1. Home
  2. Maps & Mods
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • J

    Fixed Game of Thrones Map Bug

    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    9k Views
    redrumR
    @Cernel Yeah, can probably repurpose that thread to be the official one and should probably move the conversation there since this was really about fixing some of the bugs in the map.
  • Black_ElkB

    Connected Empire: Contiguous Landgrab vs Can Opener Criss-Cross?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Cernel I don't see the current patchwork is a problem (it rewards the minor allies for participating). But you could easily create an event that triggers in the current version of the engine, changing ownership to reflect the assigned sphere of influence. Here is the reference from POS2 changeOwnership values: This will change the ownership of the territory, either directly or by conquering the territory (there is a difference). Format is "territoryName:oldOwner:newOwner:booleanCaptured?". territoryName can be "all", and oldOwner can be "any". Can have multiple instances. examples: <option name="changeOwnership" value="South France:Germans:VichyFrench:false"/> or <option name="changeOwnership" value="all:Mongolians:Russians:true"/> or <option name="changeOwnership" value="Danzig:any:Germans:false"/>
  • HeppsH

    Revisiting an old project

    161
    1
    3 Votes
    161 Posts
    146k Views
    redrumR
    So there doesn't appear to be an appetite to rebalance this map based on the territory differences between RTW and 270BC. So I've taken the improved unit images and dice images and merged them into standard 270BC: https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/pull/4 I will also be reviewing the changes in 270BC variants to see if any balances adjustments should be added from those. New official map thread: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1448/270bc-official-thread
  • aman nagdiveA

    This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • SchulzS

    Unit costs of World at War

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    677 Views
    C
    @Schulz Moving to Maps & Mods.
  • RogerCooperR

    D-Day Version 3

    1
    3 Votes
    1 Posts
    502 Views
    No one has replied
  • R

    did anybody fix that bug on the game of thrones map?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    737 Views
    C
    @runman Sadly, I don't think anyone fixed anything. It's many years that several people talk about the Game of Thrones map, but nothing has ever come out of it (I may be interested in playing that map if well remade). If you are interested in learning mapmaking and fixing it yourself, you can do it (whatever changes are probably going to be accepted, I assume, the map being just largely broken).
  • RogerCooperR

    Historical Statistics

    25
    1
    2 Votes
    25 Posts
    10k Views
    RogerCooperR
    I have added total mobilized: [image: 1552950679041-35360048-954c-449f-984e-7a611e94440c-image.png] Country Manpower on Entry into War End of War Peak Number Total Mobilized Albania 13,000 13,000 13,000 Australia 91,700 575,100 575,100 993,000 Belgium 600,000 650,000 650,000 900,000 Bulgaria 160,000 450,000 450,000 1,011,000 Canada 63,100 759,800 759,800 1,100,000 China 2,500,000 5,000,000 5,700,000 14,000,000 Denmark 6,600 6,600 6,600 Finland 127,800 270,000 270,000 270,000 France 900,000 437,000 2,680,000 2,680,000 Germany 3,180,000 7,800,000 9,500,000 17,900,000 Greece 430,000 540,000 540,000 Hungary 80,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 India 197,000 2,159,700 2,159,700 2,581,800 Italy 1,899,600 259,100 2,563,000 2,563,000 Japan 1,700,000 7,200,000 7,200,000 9,100,000 Netherlands 270,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 New Zealand 13,800 192,800 192,800 192,800 Norway 25,000 25,000 90,000 Poland 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 2,400,000 Rumania 686,000 370,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 South Africa 19,000 198,000 250,000 UK 681,000 4,683,000 4,683,000 5,896,000 USA 5,413,000 11,877,000 11,877,000 16,354,000 USSR 9,000,000 12,400,000 13,200,000 13,200,000 Yugoslavia 150,000 800,000 800,000 1,500,000
  • forthebirdsF

    World at war : variant v3 (Victory Conditions)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    547 Views
    No one has replied
  • alkexrA

    Feudal Lords

    6
    5 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    @redrum Wow that is seriously Ethnic oriented. There is that single "Slavs" players that groups together Pomerania, Bohemia, Polonia, almost all Russia, Serbia and Bulgaria. Tho, in this case, they got the name "Britons" wrong, as those are, rather, the "Anglo-Saxons" migrants, since also "Brittany" ("Little Britain") I see it is not part of the "Britons"...
  • O

    No retreat LL games? Especially NML/NWO

    22
    2 Votes
    22 Posts
    7k Views
    O
    Have you ever beaten the Union militarily? So who made the map? Also wondering if there is any negative consequence for having negative manpower?
  • HeppsH

    Total World War: December 1941 (BETA) 2.8.0.5

    472
    2
    2 Votes
    472 Posts
    782k Views
    redrumR
    @LovePlayingAAA Good catch, it appears we missed a few updates on some of the HeavyDestroyers and will fix that in the next minor version. ImprovedDestroyers and AdvancedDestroyer techs still exist and have been updated to make different improvements for destroyers now. This post outlines the sub/destroyer changes: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/493/total-world-war-december-1941-beta-2-8-0-5/392 (there were a few adjustments to that original vision). The notes haven't been updated yet for 3.0 but are in-progress and hopefully be added shortly. Please use the new TWW 3.0 for discussing the new version: https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/1181/total-world-war-december-1941-3-0-0-0-now-available
  • MahksM

