@xxXEddieXxx What is your Mobile's TripleA closest version? In your Politics/Diplomacy panel above, you have purple for Allied, yes? TripleA convention is Green for Allied, no biggy for me. Also Mobile has Diplomacy, TripleA has Politics, maybe stick to TripleA naming? Does a very large map like 1941 Global Command Decision, run on Mobile? It has large images for its manual in Help> Game Notes, do they render? Keep up the great work.

@panther said The fact that the installation now went flawlessly shows, that the MS service behind is 'learning'. I agree. I am inclined to think that it is based on the number of downloads Microsoft has in its SAC database, too few and it is a risk, enough and it passes. So from our point of view, we will need to keep a SAC viable downloads list @cowey To confirm, please find out your friends TripleA version, I will guess it is 2026-10.16.15815 ? Just need the last 5 digits, so its probably 15815

@Ramon Can't help you with the transparent eraser. I use plain old Paint

@rwb4 Welcome to the forums! Well done on making your first map, its a steep learning curve.

Cernel said: Cernel said: I'm keeping finding issues. I'm again (...) confident it will be a matter of very few days. Some information here: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/15013 Ok. I'm not going to give ETA any longer, but I'm working on the map as I find more things to address. When I played with @wirkey, I attacked and captured a lord with the Sword. To my dismay, the lord got automatically freed. I thought that was something intended because I assumed I need a lord to keep captives, but now I think it's actually a bug, and I should have been able to execute the lord I captured with the Sword. More information here: https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/issues/15013 Since the rule-book is far from clear here, I'm actually just going to leave the behaviour as it is and document it in Game Notes (that, if you win an offensive battle with only relics or with only relics remaining, every captive lord in there gets freed). (That was quite a bummer when it happened to me.)

Resolving minor inter-war conflicts. Territory Country Probability Outcome Afghanistan Afghanistan 60% Third Anglo-Afghan War is inconclusive. Afghanistan Impassable 10% Afghan neutrality guaranteed by Britain and Russia. Afghanistan Britain 10% British decisively win the Third Ango-Afghan War Afghanistan Victim 20% Afghanistan collapses into chaos after British victory in the Third Ango-Afghan War. Anglo-Egypt Sudan Britain 80% Anglo-Egypt Sudan Egypt 20% Egypt establishes firm control of the Sudan Belorussia Belorussia 10% Belorussia gains independence Borneo Brunei 20% Brunei preponderant in Borneo Borneo Britain 50% Britain preponderant in Borneo Borneo Netherlands 30% Dutch preponderant in Borneo Buryatia S.S.R. Japan 10% Japanese gain control of Buryatia Buryatia S.S.R. Russia 90% Caucasus Caucasus 20% Independent state(s) in Caucasus Caucasus Russia 80% Eire Britain 20% Irish uprising defeated Eire Ireland 80% Finland Finland 80% Finland gains independence Finland Russia 20% Russia retains Finland French Indo-China Thailand Vietnam 40% Vietnam dominant in Southeast Asia French Indo-China Thailand Siam 30% Siam dominant in Southeast Asia French Indo-China Thailand Britain 30% Britain dominant in Southeast Asia Himalaya Tibet 20% Tibet dominates the Himalayas Himalaya Nepal 10% Nepal dominates the Himalayas Himalaya Impassable 70% Snow & ice dominate the Himalayas Italian Africa Abyssinia 25% Abyssinia modernizes Italian Africa Britain 25% Britain dominant in East Africa Italian Africa Italy 50% Italy conquers Abyssinia Kazakh S.S.R. Kazakhstan 10% Kazakhstan gains independence Kazakh S.S.R. Russia 90% Kwangtung Britain 60% Hong Kong dominates South China Kwangtung China 40% Canton dominates South China Manchuria Japan 70% Japan dominates Korea and Manchuria Manchuria Korea 10% Korea regains independence Manchuria China 10% China gains full control over Manchuria Manchuria Russia 10% Russia dominates Manchuria Mongolia Mongolia 70% Mongolia gains independence Mongolia Russia 20% Russia controls Mongolia Mongolia China 10% China controls Mongolia Morocco Algeria France 80% France dominates the Mahgreb Morocco Algeria Morocco 20% Morocco dominates the Mahgreb New Guinea Netherlands 50% Netherlands dominates New Guinea New Guinea Australia 50% Australia dominates New Guinea Northwestern Europe Belgium 50% Belgium dominates the Low Countries Northwestern Europe Netherlands 50% Netherlands dominates the Low Countries Sahara Impassable 90% Sahara France 10% France develops the Sahara Saudi Arabia Saudi 60% Saudis defeat the Hashemites Saudi Arabia Hashemite 40% Hashemites defeat the Saudis Spain Spain 80% Spain Portugal 20% Portugal dominates Iberian Peninsula Trans-Jordan Hashemite 60% Hashemite kings installed in Middle East Trans-Jordan Britain 10% Britain dominates the Middle East Trans-Jordan France 30% France dominates the Middle East West Indies Cuba 25% Cuba dominates West Indies West Indies United_States 25% USA dominates West Indies West Indies Britain 25% Britain dominates West Indies West Indies France 25% France dominates West Indies [image: image.jpeg]

