1. Home
  2. Maps & Mods
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • SchulzS

    Need Relief Tiles

    39
    0 Votes
    39 Posts
    9k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Schulz Nice, I have added to shades of "shores" so far but I still don't know exactly what it would be the best approach. Thanks!
  • jkprinceJ

    Churchill's 1939

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE Try this http://www.rogercooper.com/churchills_1939.zip There is no point to sending the xml, as I have not changed the xml. To make this work, you will need to create art for antitank and tank_destroyer. I don't know of any scenario that used those unit types. The Benelux flag is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Benelux.
  • Major ArcanaM

    Operation Unthinkable and Operation Dandelion

    31
    1 Votes
    31 Posts
    8k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Major-Arcana The historical situation was fairly interesting. With many US troops withdrawn from Europe, the British government was estimating the Soviets had a 2.5 to 1 superiority in ground forces, but the Allies were superior in the air. Could the British hold the line until the US redeployed? A good scenario for Europe-only game, especially with more realistic air rules. For a world game, one could add Communist guerillas popping up and the Japanese continuing the Pacific war.
  • F

    new_world_order_lebowski_edition missing image

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    820 Views
    F
    @LaFayette I could also just leave it white and let Russia have a special one. I don't know how to hue shift.
  • FrostionF

    Iron War: Europe - Official Thread

    67
    4
    2 Votes
    67 Posts
    41k Views
    F
    Been playing Europe instead of the whole world. Couple of thoughts. I am playing all of one side against the AI. Seems to favor the axis quite a bit. As the allies it went to turn 15 before i was tipped the scales. As axis, i feel like i am in the winning position on turn 5, just a matter of time. I think part of that is the size of the navies. The rally points from IW could be a good addition to this map. USA had difficulties finding a place to put a new factory. Germany and USA had fairly similar colors. Germany was also similar to one of the Balkan nations, but that isn't as big of a deal, as they are allied. After like 2 turns, iron was not much of a factor for me. I don't know how much you wanted that to be a factor, but the fuel is what really limits things for me. AI seems to use more of its iron though. SS troops seem to need a higher TUV value. They are picked first for casualties.
  • Mas NM

    Question about triggers

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    783 Views
    F
    @Mas-N invert values: true or false. default if missing is false. if true, this attachment's condition will be reversed (does not reverse the effect). line 2922 of POS2. Wouldn't that do what you want? Or am i reading something wrong?
  • F

    Single Player Maps

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @AprilForever It is fun to play Australia and to optimize its play. Well-timed attacks and retreats can throw the Japanese off-balance and divert the Japanese enough to give the Allies victory. I general, it is more fun to play one of the Allies with everyone else on AI and try to depend on your AI allies.
  • SchulzS

    World War II v5 1942 Second Edition

    43
    0 Votes
    43 Posts
    20k Views
    SchulzS
    I've saw overall negative views for this map campared to revised and anniversary no idea if it because of balance or fun issue. The vanilla one is biased towards Axis. Even inTR set up they still give 6 bid to allies. I think it would be better with Italian presence and reducing armour cost to 5.
  • F

    Air battles question

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    623 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @ff03k64 In the unitAttachment there is the 'canAirBattle' option. Setting it to 'true' should allow those unit to participate in air battles prior to the normal ground battle. Cheers...
  • E

    No Armor upgrade after you research the upgrade in new version this worked fine in 1.9

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    @eregister I looked at that save. The USA player doesn't have the buyTank production rule. Looking through the history, it doesn't show a trigger having run after the armour technology was gained. I looked at other turns when technologies were purchased and I don't see any triggers running after the technologies were purchased. I played one round where I used "edit game" to give the armour technology to USA. After the technology activation phase, the history showed the trigger having run. What version are you using? And could you make a save on the turn after you purchase the armour technology?
  • RogerCooperR

    canNotTarget/canNotBeTargetedBy on Attack/Defense

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Trevan That looks like a good generalization of the AA rules.
  • RogerCooperR

    New Scenario: Axis & Allies & Zombies (AAZ)

    5
    5 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    Here is the fixed version. AAZ.zip
  • RogerCooperR

    CanalAttachment not Working

    canalattachment
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    591 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @RogerCooper I did not find a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '29 Sea Zone' for 'Suez Canal'. Also there is no connection between '20 Sea Zone' and '12 Sea Zone' for 'Panama Canal'. There is a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '19 Sea Zone' for 'Turkish Straits'. Maybe adding the following connections will help. <connection t1="18 Sea Zone" t2="29 Sea Zone"/> <connection t1="12 Sea Zone" t2="20 Sea Zone"/> Not sure just guessing here. Cheers...
  • F

