• World War 2010

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    3k Views
    RavilleR
    I also like a lot this map, but when trying to game it people said it has many problems and bugs. Could be great if can be fixing as a normal map... Thanks forwardly
  • Oztea 1939 Global

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @wc_sumpton right on thanks again. I'll give it a go
  • How do I call new nations in World War 2 v5 SE?

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    912 Views
    SchulzS
    You need to name it Chinese instead China for the easiest way to bring China. Then copy the XML and give a different name. Then examine the XML. It is not complicated.
  • NWO and NWO 5 nations victory condition

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    611 Views
    RogerCooperR
    Many scenarios have no victory condition defined.
  • AA50 with Maintenance

    Moved
    2
    5 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Moved to Maps & Mods.
  • Spring 1942

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    zoozocZ
    Oops, I think I spoke in ignorance here. I didn't realize that there are two editions of "Spring 1942". I apparently own the 1st edition. The 2nd edition does indeed appear to be "World War II v5"
  • Can someone make/find a few icons for me?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    521 Views
    No one has replied
  • War at War changes

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    SchulzS
    Upkeep is possible to implement, the important one is finding good upkeep/cost ratio and in my experiences with upkeep, it works best with 5%-10%. For example infantry cost is 2 and 0.1 upkeep (5%) would work perfectly. But armour upkeep should be definitely higher than 5% but still should not be higher than 10%. Yes, draw means nobody wins and nobody lose pretty much same with chess. Because of the cumulative aspects of games, the loser side really cannot turn the tide of the war and the fate of the games always seales in the middle of games and just there should have been draw option that gives a good reason the loser side to continue.
  • Fallen Empire

    92
    2 Votes
    92 Posts
    54k Views
    SchulzS
    @alkexr I was trying to make upkeep as visible source in the purchase screen in my map like that but couldn't find a way because its not a resource. I am using <option name="createsResourcesList" value="-x:PUs"/> tag to represent upkeep. Wondering is turning into supply like this system the onyl way to make is visible?
  • Fixed Scenarios from the Repository

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    6k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @ff03k64 I don't remember exactly. With the way TripleA runs now, it easy to find which images are missing.
  • Oztea 1942 needs to add "Original Owners" for territories

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    928 Views
    B
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE border-gore is aptly named lol I think i got em all. Uninstall and reinstall and you should be good to go. I added a notification at game start with version and date as I didn't do a yaml PR. I must of spaced it's own thread so we'll just make this it for the future
  • world at war with red dot units

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    696 Views
    A
    Thank you very much
  • Which mods have tech trees like age of tribes?

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    Teddy SelfT
    Thanks for the info, if anyone is interested in this scenario I have altered just tell me where to upload it. You will play as northern starting on turn 2.
  • Need Relief Tiles

    39
    0 Votes
    39 Posts
    10k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Schulz Nice, I have added to shades of "shores" so far but I still don't know exactly what it would be the best approach. Thanks!
  • Churchill's 1939

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE Try this http://www.rogercooper.com/churchills_1939.zip There is no point to sending the xml, as I have not changed the xml. To make this work, you will need to create art for antitank and tank_destroyer. I don't know of any scenario that used those unit types. The Benelux flag is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Benelux.
  • Operation Unthinkable and Operation Dandelion

    31
    1 Votes
    31 Posts
    9k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Major-Arcana The historical situation was fairly interesting. With many US troops withdrawn from Europe, the British government was estimating the Soviets had a 2.5 to 1 superiority in ground forces, but the Allies were superior in the air. Could the British hold the line until the US redeployed? A good scenario for Europe-only game, especially with more realistic air rules. For a world game, one could add Communist guerillas popping up and the Japanese continuing the Pacific war.
  • new_world_order_lebowski_edition missing image

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    881 Views
    F
    @LaFayette I could also just leave it white and let Russia have a special one. I don't know how to hue shift.
  • Iron War: Europe - Official Thread

    67
    4
    2 Votes
    67 Posts
    43k Views
    F
    Been playing Europe instead of the whole world. Couple of thoughts. I am playing all of one side against the AI. Seems to favor the axis quite a bit. As the allies it went to turn 15 before i was tipped the scales. As axis, i feel like i am in the winning position on turn 5, just a matter of time. I think part of that is the size of the navies. The rally points from IW could be a good addition to this map. USA had difficulties finding a place to put a new factory. Germany and USA had fairly similar colors. Germany was also similar to one of the Balkan nations, but that isn't as big of a deal, as they are allied. After like 2 turns, iron was not much of a factor for me. I don't know how much you wanted that to be a factor, but the fuel is what really limits things for me. AI seems to use more of its iron though. SS troops seem to need a higher TUV value. They are picked first for casualties.
  • Question about triggers

