• Removing grey edges after resizing base maps

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    917 Views
    ubernautU
    @schulz i think you're gonna have to do a better job with the resizing
  • New Map: World War 1 End of Empires

    76
    1
    2 Votes
    76 Posts
    32k Views
    I
    I am changing battleships to be unbuildable and 1-hit. I thought that this would lead to a lot of battleships being destroyed too quickly, but after a few playthroughs with the AI it seems like I was wrong.
  • AI Suitability

    49
    2 Votes
    49 Posts
    19k Views
    RogerCooperR
    So I am starting to examine AI suitability for some randomly picked scenarios. Great Lakes War All these scenario are fine for AI Great War The only problem for the AI is the odd blockages for the US. This is an old scenario before events were introduced into TripleA. The large numbers of units and sprawaling map also slow the game. The actual units are straight-forward and the game can be played with Fast AI. Combat movement is before purchase.
  • Global 1940 improving the notes

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    721 Views
    ubernautU
    @zlefin just make sure you aren't reusing other people's IP.
  • Best Rules Version

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    Z
    @rogercooper It has some understanding, but not a complete understanding; from what I've been able to tell. It does, at least partly, recognize the movement bonuses units will get in terms of avoiding counterattacks, though I'm not sure it does so fully. In terms of strategic bombing, I'm not sure to what extent it specifically targets harbors/airfields that are relevant right now, vs simply targetting anything in the area that's raidable that it's not already invading. (and of course bombers often have regular combats worth doing as well). It does not seem to preferentially move units on/next to harbors/airfields so as to get the movement bonus. I was trying out Global recently, and some of the moves quite clearly showed the ai not 'getting' the impacts of those bases.
  • 270BC - Official Thread

    32
    1
    2 Votes
    32 Posts
    10k Views
    C
    @lafayette said in 270BC Wars - Official Thread: @Cernel why is there a '+' folder in the map? Seemingly it's making the download size quite a bit larger than it needs to be. The "270bc" map has several such useless items too. The main difference is that I group them externally, leaving inside the "map" folder nothing but what is or may be used by the program. Completely useless items of 270bc (I would keep without the "map" folder): https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/misc/Legend.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/territoryNames/Saria.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/territoryNames/Heraclea.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/RomanRepublic_unit_development.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/archer_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/archer_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/ballista_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/hoplite_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/legionaire_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/warelephant_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/warelephant_hepps_hit.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/Neutral/longboat.png Other maps have a lot more useless items than this one.
  • Aggression 1941

    32
    1
    4 Votes
    32 Posts
    12k Views
    ebbeE
    @schulz Hej Schulz, you asked me to use Soundfiles I made/ adapted for the recently released WW2 Oil & Snow project, which is fine, ( except the intro tune , I prefer to keep that unique ) nice to see another 1941 map and I like your ingredients...
  • World War 2010

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    3k Views
    RavilleR
    I also like a lot this map, but when trying to game it people said it has many problems and bugs. Could be great if can be fixing as a normal map... Thanks forwardly
  • Oztea 1939 Global

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    969 Views
    B
    @wc_sumpton right on thanks again. I'll give it a go
  • How do I call new nations in World War 2 v5 SE?

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    853 Views
    SchulzS
    You need to name it Chinese instead China for the easiest way to bring China. Then copy the XML and give a different name. Then examine the XML. It is not complicated.
  • NWO and NWO 5 nations victory condition

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    569 Views
    RogerCooperR
    Many scenarios have no victory condition defined.
  • AA50 with Maintenance

    Moved
    2
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    Moved to Maps & Mods.
  • Spring 1942

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    zoozocZ
    Oops, I think I spoke in ignorance here. I didn't realize that there are two editions of "Spring 1942". I apparently own the 1st edition. The 2nd edition does indeed appear to be "World War II v5"
  • Can someone make/find a few icons for me?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    476 Views
    No one has replied
  • War at War changes

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    SchulzS
    Upkeep is possible to implement, the important one is finding good upkeep/cost ratio and in my experiences with upkeep, it works best with 5%-10%. For example infantry cost is 2 and 0.1 upkeep (5%) would work perfectly. But armour upkeep should be definitely higher than 5% but still should not be higher than 10%. Yes, draw means nobody wins and nobody lose pretty much same with chess. Because of the cumulative aspects of games, the loser side really cannot turn the tide of the war and the fate of the games always seales in the middle of games and just there should have been draw option that gives a good reason the loser side to continue.
  • Fallen Empire

