• Oztea 1939 Global

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @wc_sumpton right on thanks again. I'll give it a go
  • How do I call new nations in World War 2 v5 SE?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    912 Views
    SchulzS
    You need to name it Chinese instead China for the easiest way to bring China. Then copy the XML and give a different name. Then examine the XML. It is not complicated.
  • NWO and NWO 5 nations victory condition

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    611 Views
    RogerCooperR
    Many scenarios have no victory condition defined.
  • AA50 with Maintenance

    Moved
    2
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Moved to Maps & Mods.
  • Spring 1942

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    zoozocZ
    Oops, I think I spoke in ignorance here. I didn't realize that there are two editions of "Spring 1942". I apparently own the 1st edition. The 2nd edition does indeed appear to be "World War II v5"
  • Can someone make/find a few icons for me?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    521 Views
    No one has replied
  • War at War changes

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    SchulzS
    Upkeep is possible to implement, the important one is finding good upkeep/cost ratio and in my experiences with upkeep, it works best with 5%-10%. For example infantry cost is 2 and 0.1 upkeep (5%) would work perfectly. But armour upkeep should be definitely higher than 5% but still should not be higher than 10%. Yes, draw means nobody wins and nobody lose pretty much same with chess. Because of the cumulative aspects of games, the loser side really cannot turn the tide of the war and the fate of the games always seales in the middle of games and just there should have been draw option that gives a good reason the loser side to continue.
  • Fallen Empire

    92
    2 Votes
    92 Posts
    54k Views
    SchulzS
    @alkexr I was trying to make upkeep as visible source in the purchase screen in my map like that but couldn't find a way because its not a resource. I am using <option name="createsResourcesList" value="-x:PUs"/> tag to represent upkeep. Wondering is turning into supply like this system the onyl way to make is visible?
  • Fixed Scenarios from the Repository

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    6k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @ff03k64 I don't remember exactly. With the way TripleA runs now, it easy to find which images are missing.
  • Oztea 1942 needs to add "Original Owners" for territories

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    928 Views
    B
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE border-gore is aptly named lol I think i got em all. Uninstall and reinstall and you should be good to go. I added a notification at game start with version and date as I didn't do a yaml PR. I must of spaced it's own thread so we'll just make this it for the future
  • world at war with red dot units

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    696 Views
    A
    Thank you very much
  • Which mods have tech trees like age of tribes?

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    Teddy SelfT
    Thanks for the info, if anyone is interested in this scenario I have altered just tell me where to upload it. You will play as northern starting on turn 2.
  • Need Relief Tiles

    39
    0 Votes
    39 Posts
    10k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Schulz Nice, I have added to shades of "shores" so far but I still don't know exactly what it would be the best approach. Thanks!
  • Churchill's 1939

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE Try this http://www.rogercooper.com/churchills_1939.zip There is no point to sending the xml, as I have not changed the xml. To make this work, you will need to create art for antitank and tank_destroyer. I don't know of any scenario that used those unit types. The Benelux flag is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Benelux.
  • Operation Unthinkable and Operation Dandelion

    31
    1 Votes
    31 Posts
    9k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Major-Arcana The historical situation was fairly interesting. With many US troops withdrawn from Europe, the British government was estimating the Soviets had a 2.5 to 1 superiority in ground forces, but the Allies were superior in the air. Could the British hold the line until the US redeployed? A good scenario for Europe-only game, especially with more realistic air rules. For a world game, one could add Communist guerillas popping up and the Japanese continuing the Pacific war.
  • new_world_order_lebowski_edition missing image

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    881 Views
    F
    @LaFayette I could also just leave it white and let Russia have a special one. I don't know how to hue shift.
  • Iron War: Europe - Official Thread

    67
    2 Votes
    67 Posts
    43k Views
    F
    Been playing Europe instead of the whole world. Couple of thoughts. I am playing all of one side against the AI. Seems to favor the axis quite a bit. As the allies it went to turn 15 before i was tipped the scales. As axis, i feel like i am in the winning position on turn 5, just a matter of time. I think part of that is the size of the navies. The rally points from IW could be a good addition to this map. USA had difficulties finding a place to put a new factory. Germany and USA had fairly similar colors. Germany was also similar to one of the Balkan nations, but that isn't as big of a deal, as they are allied. After like 2 turns, iron was not much of a factor for me. I don't know how much you wanted that to be a factor, but the fuel is what really limits things for me. AI seems to use more of its iron though. SS troops seem to need a higher TUV value. They are picked first for casualties.
  • Question about triggers

