• TripleA - a request from a player to a designer

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    734 Views
    C
    @The_Good_Captain said in TripleA - a request from a player to a designer: First, in both '41 and '42 versions of Anniversary, the official errata optional rule regarding SZ 16 (the Dardanelles rule) was omitted. The problem here is that the TripleA program doesn't allow for having a direct setting that enables/disables a canal. This could be hacked in a number of ways, but probably should rather be a feature request for the program to support such a possibility, before changing any maps (so, one would need first to find a developer to add the feature to the program, another developer to review such feature, then someone willingly to modify the map's games, and, finally, an administrator accepting the changes (all this besides any considerations about copyrights over the existent map, whose creators are likely not all active any longer)). Meanwhile, you can use my "WWIIv3 1941 Tech Advance" variant. Just be sure to customize it back to standard WWIIv3 rules, before enabling the "Canal Turkey" option. Second, I know this is a map in development but the destroyer units in Europe '99 (“Europe - Alpha” map as its called in TripleA) This (as well as "Pacific") is more like a map abandoned during development. It may be more than 10 years nobody is working on it.
  • "Bad-Ass" 4 Nation FFA

    58
    1 Votes
    58 Posts
    24k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @RogerCooper This scenario has been fixed can be downloaded
  • Amsterdam_met_de_bois

    Moved
    19
    5 Votes
    19 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Hidde2k You need to change the B in the version number to 2.
  • Diplomacy like modification?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    978 Views
    RoiEXR
    @Cernel Not necessary. Providing the link like you just did is absolutely fine. @Marc-Sarzi Yeah it's a real bummer that simultaneous movement is not possible. You can do a lot with the xml, but there are just some core concepts that can't be changed. As developers we're in a long process of modernising the code and TripleA itself in multiple areas, but core gameplay is simply not a priority. There are tons of more pressing problems to solve and simultaneous movement isn't just something one can implement in an afternoon. TripleA is open source after all, so if you're ambitious enough, at least in theory, you could contribute for this to eventually become a reality.
  • Axis & Allies Zombies (AA42-2)

    20
    2 Votes
    20 Posts
    4k Views
    C
    @Cernel For example, if I'm making a game that is not exactly "chess", I would call it "chess" if the ultimate aim is for it to be exactly like "chess", and maybe this is just impossible, due to the limitation of the program. On the other hand, I would not call it "chess" if it is a game inspired to "chess" but deliberately made different in some ways.
  • Adding a map to the repository in one category or another one

    1
    3 Votes
    1 Posts
    554 Views
    No one has replied
  • best WW2 map?

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    4k Views
    K
    The best WWII maps are New World Order (European theater), Rising Sun (Pacific), and World at War (the whole world). They are all part of the same series. I'll focus on New World Order, as this is the one with which I'm most familiar. The attached picture shows New World Order at the start of a game. Germany is supposed to expand quickly, conquering Paris on G3, and conquering most or all of neutral Poland by G3 as well. Early in the game Italy is supposed to conquer southern France, the Balkans, central and western North Africa, and potentially Greece. It's also supposed to expand into eastern Spain. Britain is supposed to expand in the Middle East, conquering neutral Iran, Iraq, and possibly neutral Turkey. There are no diplomatic or other penalties whatsoever for attacking neutrals. Axis nations are Germany, Italy, Finnland, and Romania. Allied nations are U.S.S.R., France, Colonial France, Britain, and the U.S. Contested areas are Scandinavia (if UK or US go north) France (if UK or US go middle), Spain (if Britain or US go south) or northern Africa. Over in the east, Turkey can be contested between Britain and Italy. If Britain wins that struggle it will seek to advance into Greece and the Balkans. If Italy wins it will seek to take Iran/Iraq from Britain, perhaps even conquering Britain's factory in Cairo and driving Britain out of the east Mediterranean entirely. Sometimes Allies will go Kill Italy First, in which case Axis will often respond with Kill Soviet Union First. In this map Italy is at least as important to the Axis as the Soviet Union is to the Allies. To give you a feel for the scale of this map, it's perfectly normal for Germany to have an income of 130 and Italy to have an income of 80, and for Allied incomes to balance out Axis. Starting on round 4 you will be able to build special, more technologically advanced units: harder hitting, long ranged bombers for Britain and the U.S., Katyushka for the Soviet Union, jets for Axis, big armor and bunkers and super subs for everyone. This map includes some land and air unit types not seen in Larry Harris maps. [image: alt text] [image: alt text]
  • Existing A.I options and A.I modding

