• Aggression 1914

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    4k Views
    SchulzS
    @Hepps I've forgot to colour the lakes in the base map thank you.
  • World War I European Campaigns

    18
    1
    2 Votes
    18 Posts
    4k Views
    I
    @schulz Here is a possible unit image for Wassmuss of Persia: [image: wilhelm_wassmuss.png] Similarly to Lawrence of Arabia, he would give a bonus to allied units with him. Whereas Lawrence of Arabia would be in Hejaz fighting the Ottomans, Lawrence of Arabia would be in Persia fighting the British. I would picture them both having a small entourage of troops with them as they rarely operated alone. Also, I do not know how others create maps, but for this latest map I used Photoshop CS2. I cropped a world map to get an image of Europe and an image of America, then placed them closer together. I then traced over them and colored in the water. For detailed territories I looked up regional maps of each area and if the territories were too small I would combine two or more together so that I could fit units in them. One thing you have to be careful with is that the lines must be completely black and there can be no gaps, otherwise TripleA won't register the territories properly. This gets particularly hard to do with large maps. For this game, I have been thinking of doing a 1914 start date and that other countries will gradually join the war. Forts will be a new unit like bunkers in other games. [image: Marne.PNG] I have done some AI games and it looks like if there are forts on the French-German border, the German AI will turn away to avoid them and instead attack through Belgium, which is close to what happened historically.
  • New (& Old) Mods for TripleA

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    548 Views
    No one has replied
  • Best Triplea Map to play

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    ubernautU
    @umesh ai i'd say any of the v3 variations, 1914 no mans land, nwo or v3. versus human i'd say TWW
  • Limits of maps

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    LaFayetteL
    FWIW, a very sizeable chunk of the memory footprint and memory pressure comes from rendering the minimap. The minimap is rendered by drawing the entire map at full scale and then shrinking it down. The more detailed the territory images, the more memory that this will consume. Physically larger images can allow for greater detail, but not necessarily. Hence a large map where all the territories are a single color will require less memory than a small map where the territory images have lots of detail.
  • Removing grey edges after resizing base maps

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    968 Views
    ubernautU
    @schulz i think you're gonna have to do a better job with the resizing
  • New Map: World War 1 End of Empires

    76
    1
    2 Votes
    76 Posts
    34k Views
    I
    I am changing battleships to be unbuildable and 1-hit. I thought that this would lead to a lot of battleships being destroyed too quickly, but after a few playthroughs with the AI it seems like I was wrong.
  • AI Suitability

    49
    2 Votes
    49 Posts
    20k Views
    RogerCooperR
    So I am starting to examine AI suitability for some randomly picked scenarios. Great Lakes War All these scenario are fine for AI Great War The only problem for the AI is the odd blockages for the US. This is an old scenario before events were introduced into TripleA. The large numbers of units and sprawaling map also slow the game. The actual units are straight-forward and the game can be played with Fast AI. Combat movement is before purchase.
  • Global 1940 improving the notes

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    750 Views
    ubernautU
    @zlefin just make sure you aren't reusing other people's IP.
  • Best Rules Version

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    Z
    @rogercooper It has some understanding, but not a complete understanding; from what I've been able to tell. It does, at least partly, recognize the movement bonuses units will get in terms of avoiding counterattacks, though I'm not sure it does so fully. In terms of strategic bombing, I'm not sure to what extent it specifically targets harbors/airfields that are relevant right now, vs simply targetting anything in the area that's raidable that it's not already invading. (and of course bombers often have regular combats worth doing as well). It does not seem to preferentially move units on/next to harbors/airfields so as to get the movement bonus. I was trying out Global recently, and some of the moves quite clearly showed the ai not 'getting' the impacts of those bases.
  • 270BC - Official Thread

    32
    1
    2 Votes
    32 Posts
    10k Views
    C
    @lafayette said in 270BC Wars - Official Thread: @Cernel why is there a '+' folder in the map? Seemingly it's making the download size quite a bit larger than it needs to be. The "270bc" map has several such useless items too. The main difference is that I group them externally, leaving inside the "map" folder nothing but what is or may be used by the program. Completely useless items of 270bc (I would keep without the "map" folder): https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/misc/Legend.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/territoryNames/Saria.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/territoryNames/Heraclea.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/RomanRepublic_unit_development.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/archer_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/archer_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/ballista_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/hoplite_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/legionaire_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/warelephant_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/warelephant_hepps_hit.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/Neutral/longboat.png Other maps have a lot more useless items than this one.
  • Aggression 1941

