• Oztea 1942 needs to add "Original Owners" for territories

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    893 Views
    B
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE border-gore is aptly named lol I think i got em all. Uninstall and reinstall and you should be good to go. I added a notification at game start with version and date as I didn't do a yaml PR. I must of spaced it's own thread so we'll just make this it for the future
  • world at war with red dot units

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    656 Views
    A
    Thank you very much
  • Which mods have tech trees like age of tribes?

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    Teddy SelfT
    Thanks for the info, if anyone is interested in this scenario I have altered just tell me where to upload it. You will play as northern starting on turn 2.
  • Need Relief Tiles

    39
    0 Votes
    39 Posts
    9k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Schulz Nice, I have added to shades of "shores" so far but I still don't know exactly what it would be the best approach. Thanks!
  • Churchill's 1939

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE Try this http://www.rogercooper.com/churchills_1939.zip There is no point to sending the xml, as I have not changed the xml. To make this work, you will need to create art for antitank and tank_destroyer. I don't know of any scenario that used those unit types. The Benelux flag is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Benelux.
  • Operation Unthinkable and Operation Dandelion

    31
    1 Votes
    31 Posts
    8k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Major-Arcana The historical situation was fairly interesting. With many US troops withdrawn from Europe, the British government was estimating the Soviets had a 2.5 to 1 superiority in ground forces, but the Allies were superior in the air. Could the British hold the line until the US redeployed? A good scenario for Europe-only game, especially with more realistic air rules. For a world game, one could add Communist guerillas popping up and the Japanese continuing the Pacific war.
  • new_world_order_lebowski_edition missing image

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    834 Views
    F
    @LaFayette I could also just leave it white and let Russia have a special one. I don't know how to hue shift.
  • Iron War: Europe - Official Thread

    67
    4
    2 Votes
    67 Posts
    41k Views
    F
    Been playing Europe instead of the whole world. Couple of thoughts. I am playing all of one side against the AI. Seems to favor the axis quite a bit. As the allies it went to turn 15 before i was tipped the scales. As axis, i feel like i am in the winning position on turn 5, just a matter of time. I think part of that is the size of the navies. The rally points from IW could be a good addition to this map. USA had difficulties finding a place to put a new factory. Germany and USA had fairly similar colors. Germany was also similar to one of the Balkan nations, but that isn't as big of a deal, as they are allied. After like 2 turns, iron was not much of a factor for me. I don't know how much you wanted that to be a factor, but the fuel is what really limits things for me. AI seems to use more of its iron though. SS troops seem to need a higher TUV value. They are picked first for casualties.
  • Question about triggers

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    792 Views
    F
    @Mas-N invert values: true or false. default if missing is false. if true, this attachment's condition will be reversed (does not reverse the effect). line 2922 of POS2. Wouldn't that do what you want? Or am i reading something wrong?
  • Single Player Maps

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @AprilForever It is fun to play Australia and to optimize its play. Well-timed attacks and retreats can throw the Japanese off-balance and divert the Japanese enough to give the Allies victory. I general, it is more fun to play one of the Allies with everyone else on AI and try to depend on your AI allies.
  • World War II v5 1942 Second Edition

    43
    0 Votes
    43 Posts
    20k Views
    SchulzS
    I've saw overall negative views for this map campared to revised and anniversary no idea if it because of balance or fun issue. The vanilla one is biased towards Axis. Even inTR set up they still give 6 bid to allies. I think it would be better with Italian presence and reducing armour cost to 5.
  • Air battles question

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    646 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @ff03k64 In the unitAttachment there is the 'canAirBattle' option. Setting it to 'true' should allow those unit to participate in air battles prior to the normal ground battle. Cheers...
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    @eregister I looked at that save. The USA player doesn't have the buyTank production rule. Looking through the history, it doesn't show a trigger having run after the armour technology was gained. I looked at other turns when technologies were purchased and I don't see any triggers running after the technologies were purchased. I played one round where I used "edit game" to give the armour technology to USA. After the technology activation phase, the history showed the trigger having run. What version are you using? And could you make a save on the turn after you purchase the armour technology?
  • canNotTarget/canNotBeTargetedBy on Attack/Defense

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Trevan That looks like a good generalization of the AA rules.
  • New Scenario: Axis & Allies & Zombies (AAZ)

    5
    5 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    Here is the fixed version. AAZ.zip
  • CanalAttachment not Working

    canalattachment
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    611 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @RogerCooper I did not find a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '29 Sea Zone' for 'Suez Canal'. Also there is no connection between '20 Sea Zone' and '12 Sea Zone' for 'Panama Canal'. There is a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '19 Sea Zone' for 'Turkish Straits'. Maybe adding the following connections will help. <connection t1="18 Sea Zone" t2="29 Sea Zone"/> <connection t1="12 Sea Zone" t2="20 Sea Zone"/> Not sure just guessing here. Cheers...
  • No relief tiles

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    TheDogT
    @ff03k64 Im on Windows 10, Java 11.0.6 and AAA=2.3.21895 I too had to dl it, it works for me, I too have never played it.
  • Is 1941 better year than 1942 for WWII scenarios?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    In general, 1941 has more options than 1942, while 1940 can have too many options, making it hard to balance the game. On my Wiki here my articles by year (not all are scenarios) 1937 5 1938 0 1939 124 1940 73 1941 204 1942 233 1943 11 1944 21 1945 16
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    755 Views
    TheDogT
    @Trevan Thanks! Im on your factory building v2.3.21895 I will raise an issue on GitHub.
  • Game Crash when air units in battle

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    LaFayetteL
    Thanks for finding that. I think the fix is for AA to not shoot at air transported units. On the flip side we should be sure they are removed as casualties if the transport is shot down.

