• UPDATED: Alexander 350BC

    23
    0 Votes
    23 Posts
    7k Views
    NinjaWolfHybridN
    @ted-self that's great. I don't mind. Today I noticed a missing connection between South China Sea and Arafura Sea. Modern canals (Egypt, Panama) were removed from 350BC, fyi.
  • New World Order

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    878 Views
    RogerCooperR
    @mrquadratic Checkout "New World Order Variants", which has neutrality as an option. You could also place a bunch of bunkers on the frontier, and then remove them when you are ready to fight.
  • Set Territory as Unclaimed? [RESOLVED]

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    852 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    764 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @slendymctendies All Cheers...
  • Hi Is there a way to print out a map?

    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    891 Views
    SlendyMcTendiesS
    @rufy-0 In game under the "Export" tab, you can export a full board image "Export Gameboard Picture"
  • Remove building AA? (Factory, Airfield, Harbour) [Solved]

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    SlendyMcTendiesS
    @wc_sumpton Yeah, I initially wanted to figure out how to remove AA when disabled, but then I figured removing the AA capabilities of buildings would incentivize purchasing AA guns to protect them. I initially tried using "isAA" = "false", but this has the side-effect of making the game think it was an actual combat unit and therefore players could use them as sacrificial pawns and immediately deny the enemy their spoils if facing an overwhelming force, which was something I definitely didn't want either. You understood the original post correctly. I just decided to take a different route a day or two after posting.
  • World At War - V2.1.1 or 3.0 ? Game Unplayable

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    899 Views
    Falkon PowersF
    @falkon-powers Disregard, game as intended, I was mistaken V2 rather than V3 ruleset. Rusty memory on this map, been a few years... cheers!
  • PvP Scenario Review Thread

    34
    3 Votes
    34 Posts
    12k Views
    TheDogT
    @mattbarnes and others Any more reviews?
  • Middle Earth, Oil Wars, Forty Thousand

    8
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    NinjaWolfHybridN
    @thedog I made a new map, thanks for the encouragement. It's called Alexander350 (world conquest set in 350BC). .zip in Maps & Mods, tell me what you think. It does use modern region names (Oil Wars map), and units from Middle Earth with only minor tweaks.
  • Added Relationship Types

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    TheDogT
    The PoliticalStateOverview.java file has the color coding for the three relationship archeTypes, meaning this functionality could be added but of course its not accessible from the mapmaking point of view. As there is no Devs working on TripleA at the moment this will not change any time soon.
  • d12 alagaesia

    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    730 Views
    C
    @thedog tooltips.properties is what I was missing. I'll have to review that map further. Looking right off, arena has a very accessible xml file. Thanks for the welcome and help!
  • v6 connection error

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    580 Views
    No one has replied
  • Stuck units due to relation types

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    836 Views
    RogerCooperR
    @beornthebold-0 This is the whole logic of being unable to move to someone's territories. It means that you can't move to someone's territories. You are not going to be able to get TripleA to move in some directions and not others. You could use triggered events to simulate the evacuation of a specific base, but it would be difficult to do this on a large scale.
  • Trigger on condition if player is AI?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    642 Views
    RogerCooperR
    You need to set the information in the game options, it does not automatically determine AI status.
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    948 Views
    O
    @cernel Was there ever a way? Anyway then I guess a second version of at least the two most common maps would be hugely appreciated for us who like tech (2nd Version and 3rd Balanced)
  • Certain Maps don't seem to work

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    E
    Thanks. I'll give that a shot!
  • Big World Rise of Axis - kamikaze bug

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    655 Views
    No one has replied
  • I want to make a map

    57
    0 Votes
    57 Posts
    18k Views
    board 3659B
    @beelee yeah I'll do that
  • Global 40 Expansion - Excited about first playthrough - questions

    11
    1 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    @beelee Thanks - first time really getting to look again, then life beacons again...
  • Aventurica

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    770 Views
    TheDogT
    I agree it was the first map I played.

