1. Home
  2. Recent
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • ubernautU

    TWW 3.0.9? NTSH (ax) v (al) ubernaut Game 4

    Play By Forum
    1k
    1
    1 Votes
    1k Posts
    630k Views
    N
    @ubernaut said: @Nothingtoseehere i think at least mostly have it figured out in the double checking phase now 🫡
  • R

    Question about trenches domination 1914 no mans land

    Map Making
    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    3k Views
    B
    @Ramon Hi Ramon You could try something like this [image: 1785645076758-screenshot-from-2026-08-01-23-27-56.png] I don't have a production value set but you can see that Japan controls 6 SZ. If USA takes control of the SZ it will then show them as the Owner. You might need to activate some properties. This is based on the Global 40 game. You can also kinda do it with convoy zones. They work a little different. If you control certain TTys, then the corresponding SZ's PU value will go to the player controlling the TTys or vice versa. I can't remember. But I think if you just give a production value to what I posted/screenshot it should work Edit Hmm ... that looks like what you already have. I'm trying to test but now triplea is throwing an error at me lol Edit 2 Yea so I don't think you can do what you want [image: 1785648504730-screenshot-from-2026-08-02-00-27-31.png] What you may be able to do and it'd be kind of a hack, is have a condition showing control of the SZ e.g. USA Units present no JPN Units present in the SZ and have it activate a trigger that gives the desired bonus income/value of the TTy
  • B

