@hepps JESUS! and I wanted was chu chus ... 😉

Well, purchase window is just not comfortable, could be A/B/C/D/E with A for FirstStrike value, B for normal attack, C for FirstStrike value defense, D for normal defense and E for movement, maybe the number of rounds in brackets like : 2(1)/3/3(2)/4/1 but that looks at bit much info, colour could be used maybe.
Any text popup beeing configurable would be good, probably needs to be per unit, maybe within xml under unit attachments.
For engine casualties selection and AI it is not so easy to set. 2 attackers with 3, one FS, one normal and 2 defenders with the same values, for example is hard to judge, as it really depends on the hits your opponent scores. If both FS miss, but you get a hit in normal round, you sure want to keep your FS unit and the same situation when a FS unit scores a hit, but when the FS values are lower, say 1 or 2 with 6 sided dice, it is much harder to tell and more gambling, while I would say a FS unit with 2 is still better than a normal unit with 3...

Great! I would help if possible, let think on that (balance of forces to be even) that can be an innovation even for gametable. thanks & greets

@beelee 😉
https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/pull/2506#issuecomment-336785177

RoiEXLab created this issue in triplea-game/triplea closed Highlight empty bots #2506

Is it possible to see SBR damage in territory tab too?

@frostion Yah that is the idea. In my example the BB would actually change twice...

Unit starts as a BB

Turns into BBdamaged

Then turns into BBhvydamaged

This idea could be used in other ways as well for something like a production facilities which could have far more hit points... like 16 HP changes to a lower producing version with 8 or more damage.

@hepps I saw that, due to the purchase limits of the old Fodder AI", with the triggers bringing back the stuff, when it is going to be assigned to the players. But this is another matter yet. As I said, the two "requiresUnits" here are just useless. You could remove them both, and nothing would change, for those units. As I said, this is really a marginal matter, we/you can solve any ways you prefer (most likely, what is wanted is removing the first occurrence only), doesn't really matter and it's no problem; it was really not the focus of my post.
As a matter of my proposal, if you want just to keep it as it is, the change would be this one (but this would equal not having it):
<option name="requiresUnits" value="spanishEntrenchment:spanishCombatEngineer" count="1"/>

@cernel I agree we should increase the major version number, but for a different reason:
The work and infrastructure changes that are required for such a change would be massive, that's why the version would be completely incompatible.

@frostion Yeah, this has come up before and is probably a good idea. I think the AI actually already does this (you might want to test that out) so it would probably be pretty easy to add the same logic to default selection provided to the player.

Yes keep it.

@cernel said in Remove Space Bar for casualties confirmation:

If that doesn't happen for you, it has to be either a bug or something is not clear about that option's description.

Well, I posted the screenshot of the setting and tried the alternative. The two variables I can think of are:

OS, I'm running Ubuntu 16 Look and feel, currently set to system default instead of substance.

I'll need to check if either of those two are the reason. Thank you for confirming that @Cernel and @prastle

For combat, you need to hit space bar twice for a mis-confirmation, and politics once. I would suggest it's a majority use case where two players are spamming space bar to get through a combat phase rather than either one chatting. If you play multplayer games instead of 1v1, you may have a different experience, but looking at lobby games at any time less than 25% to less than 10% of games are more than 2 players.

So, we need to be sure:

we keep combat fast, players need to be able to confirm casualties with keyboard shortcuts quickly. We need to keep in mind that space bar is an OS default to activate the currently selected control. Getting the UX correct here may be tricky. we need to keep in mind there are cases where players are chatting, single click confirmations are effectively broken, double space bar confirmations not as bad but still can lead to accidental confirmations.

Summarizing that, I cut a tracking ticket so we don't forget this: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/2293

Please add any 'requirements' to the list if any are missing, the problem at least is well defined, the task I documented is mainly to investigate possible fixes and to propose something that fits the listed requirements.

DanVanAtta created this issue in triplea-game/triplea closed Fix accidental Space bar confirmation (problem while typing, eg: chatting) #2293

But as long as it is possibe to always install a legacy version, there should be no need to keep old jars with the latest release and pre-releases

@panther I think that is a very good point. Our new website, installer, and that we print the engine version in the game UI makes this all a lot easier compared to the SVN days.

will the next major release affect all the maps the same as the last one?

Likely not. We're in a better position to avoid a number of those problems now. We can still and always could introduce non-backward compatible XML changes. The last iteration required a re-download since we unbundled every map with from the game engine and we re-hosted. We took that opportunity to add in some non-backward compatible changes since all the maps needed to be updated anyways.

I think soon we will introduce an XML schema versioning system directly into the XML . That would allow us to start upadting XMLs in non-backwards compatible ways, but still play 'old' map XMLs that had not been updated. Today the game engine and XML code need to stay in pretty much lock step, doing that we could let the game engine code move forward but still 'remember' how to parse the old XML spec.

@RoiEX I would check on the live lobby a few times to get more player input on this one. I think the question at the moment is whether everyone agrees with

"But as long as it is possibe to always install a legacy version, there should be no need to keep old jars with the latest release and pre-releases"

Now I'm inclined to blow the dust of my raspberry and try it myself ^^

@Frostion Hoping to release in the next week. We are going through some testing and fixing a few bugs that were found. You should be able to make a PR in github or make the changes local and not upload them then wait til its released.

@LaFayette said in Ideas for a 'show combat' button?:

@redrum Always on-top could be an option, yes. IIRC there was an issue where multiple always on top windows competed, so long as that is not the case that is a good alternative.

It was me that reported that issue relatively to the "Game Notes" window. The case is different here, and I suggest having the on top and, then, see if it causes any issues or not. I think that if the window closes automatically when the battle is over, then there should be no issues at all for sure.

But, we also should consider the spectator case, an always on top combat window would be really annoying, so some conditional logic would seem called for to always on-top only if you are involved in the battle.

As long as you can still click to minimise the window, I believe that is not a problem. Anyways, if it is feasible, I agree to limit the always on top for the two referring players of the battle only, of course.

@David_VanDyke I don't believe anyone is currently working on it but I think we have a general consensus on the 2 main ways to implement it from this post: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/212/moderate-luck-option/20

Its hard to say if/when someone will pick it up to work on it but it is on the unprioritized feature list: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/182/guidelines-and-feature-request-list

I'm currently working on: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/159/tuv-for-units-that-have-consumesunits-property

I may eventually make a poll for folks to vote on feature requests they'd like to see prioritized.