• AA50: Anniversary edition

    22
    0 Votes
    22 Posts
    7k Views
    B
    It is listed as World War II v3 in the maps depot
  • WW2 alternate Scenario - 7 years war Revisited

    18
    3 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    HeppsH
    @PortableDoor I use a combination of paint . net and GIMP. But there are lots of different programs. As far as a map choice... that is for you to explore... I would not rob you of the joys of making what you want.
  • Has anyone ever made a XCom themed map?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    637 Views
    RogerCooperR
    @redrum No one has done anything like that. Take a look at Steampunk 1915 for how to handle alien invaders.
  • Fixed Game of Thrones Map Bug

    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    9k Views
    redrumR
    @Cernel Yeah, can probably repurpose that thread to be the official one and should probably move the conversation there since this was really about fixing some of the bugs in the map.
  • Connected Empire: Contiguous Landgrab vs Can Opener Criss-Cross?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Cernel I don't see the current patchwork is a problem (it rewards the minor allies for participating). But you could easily create an event that triggers in the current version of the engine, changing ownership to reflect the assigned sphere of influence. Here is the reference from POS2 changeOwnership values: This will change the ownership of the territory, either directly or by conquering the territory (there is a difference). Format is "territoryName:oldOwner:newOwner:booleanCaptured?". territoryName can be "all", and oldOwner can be "any". Can have multiple instances. examples: <option name="changeOwnership" value="South France:Germans:VichyFrench:false"/> or <option name="changeOwnership" value="all:Mongolians:Russians:true"/> or <option name="changeOwnership" value="Danzig:any:Germans:false"/>
  • Revisiting an old project

    161
    1
    3 Votes
    161 Posts
    149k Views
    redrumR
    So there doesn't appear to be an appetite to rebalance this map based on the territory differences between RTW and 270BC. So I've taken the improved unit images and dice images and merged them into standard 270BC: https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/pull/4 I will also be reviewing the changes in 270BC variants to see if any balances adjustments should be added from those. New official map thread: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1448/270bc-official-thread
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • Unit costs of World at War

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    688 Views
    C
    @Schulz Moving to Maps & Mods.
  • D-Day Version 3

    1
    3 Votes
    1 Posts
    512 Views
    No one has replied
  • did anybody fix that bug on the game of thrones map?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    760 Views
    C
    @runman Sadly, I don't think anyone fixed anything. It's many years that several people talk about the Game of Thrones map, but nothing has ever come out of it (I may be interested in playing that map if well remade). If you are interested in learning mapmaking and fixing it yourself, you can do it (whatever changes are probably going to be accepted, I assume, the map being just largely broken).
  • Historical Statistics

    25
    1
    2 Votes
    25 Posts
    11k Views
    RogerCooperR
    I have added total mobilized: [image: 35360048-954c-449f-984e-7a611e94440c-image.png] Country Manpower on Entry into War End of War Peak Number Total Mobilized Albania 13,000 13,000 13,000 Australia 91,700 575,100 575,100 993,000 Belgium 600,000 650,000 650,000 900,000 Bulgaria 160,000 450,000 450,000 1,011,000 Canada 63,100 759,800 759,800 1,100,000 China 2,500,000 5,000,000 5,700,000 14,000,000 Denmark 6,600 6,600 6,600 Finland 127,800 270,000 270,000 270,000 France 900,000 437,000 2,680,000 2,680,000 Germany 3,180,000 7,800,000 9,500,000 17,900,000 Greece 430,000 540,000 540,000 Hungary 80,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 India 197,000 2,159,700 2,159,700 2,581,800 Italy 1,899,600 259,100 2,563,000 2,563,000 Japan 1,700,000 7,200,000 7,200,000 9,100,000 Netherlands 270,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 New Zealand 13,800 192,800 192,800 192,800 Norway 25,000 25,000 90,000 Poland 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 2,400,000 Rumania 686,000 370,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 South Africa 19,000 198,000 250,000 UK 681,000 4,683,000 4,683,000 5,896,000 USA 5,413,000 11,877,000 11,877,000 16,354,000 USSR 9,000,000 12,400,000 13,200,000 13,200,000 Yugoslavia 150,000 800,000 800,000 1,500,000
  • World at war : variant v3 (Victory Conditions)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    559 Views
    No one has replied
  • Feudal Lords

    6
    5 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    @redrum Wow that is seriously Ethnic oriented. There is that single "Slavs" players that groups together Pomerania, Bohemia, Polonia, almost all Russia, Serbia and Bulgaria. Tho, in this case, they got the name "Britons" wrong, as those are, rather, the "Anglo-Saxons" migrants, since also "Brittany" ("Little Britain") I see it is not part of the "Britons"...
  • No retreat LL games? Especially NML/NWO

    22
    2 Votes
    22 Posts
    8k Views
    O
    Have you ever beaten the Union militarily? So who made the map? Also wondering if there is any negative consequence for having negative manpower?
  • Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5

