• Ancient Empires: 222 BC

    265
    1
    5 Votes
    265 Posts
    246k Views
    HeppsH
    @Name Just checking in to ensure you're ok.
  • Is it possible to balance AA50-41 without Nos?

    3
    -1 Votes
    3 Posts
    841 Views
    C
    I'm a long time believer that they should have never added National Objectives to the v3 (anniversary) 1941 game. However, it is a fact that almost everyone plays with them enabled, despite the fact that they are officially optional (differently from technology, that is the other official option, in this case rarely taken).
  • Civil War | War Financing Issues

    Moved fixed
    26
    0 Votes
    26 Posts
    9k Views
    C
    Tagged as Fixed. Moved to Maps & Mods.
  • Switching out default units

    41
    1 Votes
    41 Posts
    14k Views
    C
    @Joe-Pants said in Switching out default units: @Hepps I still have it as well; is there a new group repository? Here are the relevant links: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/918/map-maker-resources Here it is the one you are asking for: https://github.com/triplea-game/map-maker-assets Here it is the old one, for the units: https://sourceforge.net/projects/tripleamaps/files/developer resources/units/ Are your old units images in there, or were you asking for something else? Going back on topic, I suggest you share your map customization of WAW as a mapskin. This would also make much easier deciding what possibly to integrate into the original skin itself.
  • Oil Wars (WW3) - Official

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @NinjaWolfHybrid the edits @Cernel is talking about are not that much. In the xml replace "attatch" with "attach", this will replace both "attatchment" and "attatchTo", "Attatchment" with "Attachment" and "victoryCity" value="true" with "victoryCity" value="1" . This should allow the map to be played when uncompressed. File contains only edited xml: Oil Wars.zip Cheers...
  • WaW Customized. Lots of units

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    606 Views
    No one has replied
  • HOME RULES for Great War

    Moved
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    650 Views
    C
    @hale Looks like most of these rules are not something players can self-enforce, but would require changes to the map (or more realistically making a variant), so I'm moving this to "Maps & Mods". Anyways, good luck, but being Great War a high quality map currently not owned (and rarely played), it is going to be tough getting any gamechanging updates accepted (up to @redrum or @Lafayette).
  • Germany's Iron War music

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    996 Views
    FrostionF
    @Mike-Baker Iron War uses a mix of “real” historical / national orchestral music from the different countries as well as random music I found on the WWW. I would say that it is about 50/50 real historical music mixed with new music from various sources. Besides me tracking down national anthems and military marches and such, I used a lot of time searching for like Indian style/themed orchestral music, Asian style music etc. I didn’t really keep track on where exactly I found the music, but it is from places like YouTube, free game resource sites, free music sites, sites that listed the music files of old computer games etc. To me the Music_Germany_13_3 sounds like some kind of game music. I really can’t remember where I found it.
  • world at war variants & the option of changing units

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    forthebirdsF
    @Captain-Crunch I'm specifically referring to the WAW v3 variant game when I am saying that the AI plays a much better game without the "defense" unit . I assume that the same thing would occur with the other WAW variants that have the "defense" unit.
  • AA50: Anniversary edition

    22
    0 Votes
    22 Posts
    7k Views
    Black_ElkB
    It is listed as World War II v3 in the maps depot
  • WW2 alternate Scenario - 7 years war Revisited

    18
    3 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    HeppsH
    @PortableDoor I use a combination of paint . net and GIMP. But there are lots of different programs. As far as a map choice... that is for you to explore... I would not rob you of the joys of making what you want.
  • Has anyone ever made a XCom themed map?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    665 Views
    RogerCooperR
    @redrum No one has done anything like that. Take a look at Steampunk 1915 for how to handle alien invaders.
  • Fixed Game of Thrones Map Bug

    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    9k Views
    redrumR
    @Cernel Yeah, can probably repurpose that thread to be the official one and should probably move the conversation there since this was really about fixing some of the bugs in the map.
  • Connected Empire: Contiguous Landgrab vs Can Opener Criss-Cross?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Cernel I don't see the current patchwork is a problem (it rewards the minor allies for participating). But you could easily create an event that triggers in the current version of the engine, changing ownership to reflect the assigned sphere of influence. Here is the reference from POS2 changeOwnership values: This will change the ownership of the territory, either directly or by conquering the territory (there is a difference). Format is "territoryName:oldOwner:newOwner:booleanCaptured?". territoryName can be "all", and oldOwner can be "any". Can have multiple instances. examples: <option name="changeOwnership" value="South France:Germans:VichyFrench:false"/> or <option name="changeOwnership" value="all:Mongolians:Russians:true"/> or <option name="changeOwnership" value="Danzig:any:Germans:false"/>
  • Revisiting an old project

    161
    1
    3 Votes
    161 Posts
    150k Views
    redrumR
    So there doesn't appear to be an appetite to rebalance this map based on the territory differences between RTW and 270BC. So I've taken the improved unit images and dice images and merged them into standard 270BC: https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/pull/4 I will also be reviewing the changes in 270BC variants to see if any balances adjustments should be added from those. New official map thread: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1448/270bc-official-thread
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • Unit costs of World at War

