• new_world_order_lebowski_edition missing image

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    797 Views
    F
    @LaFayette I could also just leave it white and let Russia have a special one. I don't know how to hue shift.
  • Iron War: Europe - Official Thread

    67
    4
    2 Votes
    67 Posts
    40k Views
    F
    Been playing Europe instead of the whole world. Couple of thoughts. I am playing all of one side against the AI. Seems to favor the axis quite a bit. As the allies it went to turn 15 before i was tipped the scales. As axis, i feel like i am in the winning position on turn 5, just a matter of time. I think part of that is the size of the navies. The rally points from IW could be a good addition to this map. USA had difficulties finding a place to put a new factory. Germany and USA had fairly similar colors. Germany was also similar to one of the Balkan nations, but that isn't as big of a deal, as they are allied. After like 2 turns, iron was not much of a factor for me. I don't know how much you wanted that to be a factor, but the fuel is what really limits things for me. AI seems to use more of its iron though. SS troops seem to need a higher TUV value. They are picked first for casualties.
  • Question about triggers

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    766 Views
    F
    @Mas-N invert values: true or false. default if missing is false. if true, this attachment's condition will be reversed (does not reverse the effect). line 2922 of POS2. Wouldn't that do what you want? Or am i reading something wrong?
  • Single Player Maps

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @AprilForever It is fun to play Australia and to optimize its play. Well-timed attacks and retreats can throw the Japanese off-balance and divert the Japanese enough to give the Allies victory. I general, it is more fun to play one of the Allies with everyone else on AI and try to depend on your AI allies.
  • World War II v5 1942 Second Edition

    43
    0 Votes
    43 Posts
    19k Views
    SchulzS
    I've saw overall negative views for this map campared to revised and anniversary no idea if it because of balance or fun issue. The vanilla one is biased towards Axis. Even inTR set up they still give 6 bid to allies. I think it would be better with Italian presence and reducing armour cost to 5.
  • Air battles question

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    601 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @ff03k64 In the unitAttachment there is the 'canAirBattle' option. Setting it to 'true' should allow those unit to participate in air battles prior to the normal ground battle. Cheers...
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    @eregister I looked at that save. The USA player doesn't have the buyTank production rule. Looking through the history, it doesn't show a trigger having run after the armour technology was gained. I looked at other turns when technologies were purchased and I don't see any triggers running after the technologies were purchased. I played one round where I used "edit game" to give the armour technology to USA. After the technology activation phase, the history showed the trigger having run. What version are you using? And could you make a save on the turn after you purchase the armour technology?
  • canNotTarget/canNotBeTargetedBy on Attack/Defense

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Trevan That looks like a good generalization of the AA rules.
  • New Scenario: Axis & Allies & Zombies (AAZ)

    5
    5 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    Here is the fixed version. AAZ.zip
  • CanalAttachment not Working

    canalattachment
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    572 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @RogerCooper I did not find a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '29 Sea Zone' for 'Suez Canal'. Also there is no connection between '20 Sea Zone' and '12 Sea Zone' for 'Panama Canal'. There is a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '19 Sea Zone' for 'Turkish Straits'. Maybe adding the following connections will help. <connection t1="18 Sea Zone" t2="29 Sea Zone"/> <connection t1="12 Sea Zone" t2="20 Sea Zone"/> Not sure just guessing here. Cheers...
  • No relief tiles

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    984 Views
    TheDogT
    @ff03k64 Im on Windows 10, Java 11.0.6 and AAA=2.3.21895 I too had to dl it, it works for me, I too have never played it.
  • Is 1941 better year than 1942 for WWII scenarios?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    In general, 1941 has more options than 1942, while 1940 can have too many options, making it hard to balance the game. On my Wiki here my articles by year (not all are scenarios) 1937 5 1938 0 1939 124 1940 73 1941 204 1942 233 1943 11 1944 21 1945 16
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    714 Views
    TheDogT
    @Trevan Thanks! Im on your factory building v2.3.21895 I will raise an issue on GitHub.
  • Game Crash when air units in battle

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    LaFayetteL
    Thanks for finding that. I think the fix is for AA to not shoot at air transported units. On the flip side we should be sure they are removed as casualties if the transport is shot down.
  • Need help to convert an old game

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    SchulzS
    It works now perfectly, unfortunately both Great war and GW1918 lack of png image. How do I can create relief tiles?
  • second currency - possible?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    PantherP
    @Numetalfan That is from the wrong XML. Please look into the pact_of_steel_2.xml It starts with <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE game SYSTEM "game.dtd"> <game> <info name="Pact of Steel 2" version="3.8"/>
  • Caribbean Trade War question

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    789 Views
    M
    Just an observation but the AI Pirates and Indians are very active in early turns and make for really interesting dynamics, but after about turn 6 they become incredibly passive. Perhaps they assess the Player Nations as having strengthened into a threat not worth fighting against? It's a shame though.
  • Question about beginning map for The Rising Sun

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    685 Views
    G
    Thanks for the insight. I totally take your word for it about balance of gameplay, not having played it yet. Interesting, I went back into the map just now and saw something I had missed before. The banner page says "Version 1.9.3, It's December 8,1941", not the 7th, so perhaps the whole premise is that indeed the carriers and some battleships survived, which is reality, and the Japanese retained the option of going back in for another strike to finish what they started.
  • Labyrinth - Official Thread

    28
    2
    9 Votes
    28 Posts
    9k Views
    ubernautU
    @Black_Elk cool sketch.
  • Starting Tech Advantages (Anniversary)

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    Oh wow...didn't know those. They work perfect! Thanks to both of you!

Recent Posts

  • @RogerCooper I think the ahistorical presence of the Bolsheviks in Siberia makes the game more interesting and provides more options to both sides.

    I haven't played against the AI in a long time. All I remember is that the AI is worse at handling naval stuff, not necessarily specific to the Americans on this map.

    There used to be a tech that gave transports +2 range, but it was nerfed to +1. Not sure if that would make any difference to the American AI's behavior.

    read more

  • @Schulz I was recently playing Domination 1914 and I saw two problems.

    The way the Russian Revolution is handled is very ahistorical. They are there at the start in 1914 and have their main base in Siberia, which historically held against the Bolsheviks for longest. They should pop up in the middle of the war instead.

    The other issue is that Americans have trouble entering the war. The AI builds ships and planes but few ground forces. Faster but more expensive transports might help.

    The world map is good either way.

    read more

  • I have a 9800 px wide draft map with more realistic land shapes, while Europe is enlarged enough to fit more units (ignore the WW1 borders). If the project is still alive, we can work on this.

    NewMapProject2.jpg

    read more

  • It has been years since I played NM.

    Is there anything left we could still improve regarding balance, graphics, techs, etc.? Or is it in a perfect state right now?

    Would anyone be interested in a toggleable alternative skin with more realistic land shapes? I have a 9800 px draft map. I got rid of the exaggerated land curves (looking at you, Spain!). Europe is also slightly enlarged to fit more units while keeping the rest of the landmasses far less distorted.

    Here's a comparison of the scale of the two versions:

    olcek.png

    read more