1. Home
  2. Maps & Mods
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • forthebirdsF

    world at war variants & the option of changing units

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    forthebirdsF
    @Captain-Crunch I'm specifically referring to the WAW v3 variant game when I am saying that the AI plays a much better game without the "defense" unit . I assume that the same thing would occur with the other WAW variants that have the "defense" unit.
  • C

    AA50: Anniversary edition

    22
    0 Votes
    22 Posts
    7k Views
    B
    It is listed as World War II v3 in the maps depot
  • PortableDoorP

    WW2 alternate Scenario - 7 years war Revisited

    18
    3 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    HeppsH
    @PortableDoor I use a combination of paint . net and GIMP. But there are lots of different programs. As far as a map choice... that is for you to explore... I would not rob you of the joys of making what you want.
  • F

    Has anyone ever made a XCom themed map?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    656 Views
    RogerCooperR
    @redrum No one has done anything like that. Take a look at Steampunk 1915 for how to handle alien invaders.
  • J

    Fixed Game of Thrones Map Bug

    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    9k Views
    redrumR
    @Cernel Yeah, can probably repurpose that thread to be the official one and should probably move the conversation there since this was really about fixing some of the bugs in the map.
  • B

    Connected Empire: Contiguous Landgrab vs Can Opener Criss-Cross?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Cernel I don't see the current patchwork is a problem (it rewards the minor allies for participating). But you could easily create an event that triggers in the current version of the engine, changing ownership to reflect the assigned sphere of influence. Here is the reference from POS2 changeOwnership values: This will change the ownership of the territory, either directly or by conquering the territory (there is a difference). Format is "territoryName:oldOwner:newOwner:booleanCaptured?". territoryName can be "all", and oldOwner can be "any". Can have multiple instances. examples: <option name="changeOwnership" value="South France:Germans:VichyFrench:false"/> or <option name="changeOwnership" value="all:Mongolians:Russians:true"/> or <option name="changeOwnership" value="Danzig:any:Germans:false"/>
  • HeppsH

    Revisiting an old project

    161
    1
    3 Votes
    161 Posts
    150k Views
    redrumR
    So there doesn't appear to be an appetite to rebalance this map based on the territory differences between RTW and 270BC. So I've taken the improved unit images and dice images and merged them into standard 270BC: https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/pull/4 I will also be reviewing the changes in 270BC variants to see if any balances adjustments should be added from those. New official map thread: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1448/270bc-official-thread
  • aman nagdiveA

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • SchulzS

    Unit costs of World at War

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    709 Views
    C
    @Schulz Moving to Maps & Mods.
  • RogerCooperR

    D-Day Version 3

    1
    3 Votes
    1 Posts
    520 Views
    No one has replied
  • R

    did anybody fix that bug on the game of thrones map?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    782 Views
    C
    @runman Sadly, I don't think anyone fixed anything. It's many years that several people talk about the Game of Thrones map, but nothing has ever come out of it (I may be interested in playing that map if well remade). If you are interested in learning mapmaking and fixing it yourself, you can do it (whatever changes are probably going to be accepted, I assume, the map being just largely broken).
  • RogerCooperR

    Historical Statistics

    25
    1
    2 Votes
    25 Posts
    11k Views
    RogerCooperR
    I have added total mobilized: [image: 35360048-954c-449f-984e-7a611e94440c-image.png] Country Manpower on Entry into War End of War Peak Number Total Mobilized Albania 13,000 13,000 13,000 Australia 91,700 575,100 575,100 993,000 Belgium 600,000 650,000 650,000 900,000 Bulgaria 160,000 450,000 450,000 1,011,000 Canada 63,100 759,800 759,800 1,100,000 China 2,500,000 5,000,000 5,700,000 14,000,000 Denmark 6,600 6,600 6,600 Finland 127,800 270,000 270,000 270,000 France 900,000 437,000 2,680,000 2,680,000 Germany 3,180,000 7,800,000 9,500,000 17,900,000 Greece 430,000 540,000 540,000 Hungary 80,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 India 197,000 2,159,700 2,159,700 2,581,800 Italy 1,899,600 259,100 2,563,000 2,563,000 Japan 1,700,000 7,200,000 7,200,000 9,100,000 Netherlands 270,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 New Zealand 13,800 192,800 192,800 192,800 Norway 25,000 25,000 90,000 Poland 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 2,400,000 Rumania 686,000 370,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 South Africa 19,000 198,000 250,000 UK 681,000 4,683,000 4,683,000 5,896,000 USA 5,413,000 11,877,000 11,877,000 16,354,000 USSR 9,000,000 12,400,000 13,200,000 13,200,000 Yugoslavia 150,000 800,000 800,000 1,500,000
  • forthebirdsF

    World at war : variant v3 (Victory Conditions)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    567 Views
    No one has replied
  • alkexrA