    barnee vs beelee EXP 2.59

    Play By Forum
    34
    1 Votes
    34 Posts
    8k Views
    B
    Game History Round: 5 Purchase Units - Americans Note to players Americans: <body><b>It is Early 1942 and the United States has Started Research on the Atomic Bomb !<br>Refer to Game Notes<b></body> Note to players Americans: <body><b>It is Early 1942 and the United States has begun Forming Tank Armies.<br><br><img src="1stUSTank.png"/><br><br>You may have a total of 2 Tank Armies at any one time.<b></body> Note to players Americans: It is Early 1942 and the United States General Staff have Agreed to the Formation of a Army Group. They may only have 1 Army Group at a time. Trigger USATankGeneral: buyUSA_TankGeneral added to productionAmericans Trigger Army GroupUSA: buyArmy_Group added to productionAmericans Trigger AtomicBombLevel1: buyAtomicLevel1 added to productionAmericans Americans buy 2 ArmoredInfantrys, 1 AtomicLevel1, 2 Escorts, 3 Fortifications, 3 artilleries, 1 elite, 3 transports, 2 usa_fighters and 1 usa_tactical_bomber; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Place Units - Americans 1 AtomicLevel1 placed in Eastern United States Combat Move - Americans Trigger RailMovementAutoPlaceAmericans: Americans has 6 Rails placed in Eastern United States 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Central United States to 101 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 elite moved from Quebec to 106 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 2 carriers, 1 cruiser, 2 destroyers, 1 elite, 2 submarines and 1 transport moved from 106 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 1 Escort_Convoy, 1 artillery, 1 destroyer, 1 infantry, 1 submarine and 1 transport moved from 101 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 2 artilleries, 1 elite and 1 infantry moved from 91 Sea Zone to Morocco 3 usa_fighters moved from Eastern United States to 91 Sea Zone Combat - Americans Battle in Morocco Americans attack with 2 artilleries, 1 elite and 1 infantry Italians defend with 1 mech_infantry Americans roll dice for 1 cruiser in Morocco, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.50 expected hits Italians roll dice for 1 mech_infantry in Morocco, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Americans lost in Morocco 1 mech_infantry owned by the Italians lost in Morocco Americans win, taking Morocco from Italians with 2 artilleries and 1 elite remaining. Battle score for attacker is 1 Casualties for Americans: 1 infantry Casualties for Italians: 1 mech_infantry Trigger Remove All Wolfpack: has removed 1 Wolfpack owned by Germans in 112 Sea Zone Non Combat Move - Americans Trigger Wolfpack at112 SeaZones: Germans has 1 Wolfpack placed in 112 Sea Zone Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from Caroline Islands: 3 mine_unarmeds EDIT: Adding units owned by Changer to Caroline Islands: 3 japan_mines EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Trigger RailMovementAutoPlaceRemoveAmericans: has removed 5 Rails owned by Americans in Eastern United States Trigger RailMovementAutoPlaceRemoveAmericans: has removed 1 Rail owned by Americans in Alaska 1 Rail and 1 elite moved from Eastern United States to Alaska 1 ArmoredInfantry and 1 artillery moved from Western United States to 10 Sea Zone 1 ArmoredInfantry, 1 Escort_Convoy, 1 artillery, 1 carrier, 1 submarine and 1 transport moved from 10 Sea Zone to 26 Sea Zone 1 ArmoredInfantry and 1 artillery moved from 26 Sea Zone to Hawaiian Islands 1 transport moved from 26 Sea Zone to 10 Sea Zone 1 elite moved from Central United States to Western United States 1 infantry moved from Eastern United States to Central United States Place Units - Americans 1 Fortification placed in Guam 2 Fortifications placed in Midway 1 Escort and 1 transport placed in 10 Sea Zone 1 ArmoredInfantry, 2 artilleries and 2 usa_fighters placed in Western United States 1 elite and 1 usa_tactical_bomber placed in Eastern United States 1 Escort and 2 transports placed in 101 Sea Zone 1 ArmoredInfantry and 1 artillery placed in Central United States Americans undo move 4. 1 artillery placed in Central United States 1 ArmoredInfantry, 1 artillery and 2 usa_fighters placed in Western United States Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Removing units owned by Americans from Central United States: 1 infantry EDIT: Adding units owned by Americans to Western United States: 1 infantry EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turn Complete - Americans Note to players Americans: It is Early 1942 and Our Shipyards are Hard at Work. 1 Cruiser and 1 Submarine are placed off the West Coast. They may only Operate in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Trigger Americans RemoveUSAConvoySZ101Invert: has removed 1 Escort owned by Americans in 101 Sea Zone Trigger Americans RemoveUSAConvoySZ10Invert: has removed 1 Escort owned by Americans in 10 Sea Zone Trigger PacificFleetJPNRD5: Japanese has 1 pacific_cruiser and 1 pacific_submarine placed in 6 Sea Zone Trigger Americans RemoveUSAConvoySZ101Invert: Americans has 1 Escort_Convoy placed in 101 Sea Zone Trigger PacificFleetRD5: Americans has 1 pacific_cruiser and 1 pacific_submarine placed in 10 Sea Zone Trigger Americans RemoveUSAConvoySZ10Invert: Americans has 1 Escort_Convoy placed in 10 Sea Zone Americans collect 53 PUs; end with 53 PUs Trigger Americans AdvancedProduction: Americans met a national objective for an additional 14 Optional[PUs]; end with 67 Optional[PUs] Objective Americans 1 Homeland: Americans met a national objective