    7
    1 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @felizardo You should also check out the Fast AI. It plays almost as well and it usually much faster.
  • Steampunk 1915

    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    @RogerCooper Hi Roger, Actual Cernel answered my question for me. I had inadvertently left some of the original authors units in the unit folder. That is why they were appearing in "unit help". I think my version is ready to go.
  • Dragon War - Official Thread

    103
    0 Votes
    103 Posts
    63k Views
    FrostionF
    @Michael-Hoover Very well spotted! () This is now fixed if you remove and redownload the map. There were actually 3 dragon notification mix-ups that I had to fix.
  • TWW 2.7.7.2 or earlier versions

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    384 Views
    No one has replied
  • Total World War Diplomacy?

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    Hal LinH
    Oh, that fixed it! I feel dumb now haha
  • Game of Thrones & A Song of Ice and Fire - Official Thread

    96
    4 Votes
    96 Posts
    55k Views
    Greg AndersonG
    Sorry for not posting in a while. I'm currently quite busy. I'll post again when I finish the units, as there are a few things to iron out.
  • Star Trek Dilithium mod

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    580 Views
    No one has replied
  • Missing Connection in Dragon War

    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    FrostionF
    Thanks @Michael-Hoover for the notification. I appreciate that you came here to the forum and not just fixed your own local copy Yes, there was a flaw in the XML. Actually there were two connections in the XML between the two territories. But this was not the problem. There has recently been an implementation of “Air connections” to the map as an alternative to bridge connections. (Credit to @Cernel :thumbs_up:) The two territories had gotten an air connection (even though it shouldn’t) and this was preventing normal unit movement. You probably flew over the connection but could not walk over it with another unit. It should be fixed now when v1.2.8 Dragon War is downloadable/updateable. I hope you return and notify if you find other flaws. :winking_face:
  • Broken Mods in Scenario Repository

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    587 Views
    LaFayetteL
    The hope was that we'd have an army of map owners/makers taking care of the maps in repositories. In practice the maps in repository tend to be a last step and a bit of 'fire and forget'. That is not the case for all maps, there are some certainly being actively maintained, though that can't be said for the bulk as we have over a hundred and just a few people maintaining the whole project (code, servers, maps). If you have fixes, it would be great to see them get uploaded, let us know where you are running into trouble and/or what you are trying. Any scenarios you have that can be uploaded are certainly very welcome additions.
  • 1940 map with 1942 rules?

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    Michael HooverM
    Thanks for the ideas I'll check that out!
  • Correcting the Pacific Mod

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    509 Views
    No one has replied
  • Ancient Empires: 222 BC

    265
    5 Votes
    265 Posts
    246k Views
    HeppsH
    @Name Just checking in to ensure you're ok.
  • Is it possible to balance AA50-41 without Nos?

    3
    -1 Votes
    3 Posts
    841 Views
    C
    I'm a long time believer that they should have never added National Objectives to the v3 (anniversary) 1941 game. However, it is a fact that almost everyone plays with them enabled, despite the fact that they are officially optional (differently from technology, that is the other official option, in this case rarely taken).

Recent Posts

  • @KurtGodel7 said:

    To take the example you gave, suppose the Soviet Union builds a bunch of fighters to prevent Germany from having control over the eastern front. The Luftwaffe then exits the eastern front and goes elsewhere. This makes the Soviet Union happy for two reasons. 1) His armies are no longer being strafed by German dive bombers. 2) Now the Soviet Union can build dive bombers of its own to strafe German armies

