1. Home
  2. Maps & Mods
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • trulpenT

    War at War changes

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    SchulzS
    Upkeep is possible to implement, the important one is finding good upkeep/cost ratio and in my experiences with upkeep, it works best with 5%-10%. For example infantry cost is 2 and 0.1 upkeep (5%) would work perfectly. But armour upkeep should be definitely higher than 5% but still should not be higher than 10%. Yes, draw means nobody wins and nobody lose pretty much same with chess. Because of the cumulative aspects of games, the loser side really cannot turn the tide of the war and the fate of the games always seales in the middle of games and just there should have been draw option that gives a good reason the loser side to continue.
  • alkexrA

    Fallen Empire

    92
    2 Votes
    92 Posts
    53k Views
    SchulzS
    @alkexr I was trying to make upkeep as visible source in the purchase screen in my map like that but couldn't find a way because its not a resource. I am using <option name="createsResourcesList" value="-x:PUs"/> tag to represent upkeep. Wondering is turning into supply like this system the onyl way to make is visible?
  • RogerCooperR

    Fixed Scenarios from the Repository

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    6k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @ff03k64 I don't remember exactly. With the way TripleA runs now, it easy to find which images are missing.
  • jkprinceJ

    Oztea 1942 needs to add "Original Owners" for territories

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    918 Views
    B
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE border-gore is aptly named lol I think i got em all. Uninstall and reinstall and you should be good to go. I added a notification at game start with version and date as I didn't do a yaml PR. I must of spaced it's own thread so we'll just make this it for the future
  • A

    world at war with red dot units

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    685 Views
    A
    Thank you very much
  • Teddy SelfT

    Which mods have tech trees like age of tribes?

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    Teddy SelfT
    Thanks for the info, if anyone is interested in this scenario I have altered just tell me where to upload it. You will play as northern starting on turn 2.
  • SchulzS

    Need Relief Tiles

    39
    0 Votes
    39 Posts
    10k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Schulz Nice, I have added to shades of "shores" so far but I still don't know exactly what it would be the best approach. Thanks!
  • jkprinceJ

    Churchill's 1939

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE Try this http://www.rogercooper.com/churchills_1939.zip There is no point to sending the xml, as I have not changed the xml. To make this work, you will need to create art for antitank and tank_destroyer. I don't know of any scenario that used those unit types. The Benelux flag is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Benelux.
  • Major ArcanaM

    Operation Unthinkable and Operation Dandelion

    31
    1 Votes
    31 Posts
    8k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Major-Arcana The historical situation was fairly interesting. With many US troops withdrawn from Europe, the British government was estimating the Soviets had a 2.5 to 1 superiority in ground forces, but the Allies were superior in the air. Could the British hold the line until the US redeployed? A good scenario for Europe-only game, especially with more realistic air rules. For a world game, one could add Communist guerillas popping up and the Japanese continuing the Pacific war.
  • F

    new_world_order_lebowski_edition missing image

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    869 Views
    F
    @LaFayette I could also just leave it white and let Russia have a special one. I don't know how to hue shift.
  • FrostionF

    Iron War: Europe - Official Thread

    67
    4
    2 Votes
    67 Posts
    42k Views
    F
    Been playing Europe instead of the whole world. Couple of thoughts. I am playing all of one side against the AI. Seems to favor the axis quite a bit. As the allies it went to turn 15 before i was tipped the scales. As axis, i feel like i am in the winning position on turn 5, just a matter of time. I think part of that is the size of the navies. The rally points from IW could be a good addition to this map. USA had difficulties finding a place to put a new factory. Germany and USA had fairly similar colors. Germany was also similar to one of the Balkan nations, but that isn't as big of a deal, as they are allied. After like 2 turns, iron was not much of a factor for me. I don't know how much you wanted that to be a factor, but the fuel is what really limits things for me. AI seems to use more of its iron though. SS troops seem to need a higher TUV value. They are picked first for casualties.
  • Mas NM

    Question about triggers

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    821 Views
    F
    @Mas-N invert values: true or false. default if missing is false. if true, this attachment's condition will be reversed (does not reverse the effect). line 2922 of POS2. Wouldn't that do what you want? Or am i reading something wrong?
  • F

    Single Player Maps

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @AprilForever It is fun to play Australia and to optimize its play. Well-timed attacks and retreats can throw the Japanese off-balance and divert the Japanese enough to give the Allies victory. I general, it is more fun to play one of the Allies with everyone else on AI and try to depend on your AI allies.
  • SchulzS