for an additional 10 PUs; end with 77 PUs Objective Americans 3 Defense Obligations: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 82 PUs Objective Americans 2 Outer Territories: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 87 PUs Objective Americans 4 Philippines: Americans met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 92 PUs Purchase Units - Chinese Trigger Chinese Loses Burma Road: Chinese has their production frontier changed to: productionChinese_Burma_Road_Closed Chinese buy nothing; Remaining resources: 7 PUs; Combat Move - Chinese Combat - Chinese Trigger Remove All Wolfpack: has removed 1 Wolfpack owned by Germans in 112 Sea Zone Non Combat Move - Chinese Trigger Wolfpack at112 SeaZones: Germans has 1 Wolfpack placed in 112 Sea Zone Turn Complete - Chinese Chinese collect 0 PUs; end with 7 PUs Purchase Units - British Note to players British: <body><b>It is Early 1942 and French Forces in UK Can Join The British Army ! <br>For This Turn Only !<b></body> Trigger FrenchUK: buyFrenchUK added to productionBritish British buy 1 Escort, 1 Fortification, 1 FrenchUK, 4 artilleries, 2 infantry, 1 mech_infantry, 3 mine_unarmeds, 2 uk_armours and 2 uk_paras; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 0 AirLendLease; 3 NavyLendLease; Place Units - British 1 FrenchUK placed in United Kingdom Combat Move - British Trigger RailMovementAutoPlaceBritish: British has 2 Rails placed in Union of South Africa Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Removing units owned by British from United Kingdom: 1 FrenchUK EDIT: Removing units owned by French from United Kingdom: 1 fighter and 2 infantry EDIT: Adding units owned by British to United Kingdom: 2 infantry and 1 uk_fighter EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode 1 bomber, 2 infantry and 1 uk_fighter moved from Egypt to Alexandria 1 bomber and 3 uk_fighters moved from United Kingdom to Holland Belgium EDIT: 1 UK_LCV and 2 infantry moved from United Kingdom to Holland Belgium Combat - British Battle in Alexandria British attack with 1 bomber, 2 infantry and 1 uk_fighter Italians defend with 1 infantry British roll dice for 1 bomber, 2 infantry and 1 uk_fighter in Alexandria, round 2 : 1/4 hits, 1.50 expected hits Italians roll dice for 1 infantry in Alexandria, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the British lost in Alexandria 1 infantry owned by the Italians lost in Alexandria British win, taking Alexandria from Italians with 1 bomber, 1 infantry and 1 uk_fighter remaining. Battle score for attacker is 0 Casualties for British: 1 infantry Casualties for Italians: 1 infantry Battle in Holland Belgium British attack with 1 UK_LCV, 1 bomber, 2 infantry and 3 uk_fighters Germans defend with 1 infantry British roll dice for 1 UK_LCV, 1 bomber, 2 infantry and 3 uk_fighters in Holland Belgium, round 2 : 2/6 hits, 2.50 expected hits Germans roll dice for 1 infantry in Holland Belgium, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Germans lost in Holland Belgium British win, taking Holland Belgium from Germans with 1 UK_LCV, 1 bomber, 2 infantry and 3 uk_fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3 Casualties for Germans: 1 infantry Trigger Remove All Wolfpack: has removed 1 Wolfpack owned by Germans in 112 Sea Zone Non Combat Move - British Trigger RailMovementAutoPlaceRemoveBritish: has removed 2 Rails owned by British in Russia 1 bomber and 3 uk_fighters moved from Holland Belgium to United Kingdom 1 destroyer moved from 109 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Quebec to 106 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 106 Sea Zone to 91 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 91 Sea Zone to Morocco 2 infantry moved from Union of South Africa to Rhodesia 2 Rails and 2 uk_armours moved from Union of South Africa to Russia 1 mech_infantry and 5 uk_armours moved from Egypt to Iraq 2 uk_armours moved from Belgian Congo to Egypt 1 bomber and 1 uk_fighter moved from Alexandria to Egypt 1 artillery moved from Anglo Egyptian Sudan to Egypt 1 transport moved from 41 Sea Zone to 39 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 3 mine_unarmeds moved from India to 39 Sea Zone 1 infantry, 3 mine_unarmeds and 1 transport moved from 39 Sea Zone to 41 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 3 mine_unarmeds moved from 41 Sea Zone to Sumatra Place Units - British Trigger Wolfpack at112 SeaZones: Germans has 1 Wolfpack placed in 112 Sea Zone 1 Fortification placed in Sumatra Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Removing units owned by British from Sumatra: 6 mine_unarmeds EDIT: Adding units owned by Changer to Sumatra: 6 uk_mines EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode 4 artilleries placed in India 2 infantry placed in Union of South Africa 1 mech_infantry and 2 uk_armours placed in Egypt 1 Escort placed in 110 Sea Zone 2 uk_paras placed in United Kingdom 3 mine_unarmeds placed in India Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Adding units owned by British to Russia: 2 uk_armour_lendleases EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turn Complete - British British collect 56 PUs; end with 56 PUs Trigger British AdvancedProduction: British met a national objective for an additional 6 Optional[PUs]; end with 62 Optional[PUs] Objective British 1 Original: British met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 67 PUs Combat Hit Differential Summary : Americans regular : 0.50 Italians regular : 1.33 Germans regular : -0.33 British regular : -1.00 exp-bvsb-7-1-26-UK 4.tsvg
  • T