    472
    2
    2 Votes
    472 Posts
    809k Views
    redrumR
    @LovePlayingAAA Good catch, it appears we missed a few updates on some of the HeavyDestroyers and will fix that in the next minor version. ImprovedDestroyers and AdvancedDestroyer techs still exist and have been updated to make different improvements for destroyers now. This post outlines the sub/destroyer changes: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/493/total-world-war-december-1941-beta-2-8-0-5/392 (there were a few adjustments to that original vision). The notes haven't been updated yet for 3.0 but are in-progress and hopefully be added shortly. Please use the new TWW 3.0 for discussing the new version: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1181/total-world-war-december-1941-3-0-0-0-now-available
  • Unit Browser Instructions

    17
    2 Votes
    17 Posts
    7k Views
    MahksM
    UBr Update: WARNING using this update will require scenarios to be reloaded. Added sorting options. Added a list of game properties used in the scenario. Better handling of complex support attachments. Fixed off-line issues. Production frontiers are now dealt with as groups in the unit list, rather than having them as separate items in the empire list. This allows one to view and filter the frontiers so one can compare. Initial placement units are placed in a group as well as sometimes they are not in a production frontier. Newest version : UBr Link 1.002.003
  • Iron Blitz (with Classic Map)

    7
    1 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    L
    not sure if i should start a new thread but ever since i update to 1.10.13285 the game cannot parse: age of tribes classical civil war eastern campaign 1914 blood and steel thegreatwar-ultimate
  • Star Trek Dilithium War - Official Thread

    17
    3
    5 Votes
    17 Posts
    6k Views
    HeppsH
    @Frostion Just the new pizza delivery feature!
  • Update for Domination 1914 No Man's Land

    Moved
    31
    0 Votes
    31 Posts
    11k Views
    SchulzS
    Did you guys get permission from sieg for adding additional sea zone into Pacific during WaW update process? If not then wouldn't be possible to divide Belarus and Arabia in the update like you had done similar thing in WaW?
  • Upgraded V3 41-42 Version

    Moved
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @Panther Thanks : )

Recent Posts

  • Step 6 Order of Play
    The lead Aggressor always goes first. Alternate Status Quo and Aggressor countries, randomly chosen. There will likely be a bunch of Status Quo countries at the end.

    read more

  • Post removed, wrong thread.

    read more

  • Step 5 Assign alliances

    There will to be two alliances "Aggressor" and "Status Quo" The Aggressor alliance is attempting to reorder the world through military force, while the Status Quo is trying to resist that.

    As I am not trying to track the ideologies you can assume that unlikely alliances are probably the result of ideological conflicts and similarities.

    The first step is to determine the lead aggressor. The lead aggressor is randomly chosen from the major countries. The lead aggressor goes first and will receive more units.

    Next the lead status quo power is chosen from the remaining major countries. The lead status quo power receives extra resources.

    The remaing major and medium powers are randomly assigned as follows

    50% Status Quo 30% Aggressor 10% Victim 10% Impassable

    The "Victim" nation is a passive member of the Status Quo alliance. It is neutral with regards to the rest of the Status Quo alliance and at war with the Aggessor alliance. The Status Quo alliance can't assist the "Victim" but if the liberate a territory they don't need to return it. Each turn the lead Status Quo power receives a bonus of 1 PU for every Victim-held territory. Note that is major or medium power has been reassigned to the victim nation, that means it is in civil war or some other internal disorder.

    The "Impassable" nation is neutral to everyone and out of play.

    There is a 50% change of delayed entry of each Status Quo nation and a 25% change of delayed entry for each Aggessor nation (other than the lead aggressor). The delayed entry nation comes in a randomly chosen turn between 2 and 5 at the start of the lead aggressor turn. It is possible that every Status Quo nation is delayed entry, allowing the lead aggessor to focus on victims.

    Historically, there was one territorial dispute directly involving major & medium countries, Alsace-Lorraine. Ethnically German but historically French it would be difficult (but not impossible) to resolve the dispute and conflict is likely. There will be a 30% chance that Germany is lead aggressor, while France is a status quo power that is active immediately. This will probably not work out well for France.

    read more

  • Step 4 Align minor countries with larger countries

    As minor countries don't have their unit images or turns they will be aligned with medium and major countries. Medium countries will also sometimes be aligned with major countries.

    When countries are aligned, their territories and units become part of the larger country, like Canada with Britain in the original game.

    Each minor and medium country will be entered into a table giving their chances of being aligned. In addition, countries may be aligned into the dummy countries of "Victim" and "Impassable".

    Note that this may in effect undo step 3. For example India may gain independence in step 3 and become a close ally of Britain in step 4. The effect will be the same, but the notes will be different.

    This is also when protectorates are handled. Egypt will be probably be aligned with Britain, but it may escape British control and be aligned with some other country.

    If China has become aligned with another country, then the special Chinese rules don't apply.

    read more