• Aggression 1914 (release)

    4
    1
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    TheDogT
    @schulz Downloaded, but not everyone can open rar files, consider changing it to zip. Im on 2.6.149 I have been testing 2.6, its running fine, ie. it has not crashed, after 1 round.
  • Aggression 1914

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    4k Views
    SchulzS
    @Hepps I've forgot to colour the lakes in the base map thank you.
  • World War I European Campaigns

    18
    1
    2 Votes
    18 Posts
    4k Views
    I
    @schulz Here is a possible unit image for Wassmuss of Persia: [image: wilhelm_wassmuss.png] Similarly to Lawrence of Arabia, he would give a bonus to allied units with him. Whereas Lawrence of Arabia would be in Hejaz fighting the Ottomans, Lawrence of Arabia would be in Persia fighting the British. I would picture them both having a small entourage of troops with them as they rarely operated alone. Also, I do not know how others create maps, but for this latest map I used Photoshop CS2. I cropped a world map to get an image of Europe and an image of America, then placed them closer together. I then traced over them and colored in the water. For detailed territories I looked up regional maps of each area and if the territories were too small I would combine two or more together so that I could fit units in them. One thing you have to be careful with is that the lines must be completely black and there can be no gaps, otherwise TripleA won't register the territories properly. This gets particularly hard to do with large maps. For this game, I have been thinking of doing a 1914 start date and that other countries will gradually join the war. Forts will be a new unit like bunkers in other games. [image: Marne.PNG] I have done some AI games and it looks like if there are forts on the French-German border, the German AI will turn away to avoid them and instead attack through Belgium, which is close to what happened historically.
  • New (& Old) Mods for TripleA

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    554 Views
    No one has replied
  • Best Triplea Map to play

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    ubernautU
    @umesh ai i'd say any of the v3 variations, 1914 no mans land, nwo or v3. versus human i'd say TWW
  • Limits of maps

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    LaFayetteL
    FWIW, a very sizeable chunk of the memory footprint and memory pressure comes from rendering the minimap. The minimap is rendered by drawing the entire map at full scale and then shrinking it down. The more detailed the territory images, the more memory that this will consume. Physically larger images can allow for greater detail, but not necessarily. Hence a large map where all the territories are a single color will require less memory than a small map where the territory images have lots of detail.
  • Removing grey edges after resizing base maps

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    988 Views
    ubernautU
    @schulz i think you're gonna have to do a better job with the resizing
  • New Map: World War 1 End of Empires

    76
    1
    2 Votes
    76 Posts
    34k Views
    I
    I am changing battleships to be unbuildable and 1-hit. I thought that this would lead to a lot of battleships being destroyed too quickly, but after a few playthroughs with the AI it seems like I was wrong.
  • AI Suitability

    49
    2 Votes
    49 Posts
    20k Views
    RogerCooperR
    So I am starting to examine AI suitability for some randomly picked scenarios. Great Lakes War All these scenario are fine for AI Great War The only problem for the AI is the odd blockages for the US. This is an old scenario before events were introduced into TripleA. The large numbers of units and sprawaling map also slow the game. The actual units are straight-forward and the game can be played with Fast AI. Combat movement is before purchase.
  • Global 1940 improving the notes

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    756 Views
    ubernautU
    @zlefin just make sure you aren't reusing other people's IP.
  • Best Rules Version

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    Z
    @rogercooper It has some understanding, but not a complete understanding; from what I've been able to tell. It does, at least partly, recognize the movement bonuses units will get in terms of avoiding counterattacks, though I'm not sure it does so fully. In terms of strategic bombing, I'm not sure to what extent it specifically targets harbors/airfields that are relevant right now, vs simply targetting anything in the area that's raidable that it's not already invading. (and of course bombers often have regular combats worth doing as well). It does not seem to preferentially move units on/next to harbors/airfields so as to get the movement bonus. I was trying out Global recently, and some of the moves quite clearly showed the ai not 'getting' the impacts of those bases.
  • 270BC - Official Thread

    32
    1
    2 Votes
    32 Posts
    11k Views
    C
    @lafayette said in 270BC Wars - Official Thread: @Cernel why is there a '+' folder in the map? Seemingly it's making the download size quite a bit larger than it needs to be. The "270bc" map has several such useless items too. The main difference is that I group them externally, leaving inside the "map" folder nothing but what is or may be used by the program. Completely useless items of 270bc (I would keep without the "map" folder): https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/misc/Legend.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/territoryNames/Saria.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/territoryNames/Heraclea.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/RomanRepublic_unit_development.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/archer_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/archer_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/ballista_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/hoplite_with_marker_at_55pt.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/legionaire_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/warelephant_hepps.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/alt/warelephant_hepps_hit.png https://github.com/triplea-maps/270bc/blob/master/map/units/Neutral/longboat.png Other maps have a lot more useless items than this one.
  • Aggression 1941