    How to add to Big World Variations

    Maps & Mods
    15
    1 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    I put it onto github under https://github.com/triplea-maps/thehobbesians_1939. I will add to the in-game downloader tomorrow.
  • B

    Multi Game 2 barnee Trout vs Alex Panzer

    Play By Forum
    292
    1
    0 Votes
    292 Posts
    49k Views
    B
    @Alexander We wish you well in this Noblest of all pursuits. 🫡
  • RogerCooperR

    TripleA Maps List

    Maps & Mods
    4
    1
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    136 Views
    RogerCooperR
    @TheDog said: @rogercooper Cant find Ansalon/Analon on Github maps Missing from your list, but on Github maps Settlers: Fallen Empire Shogun Advanced Ansalon was superseded. https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/Master_of_Ansalon Settlers: Fallen Empire uses the Fallen Empire Map Shogun Advanced is under The Shogun Map
  • KindwindK

    Game Engine Rules (AI Training)

    Development
    25
    5 Votes
    25 Posts
    9k Views
    RogerCooperR
    There is some other questionable stuff going on in Germany's first turn. NONCOM 5 Sea Zone -> 7 Sea Zone (2 x submarine, 1 x transport, 1 x destroyer) NONCOM Germany -> 7 Sea Zone (1 x infantry) << LOAD NONCOM 7 Sea Zone -> Western Europe (1 x infantry) << UNLOAD NONCOM Southern Europe -> 7 Sea Zone (1 x infantry) << LOAD NONCOM 7 Sea Zone -> Western Europe (1 x infantry) << UNLOAD How did Germany make a non-combat move from 5 Sea Zone to 7 Sea Zone. Didn't the British object? How did the Germans load a transport in 7 Sea Zone from Germany and Southern Europe. And then unload in Western Europe. It would seem to be failure of basic rules and map implementation. I don't think a LLM can learn to play a game like Axis & Allies. A neural net like AlphaZero might fare better, but in either case you need to implement the rules separately from the decision-making.
  • LaFayetteL

    TripleA Server Costs

    News
    16
    4 Votes
    16 Posts
    5k Views
    E
    @Cernel When the Revised Ladder bots were crashing frequently, I moved them onto Amazon Web Services and reworked how they were launched and maintained. AWS is a cloud hosted Linux server, so the bots run remotely rather than depending on my own computer, home internet connection, or an open SSH window. I connect to the server through SSH, but the bots themselves run inside persistent tmux sessions. tmux is useful here because it separates the bot process from the temporary SSH connection. I can disconnect from the server, close my laptop, or lose my local connection without terminating the bot. Each bot has its own named session, which also makes it easier to inspect or restart one without affecting the other. The main upkeep commands are: tmux ls This shows whether the bot sessions are still present. tmux attach -t revised_ladder tmux attach -t revised_ladder2 These reconnect me to the live console output for either bot so I can inspect errors, freezes, or lobby disconnects. To leave a session while keeping the bot running: Ctrl+B, then D If the bot is frozen rather than fully gone, I can attach to the session, stop the process with Ctrl+C, and relaunch it using the relevant startup script. I also set up the launch process so that if a bot process actually disappears or exits, it is automatically started again. In other words, the server does not simply leave the bot offline after a crash. The surrounding startup or monitoring process detects that the bot is no longer running and relaunches it. That does not necessarily fix every possible freeze, since a frozen process may still technically exist, but it does handle ordinary crashes and unexpected exits without requiring me to log in immediately. So the overall setup has three layers: AWS provides the continuously available cloud server. tmux keeps the bot sessions alive independently of SSH. The restart logic relaunches a bot when its process exits or disappears. This is what I implemented when the bots were crashing a lot. Since then, the AWS and tmux setup has generally been stable, and the automatic restart behavior has reduced the amount of manual intervention needed.
  • Panzerstahl-Helm 0P

    exp-game -10 - beelee (Axis) vs. panzer (Allies) - Operation "Straweberry Fields Forever"

    Play By Forum
    161
    0 Votes
    161 Posts
    21k Views
    B
    @Panzerstahl-Helm-0 [image: 1785446601574-prost.png] [image: 1785446626891-rock-on.png]
  • E

