available.

Or just click here.

Another good example is the Warcraft_war_heroes beta from Frostion. Although he uses the chance option for fishing you can modify it for whatever.

I might be more help if you want to post some code I can look at?

A factory that carry no battle-value is structural whether it's mobile or not.

Yes, just enabling battles between land units and warships which land units may even sink ships too. Always found naval bombardment feature underwhelming when trenches/bunkers present.

@Michael-Hoover said in DestroyedUnit Condition:

I tried using the "whenHitPointsDamagedChangesInto" unit attachment option but it doesn't work when the unit is reduced to 0 hp (killed, destroyed, etc).

It does, but not in the current release.

I like the changes. i thought I saw somewhere else that the color might be changed to more of a blood red look ? So not so bright ? Idk if it'd work or not but the red seems a little too bright to me.

My other critique is I prefer the (parentheses) to have a space ( parentheses ) before their content. It makes it easier for me to read, but that just might be a personable problem of my own that I need to learn to live with 🙂

Great work. I like it. Thank You

then let me rephrase ☺
Is it possible to have the engine altered so that all the "stacking limits" that that the unit/player has, also be in effect under pregame placements?

@Schulz said in A new map project for variety of scenarios?:

Modern Day, War on Terror, War on Drug, Cold War, WW2, Inter-war, WW1, 1900, Napoleon Wars, Seven Years Wars, 6 days war etc...

It will be hard to make a map that can handle such disparate conflicts. I always like a new map, but it once you decide to exaggerate some areas you will need to decide which ones based upon some specific time.