• Fallen Empire

    92
    2 Votes
    92 Posts
    53k Views
    SchulzS
    @alkexr I was trying to make upkeep as visible source in the purchase screen in my map like that but couldn't find a way because its not a resource. I am using <option name="createsResourcesList" value="-x:PUs"/> tag to represent upkeep. Wondering is turning into supply like this system the onyl way to make is visible?
  • Fixed Scenarios from the Repository

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    6k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @ff03k64 I don't remember exactly. With the way TripleA runs now, it easy to find which images are missing.
  • Oztea 1942 needs to add "Original Owners" for territories

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    906 Views
    B
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE border-gore is aptly named lol I think i got em all. Uninstall and reinstall and you should be good to go. I added a notification at game start with version and date as I didn't do a yaml PR. I must of spaced it's own thread so we'll just make this it for the future
  • world at war with red dot units

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    668 Views
    A
    Thank you very much
  • Which mods have tech trees like age of tribes?

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    Teddy SelfT
    Thanks for the info, if anyone is interested in this scenario I have altered just tell me where to upload it. You will play as northern starting on turn 2.
  • Need Relief Tiles

    39
    0 Votes
    39 Posts
    9k Views
    MirkoBrunerM
    @Schulz Nice, I have added to shades of "shores" so far but I still don't know exactly what it would be the best approach. Thanks!
  • Churchill's 1939

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @JOSEPH-PRINCE Try this http://www.rogercooper.com/churchills_1939.zip There is no point to sending the xml, as I have not changed the xml. To make this work, you will need to create art for antitank and tank_destroyer. I don't know of any scenario that used those unit types. The Benelux flag is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Benelux.
  • Operation Unthinkable and Operation Dandelion

    31
    1 Votes
    31 Posts
    8k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Major-Arcana The historical situation was fairly interesting. With many US troops withdrawn from Europe, the British government was estimating the Soviets had a 2.5 to 1 superiority in ground forces, but the Allies were superior in the air. Could the British hold the line until the US redeployed? A good scenario for Europe-only game, especially with more realistic air rules. For a world game, one could add Communist guerillas popping up and the Japanese continuing the Pacific war.
  • new_world_order_lebowski_edition missing image

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    846 Views
    F
    @LaFayette I could also just leave it white and let Russia have a special one. I don't know how to hue shift.
  • Iron War: Europe - Official Thread

    67
    4
    2 Votes
    67 Posts
    42k Views
    F
    Been playing Europe instead of the whole world. Couple of thoughts. I am playing all of one side against the AI. Seems to favor the axis quite a bit. As the allies it went to turn 15 before i was tipped the scales. As axis, i feel like i am in the winning position on turn 5, just a matter of time. I think part of that is the size of the navies. The rally points from IW could be a good addition to this map. USA had difficulties finding a place to put a new factory. Germany and USA had fairly similar colors. Germany was also similar to one of the Balkan nations, but that isn't as big of a deal, as they are allied. After like 2 turns, iron was not much of a factor for me. I don't know how much you wanted that to be a factor, but the fuel is what really limits things for me. AI seems to use more of its iron though. SS troops seem to need a higher TUV value. They are picked first for casualties.
  • Question about triggers

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    802 Views
    F
    @Mas-N invert values: true or false. default if missing is false. if true, this attachment's condition will be reversed (does not reverse the effect). line 2922 of POS2. Wouldn't that do what you want? Or am i reading something wrong?
  • Single Player Maps

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @AprilForever It is fun to play Australia and to optimize its play. Well-timed attacks and retreats can throw the Japanese off-balance and divert the Japanese enough to give the Allies victory. I general, it is more fun to play one of the Allies with everyone else on AI and try to depend on your AI allies.
  • World War II v5 1942 Second Edition

    43
    0 Votes
    43 Posts
    20k Views
    SchulzS
    I've saw overall negative views for this map campared to revised and anniversary no idea if it because of balance or fun issue. The vanilla one is biased towards Axis. Even inTR set up they still give 6 bid to allies. I think it would be better with Italian presence and reducing armour cost to 5.
  • Air battles question

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    658 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @ff03k64 In the unitAttachment there is the 'canAirBattle' option. Setting it to 'true' should allow those unit to participate in air battles prior to the normal ground battle. Cheers...
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    @eregister I looked at that save. The USA player doesn't have the buyTank production rule. Looking through the history, it doesn't show a trigger having run after the armour technology was gained. I looked at other turns when technologies were purchased and I don't see any triggers running after the technologies were purchased. I played one round where I used "edit game" to give the armour technology to USA. After the technology activation phase, the history showed the trigger having run. What version are you using? And could you make a save on the turn after you purchase the armour technology?
  • canNotTarget/canNotBeTargetedBy on Attack/Defense

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @Trevan That looks like a good generalization of the AA rules.
  • New Scenario: Axis & Allies & Zombies (AAZ)

    5
    5 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    RogerCooperR
    Here is the fixed version. AAZ.zip
  • CanalAttachment not Working

    canalattachment
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    620 Views
    wc_sumptonW
    @RogerCooper I did not find a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '29 Sea Zone' for 'Suez Canal'. Also there is no connection between '20 Sea Zone' and '12 Sea Zone' for 'Panama Canal'. There is a connection between '18 Sea Zone' and '19 Sea Zone' for 'Turkish Straits'. Maybe adding the following connections will help. <connection t1="18 Sea Zone" t2="29 Sea Zone"/> <connection t1="12 Sea Zone" t2="20 Sea Zone"/> Not sure just guessing here. Cheers...
  • No relief tiles