    Unit Browser Instructions

    17
    2 Votes
    17 Posts
    7k Views
    MahksM
    UBr Update: WARNING using this update will require scenarios to be reloaded. Added sorting options. Added a list of game properties used in the scenario. Better handling of complex support attachments. Fixed off-line issues. Production frontiers are now dealt with as groups in the unit list, rather than having them as separate items in the empire list. This allows one to view and filter the frontiers so one can compare. Initial placement units are placed in a group as well as sometimes they are not in a production frontier. Newest version : UBr Link 1.002.003
  • S

    Iron Blitz (with Classic Map)

    7
    1 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    L
    not sure if i should start a new thread but ever since i update to 1.10.13285 the game cannot parse: age of tribes classical civil war eastern campaign 1914 blood and steel thegreatwar-ultimate
  • FrostionF

    Star Trek Dilithium War - Official Thread

    17
    3
    5 Votes
    17 Posts
    6k Views
    HeppsH
    @Frostion Just the new pizza delivery feature!
  • SchulzS

    Update for Domination 1914 No Man's Land

    Moved
    31
    0 Votes
    31 Posts
    11k Views
    SchulzS
    Did you guys get permission from sieg for adding additional sea zone into Pacific during WaW update process? If not then wouldn't be possible to divide Belarus and Arabia in the update like you had done similar thing in WaW?
  • B

    Upgraded V3 41-42 Version

    Moved
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @Panther Thanks : )
  • A

    Big World v3 issues with balancing - unbalanced

    Moved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    Not sure why this was moved in tournaments, but moving it to Maps & Mods, if that's fine.
  • Z

    The Rising Sun

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    Z
    zod's explanations don't account for it at all though. his stuff applies to ALL sieg maps, by his own statement. While the situation we have here is TRS receives very little play, while NWO and WAW receive a good amount. In order to be an explanation it needs to account for that discrepancy. which means it needs to point to something that differentiates TRS from the other Sieg maps.
  • General_ZodG

    WWII Revised - Facelift

    55
    0 Votes
    55 Posts
    26k Views
    General_ZodG
    @hepps Yeah, I saw a nice bf109 model with that paint scheme. I'm glad someone noticed it. As the infantry goes, he is glistening in the sun and sleeves rolled up ready to fight. The tiger is much nicer than original too, added the german cross and high lighted some areas so the tank pops a little. These were little experiments to see what it takes to improve units. It's quite difficult to work on tiny scales where a few pixels is all I have to work with. But I learned a lot. Too bad we don't have a vectored graphics for TripleA, then can do all kinds of stuff on any scale.

Recent Posts

  • C
    captain0

    Thanks Dog. In the game I am playing I am using Hard AI but I generally use a combination of both.
    Oh yeah in the stack the Russian AI was holding back in Yekaterinburg? area was not 150 TUV but about 81 units/ 640 TUV
    The AI kept a fair bit there since the start of the game really. With some old double hit 1941 tanks.

    read more
  • TheDogT
    TheDog

    @captain0
    Are you playing with Fast-AI as it is more aggressive than Hard-AI ?

    The US AI does have enough air power to control 2 SZ distance of its West Coast and has enough PU to dominate the sea, but sadly it does not.
    I will look at reinforcing the US west coast, but it will be awhile.

    .

    One other issue I have noticed that there are no UK heavy industry in the Indian ocean/ Red Sea, East of Africa.
    Whilst I respect this is quite accurate historically.

    Agreed, it is not going to change. You could replace the South Africa Industry-Med with a Industry-Hvy if you wish.

    read more
  • C
    captain0

    The US may need a hand Dog as a lot of the ships exit through Panama rapidly
    Perhaps a small random pop up of PT boats or something-like Germany with the subs..
    I was also wondering what the hell was going on when the AI had 14 destroyers in a zone off the West coast lol.

    Just regarding the AI hogging counter strike units at factory areas away from the battlefield to launch a counterstrike.

    'It is good but I am playing the AI at present as axis player v allies.
    The Germans and Italians are holding Stalingrad and a force is moving down to Baku.
    Interestingly the AI has about 100? units TUV 160 ready for a counter as soon as I advance past Stalingrad.
    Maybe it has something else planned but it has more than enough units to heavily influence battles yet stays 4 zones away for the counter

    One other issue I have noticed that there are no UK heavy industry in the Indian ocean/ Red Sea, East of Africa.
    Whilst I respect this is quite accurate historically. It does sort of hog tie the British if the Italian fleet gets on top and can only be confronted by destroyers etc in the East Med.
    Sort of kamikaze.
    Unless the AI/ player even, transits around South Africa and back up to the Med via East Africa.
    I doubt that is something that the AI would approach and even as player Britain it is tough.
    Could it be looked at or Cruisers possibly being allowed to be built at medium factories to compensate and give a bit of firepower.

    Cheers

    read more
  • TheDogT
    TheDog

    @captain0 said:

    Also n my observation the AI US generally doesn't put up much of a fight in the Pacific v Japan,
    Possibly due to confusion and balancing in the Atlantic convoy war and countering subs popping up.

    The AI at sea is weak and does need help.
    Even with USA AI
    Turns 4, 8,12,16,20,24,28,32 AI purchases 3x Fighter, 1x Carrier-Fleet, 1x Cruiser and places in 010 B Sea Zone
    and
    Turn 2-40, USA AI, purchases 2x Destroyer and places in 010 B Sea Zone

    It does not play well, but it does give an OK game for Japan. Maybe it needs more help to be more of a challenge?

    read more