1. Home
  2. Maps & Mods
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • trulpenT

    War at War changes

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    SchulzS
    Upkeep is possible to implement, the important one is finding good upkeep/cost ratio and in my experiences with upkeep, it works best with 5%-10%. For example infantry cost is 2 and 0.1 upkeep (5%) would work perfectly. But armour upkeep should be definitely higher than 5% but still should not be higher than 10%. Yes, draw means nobody wins and nobody lose pretty much same with chess. Because of the cumulative aspects of games, the loser side really cannot turn the tide of the war and the fate of the games always seales in the middle of games and just there should have been draw option that gives a good reason the loser side to continue.
  • alkexrA

    Fallen Empire

    92
    2 Votes
    92 Posts
    54k Views
    SchulzS
    @alkexr I was trying to make upkeep as visible source in the purchase screen in my map like that but couldn't find a way because its not a resource. I am using <option name="createsResourcesList" value="-x:PUs"/> tag to represent upkeep. Wondering is turning into supply like this system the onyl way to make is visible?
  • RogerCooperR

    Fixed Scenarios from the Repository

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    6k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @ff03k64 I don't remember exactly. With the way TripleA runs now, it easy to find which images are missing.
  • jkprinceJ

    Oztea 1942 needs to add "Original Owners" for territories

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    928 Views
    B
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE border-gore is aptly named lol I think i got em all. Uninstall and reinstall and you should be good to go. I added a notification at game start with version and date as I didn't do a yaml PR. I must of spaced it's own thread so we'll just make this it for the future
  • A

    world at war with red dot units

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    696 Views
    A
    Thank you very much
  • Teddy SelfT

    Which mods have tech trees like age of tribes?

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    Teddy SelfT
    Thanks for the info, if anyone is interested in this scenario I have altered just tell me where to upload it. You will play as northern starting on turn 2.
  • SchulzS

    Need Relief Tiles

    39
    0 Votes
    39 Posts
    10k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Schulz Nice, I have added to shades of "shores" so far but I still don't know exactly what it would be the best approach. Thanks!
  • jkprinceJ

    Churchill's 1939

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE Try this http://www.rogercooper.com/churchills_1939.zip There is no point to sending the xml, as I have not changed the xml. To make this work, you will need to create art for antitank and tank_destroyer. I don't know of any scenario that used those unit types. The Benelux flag is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Benelux.
  • Major ArcanaM

    Operation Unthinkable and Operation Dandelion

    31
    1 Votes
    31 Posts
    9k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Major-Arcana The historical situation was fairly interesting. With many US troops withdrawn from Europe, the British government was estimating the Soviets had a 2.5 to 1 superiority in ground forces, but the Allies were superior in the air. Could the British hold the line until the US redeployed? A good scenario for Europe-only game, especially with more realistic air rules. For a world game, one could add Communist guerillas popping up and the Japanese continuing the Pacific war.
  • F

    new_world_order_lebowski_edition missing image

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    881 Views
    F
    @LaFayette I could also just leave it white and let Russia have a special one. I don't know how to hue shift.
  • FrostionF

    Iron War: Europe - Official Thread

    67
    2 Votes
    67 Posts
    43k Views
    F
    Been playing Europe instead of the whole world. Couple of thoughts. I am playing all of one side against the AI. Seems to favor the axis quite a bit. As the allies it went to turn 15 before i was tipped the scales. As axis, i feel like i am in the winning position on turn 5, just a matter of time. I think part of that is the size of the navies. The rally points from IW could be a good addition to this map. USA had difficulties finding a place to put a new factory. Germany and USA had fairly similar colors. Germany was also similar to one of the Balkan nations, but that isn't as big of a deal, as they are allied. After like 2 turns, iron was not much of a factor for me. I don't know how much you wanted that to be a factor, but the fuel is what really limits things for me. AI seems to use more of its iron though. SS troops seem to need a higher TUV value. They are picked first for casualties.
  • Mas NM

    Question about triggers

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    836 Views
    F
    @Mas-N invert values: true or false. default if missing is false. if true, this attachment's condition will be reversed (does not reverse the effect). line 2922 of POS2. Wouldn't that do what you want? Or am i reading something wrong?
  • F

    Single Player Maps

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @AprilForever It is fun to play Australia and to optimize its play. Well-timed attacks and retreats can throw the Japanese off-balance and divert the Japanese enough to give the Allies victory. I general, it is more fun to play one of the Allies with everyone else on AI and try to depend on your AI allies.
  • SchulzS