    IllegalStateException

    Bug Reports
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    176 Views
    E
    @Cernel yes there's a temporary workaround which is to go to "show current game". i say it is attached to being online because it's ok with a local game.
  • TheDogT

    💥 1941 Global Command Decision - Official Thread

    Maps & Mods maps thedog
    1k
    2
    4 Votes
    1k Posts
    2m Views
    C
    Thanks Dog. In the game I am playing I am using Hard AI but I generally use a combination of both. Oh yeah in the stack the Russian AI was holding back in Yekaterinburg? area was not 150 TUV but about 81 units/ 640 TUV The AI kept a fair bit there since the start of the game really. With some old double hit 1941 tanks.
  • SchulzS

    World War I with more territories?

    Maps & Mods
    56
    1
    1 Votes
    56 Posts
    11k Views
    SchulzS
    Let's handle the Battle of the Atlantic in the same way as it is handled in Big World 2. It will be named Handelskrieg instead of Wolfpack. It spawns 1 German submarine each round. It will have a unique submarine appearance (slightly different from regular subs) with 0/4/2 stats and 2 HP. I drew 3 new territories in the South Atlantic just in case the Allies try to kill it, so that "Handelskrieg" will have more space to escape. [image: 1785075450210-wwieurope_names_values-copy.jpg]
  • alkexrA

    Middle Earth: Battle For Arda - Official Thread

    Maps & Mods
    588
    2
    3 Votes
    588 Posts
    1m Views
    R
    Interesting video, and welcome back! I think the changes are interesting. Regarding tactics I do think that having 5 levels is a lot. I think that @shorogyth 's system seems reasonable. I'd also pull the plains bonus out of the tactics system (call it "defensive tactics") and have a separate plains attack bonus. That way horses can have a bonus there, and rangers won't automatically be good attacking on plains. I know it's a third number, but I think it'll be less confusing than tactics being mostly defense bonuses but also one attack bonus. Also, can you have more than a +-1bonus on some terrains? I feel like most flying units would need more than a -1 bonus on caves, especially because tactics give them bonuses. I agree with the relentless issue. I think it's cool for some units to ignore your defensive terrain advantage, but they should be rare and therefore scary. Having basically all orcs be relentless is pretty silly and makes plains better for defense than cities. Regarding unit abilities, I don't think rock paper scissors is necessarily bad, especially because not all factions are equally strong in each. If each faction has different strengths and weaknesses, it forces factions to collaborate more, and stops things from snowballing as much if one faction falls. Eg Gondor would spam rangers because they have good defense bonuses and would kill the winged nazgul (thereby denying mordor's leadership), so you could send flanking cavalry from Rhun or harad to eliminate them. Elven archers were much stronger than the spearmen, but fell very quickly to wargs, which forced the elves to diversify more. In particular, Isengard had no ranged units, so Rohan's flank cavalry was especially dangerous since it would directly target the fires of orthanc, and so isengard had to spend a lot of effort screening its siege forces. I think ranged support feels reasonable. I like all abilities that encourage using a variety of units. Eg the galadhrim archers are one of the most powerful units in the game, but they require you to buy the weaker elven spearmen to unlock their full value. I like the change to charge, since before formation made those units a liability because you couldn't make them not charge. Eg the warg riders were essentially useless for angmar because of this and rohan suffered hard. I do like the new ambush mechanic since it encourages more diversity in unit selection. I do think it should be allowed in cities though (that was the whole siege of osgilliath), and the fact that only a certain number of units can ambush will balance it. I'm not sure I like scouting as it is though. If scouting eliminates ambush, then you just need 1-2 units with scouting in your army and you're fine. And if those units are otherwise useful (eg rangers) then it makes ambushers useless. Maybe scouting should be like spearwall? Just decreasing the effectiveness of ambush so it's less good but still useful? So maybe barrow wights would have an ambush of 6, then eg warg scouts could have a scouting of 2, rangers 3, and wizards 6x2 or sth? I feel like something missing in the game is some notion of hit and run tactics for cavalry. Cavalry is expensive and strong and excels at taking out small groups, but you often can't take advantage of this because if you do it exposes your cavalry to counterattack where they won't make up their PU values. Meanwhile air units can do this which gives angmar and mordor a big advantage. Maybe some cavalry could have an ability wherein they (and only they) can independently retreat after the first round of combat, even if there's a win? This still requires some thought, since if you don't have a win in your first round you have to decide if it's worth leaving your cavalry open to guarantee the win, and cavalry is still worse than flying units since they don't get the whole combat or a noncombat move. But it makes cavalry much more tactically interesting Also a general thought, but I think rangers need to be a higher tier of ranged unit. They have excellent tactics, mountaineer, high movement, anti-flying, scouting, ambush, support, and maybe more. And given the lore this makes sense, but also in the lore they aren't common at all - the Dunedain are solitary and dying out. So I think buffing them and treating them more like weak creatures than elite infantry would make more sense. And then you could maybe have some weaker version for gondor representing Faramir's rangers which are just elite infantry
  • D