    World War II v5 1942 Second Edition

    43
    0 Votes
    43 Posts
    20k Views
    SchulzS
    I've saw overall negative views for this map campared to revised and anniversary no idea if it because of balance or fun issue. The vanilla one is biased towards Axis. Even inTR set up they still give 6 bid to allies. I think it would be better with Italian presence and reducing armour cost to 5.
  • F

    Air battles question

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    670 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @ff03k64 In the unitAttachment there is the 'canAirBattle' option. Setting it to 'true' should allow those unit to participate in air battles prior to the normal ground battle. Cheers...
  • E

    No Armor upgrade after you research the upgrade in new version this worked fine in 1.9

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    @eregister I looked at that save. The USA player doesn't have the buyTank production rule. Looking through the history, it doesn't show a trigger having run after the armour technology was gained. I looked at other turns when technologies were purchased and I don't see any triggers running after the technologies were purchased. I played one round where I used "edit game" to give the armour technology to USA. After the technology activation phase, the history showed the trigger having run. What version are you using? And could you make a save on the turn after you purchase the armour technology?
  • RogerCooperR

    canNotTarget/canNotBeTargetedBy on Attack/Defense

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Trevan That looks like a good generalization of the AA rules.
  • RogerCooperR

    New Scenario: Axis & Allies & Zombies (AAZ)

    5
    5 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    Here is the fixed version. AAZ.zip
  • RogerCooperR

    CanalAttachment not Working

    canalattachment
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    631 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @RogerCooper I did not find a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '29 Sea Zone' for 'Suez Canal'. Also there is no connection between '20 Sea Zone' and '12 Sea Zone' for 'Panama Canal'. There is a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '19 Sea Zone' for 'Turkish Straits'. Maybe adding the following connections will help. <connection t1="18 Sea Zone" t2="29 Sea Zone"/> <connection t1="12 Sea Zone" t2="20 Sea Zone"/> Not sure just guessing here. Cheers...
  • F

    No relief tiles

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    TheDogT
    @ff03k64 Im on Windows 10, Java 11.0.6 and AAA=2.3.21895 I too had to dl it, it works for me, I too have never played it.

Recent Posts

  • B
    beelee

    @wc_sumpton

    Ramon got me to thinking and I tried to alter how my Marines work. The way they're supposed to work is they are A1 D2 unit that gets boosted to A3 when a Artillery is present.

    Artillery also boosts Infantry and a pile of other units +1 on the attack.

    I had the Marine at A2 and get boosted +1 on the attack with all the other units in the same supportAttachment. But then you have to switch to a MarineA1 unit that only attacks at 1 when no Arty present.

    So i made a separate supportAttachment for the jarhead and gave him +2 on the attack when paired with the Arty as he is now just a A1 otherwise.

    I gave it the same "bonusType" name as the one that supports the Infantry. When I attack with 1 Inf and 1 Marine and 1 Arty, the Arty gives +2 to the Marine and +1 to the Inf.

    We want it to just give +2 to the jarhead and no bonus to the Inf. Is that possible ? It seems I tried when initially doing it but couldn't get it to work, hence the two different types of Marines.

    I thought the same bonusType name meant the Arty would only support 1 unit but then which unit was a bit of a problem too but you did say something about which order their listed in gets the support.

    I have to dig that one up but anyway, I think I already tried this and there was no solution but ... I'll ask again anyways 🙂

    Screenshot from 2026-09-18 11-45-36.png

    read more
  • B
    beelee

    @wc_sumpton

    heh heh I'll give it a go 🙂

    I thought defense since the defenders should be affected by the attacker the ABomb But will try as I didn't think to 🙂

    Edit
    and wc comes through with the obvious solution lol

    Screenshot from 2026-09-17 23-12-49.png

    The 2 hitters are at 1 now. Just a testing stage but I hate being stupid lol

    Thanks Brother

    rightarm.png

    read more
  • wc_sumptonW
    wc_sumpton

    @beelee

    Is the " ABomb" attacking or defending? 'side' is which side the 'attachTo' unit is on. If 'attachTo' is attacking side=offense. Defending side=defense.

    Cheers...

    read more
  • TheDogT
    TheDog

    @beelee
    check your javaclass is
    javaClass="UnitSupportAttachment"

    read more