Resolving minor inter-war conflicts. Territory Country Probability Outcome Afghanistan Afghanistan 60% Third Anglo-Afghan War is inconclusive. Afghanistan Impassable 10% Afghan neutrality guaranteed by Britain and Russia. Afghanistan Britain 10% British decisively win the Third Ango-Afghan War Afghanistan Victim 20% Afghanistan collapses into chaos after British victory in the Third Ango-Afghan War. Anglo-Egypt Sudan Britain 80% Anglo-Egypt Sudan Egypt 20% Egypt establishes firm control of the Sudan Belorussia Belorussia 10% Belorussia gains independence Borneo Brunei 20% Brunei preponderant in Borneo Borneo Britain 50% Britain preponderant in Borneo Borneo Netherlands 30% Dutch preponderant in Borneo Buryatia S.S.R. Japan 10% Japanese gain control of Buryatia Buryatia S.S.R. Russia 90% Caucasus Caucasus 20% Independent state(s) in Caucasus Caucasus Russia 80% Eire Britain 20% Irish uprising defeated Eire Ireland 80% Finland Finland 80% Finland gains independence Finland Russia 20% Russia retains Finland French Indo-China Thailand Vietnam 40% Vietnam dominant in Southeast Asia French Indo-China Thailand Siam 30% Siam dominant in Southeast Asia French Indo-China Thailand Britain 30% Britain dominant in Southeast Asia Himalaya Tibet 20% Tibet dominates the Himalayas Himalaya Nepal 10% Nepal dominates the Himalayas Himalaya Impassable 70% Snow & ice dominate the Himalayas Italian Africa Abyssinia 25% Abyssinia modernizes Italian Africa Britain 25% Britain dominant in East Africa Italian Africa Italy 50% Italy conquers Abyssinia Kazakh S.S.R. Kazakhstan 10% Kazakhstan gains independence Kazakh S.S.R. Russia 90% Kwangtung Britain 60% Hong Kong dominates South China Kwangtung China 40% Canton dominates South China Manchuria Japan 70% Japan dominates Korea and Manchuria Manchuria Korea 10% Korea regains independence Manchuria China 10% China gains full control over Manchuria Manchuria Russia 10% Russia dominates Manchuria Mongolia Mongolia 70% Mongolia gains independence Mongolia Russia 20% Russia controls Mongolia Mongolia China 10% China controls Mongolia Morocco Algeria France 80% France dominates the Mahgreb Morocco Algeria Morocco 20% Morocco dominates the Mahgreb New Guinea Netherlands 50% Netherlands dominates New Guinea New Guinea Australia 50% Australia dominates New Guinea Northwestern Europe Belgium 50% Belgium dominates the Low Countries Northwestern Europe Netherlands 50% Netherlands dominates the Low Countries Sahara Impassable 90% Sahara France 10% France develops the Sahara Saudi Arabia Saudi 60% Saudis defeat the Hashemites Saudi Arabia Hashemite 40% Hashemites defeat the Saudis Spain Spain 80% Spain Portugal 20% Portugal dominates Iberian Peninsula Trans-Jordan Hashemite 60% Hashemite kings installed in Middle East Trans-Jordan Britain 10% Britain dominates the Middle East Trans-Jordan France 30% France dominates the Middle East West Indies Cuba 25% Cuba dominates West Indies West Indies United_States 25% USA dominates West Indies West Indies Britain 25% Britain dominates West Indies West Indies France 25% France dominates West Indies [image: image.jpeg]

@Rrrrricky said: Hey everyone, im new here. Trying to modify NO's on World War ii v3 1942 map. Github looks locked apparently? I couldn't create an account there for some reason. Any ideas? TY! Why did you want to change the NO's? If you want different NO's, you need to create a new mod.

Hello, I'm back. So uh idk if I'll do much but probably will do something like maybe get a game set up (idk if like via forum or online depending on time constrants).

@Vendetta Currently using the XML, you can configure this to work exactly in the way you described, except for "Allies retreating to different territories". Currently all units go to one territory. The Pull Request is almost merge-ready, it just needs a bit of improvements outlined at the GitHub page. @iratoric How are things looking right now? Are you planning to work on the last bits of the PR?

@RogerCooper said: more sense to have the executive module set a broad plan and then the other modules figure how to execute the plan. I was thinking that the plan would be more emergent rather than preset if it was set by local processes, but maybe you're right. I will try both ways. The issue with global plannig i think will be getting the nescessary information to the executive and have it analyze that info appropriately without just simulating all possibilities (which isn't possible.) My account is drained of tokens now, so progress is on temporary hiatus.

@VictoryFirst I replaced all references to "placeNoAir" to "place" and added <attachment foreach="$All-Players$" name="rulesAttachment" attachTo="@All-Players@" javaClass="RulesAttachment" type="player"> <option name="placementAnyTerritory" value="true"/> </attachment>

@GREGOREK Yah, scrolling both edges sure is cool. I wish this could be possible in an actual (spherical) world (like ours) with some sort of projection, but unfortunately it is not (as far as I know).

@captain0 said AI may have issues moving the 2 hit tanks, as they start off with stacks of 9? per territory in the game. Part of the problem might be me leaving the Armor-Inf stacked in 9s. I will destack them and that might alleviate the problem, they should be in 5s Regarding reduced incomes. I like this idea, but I also like spending PUs, so it's a balance, hopefully currently it feels about right? Did some testing, reduced each of the 3 Industries PU production by -2, I got mixed results, so I will have to do more testing.

As if by magic they are back, please ignore.

Updated to 2.63 [image: Screenshot from 2026-09-25 20-20-09.png]

@beelee I would suggest erasing the flags which is easy to do in Paint. There is no reason to have flags in unit images, as you can turn flags on with View/Flag Display/Small.

@pgsquig I am a non-graphic non-artist I use this https://greenfishsoftware.org/gfie.php Crop those images above, then paste them into greenfish and shrink them into 48x48px or 72x54px or whatever size you want.

@TheDog thanks

@craigviau Nice you got it working xml work can be frustrating, unless you were born with a large amount of patience I try to look at it as a puzzle anymore, as opposed to wanting to throw my computer down the driveway lol PactofSteel2 xml is still the best information source, next to wc

@GREGOREK said: Is a Frontier change the only way to change the cost of a unit? Define the unit multiple times with different names per cost, then use trigger to change the frontier or productionRule. Yes. Cheers...

@Petiantone the server has already been switched. your link goes to a page that says it can't be reached [image: Screenshot from 2026-09-13 11-17-44.png] Are you AI