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    TheDogT
    @ff03k64 Im on Windows 10, Java 11.0.6 and AAA=2.3.21895 I too had to dl it, it works for me, I too have never played it.
  • Is 1941 better year than 1942 for WWII scenarios?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    RogerCooperR
    In general, 1941 has more options than 1942, while 1940 can have too many options, making it hard to balance the game. On my Wiki here my articles by year (not all are scenarios) 1937 5 1938 0 1939 124 1940 73 1941 204 1942 233 1943 11 1944 21 1945 16

Recent Posts

  • I tested this to the game ends. No one builds anything,

    read more

  • Step 5 Assign alliances

    There will to be two alliances "Aggressor" and "Status Quo" The Aggressor alliance is attempting to reorder the world through military force, while the Status Quo is trying to resist that.

    As I am not trying to track the ideologies you can assume that unlikely alliances are probably the result of ideological conflicts and similarities.

    The first step is to determine the lead aggressor. The lead aggressor is randomly chosen from the major countries. The lead aggressor goes first and will receive more units.

    Next the lead status quo power is chosen from the remaining major countries. The lead status quo power receives extra resources.

    The remaing major and medium powers are randomly assigned as follows

    50% Status Quo 30% Aggressor 10% Victim 10% Impassable

    The "Victim" nation is a passive member of the Status Quo alliance. It is neutral with regards to the rest of the Status Quo alliance and at war with the Aggessor alliance. The Status Quo alliance can't assist the "Victim" but if the liberate a territory they don't need to return it. Each turn the lead Status Quo power receives a bonus of 1 PU for every Victim-held territory. Note that is major or medium power has been reassigned to the victim nation, that means it is in civil war or some other internal disorder.

    The "Impassable" nation is neutral to everyone and out of play.

    There is a 50% change of delayed entry of each Status Quo nation and a 25% change of delayed entry for each Aggessor nation (other than the lead aggressor). The delayed entry nation comes in a randomly chosen turn between 2 and 5 at the start of the lead aggressor turn. It is possible that every Status Quo nation is delayed entry, allowing the lead aggessor to focus on victims.

    Historically, there was one territorial dispute directly involving major & medium countries, Alsace-Lorraine. Ethnically German but historically French it would be difficult (but not impossible) to resolve the dispute and conflict is likely. There will be a 30% chance that Germany is lead aggressor, while France is a status quo power that is active immediately. This will probably not work out well for France.

    read more

  • Step 4 Align minor countries with larger countries

    As minor countries don't have their unit images or turns they will be aligned with medium and major countries. Medium countries will also sometimes be aligned with major countries.

    When countries are aligned, their territories and units become part of the larger country, like Canada with Britain in the original game.

    Each minor and medium country will be entered into a table giving their chances of being aligned. In addition, countries may be aligned into the dummy countries of "Victim" and "Impassable".

    Note that this may in effect undo step 3. For example India may gain independence in step 3 and become a close ally of Britain in step 4. The effect will be the same, but the notes will be different.

    This is also when protectorates are handled. Egypt will be probably be aligned with Britain, but it may escape British control and be aligned with some other country.

    If China has become aligned with another country, then the special Chinese rules don't apply.

    read more

  • Step 3 Resolve Interwar Period

    There were a number of conflicts in the interwar period which could change what country controls a specific territory. Most only involved a single territory such as the Rif War or the Indian Independence movement. Territories controlled by the "Split" country must be assigned to a specific country.

    There are three conflicts that deserve special consideration, Russian Civil War, Russo-Polish War and the Reunification of China.

    Russian Civil War In the context of this scenario generator, it does not matter which side wins as somebody will end up controlling the core Russian areas of Russia, Archangel and Karelia. However there was a possibility of creating a stable country in Siberia controlling multiple areas. Peripheral areas of Russia may gain independence.

    Russo-Polish War as closely related to the Russian Civil War. Plausible outcomes range from Russian reconquering Poland to a powerful Polish state controlling Poland, East Poland, Baltic States, Ukraine, East Ukraine and Belorussia. However the outcomes must all involve a contiguous Polish state. Note that even a maximum Polish state remains a minor country.

    The order of resolution needs to be

    Siberian independence Peripheral territories status Russo-Polish War

    War of Chinese Reunification By the end of WW1, warlords have already taken control of China. In effect each territory was an independent state. If the Northern Expedition had failed, China would have remained divided.

    An additional complication was the Japanese invasion. The Japanese may decide not to invade, to only take Manchuria or to take Kiangsu as well. Note that if the Japan and China end up on the same side, Kiangsu will be returned to China.

    Even if China is reunified, there still be independent states formed, representing undefeated warlords or Communist territory. There is also a chance that Kwangtung ends up under effective Chinese control.

    In any case the usual China build rules and territory restrictions apply, as the KMT would not even under the best of circumstances had enough time to build a modern industrial economy. If China is allied with Japan, than the movement restrictions are China are lifted.

    read more