• Invasion USA - Main Thread

    7
    2 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    Z
    @strategery I remember looking at the map a few months ago; I suspect there are some bugs as a result of the map not having been updated since 2018-ish and changes in the triplea engine since then. Or maybe the bugs were present at the time and simply weren't noticed due to the map not being played much. I've never seen people play the map in the lobby, so I'm not sure how much actual play it sees.
  • Making RISK within TripleA - Help Requested

    38
    1 Votes
    38 Posts
    9k Views
    SlendyMcTendiesS
    @lafayette Hmm. Ok. I already have an automated "Victory" system which seems to accomplish the same thing. I'll probably write a surrender system into the game. I have a few ideas on how it could be accomplished.
  • WW1 in 1939

    8
    1
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    board 3659B
    @schulz thanks, I'll play until 10-20 times (which isn't too hard) and then give some thoughts
  • WW2 RISK of Defeat (BETA)

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    479 Views
    No one has replied
  • Global Dominance

    512
    2
    3 Votes
    512 Posts
    972k Views
    ghostroninG
    @hepps @redrum Time for my 2 year check-in hehehe:) I know I know, your planning GD and P&P to perfection, but they're coming still:)
  • Axis & Allies Wiki

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @schulz said in Axis & Allies Wiki: @rogercooper You could add https://triplea-game.org/map/aggression-1942/ as well. Looks interesting.
  • Red Sun Over China (RSOC) - Official Thread

    119
    1
    2 Votes
    119 Posts
    73k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @cernel I got the map working by commenting out all the train stuff. I didn't bother trying to merge the code in RSOC with Warlords. Maybe, as a quick fix, I will give all train stations, a bonus of 1 for land movement.
  • Churchill's 1939 (thread 2)

    15
    16
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    4k Views
    B
    @joseph-prince In case you're unaware of them, here are a couple 39 mods that may give you some ideas: https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/32236/oztea-s-1939-global-setup?page=1 https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/30608/global-europe-pacific-1939-for-1940-2nd-editon?page=1 @RogerCooper yea it'd work ok aginst the neutral TTys if the human was russian, but JPN/russia where one is the AI probably wouldn't. AI doesn't do good on the Global map anyway. PTV be the same I'd imagine
  • Global 40 House Rules

    32
    4 Votes
    32 Posts
    18k Views
    B
    Change Log: 2.71 1/28/22 Fix all "figher_LR" Units to work correctly when "longRangeAir" and "jetPower" Tech activated. Fix "battelship and carrier hull" Units to work correctly. yea took a while to fix your dudes @board-3659 . Be best if you do those yourself. Had to fix Long Range Fighter too ( Barons Unit ). Major burn and had to rename and xml it too lol. But anyway , it was 8 units per player for fix for yours. Took a couple hours. Be best for you to do the maintenance on them At least someone is playing it lol
  • Civil War: A House Divided

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    5k Views
    A
    Hate to necro a dead post like this but im gonna anyway. Im working on creating a physical boardgame version of this for myself and was wondering if there was like a large/printable pdf of the map someone could send my way? Thanks
  • Is it possible to win as the Borg?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    698 Views
    S
    @danawriter yes it is. I’m in the process of it now. While I can beat six Hard AI, I don’t think this would work against humans.
  • Manassas Wars - Official Thread

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    board 3659B
    @cernel oh ok wasn't sure just assumed so
  • Steampunk Advanced: Available for download now.