    32
    1
    4 Votes
    32 Posts
    15k Views
    ebbeE
    @schulz Hej Schulz, you asked me to use Soundfiles I made/ adapted for the recently released WW2 Oil & Snow project, which is fine, ( except the intro tune , I prefer to keep that unique ) nice to see another 1941 map and I like your ingredients...
  • World War 2010

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    3k Views
    RavilleR
    I also like a lot this map, but when trying to game it people said it has many problems and bugs. Could be great if can be fixing as a normal map... Thanks forwardly
  • Oztea 1939 Global

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @wc_sumpton right on thanks again. I'll give it a go
  • How do I call new nations in World War 2 v5 SE?

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    894 Views
    SchulzS
    You need to name it Chinese instead China for the easiest way to bring China. Then copy the XML and give a different name. Then examine the XML. It is not complicated.
  • NWO and NWO 5 nations victory condition

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    601 Views
    RogerCooperR
    Many scenarios have no victory condition defined.
  • AA50 with Maintenance

    Moved
    2
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Moved to Maps & Mods.
  • Spring 1942

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    zoozocZ
    Oops, I think I spoke in ignorance here. I didn't realize that there are two editions of "Spring 1942". I apparently own the 1st edition. The 2nd edition does indeed appear to be "World War II v5"
  • Can someone make/find a few icons for me?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    511 Views
    No one has replied

Recent Posts

  • Hello again!

    This is an update to our new TripleA map, "War Plan Red-Orange", about an alternate WWI timeline where the United States, China, The Netherlands, Portugal and Japan join as a full-fledged belligerents from the start!

    With this update we introduce new features including:

    -20! new technologies, including economic combat naval and many more techs!
    -custom units such as Landmines, sea mines, zeppelins and trenches to bring the experience of WW1 to life.
    -Map customization to optimize gameplay, the Dutch have a capital in Indonesia!
    -Blockade zones to starve your opponents from their precious IPCS!
    -Portugal now owns Brazil! taking the fight truly around the globe!
    -Many balance changes and Bug fixes to improve the gameplay.

    We are searching for people who want to playtest this map with us! We have an active community with multiple developers and playtesters, with multiple games going on simultaneously!

    If you are interested in joining this project or just simply want to play the map against the ai or your friends you can join our discord https://discord.gg/U86J4DG33h

    Or you can PM me if you have any questions!

    (picture with all technologies unlocked)

    image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    image.jpeg

    read more

  • Step 8 Balancing the Game

    Balancing Axis & Allies style games is a difficult task. For example in V3-1941 the Allies are ahead in every measure, but the game is reasonably balanced.

    Production 120 to 58 Starting PU 113 to 58 Units 124 to 105 TPV 696 to 645 Objectives 12 to 6

    This is typical of A&A games, that units and TPV are close between the sides. However income obviously matters in the long run. Furthermore, vulnerable territories of the Status Quo players may actually work to the benefit of the Aggressor.

    As a starting formula I have:

    Production x 3+ Starting PU's + Units + TPV - vulnerability penalty - delayed entry penalty

    The vulnerability penalty is x3 the income of vulnerable territories + factories in vulnerable territories.

    A territory is vulnerable if they are owned by Status Quo country that is active at the game start and that is adjacent to an Aggressor country that is active the game start.

    The delayed entry penalty is 10% of the TPV for each turn past 1 of delay.

    To balance the game additional units (and starting PU's) are added to the aggressors if they are behind and additional income to the lead status quo power if they are behind.

    Units will be randomly added to territories with a weighting equal to value+1. The chance of a specific unit will be proportional to the inverse of its cost.

    In either case units will have the build caps equal to 120/cost to prevent ridiculous builds by the AI.

    read more

  • Step 7: Starting units and resources

    I will create a standard setup largely derived from the 1941 scenario. The units will be handled by territory, so they may be controlled by a different country than in the standard game.

    In all standard A&A games, the starting resources are the same as the starting income but there is no reason to mandate that. I will likely vary with higher values for the lead aggressor and lower values for delayed entry countries.

    read more

  • Step 6 Order of Play
    The lead Aggressor always goes first. Alternate Status Quo and Aggressor countries, randomly chosen. There will likely be a bunch of Status Quo countries at the end.

    read more