    92
    2 Votes
    92 Posts
    50k Views
    SchulzS
    @alkexr I was trying to make upkeep as visible source in the purchase screen in my map like that but couldn't find a way because its not a resource. I am using <option name="createsResourcesList" value="-x:PUs"/> tag to represent upkeep. Wondering is turning into supply like this system the onyl way to make is visible?
  • Fixed Scenarios from the Repository

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    5k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @ff03k64 I don't remember exactly. With the way TripleA runs now, it easy to find which images are missing.
  • Oztea 1942 needs to add "Original Owners" for territories

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    879 Views
    B
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE border-gore is aptly named lol I think i got em all. Uninstall and reinstall and you should be good to go. I added a notification at game start with version and date as I didn't do a yaml PR. I must of spaced it's own thread so we'll just make this it for the future
  • world at war with red dot units

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    635 Views
    A
    Thank you very much
  • Which mods have tech trees like age of tribes?

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    Teddy SelfT
    Thanks for the info, if anyone is interested in this scenario I have altered just tell me where to upload it. You will play as northern starting on turn 2.

Recent Posts

  • Middle Eastern rework.

    Syria being the logistic base for both the Palestine and Iraq fronts didn't make sense previously.

    wwieurope - Copy.jpg

    read more

  • Latest version v270 ready for download in TripleA.

    In TripleA
    Click Download Maps Button
    Click Installed tab
    Click 1941 Global Command Decision
    Click Remove Button
    Click Yes button to remove
    Click Ok button (Successfully removed)
    Click Close (To force the map list to refresh)
    Click Download Maps Button
    Find & Click 1941 Global Command Decision
    Click Install button

    Enjoy!

    .
    v270

    Bunker 4pu, was 5, helps the AI buy more Turkey will now defend as a nation, if attacked, was as each separate territory

    .
    🔻 Unchanged v255 documentation, last page has winter turn on instructions. 🔻
    1941_Global_Command_Decision_Manual.pdf

    🔻 Suggested TripleA version 🔻
    https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/releases
    .
    Link to 1st post that has;
    Downloads for new Players
    https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/3326/1941-global-command-decision-official-thread

    read more

  • Name Hearts of Iron: The Rising Sun 1942
    Description World War 2 in 1942 on the Big World map with many added unit types
    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Hearts_of_Iron:_The_Rising_Sun_1942
    f8519453-3506-49db-ba4c-5fceca8f4170-image.jpeg

    Good Points

    Both sides have a chance to win

    Bad Points

    Many unit types are similar
    read more

  • I hope I'm not spamming. Let's continue:

    1 round = 110 days, so the game should last approximately 15 rounds.

    The USA joins in Round 9, slightly earlier than historically to represent its support for the Entente even before entering the war.

    Russia will receive an increasing income penalty each round. It will be negligible early on, but they will eventually go bankrupt in Round 11 (September 1917) and permanently leave the war in the next turn. Their units will be removed, and all unoccupied Russian territories will become impassable. The Central Powers will keep any territories they have already captured. Here's how the Russian income penalty will gradually increase:

    Round 1: -1
    Round 2: -2
    Round 3: -4
    Round 4: -7
    Round 5: -11
    Round 6: -16
    Round 7: -22
    Round 8: -29
    Round 9: -37
    Round 10: -46
    Round 11: -56

    No upkeep this time, but unit costs are doubled. Here are the standard land units:

    Infantry 2/3/1 : 6 IPC
    Artillery 3/3/1 : 8 IPC
    Fighter 2/2/2 : 12 IPC
    Cavalry 2/2/2 : 8 IPC

    However, I'm thinking about giving the Russians and Ottomans slightly different units: weaker, but with more HP efficiency. This would offset their lower incomes, greater vulnerabilities, and worse factory positions. Plus, their individual territories are generally worth less than those of the other powers, so cheaper units would give them more incentive to fight even for lower-value territories. They would have Light Infantry and Light Artillery instead:

    Light Infantry 1/2/1 : 4 IPC
    Light Artillery 2/2/1 : 6 IPC

    wwieurope - values - Copy.jpg

    read more