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    719 Views
    C
    @Schulz Moving to Maps & Mods.
  • D-Day Version 3

    1
    3 Votes
    1 Posts
    525 Views
    No one has replied
  • did anybody fix that bug on the game of thrones map?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    791 Views
    C
    @runman Sadly, I don't think anyone fixed anything. It's many years that several people talk about the Game of Thrones map, but nothing has ever come out of it (I may be interested in playing that map if well remade). If you are interested in learning mapmaking and fixing it yourself, you can do it (whatever changes are probably going to be accepted, I assume, the map being just largely broken).
  • Historical Statistics

    25
    1
    2 Votes
    25 Posts
    11k Views
    RogerCooperR
    I have added total mobilized: [image: 35360048-954c-449f-984e-7a611e94440c-image.png] Country Manpower on Entry into War End of War Peak Number Total Mobilized Albania 13,000 13,000 13,000 Australia 91,700 575,100 575,100 993,000 Belgium 600,000 650,000 650,000 900,000 Bulgaria 160,000 450,000 450,000 1,011,000 Canada 63,100 759,800 759,800 1,100,000 China 2,500,000 5,000,000 5,700,000 14,000,000 Denmark 6,600 6,600 6,600 Finland 127,800 270,000 270,000 270,000 France 900,000 437,000 2,680,000 2,680,000 Germany 3,180,000 7,800,000 9,500,000 17,900,000 Greece 430,000 540,000 540,000 Hungary 80,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 India 197,000 2,159,700 2,159,700 2,581,800 Italy 1,899,600 259,100 2,563,000 2,563,000 Japan 1,700,000 7,200,000 7,200,000 9,100,000 Netherlands 270,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 New Zealand 13,800 192,800 192,800 192,800 Norway 25,000 25,000 90,000 Poland 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 2,400,000 Rumania 686,000 370,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 South Africa 19,000 198,000 250,000 UK 681,000 4,683,000 4,683,000 5,896,000 USA 5,413,000 11,877,000 11,877,000 16,354,000 USSR 9,000,000 12,400,000 13,200,000 13,200,000 Yugoslavia 150,000 800,000 800,000 1,500,000

Recent Posts

  • Recent modifications to this map:

    Because I'm using a different version of the engine, this cannot be played on the TripleA lobby. There are other ways to achieve networked play, however, and today some changes to my version of the engine were made to achieve this. Also, I've started the grim task of getting this ready for AI play. Step 1 was to have the AI play for 15 rounds without the game generating errors or crashing. This has now been achieved. Step 2 (currently in progress) is to have the AI make decent decisions during the research phase.

    In the test games (AI vs. AI) Moscow fell on round 12 or so. China fell as well. Is this a game balance issue of the Axis being too strong, or is this the result of poor AI play? From the verbal description I was given of these test games, Britain launched some minor raids on the German coast, but not a large scale invasion of Western Europe. The descriptions were a bit vague as to what America Atlantic did or didn't do.

    Also, Conscription 1 tech provides the USSR with 5 free infantry per turn (assuming it still holds the Soviet interior). This is doubled to 10 free infantry per turn with Conscription 2, and maxes out at 20 free infantry for Conscription 4. Those are in addition to the free infantry it gets each turn for its Propaganda techs. If the Soviet Union wasn't researching Recruitment--which I'm pretty sure it wasn't--then that's a huge wasted opportunity for it to have put up a better fight against Germany.

    There could well be balance problems with this map--that wouldn't surprise me even a little--but I feel the AI needs to improve before it can accurately reveal those problems. I'm at about 50% of my weekly usage, so we'll see how much progress I'm able to make on the AI front before that usage is consumed.

    read more

  • Starting productions;

    Germany: 90
    Japan: 45
    Italy: 25

    USA: 85
    UK: 65
    USSR: 45

    No Chinese front and no Soviet-Japanese War. The Western Allies and the Soviets can't land on each other's territory.

    The Soviets and the Japanese get conscripts with 0/1/1 stats with a 4 IPC cost instead of infantry.

    I'm still working on distributing incomes better, though. Like, the British mainland itself is currently only worth 10 IPCs, which is too low to be worth bombing compared to Germany's 30 mainland IPCs. So, Germany is prevented from using more than one bomber, which is a bit lame. Maybe the UK could be raised to 75, Germany to 95, and Italy to 30.

    read more

  • @Schulz Post the income rates for the nations in your mod too so we can get a sense of the scaling

    read more

  • I've always liked Anniversary's unit costs more than others'. I think armor and bombers are on the expensive side, costing 6 and 14 respectively. Cruisers also feel expensive at 12 IPCs, and carriers + fighters are way too good.

    I also like that air units always provide more value per IPC than naval units.

    My current unit costs:

    Fighters have a +1 attack bonus against surface ships (not currently working due to a bug), and they can scramble to nearby sea zones too if a fight occurs there.

    Bombers can inflict 5–10 damage (no more than the territory's total value) and have +1 air attack as well. Meanwhile, fighters have +1 air attack and +1 air defense.

    I'm struggling to balance the cost of air units vs. transports. I want strategic bombing to be neither too inefficient nor overpowered, while still keeping it nowhere near as efficient as a land invasion.

    as.png

    read more