    No relief tiles

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    TheDogT
    @ff03k64 Im on Windows 10, Java 11.0.6 and AAA=2.3.21895 I too had to dl it, it works for me, I too have never played it.
  • SchulzS

    Is 1941 better year than 1942 for WWII scenarios?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    In general, 1941 has more options than 1942, while 1940 can have too many options, making it hard to balance the game. On my Wiki here my articles by year (not all are scenarios) 1937 5 1938 0 1939 124 1940 73 1941 204 1942 233 1943 11 1944 21 1945 16
  • TheDogT

    TripleA 2.3 cannot see my new map projects when I Select a Map, unless I zip them.

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    738 Views
    TheDogT
    @Trevan Thanks! Im on your factory building v2.3.21895 I will raise an issue on GitHub.
  • G

    Game Crash when air units in battle

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    LaFayetteL
    Thanks for finding that. I think the fix is for AA to not shoot at air transported units. On the flip side we should be sure they are removed as casualties if the transport is shot down.
  • SchulzS

    Need help to convert an old game

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    SchulzS
    It works now perfectly, unfortunately both Great war and GW1918 lack of png image. How do I can create relief tiles?
  • N

    second currency - possible?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    PantherP
    @Numetalfan That is from the wrong XML. Please look into the pact_of_steel_2.xml It starts with <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE game SYSTEM "game.dtd"> <game> <info name="Pact of Steel 2" version="3.8"/>
  • M

    Caribbean Trade War question

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    805 Views
    M
    Just an observation but the AI Pirates and Indians are very active in early turns and make for really interesting dynamics, but after about turn 6 they become incredibly passive. Perhaps they assess the Player Nations as having strengthened into a threat not worth fighting against? It's a shame though.

Recent Posts

  • C
    captain0

    Thanks Dog.

    The terrain inclusions are great.
    The AI put 30 infantry into pripyet marshes and with the terrain bonuses they will be 'hard as hell' to knock out.

    I feel like some territories should be a little more fortified and/ or difficult to take i.e. cities could favour defenders more when they are outnumbered.

    The upkeep works well and it is a shame to have a 2 fort limit but I guess that is because of AI.
    You can edit them on I know,
    I don't know if other people would like it but perhaps the fort allowance per territory could be increased and the static fort upkeep be halved?

    Another thing that would be great is that transport planes could airlift HQ units to evacuate them from say, Africa when the Italian navy is knocked out.

    I set Russia and Japan as allied for a historic game and change that when war in Europe finishes,

    On my first game AI Germany took Lenningrad on first turn.
    I was a bit surprised at the effectiveness of the AI at that point.

    I believe historically the Finns were averse to advancing further than the Vyborg territory that they gave up in the Winter war..
    The Finnish commander Mannerheim had Soviet roots and Finnish people were not hugely anti Russian in general.

    Lastly whilst playing the AI some countries are close to maximum upkeep on round one.
    So a solution is to edit and remove the forts you don't need and convert the value into units.
    All my opinion of course but what do other people think?

    read more
  • wc_sumptonW
    wc_sumpton

    @beelee said:

    Didn't want to hijack Ramon's thread what is the downside, if any, from having this enabled ? Turns out it wasn't on.

    "Transport Casualties Restricted"

    It can throw errors if units that do transport, have "transportCapacity" greater then 0, have attack or defense values greater then 0. These units will need "isCombatTransport" set.

    Cheers...

    read more
  • B
    beelee

    @wc_sumpton

    @wc_sumpton said:

    @beelee said:

    What does that one do ?

    From my understanding this setting restricted the taking of 0 attack/0 defense units as fodder during combat, and allows these units to be auto-destroyed if there are no accompanying units.

    Cheers...

    Didn't want to hijack Ramon's thread 🙂 what is the downside, if any, from having this enabled ? Turns out it wasn't on.

    "Transport Casualties Restricted"

    read more
  • TheDogT
    TheDog

    @captain0
    Welcome to the forums!

    Thanks for the kind words and your first post 👍

    I still play it now as it does give me also the best of solo games.

    Can you tell, cause I keep on improving it, hopefully for the better 😁

    read more