    Ok it is as I said, Russia need to pay a lot for fighters just to get point 1) but this was the same in normal A&A games with one difference, russian fig can be also used to attack and take back precious territories
    About point 2) it was predicted by me but I have never seen Rus purchasing bombers or battleships or other expansive units in any game over teh last 10 years playing TripleA. It all depends on the cost for those dive bombers; if a bomber costs like 4 inf it will allow to kill 4 german inf in the incoming 4 turns but on the otjher side it will be a -4 inf for Stalin too...
    I am sure you balanced your game very well, my posts are just opinions of a player who did not crrated the game, did not even read complete rules, just trying to help in a construcitve way 🙂

    read more

  • @KurtGodel7 Fascinating. My own tech system overhaul plays closer to vanilla but has 45 universal techs and 48 national exclusives (4 each for ANZAC/China/France and 6 each for Germany/Italy/Japan/UK/US/USSR). It would be interesting to compare notes on that once I've finished getting it all written up.

    read more

  • @Vendetta said:

    That was helpful to see. Your new rules on air combat systems are particularly interesting.

    The conscript spam problem is one you might have several ways to address. Fundamentally, you have two routes to look into: making it easier to kill them, or throttling the production pipeline.

    The way to make them more killable would be giving some of the higher value units multiple attack rolls so they can potentially kill two or three of them at a time. However, that’s going to have severe ripple effects on the balance of the entire combat system, so it’s probably the least attractive option.

    You could raise the MP price by 1, or lower the MP budget for the presently overpowered nations. Raising the MP cost may of course make the unit no longer economical to produce, and nerfing Soviet and Chinese MP too much may handicap them from building enough of their normal units if those are also using MP.

    Putting a flat population cap on them is the simplest band-aid fix that won’t fundamentally alter the balance of the game. I included a Militia unit based on the House Rules one in my draft of a total overhaul of the A&A research and tech system, which I’ll be posting a thread about sooner or later. It has more or less the same combat profile as your Conscript (A0/D1/M1) but can’t get artillery support, and a 2 PU cost. I decided to impose a flat production cap of 12 on the map at a time per nation to control spammage. The use case for them in my meta is emergency defense - the enemy is sitting one territory away from your major factory and you want to put the maximum amount of cannon fodder there at the lowest possible price - that and I tied them in to the mechanics for Chinese and Soviet partisan spawns. The difference here is that I explicitly wanted to make sure my Militia would never became a mainstay unit that would displace Infantry from its role as the backbone of your army - but you actually want your Conscripts to do that for your select group of countries. The main downside of flat population caps is that they feel very artificial and arbitrary for the players, like running into an invisible wall.

    One more solution that might work for you is separating conscripts from standard Factory production infrastructure to keep a tighter control on the number players can place per turn. Consider this: Conscripts are built out of a separate building altogether (call it a Recruiting Center, Training Ground, Army Base, or whatever else suits your fancy).

    Recruiting Centers are cheap (maybe 4-6 PUs) and each one allows 3-5 Conscript placements. The Soviets, Chinese, and Italians would start with a few on the map, allowing some immediate Conscript placements, but not enough to just dump their entire surplus MP budget into Conscript buys every turn. They can do that, but they’ll have a bunch stuck in the queue because they don’t have enough spawn points to place them all. They can solve that problem, however, once they buy some additional Recruiting Centers - but that requires a PU investment, so they need to divert some of their budget from normal units in order to achieve their maximum potential on conscript spawns.

    It also gives enemy players some options for counterplay against Conscript spamming - they can try to bomb or overrun your Recruiting Centers to limit the spawns.

    That option seems like the most promising one to me, but you’ll have to do some experimenting with how much the Recruiting Centers should cost / how many conscripts can spawn at each to figure out what would play best.

    An important facet of this game is its tech system. There are 55 techs the Soviet Union can research, 52 for Japan, 65 for Germany. A number of those techs require multiple stars to research. I will grant that not every nation needs every tech. The Soviets, for example, do not need fleet carrier tech.

    Even so, my goal is for the outcome of the game to be undecided on round 20. This will give the tech system time to unfold. If someone concedes on round 7, that means I have failed. The effect of tech is small for the early game and grows over time.

    In my test game, Japan was slowly conquering China. That was exactly what I'd wanted. The Axis needs to expand to counteract the Allies' advantage in early game income. But I didn't want the expansion to be too rapid.