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    836 Views
    F
    @Mas-N invert values: true or false. default if missing is false. if true, this attachment's condition will be reversed (does not reverse the effect). line 2922 of POS2. Wouldn't that do what you want? Or am i reading something wrong?
  • Single Player Maps

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @AprilForever It is fun to play Australia and to optimize its play. Well-timed attacks and retreats can throw the Japanese off-balance and divert the Japanese enough to give the Allies victory. I general, it is more fun to play one of the Allies with everyone else on AI and try to depend on your AI allies.

Recent Posts

  • image.jpeg

    The end of the game. Round 7. The Soviet Union destroys the German army at Dnepropetrovsk. 76 conscripts to soak up hits, plus 42 anti-tank guns to provide some firepower while soaking up more hits, plus some tanks and artillery to enhance the offensive firepower.

    I may need to make some tweaks to help balance this. However, Germany did put up a better fight on the northern part of its eastern front than it did in the southern portion.

    image.jpeg

    The Asian mainland, round 7. Japan would love to just crush China but thus far has been unable to do so. Japan would also like to start pushing Britain out of India, but that hasn't happened thus far. Britain just got Raj tech, which means three free colonial militia for India each turn.

    image.jpeg

    Japan has conquered the Philippines and part of the East Indies. It finally took Hong Kong. Singapore is proving a disturbingly tough nut to crack.

    image.jpeg

    Neutral farming for America Pacific. Also it has been building up its fleet to be able to challenge the IJN. Japan hasn't kept pace with the naval builds, because it's been preoccupied with mainland Asia and the East Indies.

    image.jpeg

    The Soviet Union has been one of Japan's problems. Vladivosok is worth 7. The Soviets recently started placing 9 units a turn there due to industry tech. Japan does not want that war, because it's one war too many.

    End of the game tech: Germany had just gotten Speer's Industrialization. It was making good progress with advanced tech. But all that was hollow without Panther tank tech (which it did not yet have). Japan was making good progress with its Japan techs, but the Japan techs it really wanted--the income increasing ones--would not kick in until later in the game. Italy was unlucky with its tech rolls, with nearly everything chosen at random. Britain had made good use of tech (industry tech), the Soviet Union had gotten conscription 1 tech (1 free conscript a turn per factory, so long as the underlying territory is originally Soviet and worth at least 9). Possibly the most successful for tech was America Pacific. It had discovered fleet carrier, it had an SPC, and it had extended range for piston tech. (Allowing its fighters, heavy fighters, dive bombers, and torpedo bombers to have a range of 4.)

    Conclusion: I could have played better with both sides. No question there. That said, I believe the map is unbalanced in favor of the Allies. Germany got distracted from its eastern front too quickly. Japan could maybe use a couple extra transports with which to start the game. Britain can exert too much pressure too quickly in France, and it's difficult for Germany to counter that due to Britain's advantage in local unit placement capacity. Italy had some success, but it didn't look as if that success was going to turn into anything decisive. America Atlantic's income grows over time--I think it hits full income on round 10--so it was going to be able to put more and more economic pressure on Italy.

    read more

  • The start of round 5 for a recent test game.

    image.jpeg

    Germany built a ton of transports on G1, and conquered Leningrad on G2. After that, however, the northern portion of Germany's eastern front somewhat stalled. Note the massive Soviet unit placement capacity on Archangel and Gorky.

    image.jpeg

    This is the southern portion of Germany's eastern front. It is tempted to unite the Kiev and Vitebsk stacks in Gomel. While the German offensive might stall before Moscow, at least the Germans can add some land before that happens.

    image.jpeg

    Over in the west, the British have been invading France. Germany probably under-spent on that front early game, but is trying to make up for it now.

    image.jpeg

    Germany may have messed up its western front. America Atlantic is starting to behave as you'd expect America in NWO to behave. To push back against that, the Germans should not have neutral farmed Switzerland on G1. Instead they should have gone to Spain earlier, in an effort to prevent the Allies from taking root there.

    image.jpeg

    The east Mediterranean. The British weren't paying enough attention, and the Italians won a crushing victory in the Western Desert. Italy should be in good shape on that front, at least for now. However, problems are starting to appear in the west.