Recent Posts

  • Step 3 Resolve Interwar Period

    There were a number of conflicts in the interwar period which could change what country controls a specific territory. Most only involved a single territory such as the Rif War or the Indian Independence movement. Territories controlled by the "Split" country must be assigned to a specific country.

    There are three conflicts that deserve special consideration, Russian Civil War, Russo-Polish War and the Reunification of China.

    Russian Civil War In the context of this scenario generator, it does not matter which side wins as somebody will end up controlling the core Russian areas of Russia, Archangel and Karelia. However there was a possibility of creating a stable country in Siberia controlling multiple areas. Peripheral areas of Russia may gain independence.

    Russo-Polish War as closely related to the Russian Civil War. Plausible outcomes range from Russian reconquering Poland to a powerful Polish state controlling Poland, East Poland, Baltic States, Ukraine, East Ukraine and Belorussia. However the outcomes must all involve a contiguous Polish state. Note that even a maximum Polish state remains a minor country.

    The order of resolution needs to be

    Siberian independence Peripheral territories status Russo-Polish War

    War of Chinese Reunification By the end of WW1, warlords have already taken control of China. In effect each territory was an independent state. If the Northern Expedition had failed, China would have remained divided.

    An additional complication was the Japanese invasion. The Japanese may decide not to invade, to only take Manchuria or to take Kiangsu as well. Note that if the Japan and China end up on the same side, Kiangsu will be returned to China.

    Even if China is reunified, there still be independent states formed, representing undefeated warlords or Communist territory. There is also a chance that Kwangtung ends up under effective Chinese control.

    In any case the usual China build rules and territory restrictions apply, as the KMT would not even under the best of circumstances had enough time to build a modern industrial economy. If China is allied with Japan, than the movement restrictions are China are lifted.

    read more

  • Step 2 Assign each territory to a country

    There are three levels of countries

    Major Countries
    Russia, Germany, Britain, Japan, United States
    The world's leading powers. If active they are always separate players. At least one of these powers must be trying to change the current world order.

    Medium Countries
    France, Italy, China
    Powers of regional importance. If active they are usually separate players, but sometimes they are combined with a major country.

    Minor Countries
    Everyone else
    They are never their own player. They may be combined with a major or medium country. If not they will be part of the "Victim" or "Impassable" country

    There are three dummy countries, "Victim", "Impassable" and "Split"

    The "Victim" country has units but no moves or production. It can invaded by aggressor nations and is passively aligned with their opponents. This reflects countries with only defensive capabilities. This includes minor countries which have not been combined with a player country and major & medium countries that have fallen into disorder. Yugoslavia was a historical example.

    The "Impassable" country is impassable of course. This reflects countries which can't be invaded because of some combination of difficult terrain, military strength, good relations with both sides or the lack of anything worth attacking. Switzerland and Afghanistan were historical examples.

    The "Split" country reflects territories occupied by two distinct countries such as "Northwest Europe" and "Spain". They will be assigned randomly in step 3.

    Some countries are conditional in that depending on step 3, they may come into existence or not such as Poland or an independent India.

    Composite countries are combinations of different real countries which were in the same territory can be treated together such as the Baltic States and Central America.

    Some countries, especially British colonies in the Middle East are protectorates. They are technically independent countries but they are likely to be combined with their colonial overlords in step 4. Egypt is a good example. Iraq is an example of a wayward protectorate attempting to ally with another country.

    read more

  • @RogerCooper love this

    read more

  • Step 1 The non-changing part of the XML file

    This code will remain the same

    Territory definitions Connections Unit list Delegates Production costs Unit attachments Territory attachments Most game properties

    I will probably drop tech for simplicity. Objectives will be used in a limited way to be discussed in a future post.

    I may vary the production values of territories in 50% of the generated scenarios to reflect actual economic data.

    read more