    The way I've conceived things, some territories produce manpower points--but only for their original owners. As Japan took Chinese territory, China's MP income was slowly reduced. This meant Japan's invasion was starting to gain momentum. I want the Axis to conquer enough to keep it in the game economically, but not so much that it delivers a quick knockout punch.

    The European theater of my test game was a different story. Despite the Soviet Union's ability to spam massive amounts of conscripts, Germany was able to stack Smolensk on G4. Smolensk is two spaces away from Moscow. Barbarossa was a little too strong. What was required there was a little bit of a nerf of Germany's starting units. As the Soviets lost territory to the Germans, their manpower points declined. By round 3 their MP income had been reduced to 22, or 22 conscripts per turn.

    I'm perfectly happy with the Soviet Union or China spamming large armies of conscripts. There is nothing at all wrong with that. They had large armies in the real war, they may as well have large armies in this game. The tricky part is balancing the game, such that the game lasts a long time before the outcome is decided.

    Infantry-type units
    Conscript. Cost: 0 PUs, 1 MP. Move 1, attack 0, defend 1.
    Infantry. Cost: 1 PU, 1 MP. Move 1, attack 1, defend 2.
    Sturmtruppen. Cost: 3 PUs, 1 MP. Move 1, attack 2, defend 3.
    Mobile infantry. Cost: 3 PUs, 1 MP. Move 2, attack 1, defend 2.
    Mechanized infantry. Cost: 5 PUs, 1 MP. Move 3, attack 2, defend 2.

    Conscripts can only be built by the Soviet Union, China, and Italy. All nations except China can build infantry. Sturmtruppen are Germany only. Mechanized infantry can be built only after researching the appropriate tech. Tech can also be used to upgrade your mobile infantry to movement 3 and defense 3. The "assault rifle" tech for Germany adds +1 to the attack and defense of its Sturmtruppen. All infantry-type units can receive support on both offense and defense.

    The nation with the most MPs is the Soviet Union. But even the USSR, with its massive MP income, ran out of MPs before it ran out of a need for cannon fodder. That's why there's the anti-tank gun, available for all nations to purchase. Cost: 3 PUs. Movement 1, attack 1, defense 1, receives support on defense only. Anti-tank guns can receive support on attack also, if you research "unrelenting attack" tech.

    Let's say the Soviet Union is on defense. It has lots of conscripts as cannon fodder. It has some anti-tank guns to provide additional cannon fodder. But then it needs something to "crown the stack" as it were. Something with really good defensive firepower. That's why there's the heavy gun. Cost: 7 PUs. Attack 2, defend 4. Provides support on defense only. Its defense value can be upgraded to 5 with rail guns tech. Its cost can be reduced by 1 with working women tech.

    Another good defensive unit is the trench. Cost: 3 PUs, movement 0, defends on a 0, takes 2 hits to kill. Trenches can be placed on any territory you owned at the start of your turn. They do not count against factory placement limits. A maximum of two trenches per territory per turn can be placed. Their defense value can be upgraded to 1 with bunkers tech.

    Let's say I'm the Soviet player and I'm defending Moscow. I'd want lots of trenches. Lots of conscripts and anti-tank guns to soak up hits. Heavy guns, both for the defensive firepower they offer in and of themselves, and also because they provide support on defense. If I have 20 heavy guns, that means 20 of my conscripts or anti-tank guns are getting +1 to their combat rolls on defense. If I need to bring in units from a distant factory, and if I need to get them to Moscow quickly, I'm bringing tanks. A tank costs 8 PUs, attacks and defends on a 3, has two hitpoints, and a movement of 2. If that movement of 2 is a must-have, tanks give you good hitpoints for the money, and give you good firepower on both offense and defense. Soviet tanks can experience a 1 PU cost decrease with the "simplify the T-34" tech. British tanks can gain +1 to offense and defense by researching the "Comet" tank tech.

    read more

  • @Vendetta If you want to prevent unit spamming, TripleA has a number of straightforward solutions.

    You can set a maximum number of units built You can set a stacking limit You can have units that launch AA-style attacks against every unit
    read more