    World War II v5 1942 Second Edition

    43
    0 Votes
    43 Posts
    20k Views
    SchulzS
    I've saw overall negative views for this map campared to revised and anniversary no idea if it because of balance or fun issue. The vanilla one is biased towards Axis. Even inTR set up they still give 6 bid to allies. I think it would be better with Italian presence and reducing armour cost to 5.
  • F

    Air battles question

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    680 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @ff03k64 In the unitAttachment there is the 'canAirBattle' option. Setting it to 'true' should allow those unit to participate in air battles prior to the normal ground battle. Cheers...
  • E

    No Armor upgrade after you research the upgrade in new version this worked fine in 1.9

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    @eregister I looked at that save. The USA player doesn't have the buyTank production rule. Looking through the history, it doesn't show a trigger having run after the armour technology was gained. I looked at other turns when technologies were purchased and I don't see any triggers running after the technologies were purchased. I played one round where I used "edit game" to give the armour technology to USA. After the technology activation phase, the history showed the trigger having run. What version are you using? And could you make a save on the turn after you purchase the armour technology?
  • RogerCooperR

    canNotTarget/canNotBeTargetedBy on Attack/Defense

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Trevan That looks like a good generalization of the AA rules.
  • RogerCooperR

    New Scenario: Axis & Allies & Zombies (AAZ)

    5
    5 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    Here is the fixed version. AAZ.zip
  • RogerCooperR

    CanalAttachment not Working

    canalattachment
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    641 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @RogerCooper I did not find a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '29 Sea Zone' for 'Suez Canal'. Also there is no connection between '20 Sea Zone' and '12 Sea Zone' for 'Panama Canal'. There is a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '19 Sea Zone' for 'Turkish Straits'. Maybe adding the following connections will help. <connection t1="18 Sea Zone" t2="29 Sea Zone"/> <connection t1="12 Sea Zone" t2="20 Sea Zone"/> Not sure just guessing here. Cheers...
  • F

    No relief tiles

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    TheDogT
    @ff03k64 Im on Windows 10, Java 11.0.6 and AAA=2.3.21895 I too had to dl it, it works for me, I too have never played it.

Recent Posts

  • TheDogT
    TheDog

    @captain0
    Apologies for the late reply.

    A few more land/ sea territories would be great.

    I agree, but Im no map-maker, I will have to wait for someone to offer.

    .

    do you think there is an issue with the stacking restrictions on the old 2 hit tanks?

    As they are 2HP, there max stack is 5s, So you have to move the ones nearer the objective first, then the rear TT/echelons after the nearer ones. This principle applies to all stacking in the map.

    PT boats were considered, but decided against, Bomber-Tac does a similar but has a more versatile role.

    .

    enemy factories are destroyed on capture and you can only build light industry on non sovereign territory?

    Again considered, but for simplicity, kept as is. I was conscious that a lot of complexity was going into the map and that it might be too much for players to take in.

    .

    Also do you think the Russian player should be immune to Winter as they were more better prepared for it historically.

    True they were, but again for simplicity kept simple for both Germany/Russia. The Russians do have a lot of Siberian troops/ Inf-Elite that are 'immune' to the effects of winter, so as a player spam them in the north.

    .

    Maybe also a Rasputitsa effect could block all movement on the Eastern front (all player) for one turn after Winter.

    Tried a variant of that, the Germans kept on losing in the north, it was so hard to balance, so removed for simplicity.

    .

    they have to manually enter the quantity as there is no selector arrow for the box like other units.

    Yes, this is a know problem with the TripleA look & feel, FlatLaf, if it bugs you try this;
    Game> Engine settings> UI theme tab> change FlatLaf Dark to Metal or Nimbus

    read more
  • RogerCooperR
    RogerCooper

    Name Ozteas 1941 Global Setup
    Description A 1941 scenario for the Global game
    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Ozteas_1941_Global_Setup
    image.jpeg

    Good Points

    Reasonably balanced 1941 start speeds game and eliminates the messy political rules

    Bad Points
    *

    read more
  • B
    beelee

    Updated to 2.63

    Screenshot from 2026-09-25 20-20-09.png

    read more
  • RogerCooperR
    RogerCooper

    Name Hearts of Iron: The Rising Sun 1942
    Description World War 2 in 1942 on the Big World map with many nations and new & modified unit types.

    https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Hearts_of_Iron:_The_Rising_Sun_1942
    image.jpeg

    Good Points

    Reasonably balanced New unit types are interesting

    Bad Points

    Some unit types are not well balanced
    read more