    19
    10
    2 Votes
    19 Posts
    4k Views
    board 3659B
    @lord-bevan The reason you would want Australia/New Zealand safe is to prevent two VC's for Nemo Pirates
  • An old map idea of mine

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    833 Views
    B
    @alkexr cool idea. Somewhat reminds me of the Turtledove book The Two Georges
  • Greyhawk Wars - Giants and Bowmen vs Dragons

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    951 Views
    RogerCooperR
    @mattbarnes Yes the Bowman is 1. There is only 1 AA combat round. Here is the documentation of AA Guns (from Pact of Steel 2) aa related: isAA values: just sets isAAmovement, isAAforCombatOnly, isAAforBombingThisUnitOnly, isAAforFlyOverOnly, isInfrastructure, and isRocket to true. isAAmovement values: just sets canNotMoveDuringCombatMove to "true", and only for aa guns it will set the stacking limits (movementLimit, attackingLimit, placementLimit) to "1:allied" when playing by classic rules attackAA values: the value that an isAA unit will attack at, for shooting at air units before battle attackAAmaxDieSides values: sets the dice sides for aa guns. defaults to whatever you chose above in diceSides (or 6 if you didn't choose). All units with the same typeAA must have the same dice sides. Be Warned that all aa attack values (including with Radar and without Radar), MUST divide into attackAAmaxDieSides without remainders, or else there WILL be errors in LowLuck! offensiveAttackAA values: same as attackAA but for offensive side offensiveAttackAAmaxDieSides values: same as attackAAmaxDieSides but for offensive side maxAAattacks values: sets how many times this unit may fire its AA guns. Defaults to -1, which means infinite. If not infinite, then aa guns can stack. (If you have multiple aa of the same type-group in a territory, and they have different attack values or dicesides, and different maxAAattacks, then what happens is that the engine will roll for the best attack/diceSides and for the best maxAAattacks, even if that is two different units For example, if you have an aa gun that has infinite attacks and rolls a 4/20, and you have another gun with only one attack and rolls 3/6, then you will end up rolling infinite times at 3/6. This might be fixed in the future.) mayOverStackAA values: sets if this unit may fire aa more times than there are aircraft (default = false). maxRoundsAA values: sets how many rounds the AA may fire in. negative (-1) means infinite. (default = 1). damageableAA values: sets if this unit can damage a two-hitpoint unit, instead of killing it instantly with aa fire (default = false = kill instantly). isAAforCombatOnly values: allows this unit to be an AA gun for normal combat only. it will not defend against strategic bombing raids. isAAforBombingThisUnitOnly values: allows this unit to be an AA gun only when this unit is directly attacked by a strategic bombing raid (currently defends against all strategic bombing attacks in this territory, not just against this unit). it will not defend against a normal attack. isAAforFlyOverOnly values: allows this unit to be an AA gun only when being flown over. if the air unit moves into this territory and stays, then this will not fire. isAAforFlyOverOnly will only work if "AA Territory Restricted" is turned off, and will normally only fire during combat move and not during noncombat move, unless you also turn on "Always on AA". typeAA values: any string which identifies this type-group of aa guns. Only 1 aa gun per group may fire (unless you've set maxAAattacks). (defaults to "AA") Warning: all units with the same typeAA must have the same dice sides, or else you will experience weird results. targetsAA values: a list of unit types which this aa gun can hit. (defaults to all air units) (any aa guns in the same group should have the same targetsAA) willNotFireIfPresent values: a list of unit types for which if they are present in the battle, this aa gun will not fire. isRocket values: allows this unit to become a rocket if the player has the rocket technology. If the unit is named exactly "aaGun" then it will require an image called "rockets". If the unit is named anything else, then it will require an image with "_rockets" appended to its original name canNotMoveDuringCombatMove values: true or false, defaults to false, does not allow this unit to move during 'combat move phase' movementLimit values: only affects normal movement. the count is equal to the number of this unit allowed per territory, and the value is equal to "owned" (we are only counting units owned by each player), or "allied" (allied too), or "total" (which counts enemy units too) attackingLimit values: only affects movement into enemy territory/units. the count is equal to the number of this unit allowed per territory, and the value is equal to "owned" (we are only counting units owned by each player), or "allied" (allied too), or "total" (which counts enemy units too) placementLimit values: only affects placement. the count is equal to the number of this unit allowed per territory, and the value is equal to "owned" (we are only counting units owned by each player), or "allied" (allied too), or "total" (which counts enemy units too) example: <option name="placementLimit" value="allied" count="1"/>
  • Is there a Europe 1940 Out-of-Box Map? (Not Alpha+3)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    445 Views
    No one has replied
  • Help with production_tabs.properties