Recent Posts

  • Latest version v275 ready for download with in TripleA.

    In TripleA
    Click Download Maps Button
    Click Installed tab
    Click 1941 Global Command Decision
    Click Remove Button
    Click Yes button to remove
    Click Ok button (Successfully removed)
    Click Close (To force the map list to refresh)
    Click Download Maps Button
    Find & Click 1941 Global Command Decision
    Click Install button

    Enjoy!

    .
    v275
    Previously the Non Aggession Pact between USSR and Japan starts to fail arounf Turn 15, only because its Turn 15, this is illogical.

    So to improve on it, this applies to Players & AI
    The USSR and Japan have a Non Aggression Pact that prevents both sides from attacking each other.

    When Japan or allies owns Chungking/Industry-Med there will be skirmishes on the Japan-USSR border When Japan or allies owns Chungking/Industry-Med & Urumchi-Kansu/Industry-Lgt it will declare war on USSR When USSR retakes 3 of its lost territories held before Operation Barbarossa there will be skirmishes on the Japan-USSR border When USSR retakes 5 of its lost territories held before Operation Barbarossa it will declare war on Japan

    Gemrnay & Italy will now have a harder time vs USSR, as USSR will be focusing on their attacks and not distracted by Japan to the south.

    Japan AI needs help to play better

    When Japan or allies owns Chungking/Industry-Med, for each turn up to 9 times it will purchase 3x Destroyers, 1x Cruiser, 1x Convoy When Japan or allies owns Urumchi-Kansu/Industry-Lgt, for each turn up to 9 times it will purchase 3x Destroyers, 1x Cruiser Having achieved some of its primary objectives Japan can divert resources to ships.

    China Player & AI

    As Japan and USSR will not go to war around turn 15 and Japan was conquering China too easily/quickly. China has a small free increase of a Bunker per turn, this simulates its massive population digging in and resisting its invaders

    USA AI needs help to play better

    Turns 2,4,8,12,16,20,24 AI purchases 2x Fighter, Bomber-Tac, Carrier-Fleet, 2x Cruiser, Battleship and places in 010 B Sea Zone This is a small increase of a Cruiser & Battleship and it makes the USA AI more aggressive when using Fast-AI

    This is big, I think I finally understand Sea Zone ownership and PU production

    Each Sea Zone generates 1-2pu per turn for the original owner only, just like Convoy Centers. Enemy occupation denies the original owner of the PU income. The current owner has its national flag in the Sea Zone.

    .
    🔻 v275 documentation, last page has winter turn on instructions. 🔻
    1941_Global_Command_Decision_Manual.pdf

    🔻 Suggested TripleA version 🔻
    https://github.com/triplea-game/triplea/releases
    .
    Link to 1st post that has;
    Downloads for new Players
    https://forums.triplea-game.org/topic/3326/1941-global-command-decision-official-thread

    read more

  • @Ted-Self

    Hi Ted

    You need to edit in some paragraph breaks as your post is too hard to read otherwise 🙂

    read more

  • Re: The Grand War So I am pretty fascinated with this game. I just discovered it a couple of days ago. So maybe I have not read everything yet but I wonder in what year is it set? Also googled Arkism (my google on opera just goes to ai answers for most queries). Since "The Grand War" scenario in TripleA is a speculative, alternate-history war game, the exact theological details of Arkism are not deeply coded into the software. However, based on its name, its association with "EuroForce," and its symbolic representation as an Ark, we can logically speculate on its core tenets. Here is a breakdown of what the belief system of Arkism likely entails:1. The Preservation of Civilization The Ark as a Sanctuary: Just as Noah’s Ark preserved life during the deluge, Arkism likely views society—specifically EuroForce—as a literal or metaphorical "Ark" tasked with protecting human knowledge, culture, and order from a sea of global chaos and war. Duty of Stewardship: Believers are likely taught that they are the chosen guardians of global inheritance, making the defense of their borders a holy obligation. 2. Unity Through Collective Survival All Inside are Equal: To survive a storm, everyone on the ship must work together. Arkism likely emphasizes strict societal discipline, duty to the collective, and absolute unity over individualism. Anti-Factionalism: Internal dissent would be viewed not just as a political disagreement, but as a dangerous hole poked into the hull of the Ark.3. Renewal After the Storm The Post-War Promise: A central prophecy or goal of Arkism is likely the belief that the current global conflict is a cleansing, chaotic storm. Once the war is won, the Ark will "land," allowing its followers to rebuild and repopulate a peaceful, restructured world. The Olive Branch: The ultimate goal is not endless destruction, but a forced, structured peace once the external threats are neutralized. 4. Technological or Military Deliverance The Ark as Engineering: Because an ark is a manufactured savior, the religion might lean heavily into a "techno-religious" mindset. Science, fortification, industrial output, and military engineering are likely viewed as divine tools used to construct their safety. If you want to flesh out this world further, I can help you: Draft a fictional holy text snippet or prayer for an Arkism soldier. Design a religious hierarchy or caste system for EuroForce Speculate on how rival factions in the game view Arkism. Let me know which angle you would like to explore!

    read more

  • @RogerCooper

    my experience with this game is that as a human player one has good infuence in diplomatic settings with succesful reasonable good outcome on diplo proposals and even Ai players change diplo settings reguar.... but more randomly it seems...?

    read more