    image.jpeg

    China! China has been a major thorn in Japan's side. Japan has been going south. China has responded by going south as well, and exerting major pressure on Japan. Japan had built a factory + trenches for Tonkin. China took Tonkin with a couple of heavy guns left at the end of the fight. Instead of retaking Tonkin immediately, Japan shipped to Kwangsi, to destroy a large Chinese army there. China responded by building units + trenches for Tonkin. Japan took Tonkin anyway, but it was tough. Due to an error on Japan's part, China destroyed a Japanese army in Western Hunan. China is getting pushed back overall, but it's been tough work for Japan.

    image.jpeg

    The Japanese fleet that destroyed the American fleet at Pearl. 8 torpedo bombers attacked during the air phase, and the rest of the Japanese fleet moved in during Japan's turn to finish off the American fleet.

    image.jpeg

    America Pacific's fleet. It is licking its wounds after its defeat at Pearl. It has also started neutral farming.

    Technology
    Germany hopes to have SPCs producing Panther tanks, ideally with Speer's Industrialization adding more tanks. It's made some progress towards achieving this, but has yet to unlock Panther tank tech.

    The Soviet Union would love to have SPCs producing KV-1 tanks. But even more than that, it would love to unlock better recruitment tech. (Of which the Soviet Union has by far the best in the game.) Also it's been having unit placement problems due to too many conscripts and anti-tank guns. Recruitment is the primary focus for a Soviet research center, while tanks tech and advanced are areas of secondary focus. Its other primary focus I think is Innovation, because Industry tech would solve its unit placement problems.

    Japan has two research centers. One of them has a primary focus on Japan tech, because that is a good way of increasing its late game income. Already Japan tech has yielded Long Lance torpedoes. It could also envision itself having SPCs, producing fleet carriers. Therefore carriers tech and advanced are among Japan's research goals. It also (accidentally!) got industry tech. That adds +2 to a factory's unit placement capacity, so long as the underlying territory is worth at least 2. That tech has solved Japan's unit placement problems.

    Britain also got industry tech, but unlike Japan this was done on purpose. This gives Britain the ability to place more units on India and Africa, should it wish to push harder against Japan or Italy. The extra unit placement capacity is also useful for its war against Germany.

    Italy. With just one research center Italy doesn't have much of a research strategy. Its goal is to get free units or resources. With that in mind, it chose innovation as its primary focus and recruitment as its secondary focus. It has yet to unlock any free resource techs, but it is certainly looking forward to doing so.

    America Pacific. America Pacific is proud to have already discovered fleet carrier tech. In addition it has discovered advanced 1, allowing it to build one SPC. Receiving a free fleet carrier every other turn will help it in its war against Japan. It is also focusing on USA tech, because that is a good source of added income. Due to making piston air a priority, it received SBD Dauntless tech. At least for now, its dive bombers are better at naval combat than its torpedo bombers.

    America Atlantic. Also focusing on USA tech to add to its income. It could envision itself with some SPCs creating Pershing heavy tanks. America Atlantic is the most income nerfed nation in the game. After very minimal income for rounds 1 - 2, it collects 30% of its true income on round 3, 40% on round 4, and so forth. Late game it will be an economic powerhouse. It is planning on using this economic strength in Spain, North Africa, and the Mediterranean. It could envision itself eventually conquering Rome.

    read more

  • Latest version v010 ready for download with in TripleA.

    In TripleA
    Click Download Maps Button
    Click Installed tab
    Click 11 Rings of Power
    Click Remove Button
    Click Yes button to remove
    Click Ok button (Successfully removed)
    Click Close (To force the map list to refresh)
    Click Download Maps Button
    Find & Click *11 Rings of Power
    Click Install button

    Enjoy!

    .
    v010

    Fixes Victory conditions, now counts the Rings correctly

    .
    🔻🔻 v005 unchanged 11 Rings of Power Manual here; 🔻🔻
    11_Rings_of_Power_Manual.pdf

    🔻 Suggested latestTripleA version 🔻
    https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/releases
    .
    Link to 1st post that has;
    Downloads for new Players
    https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/4444/11-rings-of-power-official-thread

    read more

  • Name World War II v3 1941 v2
    Description World War II v3 (Anniversary edition) with major changes in setup, economic value and national objectives
    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/World_War_II_v3_1941_v2
    image.jpeg

    Good Points

    Reasonably balanced Easy to understand rules

    Bad Points

    read more