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    836 Views
    F
    @Mas-N invert values: true or false. default if missing is false. if true, this attachment's condition will be reversed (does not reverse the effect). line 2922 of POS2. Wouldn't that do what you want? Or am i reading something wrong?
  • Single Player Maps

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @AprilForever It is fun to play Australia and to optimize its play. Well-timed attacks and retreats can throw the Japanese off-balance and divert the Japanese enough to give the Allies victory. I general, it is more fun to play one of the Allies with everyone else on AI and try to depend on your AI allies.
  • World War II v5 1942 Second Edition

    43
    0 Votes
    43 Posts
    20k Views
    SchulzS
    I've saw overall negative views for this map campared to revised and anniversary no idea if it because of balance or fun issue. The vanilla one is biased towards Axis. Even inTR set up they still give 6 bid to allies. I think it would be better with Italian presence and reducing armour cost to 5.

Recent Posts

  • @Vendetta said:

    @KurtGodel7

    I would recommend a name swap for the Advanced Production Centers, since APC is an acronym that every wargame is going to associate with armored personnel carrier.

    Special Production Center / SPC should be a pretty easy substitute to avoid the overlap.

    Your Europe map looks beautiful, from what I can see. Taiwan and Okinawa are a bit off-putting on the Asia one, they’d look better if they swapped sizes with one another. Okinawa being placed that close to the edge of the sea zone also leaves me wondering whether it should be shifted onto the boundary line instead.

    Your combat system ventures far enough from any version of the game I’ve played that I can’t really offer any judgement about it at this point. Hopefully, once you’re far enough along in development, you can share a play by play of a test game as a demonstration.

    Good feedback on APCs and Okinawa.

    One of the places from which I drew inspiration was Axis and Allies Naval Miniatures. With that game, you use fighters to gain air superiority. Bomber type aircraft to benefit from air superiority. It's normal for units to have multiple hitpoints. The mighty Yamato was given 6 hitpoints. Cruisers, battleships, and dive bombers are unable to hit enemy subs. There was a very good paper-rock-scissors dynamic to that game which I wanted to bring into an Axis and Allies style map.

    read more

  • Naval combat now works differently.

    Step 1: destroyers fire. Enemy subs are taken as casualties first. Only after all subs are dead can surface ships be hit. Enemies killed during this phase do get a casualty shot.

    Step 2: Subs fire. Anything hit during this phase does not receive a casualty shot. Only surface ships can be taken as casualty.

    Step 3: Surface ships fire, except for destroyers. Enemies killed during this phase receive a casualty shot. Only surface ships can be taken as casualty during this phase.

    read more

  • @KurtGodel7

    I would recommend a name swap for the Advanced Production Centers, since APC is an acronym that every wargamer is going to associate with armored personnel carrier.

    Special Production Center / SPC should be a pretty easy substitute to avoid the overlap.

    Your Europe map looks beautiful, from what I can see. Taiwan and Okinawa are a bit off-putting on the Asia one, they’d look better if they swapped sizes with one another. Okinawa being placed that close to the edge of the sea zone also leaves me wondering whether it should be shifted onto the boundary line instead.

    Your combat system ventures far enough from any version of the game I’ve played that I can’t really offer any judgement about it at this point. Hopefully, once you’re far enough along in development, you can share a play by play of a test game as a demonstration.

    read more

  • Also:

    AA guns now work differently. AA guns fire after the dogfight phase. They fire on a 2. Each aa gun gets one shot only, without regard to the number of enemy air units present. With three aa guns, you are guaranteed one hit. If there is a particular factory you want to defend, you could pile a lot of aa guns into the territory with the factory. Defending your army from being strafed is more difficult, because the dive bombers could always choose to attack a territory where your aa guns aren't. AA guns don't fire during ground combat, but they can be taken as casualties.

    Dive bombers fire at twice their normal combat value when attacking land targets. Likewise, torpedo bombers fire at twice their normal combat value when attacking surface ships. Imagine attacking a fleet of 10 ships with your torpedo bombers. Only the ships damaged or destroyed by your torpedo bombers would get to fire at aircraft. The rest of your fleet was considered too far away from the action to be able to use its aa guns. The way to defend against enemy torpedo bombers is with fighters and jets.

    Air zones come in three flavors: land, coastal waters, and open ocean. For a land zone, you need a landing base within range of your aircraft. For coastal waters, you need either a landing base or aircraft carriers. For open ocean, only carriers will suffice. When using carriers, the number of aircraft you can have in a zone is limited by carrier capacity.

    read more