@VictoryFirst You need to keep in mind that A&A combat consists of a number of interlocking pieces and that changing one can throw the balance off. It is unrealistic that a small force of infantry can stop a tank blitz but is even more unrealistic that battles run an unlimited number of rounds, that there is no retreat and the lack of supply rules. Making blitzing easier makes things hard for the Russians on the Eastern Front.

@Rrrrricky said: Hey everyone, im new here. Trying to modify NO's on World War ii v3 1942 map. Github looks locked apparently? I couldn't create an account there for some reason. Any ideas? TY! Why did you want to change the NO's? If you want different NO's, you need to create a new mod.

It seems very interesting. A lot of posts yesterday but you must be working on it since you were born !

Version History Version 3.0 (2026-10-11) Initial beta release

Hello, I'm back. So uh idk if I'll do much but probably will do something like maybe get a game set up (idk if like via forum or online depending on time constrants).

@Vendetta Currently using the XML, you can configure this to work exactly in the way you described, except for "Allies retreating to different territories". Currently all units go to one territory. The Pull Request is almost merge-ready, it just needs a bit of improvements outlined at the GitHub page. @iratoric How are things looking right now? Are you planning to work on the last bits of the PR?

@husky81 So now you have your initial baseline results, Im hoping for now, that you stop using your Tokens verses Hard-AI, Easy-AI and Does Nothing, and just concentrate on using them, against Fast-AI ? What are your plans for testing for improvements to Claude-AI ?

@RogerCooper said: more sense to have the executive module set a broad plan and then the other modules figure how to execute the plan. I was thinking that the plan would be more emergent rather than preset if it was set by local processes, but maybe you're right. I will try both ways. The issue with global plannig i think will be getting the nescessary information to the executive and have it analyze that info appropriately without just simulating all possibilities (which isn't possible.) My account is drained of tokens now, so progress is on temporary hiatus.

@VictoryFirst I replaced all references to "placeNoAir" to "place" and added <attachment foreach="$All-Players$" name="rulesAttachment" attachTo="@All-Players@" javaClass="RulesAttachment" type="player"> <option name="placementAnyTerritory" value="true"/> </attachment>

@GREGOREK Yah, scrolling both edges sure is cool. I wish this could be possible in an actual (spherical) world (like ours) with some sort of projection, but unfortunately it is not (as far as I know).

@beelee not that many times, there have been a number of updates though.

@captain0 said AI may have issues moving the 2 hit tanks, as they start off with stacks of 9? per territory in the game. Part of the problem might be me leaving the Armor-Inf stacked in 9s. I will destack them and that might alleviate the problem, they should be in 5s Regarding reduced incomes. I like this idea, but I also like spending PUs, so it's a balance, hopefully currently it feels about right? Did some testing, reduced each of the 3 Industries PU production by -2, I got mixed results, so I will have to do more testing.

As if by magic they are back, please ignore.