    4
    2
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    LaFayetteL
    @thedog somewhat looks like a bug, could you provide a full copy of the map?
  • Realistic WWII Scenario

    98
    4
    4 Votes
    98 Posts
    58k Views
    Anil YukselA
    @cernel Actually Stalingrad can display up to 4 units if its placement spots are selected manually. Units are 48 pixels with %100 zoom. I am aware there are not plenty of placement spots in the Eastern Front. But increasing the dimensions of map would be problematic which would make tracking air units way harder. Actually using 87.5% zoom for automatic placement finder significantly reduces overflows. [image: 1638640465289-1942-resized.png]
  • TripleA Politics

    4
    1
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    TheDogT
    I am torn between charging for political attempts, in this case 5pu, the cost of the cheapest land unit and being free, that is 0pu cost. I have a philosophy of every action should have a cost, but sometimes with upkeep in particular, a faction ends with 4pu or less, so cannot even try Politics. So with a FFA game in mind should Politics have a cost?
  • The Others and Glitch

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    @rogercooper I hadn't thought of that, thank you.

Recent Posts

  • @VictoryFirst

    yea it'd be cool if theyd just place on the border you want. One can manipulate the order that units place in but when they get removed it changes everything.

    I tried to have the startup have the Fctrys ABs and NBs in their historical spots. In EXP they will move if they go Undrg or upgraded AB, Scramble 4 F Yea !!! lol

    read more

  • @beelee I think 1 pixel TT could work quite well in EXP, maybe even in NA. For now, i like to keep the circles as I don't want to bother with having to redraw the map again, but for EXP it might be an excellent idea. The 1 pixel TT would function more or less as a placement in the place.txt. I'd try it with one or two territories first to see if it works.

    read more

  • Hi Dog thanks for the latest version. The game seems to play a little more challengingly.
    A few more land/ sea territories would be great.
    I still keep Russia and Japan allied until the time is right for War between them,
    AI Russia still seems a little tentative to move the Siberian based units though.
    I move them manually but do you think there is an issue with the stacking restrictions on the old 2 hit tanks? Even I find them hard to move through other units..

    The US does tend to evacuate the Pacific automatic placed units to the Atlantic and it does throw the Atlantic battles a little more in the allied favour. Tricky one. I still think random PT boat spawns may help if they were confined to Pacific only.

    Would there also be any way to look at factories. IE enemy factories are destroyed on capture and you can only build light industry on non sovereign territory?
    Also do you think the Russian player should be immune to Winter as they were more better prepared for it historically.
    Maybe also a Rasputitsa effect could block all movement on the Eastern front (all player) for one turn after Winter.

    Lastly, when any player wants to build an aircraft carrier they have to manually enter the quantity as there is no selector arrow for the box like other units.
    Took me a while to figure that one out in my first game.

    Apologies for the ramble and once again the game is playing well.

    read more

  • @VictoryFirst

    Hi Victory

    I saw your update a while back. Nice work 🙂

    Using separate TTYs for the LM borders is a good idea. I thought about it for UHD but besides the huge amount of work it'd take ( although just use high use to low use. Doesn't need all done at once. ) I didn't like the look of all the little circles.

    It just occurred to me, that your idea with a 1 pixel TTy using the existing circles center, would make them basically invisible and still be on the correct border. Obviously use same placement.

    Anyway, just a thought. I might dick around a little bit with it and see if it'd work.

    Hope all is well

    rock-on.png

    Edit
    hmm ... One could have the same border mined by different players. I guess just let overflow do it or give a 2nd place.

    I've never seen it in UHD but N AF might be more likely.

    read more