    Feudal Lords

    6
    5 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    @redrum Wow that is seriously Ethnic oriented. There is that single "Slavs" players that groups together Pomerania, Bohemia, Polonia, almost all Russia, Serbia and Bulgaria. Tho, in this case, they got the name "Britons" wrong, as those are, rather, the "Anglo-Saxons" migrants, since also "Brittany" ("Little Britain") I see it is not part of the "Britons"...
  • O

    No retreat LL games? Especially NML/NWO

    22
    2 Votes
    22 Posts
    8k Views
    O
    Have you ever beaten the Union militarily? So who made the map? Also wondering if there is any negative consequence for having negative manpower?
  • HeppsH

    Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5

    472
    2
    2 Votes
    472 Posts
    813k Views
    redrumR
    @LovePlayingAAA Good catch, it appears we missed a few updates on some of the HeavyDestroyers and will fix that in the next minor version. ImprovedDestroyers and AdvancedDestroyer techs still exist and have been updated to make different improvements for destroyers now. This post outlines the sub/destroyer changes: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/493/total-world-war-december-1941-beta-2-8-0-5/392 (there were a few adjustments to that original vision). The notes haven't been updated yet for 3.0 but are in-progress and hopefully be added shortly. Please use the new TWW 3.0 for discussing the new version: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1181/total-world-war-december-1941-3-0-0-0-now-available
  • MahksM

    Unit Browser Instructions

    17
    2 Votes
    17 Posts
    7k Views
    MahksM
    UBr Update: WARNING using this update will require scenarios to be reloaded. Added sorting options. Added a list of game properties used in the scenario. Better handling of complex support attachments. Fixed off-line issues. Production frontiers are now dealt with as groups in the unit list, rather than having them as separate items in the empire list. This allows one to view and filter the frontiers so one can compare. Initial placement units are placed in a group as well as sometimes they are not in a production frontier. Newest version : UBr Link 1.002.003
  • S

    Iron Blitz (with Classic Map)

    7
    1 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    L
    not sure if i should start a new thread but ever since i update to 1.10.13285 the game cannot parse: age of tribes classical civil war eastern campaign 1914 blood and steel thegreatwar-ultimate
  • FrostionF

    Star Trek Dilithium War - Official Thread

    17
    3
    5 Votes
    17 Posts
    6k Views
    HeppsH
    @Frostion Just the new pizza delivery feature!
  • SchulzS

    Update for Domination 1914 No Man's Land

    Moved
    31
    0 Votes
    31 Posts
    11k Views
    SchulzS
    Did you guys get permission from sieg for adding additional sea zone into Pacific during WaW update process? If not then wouldn't be possible to divide Belarus and Arabia in the update like you had done similar thing in WaW?

Recent Posts

  • RogerCooperR
    RogerCooper

    Name Hearts of Iron: The Rising Sun 1942
    Description World War 2 in 1942 on the Big World map with many nations and new & modified unit types.

    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Hearts_of_Iron:_The_Rising_Sun_1942
    image.jpeg

    Good Points

    Reasonably balanced New unit types are interesting

    Bad Points

    Some unit types are not well balanced
    read more
  • RogerCooperR
    RogerCooper

    Name Domination 1914-Weltpolitik
    Description World War One on a large world map
    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Domination_1914-Weltpolitik
    image.jpeg

    Good Points

    Lots of political detail Fighting all over the world

    Bad Points

    The AI has some trouble, especially as the US
    read more
  • RogerCooperR
    RogerCooper

    Name Twelve Clans - Sekigahara
    Description The Sengoku period
    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Twelve_Clans_-_Sekigahara
    image.jpeg

    Good Points

    Captures the feel of the Shogun/Samurai Warriors/Ikusa series of games Not another WW2 game

    Bad Points

    Many unit types produce ashigaru, resulting in huge stacks AI has some trouble playing because it is not aware of the advantages and disadvantages of some units
    read more
  • B
    beelee

    @wc_sumpton

    Ramon got me to thinking and I tried to alter how my Marines work. The way they're supposed to work is they are A1 D2 unit that gets boosted to A3 when a Artillery is present.

    Artillery also boosts Infantry and a pile of other units +1 on the attack.

    I had the Marine at A2 and get boosted +1 on the attack with all the other units in the same supportAttachment. But then you have to switch to a MarineA1 unit that only attacks at 1 when no Arty present.

    So i made a separate supportAttachment for the jarhead and gave him +2 on the attack when paired with the Arty as he is now just a A1 otherwise.

    I gave it the same "bonusType" name as the one that supports the Infantry. When I attack with 1 Inf and 1 Marine and 1 Arty, the Arty gives +2 to the Marine and +1 to the Inf.

    We want it to just give +2 to the jarhead and no bonus to the Inf. Is that possible ? It seems I tried when initially doing it but couldn't get it to work, hence the two different types of Marines.

    I thought the same bonusType name meant the Arty would only support 1 unit but then which unit was a bit of a problem too but you did say something about which order their listed in gets the support.

    I have to dig that one up but anyway, I think I already tried this and there was no solution but ... I'll ask again anyways 🙂

    Screenshot from 2026-09-18 11-45-36.png

    read more