    Pact of Steel 2 mods for new Version

    Maps & Mods
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    154 Views
    TheDogT
    @djggml So here is a working map.yml (remove the .txt to use it. map.yml.txt map_name: the_pact_of_steel games: - {game_name: Pact of Steel, file_name: pact_of_steel.xml} - {game_name: Pact of Steel 2, file_name: pact_of_steel_2.xml} - {game_name: Pact of Steel 233, file_name: pact_of_steel_233.xml} Note it has the version line removed.
  • T

    EXP G40 Game 4 Trout (Axis) vs Panzer (Allies)

    Play By Forum
    74
    0 Votes
    74 Posts
    12k Views
    Panzerstahl-Helm 0P
    @trout Ciao- Nothing exciting on ANZACs turn. They are building up their fleet a bit and preparing for some....holidays in the Pacific. BR c1546cac-e896-4615-b39c-64ce8cf91d0e-exp-game-4-trout-vs.panzer-ANZ6.tsvg
  • B

    EXP Game 12 barnee vs Trout

    Play By Forum
    103
    1
    0 Votes
    103 Posts
    15k Views
    B
    @Trout Good Morning EXP Game 12 Trout J 9.tsvg There was error that wouldn't load JPN Trprts in NCM so I had to edit. I vaguely remember seeing that after the update and it was fixed. Forgot how weak JPN is. Well they have one job. Give the Germans enough time to get to Moscow lol We'll see how it goes
  • B

    Have in Game Dice Roller Show in History

    Feature Requests & Ideas
    12
    1 Votes
    12 Posts
    5k Views
    P
    I get the appeal of having manual rolls in history. For quick out-of-game rolls, I’ve been using https://dice.onl for its simple interface and custom sides – it’s handy when I just need a fast result without syncing concerns. For in-game integration, LaFayette’s points about the upcoming ledger system make sense, but I’d still love to see this feature added eventually.
  • TheDogT

    🏯 Shogun Advanced - Official Thread

    Maps & Mods thedog
    18
    1
    2 Votes
    18 Posts
    5k Views
    RogerCooperR
    @TheDog I recently tried this mod and there is a lot to like about it. However, it does have one problem, at the start of everyone is at war with everyone else. This is both ahistorical and confusing to play. They should either start neutral with each other or grouped into two loose alliances, one in Eastern Japan and other in Western Japan.
  • RogerCooperR

    Roger's Scenario Thread

    Pinned Maps & Mods
    978
    9 Votes
    978 Posts
    2m Views
    RogerCooperR
    Name The Shogun Advanced Description Japan in the Sengoku Period on a large map https://axisandallies.fandom.com/wiki/The_Shogun_Advanced [image: 1784343226921-05614493-26a2-456d-a926-437186a5a058-image.jpeg] Good Points A variety of clearly differentiated units Upkeep costs & build caps prevent spamming and mega stacks Historical economic values and clan locations Political rules Historical events like the introduction of muskets Bad Points Everyone starts at war with everyone else (historically the clans tending to group into eastern and western alliances) Because of the lack of alliances at start and some random placements, it can be confusing to play
  • SchulzS

    Bugs in World War I

    Bug Reports
    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    RogerCooperR
    The only obvious difference between the xml files is the "placeNoAirCheck". But changing that to "place" did not solve the problem. The AI log offered no clues.