    32
    1
    4 Votes
    32 Posts
    14k Views
    ebbeE
    @schulz Hej Schulz, you asked me to use Soundfiles I made/ adapted for the recently released WW2 Oil & Snow project, which is fine, ( except the intro tune , I prefer to keep that unique ) nice to see another 1941 map and I like your ingredients...
  • World War 2010

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    3k Views
    RavilleR
    I also like a lot this map, but when trying to game it people said it has many problems and bugs. Could be great if can be fixing as a normal map... Thanks forwardly
  • Oztea 1939 Global

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @wc_sumpton right on thanks again. I'll give it a go
  • How do I call new nations in World War 2 v5 SE?

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    887 Views
    SchulzS
    You need to name it Chinese instead China for the easiest way to bring China. Then copy the XML and give a different name. Then examine the XML. It is not complicated.
  • NWO and NWO 5 nations victory condition

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    596 Views
    RogerCooperR
    Many scenarios have no victory condition defined.
  • AA50 with Maintenance

    Moved
    2
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Moved to Maps & Mods.
  • Spring 1942

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    zoozocZ
    Oops, I think I spoke in ignorance here. I didn't realize that there are two editions of "Spring 1942". I apparently own the 1st edition. The 2nd edition does indeed appear to be "World War II v5"
  • Can someone make/find a few icons for me?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    506 Views
    No one has replied
  • War at War changes

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    SchulzS
    Upkeep is possible to implement, the important one is finding good upkeep/cost ratio and in my experiences with upkeep, it works best with 5%-10%. For example infantry cost is 2 and 0.1 upkeep (5%) would work perfectly. But armour upkeep should be definitely higher than 5% but still should not be higher than 10%. Yes, draw means nobody wins and nobody lose pretty much same with chess. Because of the cumulative aspects of games, the loser side really cannot turn the tide of the war and the fate of the games always seales in the middle of games and just there should have been draw option that gives a good reason the loser side to continue.

Recent Posts

  • Step 7: Starting units and resources

    I will create a standard setup largely derived from the 1941 scenario. The units will be handled by territory, so they may be controlled by a different country than in the standard game.

    In all standard A&A games, the starting resources are the same as the starting income but there is no reason to mandate that. I will likely vary with higher values for the lead aggressor and lower values for delayed entry countries.

    read more

  • Step 6 Order of Play
    The lead Aggressor always goes first. Alternate Status Quo and Aggressor countries, randomly chosen. There will likely be a bunch of Status Quo countries at the end.

    read more

  • Post removed, wrong thread.

    read more

  • Step 5 Assign alliances

    There will to be two alliances "Aggressor" and "Status Quo" The Aggressor alliance is attempting to reorder the world through military force, while the Status Quo is trying to resist that.

    As I am not trying to track the ideologies you can assume that unlikely alliances are probably the result of ideological conflicts and similarities.

    The first step is to determine the lead aggressor. The lead aggressor is randomly chosen from the major countries. The lead aggressor goes first and will receive more units.

    Next the lead status quo power is chosen from the remaining major countries. The lead status quo power receives extra resources.

    The remaing major and medium powers are randomly assigned as follows

    50% Status Quo 30% Aggressor 10% Victim 10% Impassable

    The "Victim" nation is a passive member of the Status Quo alliance. It is neutral with regards to the rest of the Status Quo alliance and at war with the Aggessor alliance. The Status Quo alliance can't assist the "Victim" but if the liberate a territory they don't need to return it. Each turn the lead Status Quo power receives a bonus of 1 PU for every Victim-held territory. Note that is major or medium power has been reassigned to the victim nation, that means it is in civil war or some other internal disorder.

    The "Impassable" nation is neutral to everyone and out of play.

    There is a 50% change of delayed entry of each Status Quo nation and a 25% change of delayed entry for each Aggessor nation (other than the lead aggressor). The delayed entry nation comes in a randomly chosen turn between 2 and 5 at the start of the lead aggressor turn. It is possible that every Status Quo nation is delayed entry, allowing the lead aggessor to focus on victims.

    Historically, there was one territorial dispute directly involving major & medium countries, Alsace-Lorraine. Ethnically German but historically French it would be difficult (but not impossible) to resolve the dispute and conflict is likely. There will be a 30% chance that Germany is lead aggressor, while France is a status quo power that is active immediately. This will probably not work out well for France.

    read more